A Million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist

Molecular Cell

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 161-169

  Tompa, Peter ^a,b   Davey, Norman E ^c   Gibson, Toby J ^d   Babu, M Madan ^e  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^e MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEOME;

HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; HUMANS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEINS;

EID: 84904469894     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Aloy P., Russell R.B. Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22:1317-1321.
2. Babu M.M., Kriwacki R.W., Pappu R.V. Structural biology. Versatility from protein disorder. Science 2012, 337:1460-1461.
3. Belotti E., Polanowska J., Daulat A.M., Audebert S., Thomé V., Lissitzky J.C., Lembo F., Blibek K., Omi S., Lenfant N., et al. The human PDZome: a gateway to PSD95-Disc large-zonula occludens (PDZ)-mediated functions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12:2587-2603.
4. Beltrao P., Trinidad J.C., Fiedler D., Roguev A., Lim W.A., Shokat K.M., Burlingame A.L., Krogan N.J. Evolution of phosphoregulation: comparison of phosphorylation patterns across yeast species. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000134.
5. Beltrao P., Albanèse V., Kenner L.R., Swaney D.L., Burlingame A., Villén J., Lim W.A., Fraser J.S., Frydman J., Krogan N.J. Systematic functional prioritization of protein posttranslational modifications. Cell 2012, 150:413-425.
6. Beltrao P., Bork P., Krogan N.J., van Noort V. Evolution and functional cross-talk of protein post-translational modifications. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9:714.
7. Bhattacharyya R.P., Reményi A., Yeh B.J., Lim W.A. Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:655-680.
8. Bhowmick P., Pancsa R., Guharoy M., Tompa P. Functional diversity and structural disorder in the human ubiquitination pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e65443.
9. Boutros R., Lobjois V., Ducommun B. CDC25 phosphatases in cancer cells: key players? Good targets?. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7:495-507.
10. Buljan M., Chalancon G., Eustermann S., Wagner G.P., Fuxreiter M., Bateman A., Babu M.M. Tissue-specific splicing of disordered segments that embed binding motifs rewires protein interaction networks. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:871-883.
11. Buljan M., Chalancon G., Dunker A.K., Bateman A., Balaji S., Fuxreiter M., Babu M.M. Alternative splicing of intrinsically disordered regions and rewiring of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2013, 23:443-450.
12. Cheng Y., Oldfield C.J., Meng J., Romero P., Uversky V.N., Dunker A.K. Mining alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition features with cross species sequence alignments. Biochemistry 2007, 46:13468-13477.
13. Chothia C. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 1992, 357:543-544.
14. Choudhary C., Mann M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:427-439.
15. Davey N.E., Travé G., Gibson T.J. How viruses hijack cell regulation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:159-169.
16. Davey N.E., Cowan J.L., Shields D.C., Gibson T.J., Coldwell M.J., Edwards R.J. SLiMPrints: conservation-based discovery of functional motif fingerprints in intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:10628-10641.
17. Davey N.E., Van Roey K., Weatheritt R.J., Toedt G., Uyar B., Altenberg B., Budd A., Diella F., Dinkel H., Gibson T.J. Attributes of short linear motifs. Mol. Biosyst. 2012, 8:268-281.
18. Diella F., Haslam N., Chica C., Budd A., Michael S., Brown N.P., Trave G., Gibson T.J. Understanding eukaryotic linear motifs and their role in cell signaling and regulation. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13:6580-6603.
19. Dinkel H., Van Roey K., Michael S., Davey N.E., Weatheritt R.J., Born D., Speck T., Krüger D., Grebnev G., Kuban M., et al. The eukaryotic linear motif resource ELM: 10 years and counting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42(Database issue):D259-D266.
20. Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:197-208.
21. Ellis J.D., Barrios-Rodiles M., Colak R., Irimia M., Kim T., Calarco J.A., Wang X., Pan Q., O'Hanlon D., Kim P.M., et al. Tissue-specific alternative splicing remodels protein-protein interaction networks. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:884-892.
22. Freschi L., Courcelles M., Thibault P., Michnick S.W., Landry C.R. Phosphorylation network rewiring by gene duplication. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:504.
