High-throughput methods for identification of protein-protein interactions involving short linear motifs

Cell Communication and Signaling

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Blikstad, Cecilia ^a   Ivarsson, Ylva ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Interaction profiling; Linear motif; Peptide arrays; Phage display; Protein protein interactions; Yeast surface display

Indexed keywords

BINDING AFFINITY; CELL SURFACE DISPLAY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PEPTIDE ARRAY; PEPTIDE PHAGE DISPLAY; PHAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS; YEAST SURFACE DISPLAY; CHEMISTRY; ECONOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; METABOLISM; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEOMICS;

PEPTIDE; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84939627428     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1478811X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-015-0116-8     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Stumpf MP, Thorne T, de Silva E, Stewart R, An HJ, Lappe M, et al. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(19):6959-64.
2. Gavin AC, Maeda K, Kuhner S. Recent advances in charting protein-protein interaction: mass spectrometry-based approaches. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22(1):42-9.
3. Rolland T, Tasan M, Charloteaux B, Pevzner SJ, Zhong Q, Sahni N, et al. A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network. Cell. 2014;159(5):1212-26.
4. Menche J, Sharma A, Kitsak M, Ghiassian SD, Vidal M, Loscalzo J, et al. Disease networks. Uncovering disease-disease relationships through the incomplete interactome. Science. 2015;347(6224):1257601.
5. Neduva V, Russell RB. Peptides mediating interaction networks: new leads at last. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17(5):465-71.
6. Van Roey K, Gibson TJ, Davey NE. Motif switches: decision-making in cell regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012;22(3):378-85.
7. Tompa P, Davey NE, Gibson TJ, Babu MM. A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. Mol Cell. 2014;55(2):161-9.
8. Perkins JR, Diboun I, Dessailly BH, Lees JG, Orengo C. Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. Structure. 2010;18(10):1233-43.
9. Diella F, Haslam N, Chica C, Budd A, Michael S, Brown NP, et al. Understanding eukaryotic linear motifs and their role in cell signaling and regulation. Front Biosci. 2008;13:6580-603.
10. Uyar B, Weatheritt RJ, Dinkel H, Davey NE, Gibson TJ. Proteome-wide analysis of human disease mutations in short linear motifs: neglected players in cancer? Mol Biosyst. 2014;10(10):2626-42.
11. Stein A, Mosca R, Aloy P. Three-dimensional modeling of protein interactions and complexes is going 'omics. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011;21(2):200-8.
12. Ivarsson Y. Plasticity of PDZ domains in ligand recognition and signaling. FEBS Lett. 2012;586(17):2638-47.
13. Stiffler MA, Chen JR, Grantcharova VP, Lei Y, Fuchs D, Allen JE, et al. PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science. 2007;317(5836):364-9.
14. Tonikian R, Zhang Y, Sazinsky SL, Currell B, Yeh JH, Reva B, et al. A specificity map for the PDZ domain family. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(9), e239.
15. Hu H, Columbus J, Zhang Y, Wu D, Lian L, Yang S, et al. A map of WW domain family interactions. Proteomics. 2004;4(3):643-55.
16. Xin X, Gfeller D, Cheng J, Tonikian R, Sun L, Guo A, et al. SH3 interactome conserves general function over specific form. Mol Syst Biol. 2013;9:652.
17. Tong AH, Drees B, Nardelli G, Bader GD, Brannetti B, Castagnoli L, et al. A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science. 2002;295(5553):321-4.
18. Engelmann BW, Kim Y, Wang M, Peters B, Rock RS, Nash PD. The development and application of a quantitative peptide microarray based approach to protein interaction domain specificity space. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(12):3647-62.
19. Hause Jr RJ, Leung KK, Barkinge JL, Ciaccio MF, Chuu CP, Jones RB. Comprehensive binary interaction mapping of SH2 domains via fluorescence polarization reveals novel functional diversification of ErbB receptors. PLoS One. 2012;7(9), e44471.
20. Jones RB, Gordus A, Krall JA, MacBeath G. A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays. Nature. 2006;439(7073):168-74.
21. Tinti M, Kiemer L, Costa S, Miller ML, Sacco F, Olsen JV, et al. The SH2 domain interaction landscape. Cell reports. 2013;3(4):1293-305.
