How Individual Self-Regulation Affects Group Regulation and Performance: A Shared Regulation Intervention

Small Group Research

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 431-454

  Panadero, Ernesto ^a,b   Kirschner, Paul A ^a,c   Järvelä, Sanna ^a   Malmberg, Jonna ^a   Järvenoja, Hanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

collaborative work; computer supported collaborative learning; self regulated learning; shared regulation; socially shared regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937032468     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496415591219     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. M.Boekaerts (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning. In B.J.ZimmermanD.H.Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 408-425). New York, NY: Routledge.
2. D.CellarA.StuhlmacherS.YoungD.FisherC.AdairS.HaynesD.. Riester (2011). Trait goal orientation, self-regulation, and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 467-483. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9201-6
3. N.C.DiDonato (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25-47. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
4. C.DignathG.Büttner (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231-264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
5. P.DillenbourgS.JärveläF.Fischer (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N.BalacheffS.LudvigsenT.JongA.LazonderS.Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3-19). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
6. K.Dunbar (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R.J.SternbergJ.E.Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. A.Field (2013). Multilevel linear models. In Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed., pp. 814-867). London, England: Sage.
8. J.FinkelmanJ.HudesmanB.FlugmanS.Crosby (2014). An enhanced formative assessment and self-regulated learning program: From the classroom to the workplace. Journal of Psychiatry Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1-8.
9. J.FransenA.WeinbergerP.Kirschner (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 9-24. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.747947
10. V.GrauD.Whitebread (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22, 401-412. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003
11. A.F.HadwinS.JärveläM.Miller (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B.J.ZimmermanD.H.Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65-84). New York, NY: Routledge.
12. T.R.HurmeT.PalonenS.Järvelä (2006). Metacognition in joint discussions: An analysis of the patterns of interaction and the metacognitive content of the networked discussions in mathematics. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 181-200. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-9792-5
13. E.Hutchins (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L.B.ResnickJ.M.LevineS.D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283-307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. E.Hutchins (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. T.IiskalaM.VaurasE.Lehtinen (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning?Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 147-178.
16. T.IiskalaM.VaurasE.LehtinenP.Salonen (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379-393. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
17. J.JanssenU.CressG.ErkensP.Kirschner (2013). Multilevel analysis for the analysis of collaborative learning. In C.E.Hmelo-SilverC.A.ChinnC.ChanA.M.O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 41-56). New York, NY: Routledge.
18. J.JanssenG.ErkensP.A.KirschnerG.Kanselaar (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 25-43. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
19. S.JärveläA.F.Hadwin (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25-39. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
20. S.JärveläH.JärvenojaJ.MalmbergA.F.Hadwin (2013). Exploring socially-shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12, 267-286. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.267
21. S.JärveläP.KirschnerE.PanaderoJ.MalmbergC.PhielixJ.JaspersH..Järvenoja (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 125-142. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1
22. H.JärvenojaS.Järvelä (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463-481. doi:10.1348/000709909x402811
23. H.JärvenojaS.VoletS.Järvelä (2012). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33, 31-58. doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.742334
24. J.JaspersM.BroekenG.Erkens (2004). Virtual Collaborative Research Institute (VCRI) (Version 2.0). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Onderwijskunde Utrecht, Interuniversity Centre for Educational Research/Institute for Social Sciences Research.
25. P.A.KirschnerK.KreijnsC.PhielixJ.Fransen (2015). Awareness of cognitive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 59-77. doi:10.1111/jcal.12084
26. A.MüllerB.HerbigK.Petrovic (2009). The explication of implicit team knowledge and its supporting effect on team processes and technical innovations: An action regulation perspective on team reflexivity. Small Group Research, 40, 28-51. doi:10.1177/1046496408326574
27. E.PanaderoJ.Alonso-Tapia (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicologia, 30, 450-462. doi:10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
28. E.PanaderoJ.Alonso-TapiaJ.A.Huertas (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 806-813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
29. E.PanaderoS.Järvelä (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000226
30. E.PanaderoM.Romero (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21, 133-148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
31. C.Phielix (2012). Enhancing collaboration through assessment & reflection (Doctoral thesis). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University. Retrieved from http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/255570/phielix.pdf?sequence
32. C.PhielixF.J.PrinsP.A.KirschnerG.ErkensJ.Jaspers (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1087-1102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024
33. P.R.PintrichD.A.F.SmithT.GarciaW.J.Mckeachie (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
34. T.K.RogatK.R.Adams-Wiggins (2014). Other-regulation in collaborative groups: Implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science, 42, 879-904. doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9322-9
35. T.K.RogatL.Linnenbrink-Garcia (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 375-415. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
36. N.Saab (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 1-6. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5
37. C.SchoorM.Bannert (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1321-1331. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016
38. Y.Shin (2014). Positive group affect and team creativity: Mediation of team reflexivity and promotion focus. Small Group Research, 45, 337-364. doi:10.1177/1046496414533618
39. J.W.StrijbosR.L.MartensW.M.G.JochemsN.J.Broers (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195-229. doi:10.1177/1046496403260843
40. P.Van den BosscheW.H.GijselaersM.SegersP.A.Kirschner (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938
41. S.VoletM.SummersJ.Thurman (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?Learning and Instruction, 19, 128-143. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
42. S.VoletM.VaurasP.Salonen (2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44, 215-226. doi:10.1080/00461520903213584
43. P.H.WinneJ.C.NesbitV.S.KumarA.F.HadwinS.LajoieR.AzevedoN.E.Perry (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: The Learning Kit Project. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3, 105-113.
44. C.A.WoltersM.B.Benzon (2013). Assessing and predicting college students’ use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 199-221. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
45. B.J.ZimmermanA.Kitsantas (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 145-155. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.004
46. B.J.ZimmermanA.R.Moylan (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D.J.HackerJ.DunloskyA.C.Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). New York, NY: Routledge.
47. B.J.ZimmermanD.H.Schunk (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. An introduction and an overview. In B.J.ZimmermanD.H.Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Routledge.