23. Fuxreiter M., Simon I., Friedrich P., Tompa P. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J.Mol. Biol. 2004, 338:1015-1026.
24. Fuxreiter M., Tompa P., Simon I. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:950-956.
25. Galea C.A., Wang Y., Sivakolundu S.G., Kriwacki R.W. Regulation of cell division by intrinsically unstructured proteins: intrinsic flexibility, modularity, and signaling conduits. Biochemistry 2008, 47:7598-7609.
26. Gibson T.J., Seiler M., Veitia R.A. The transience of transient overexpression. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:715-721.
27. Greenspan N.S. Attributing functions to genes and gene products. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:293-297.
28. Guettler S., LaRose J., Petsalaki E., Gish G., Scotter A., Pawson T., Rottapel R., Sicheri F. Structural basis and sequence rules for substrate recognition by Tankyrase explain the basis for cherubism disease. Cell 2011, 147:1340-1354.
29. Hagai T., Azia A., Babu M.M., Andino R. Use of host-like peptide motifs in viral proteins is a prevalent strategy in host-virus interactions. Cell Rep 2014, 7:1729-1739.
30. Hart G.T., Ramani A.K., Marcotte E.M. How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks?. Genome Biol. 2006, 7:120.
31. Hartwell L.H., Hopfield J.J., Leibler S., Murray A.W. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 1999, 402(Suppl):C47-C52.
32. Havugimana P.C., Hart G.T., Nepusz T., Yang H., Turinsky A.L., Li Z., Wang P.I., Boutz D.R., Fong V., Phanse S., et al. A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell 2012, 150:1068-1081.
33. Holt L.J., Krutchinsky A.N., Morgan D.O. Positive feedback sharpens the anaphase switch. Nature 2008, 454:353-357.
34. Holt L.J., Tuch B.B., Villén J., Johnson A.D., Gygi S.P., Morgan D.O. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 2009, 325:1682-1686.
35. Hornbeck P.V., Kornhauser J.M., Tkachev S., Zhang B., Skrzypek E., Murray B., Latham V., Sullivan M. PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40(Database issue):D261-D270.
36. Jensen O.N. Modification-specific proteomics: characterization of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8:33-41.
37. Kim J., Kim I., Yang J.S., Shin Y.E., Hwang J., Park S., Choi Y.S., Kim S. Rewiring of PDZ domain-ligand interaction network contributed to eukaryotic evolution. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002510.
38. Landgraf C., Panni S., Montecchi-Palazzi L., Castagnoli L., Schneider-Mergener J., Volkmer-Engert R., Cesareni G. Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:E14.
39. Landry C.R., Levy E.D., Abd Rabbo D., Tarassov K., Michnick S.W. Extracting insight from noisy cellular networks. Cell 2013, 155:983-989.
40. Levy E.D., Landry C.R., Michnick S.W. How perfect can protein interactomes be?. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2:pe11.
41. Li P., Banjade S., Cheng H.C., Kim S., Chen B., Guo L., Llaguno M., Hollingsworth J.V., King D.S., Banani S.F., et al. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins. Nature 2012, 483:336-340.
42. Liu B.A., Engelmann B.W., Nash P.D. High-throughput analysis of peptide-binding modules. Proteomics 2012, 12:1527-1546.
43. Mahrus S., Trinidad J.C., Barkan D.T., Sali A., Burlingame A.L., Wells J.A. Global sequencing of proteolytic cleavage sites in apoptosis by specific labeling of protein N termini. Cell 2008, 134:866-876.
44. Manning G., Whyte D.B., Martinez R., Hunter T., Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002, 298:1912-1934.
45. Meggio F., Pinna L.A. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2?. FASEB J. 2003, 17:349-368.
46. Mészáros B., Simon I., Dosztányi Z. Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000376.
47. Mohan A., Oldfield C.J., Radivojac P., Vacic V., Cortese M.S., Dunker A.K., Uversky V.N. Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J.Mol. Biol. 2006, 362:1043-1059.
48. Mosca R., Pache R.A., Aloy P. The role of structural disorder in the rewiring of protein interactions through evolution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11:014969.
49. Neduva V., Russell R.B. Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:3342-3345.
50. Neduva V., Russell R.B. Peptides mediating interaction networks: new leads at last. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17:465-471.
51. Nishi H., Hashimoto K., Panchenko A.R. Phosphorylation in protein-protein binding: effect on stability and function. Structure 2011, 19:1807-1815.
52. Pajkos M., Mészáros B., Simon I., Dosztányi Z. Is there a biological cost of protein disorder? Analysis of cancer-associated mutations. Mol. Biosyst. 2012, 8:296-307.