22. Songyang Z, Shoelson SE, Chaudhuri M, Gish G, Pawson T, Haser WG, et al. SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences. Cell. 1993;72(5):767-78.
23. Dinkel H, Michael S, Weatheritt RJ, Davey NE, Van Roey K, Altenberg B, et al. ELM - the database of eukaryotic linear motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D242-51.
24. Sarkar D, Jana T, Saha S. LMPID: A manually curated database of linear motifs mediating protein-protein interactions. Database (Oxford). 2015;2015.
25. Gingras AC, Gstaiger M, Raught B, Aebersold R. Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(8):645-54.
26. Roux KJ, Kim DI, Raida M, Burke B. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 2012;196(6):801-10.
27. Roux KJ. Marked by association: techniques for proximity-dependent labeling of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(19):3657-64.
28. Liu BA, Engelmann BW, Nash PD. High-throughput analysis of peptide-binding modules. Proteomics. 2012;12(10):1527-46.
29. Katz C, Levy-Beladev L, Rotem-Bamberger S, Rito T, Rudiger SG, Friedler A. Studying protein-protein interactions using peptide arrays. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(5):2131-45.
30. Volkmer R, Tapia V, Landgraf C. Synthetic peptide arrays for investigating protein interaction domains. FEBS Lett. 2012;586(17):2780-6.
31. Briant DJ, Murphy JM, Leung GC, Sicheri F. Rapid identification of linear protein domain binding motifs using peptide SPOT arrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;570:175-85.
32. Foong YM, Fu J, Yao SQ, Uttamchandani M. Current advances in peptide and small molecule microarray technologies. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2012;16(1-2):234-42.
33. Fodor SP, Read JL, Pirrung MC, Stryer L, Lu AT, Solas D. Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science. 1991;251(4995):767-73.
34. Frank R. Spot-synthesis: An easy technique for the positionally addressable, parallel chemical synthesis on a membrane support. Tetrahedron. 1992;48(42):9217-32.
35. Boisguerin P, Leben R, Ay B, Radziwill G, Moelling K, Dong L, et al. An improved method for the synthesis of cellulose membrane-bound peptides with free C termini is useful for PDZ domain binding studies. Chem Biol. 2004;11(4):449-59.
36. Filippakopoulos P, Picaud S, Mangos M, Keates T, Lambert JP, Barsyte-Lovejoy D, et al. Histone recognition and large-scale structural analysis of the human bromodomain family. Cell. 2012;149(1):214-31.
37. Buus S, Rockberg J, Forsstrom B, Nilsson P, Uhlen M, Schafer-Nielsen C. High-resolution mapping of linear antibody epitopes using ultrahigh-density peptide microarrays. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(12):1790-800.
38. Forsstrom B, Axnas BB, Stengele KP, Buhler J, Albert TJ, Richmond TA, et al. Proteome-wide epitope mapping of antibodies using ultra-dense peptide arrays. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(6):1585-97.
39. Carmona SJ, Nielsen M, Schafer-Nielsen C, Mucci J, Altcheh J, Balouz V, et al. Towards high-throughput immunomics for infectious diseases: use of next-generation peptide microarrays for rapid discovery and mapping of antigenic determinants. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;4(7):1871-84.
40. Okada H, Uezu A, Soderblom EJ, Moseley 3rd MA, Gertler FB, Soderling SH. Peptide array X-linking (PAX): a new peptide-protein identification approach. PLoS One. 2012;7(5), e37035.
41. MacBeath G, Schreiber SL. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science. 2000;289(5485):1760-3.
42. Fasolo J, Snyder M. Protein microarrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;548:209-22.
43. Zarate X, Galbraith DW. A cell-free expression platform for production of protein microarrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1118:297-307.
44. Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R, Hall D, Casamayor A, Bertone P, et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science. 2001;293(5537):2101-5.
45. Uzoma I, Zhu H. Interactome mapping: using protein microarray technology to reconstruct diverse protein networks. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2013;11(1):18-28.
46. Kaushansky A, Allen JE, Gordus A, Stiffler MA, Karp ES, Chang BH, et al. Quantifying protein-protein interactions in high throughput using protein domain microarrays. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(4):773-90.
47. Sundell GN, Ivarsson Y. Interaction Analysis through Proteomic Phage Display. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:176172.
48. Rentero Rebollo I, Sabisz M, Baeriswyl V, Heinis C. Identification of target-binding peptide motifs by high-throughput sequencing of phage-selected peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(22), e169.
49. Gfeller D, Butty F, Wierzbicka M, Verschueren E, Vanhee P, Huang H, et al. The multiple-specificity landscape of modular peptide recognition domains. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:484.
50. Kim J, Kim I, Yang JS, Shin YE, Hwang J, Park S, et al. Rewiring of PDZ domain-ligand interaction network contributed to eukaryotic evolution. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(2), e1002510.
51. Luck K, Trave G. Phage display can select over-hydrophobic sequences that may impair prediction of natural domain-peptide interactions. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(7):899-902.
52. Di Niro R, Sulic AM, Mignone F, D'Angelo S, Bordoni R, Iacono M, et al. Rapid interactome profiling by massive sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(9), e110.
53. Ivarsson Y, Arnold R, McLaughlin M, Nim S, Joshi R, Ray D, et al. Large-scale interaction profiling of PDZ domains through proteomic peptide-phage display using human and viral phage peptidomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(7):2542-7.
54. Larman HB, Zhao Z, Laserson U, Li MZ, Ciccia A, Gakidis MA, et al. Autoantigen discovery with a synthetic human peptidome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(6):535-41.
55. Huang H, Sidhu SS. Studying binding specificities of peptide recognition modules by high-throughput phage display selections. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;781:87-97.
56. Boder ET, Wittrup KD. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15(6):553-7.
57. Gai SA, Wittrup KD. Yeast surface display for protein engineering and characterization. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007;17(4):467-73.
58. Gera N, Hussain M, Rao BM. Protein selection using yeast surface display. Methods. 2013;60(1):15-26.
59. Pepper LR, Cho YK, Boder ET, Shusta EV. A decade of yeast surface display technology: where are we now? Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2008;11(2):127-34.
60. Cherf GM, Cochran JR. Applications of Yeast Surface Display for Protein Engineering. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1319:155-75.
61. Birnbaum ME, Mendoza JL, Sethi DK, Dong S, Glanville J, Dobbins J, et al. Deconstructing the peptide-MHC specificity of T cell recognition. Cell. 2014;157(5):1073-87.
62. Dutta S, Gulla S, Chen TS, Fire E, Grant RA, Keating AE. Determinants of BH3 binding specificity for Mcl-1 versus Bcl-xL. J Mol Biol. 2010;398(5):747-62.
63. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989;340(6230):245-6.
64. Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR. Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part I. Experimental techniques and databases. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3(3), e42.
65. Lenfant N, Polanowska J, Bamps S, Omi S, Borg JP, Reboul J. A genome-wide study of PDZ-domain interactions in C. elegans reveals a high frequency of non-canonical binding. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:671.
66. Hecker CM, Rabiller M, Haglund K, Bayer P, Dikic I. Specification of SUMO1- and SUMO2-interacting motifs. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(23):16117-27.
67. Belotti E, Polanowska J, Daulat AM, Audebert S, Thome V, Lissitzky JC, et al. The human PDZome: a gateway to PSD95-Disc large-zonula occludens (PDZ)-mediated functions. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12(9):2587-603.
68. Yang M, Wu Z, Fields S. Protein-peptide interactions analyzed with the yeast two-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23(7):1152-6.
69. Song E, Gao S, Tian R, Ma S, Huang H, Guo J, et al. A high efficiency strategy for binding property characterization of peptide-binding domains. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(8):1368-81.
70. Hu S, Song E, Tian R, Ma S, Yang T, Mu Y, et al. Systematic analysis of a simple adaptor protein PDZK1: ligand identification, interaction and functional prediction of complex. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2009;24(3-4):231-42.
71. Guo Z, Song E, Ma S, Wang X, Gao S, Shao C, et al. Proteomics strategy to identify substrates of LNX, a PDZ domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(10):4847-62.
72. Mu Y, Cai P, Hu S, Ma S, Gao Y. Characterization of diverse internal binding specificities of PDZ domains by yeast two-hybrid screening of a special peptide library. PLoS One. 2014;9(2), e88286.