53. Pearson H. Genetics: what is a gene?. Nature 2006, 441:398-401.
54. Perica T., Marsh J.A., Sousa F.L., Natan E., Colwell L.J., Ahnert S.E., Teichmann S.A. The emergence of protein complexes: quaternary structure, dynamics and allostery. Colworth Medal Lecture. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40:475-491.
55. Perkins J.R., Diboun I., Dessailly B.H., Lees J.G., Orengo C. Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. Structure 2010, 18:1233-1243.
56. Reimand J., Bader G.D. Systematic analysis of somatic mutationsin phosphorylation signaling predicts novel cancer drivers. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9:637.
57. Romero P.R., Zaidi S., Fang Y.Y., Uversky V.N., Radivojac P., Oldfield C.J., Cortese M.S., Sickmeier M., LeGall T., Obradovic Z., Dunker A.K. Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:8390-8395.
58. Sammut S.J., Finn R.D., Bateman A. Pfam 10 years on: 10,000 families and still growing. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9:210-219.
59. Schreiber G., Haran G., Zhou H.X. Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109:839-860.
60. Stein A., Mosca R., Aloy P. Three-dimensional modeling of protein interactions and complexes is going 'omics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2011, 21:200-208.
61. Stumpf M.P.H., Thorne T., de Silva E., Stewart R., An H.J., Lappe M., Wiuf C. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:6959-6964.
62. te Velthuis A.J., Sakalis P.A., Fowler D.A., Bagowski C.P. Genome-wide analysis of PDZ domain binding reveals inherent functional overlap within the PDZ interaction network. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e16047.
63. Tompa P. Intrinsically disordered proteins: a 10-year recap. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37:509-516.
64. Tompa P. Hydrogel formation by multivalent IDPs. A reincarnation of the microtrabecular lattice?. Intrinsically Disordered Proteins 2013, 1:e24068.
65. Tompa P., Fuxreiter M., Oldfield C.J., Simon I., Dunker A.K., Uversky V.N. Close encounters of the third kind: disordered domains and the interactions of proteins. Bioessays 2009, 31:328-335.
66. Tonikian R., Xin X., Toret C.P., Gfeller D., Landgraf C., Panni S., Paoluzi S., Castagnoli L., Currell B., Seshagiri S., et al. Bayesian modeling of the yeast SH3 domain interactome predicts spatiotemporal dynamics of endocytosis proteins. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000218.
67. Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41(Database issue):D43-D47. UniProt Consortium.
68. Uversky V.N., Dunker A.K. Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804:1231-1264.
69. Vacic V., Markwick P.R., Oldfield C.J., Zhao X., Haynes C., Uversky V.N., Iakoucheva L.M. Disease-associated mutations disrupt functionally important regions of intrinsic protein disorder. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002709.
70. Van Roey K., Gibson T.J., Davey N.E. Motif switches: decision-making in cell regulation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22:378-385.
71. Van Roey K., Dinkel H., Weatheritt R.J., Gibson T.J., Davey N.E. The switches.ELM resource: a compendium of conditional regulatory interaction interfaces. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6:rs7.
72. Venkatesan K., Rual J.F., Vazquez A., Stelzl U., Lemmens I., Hirozane-Kishikawa T., Hao T., Zenkner M., Xin X., Goh K.I., et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:83-90.
73. Wang C.K., Pan L., Chen J., Zhang M. Extensions of PDZ domains as important structural and functional elements. Protein Cell 2010, 1:737-751.
74. Weatheritt R.J., Gibson T.J. Linear motifs: lost in (pre)translation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37:333-341.
75. Weatheritt R.J., Davey N.E., Gibson T.J. Linear motifs confer functional diversity onto splice variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:7123-7131.
76. Wright P.E., Dyson H.J. Linking folding and binding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:31-38.
77. Wu H. Higher-order assemblies in a new paradigm of signal transduction. Cell 2013, 153:287-292.
78. Zarrinpar A., Park S.H., Lim W.A. Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection. Nature 2003, 426:676-680.
79. Zhou H.X. Intrinsic disorder: signaling via highly specific but short-lived association. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37:43-48.
80. Zielinska D.F., Gnad F., Wiśniewski J.R., Mann M. Precision mapping of an invivo N-glycoproteome reveals rigid topological and sequence constraints. Cell 2010, 141:897-907.