73. Shekhawat SS, Ghosh I. Split-protein systems: beyond binary protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011;15(6):789-97.
74. Lam MH, Stagljar I. Strategies for membrane interaction proteomics: no mass spectrometry required. Proteomics. 2012;12(10):1519-26.
75. Reich LL, Dutta S, Keating AE. SORTCERY-A High-Throughput Method to Affinity Rank Peptide Ligands. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(11):2135-50.
76. Vincentelli R, Luck K, Poirson J, Polanowska J, Abdat J, Blemont M, et al. Quantifying domain-ligand affinities and specificities by high-throughput holdup assay. Nat Methods. 2015.
77. Blasche S, Koegl M. Analysis of protein-protein interactions using LUMIER assays. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1064:17-27.
78. Barrios-Rodiles M, Brown KR, Ozdamar B, Bose R, Liu Z, Donovan RS, et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science. 2005;307(5715):1621-5.
79. Eyckerman S, Verhee A, der Heyden JV, Lemmens I, Ostade XV, Vandekerckhove J, et al. Design and application of a cytokine-receptor-based interaction trap. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(12):1114-9.
80. Nyfeler B, Michnick SW, Hauri HP. Capturing protein interactions in the secretory pathway of living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(18):6350-5.
81. Yao Z, Petschnigg J, Ketteler R, Stagljar I. Application guide for omics approaches to cell signaling. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11(6):387-97.
82. Edwards RJ, Davey NE, Shields DC. SLiMFinder: a probabilistic method for identifying over-represented, convergently evolved, short linear motifs in proteins. PLoS One. 2007;2(10), e967.
83. Horn H, Haslam N, Jensen LJ. DoReMi: context-based prioritization of linear motif matches. PeerJ. 2014;2, e315.
84. Kelil A, Dubreuil B, Levy ED, Michnick SW. Fast and accurate discovery of degenerate linear motifs in protein sequences. PLoS One. 2014;9(9), e106081.
85. Davey NE, Haslam NJ, Shields DC, Edwards RJ. SLiMSearch 2.0: biological context for short linear motifs in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Web Server issue):W56-60.
86. Davey NE, Cowan JL, Shields DC, Gibson TJ, Coldwell MJ, Edwards RJ. SLiMPrints: conservation-based discovery of functional motif fingerprints in intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(21):10628-41.
87. Di Fiore B, Davey NE, Hagting A, Izawa D, Mansfeld J, Gibson TJ, et al. The ABBA motif binds APC/C activators and is shared by APC/C substrates and regulators. Dev Cell. 2015;32(3):358-72.
88. Stein A, Aloy P. Novel peptide-mediated interactions derived from high-resolution 3-dimensional structures. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(5), e1000789.
89. DeBartolo J, Taipale M, Keating AE. Genome-wide prediction and validation of peptides that bind human prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(6), e1003693.
90. Chen TS, Petrey D, Garzon JI, Honig B. Predicting Peptide-mediated interactions on a genome-wide scale. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(5), e1004248.
91. Ye F, Zhang M. Structures and target recognition modes of PDZ domains: recurring themes and emerging pictures. Biochem J. 2013;455(1):1-14.
92. Dodson EJ, Fishbain-Yoskovitz V, Rotem-Bamberger S, Schueler-Furman O. Versatile communication strategies among tandem WW domain repeats. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2015;240(3):351-60.
93. Schulze WX, Deng L, Mann M. Phosphotyrosine interactome of the ErbB-receptor kinase family. Mol Syst Biol. 2005;1:2005 0008.
94. Li N, Batzer A, Daly R, Yajnik V, Skolnik E, Chardin P, et al. Guanine-nucleotide-releasing factor hSos1 binds to Grb2 and links receptor tyrosine kinases to Ras signalling. Nature. 1993;363(6424):85-8.
95. Grootjans JJ, Zimmermann P, Reekmans G, Smets A, Degeest G, Durr J, et al. Syntenin, a PDZ protein that binds syndecan cytoplasmic domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(25):13683-8.
96. Strano S, Munarriz E, Rossi M, Castagnoli L, Shaul Y, Sacchi A, et al. Physical interaction with Yes-associated protein enhances p73 transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(18):15164-73.