Awareness of cognitive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 59-77

  Kirschner, P A ^a   Kreijns, K ^a   Phielix, C ^b   Fransen, J ^c  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c INHOLLAND UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CSCL; Group processing; Promotive interaction; Social interaction; Social space

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920722649     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12084     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1997). Mathematical problem solving in small groups: Exploring the interplay of students' metacognitive behaviors, perceptions, and ability levels. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(1), 63-74.
2. Bales, R. F. (1988). A new overview of the SYMLOG system: Measuring and changing behavior in groups. In R. B. Polly, A. P. Hare, & P. J. Stone (Eds.), The SYMLOG practitioner: Applications of small group research (pp. 319-344). New York, NY: Preager.
3. Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
4. Bonebright, D. A. (2010). Perspectives. 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman's model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 111-120.
5. Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 123-139.
6. Clarebout, G., Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (1999). An invasion in the classroom: Influence on instructional and epistemological beliefs. Paper presented at the Eighth Bi-annual Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Goteborg, Sweden.
7. den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. H. (2006). Multilevel issues in studies using students' perceptions of learning environments: The case of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research, 9, 199-213.
8. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Sorensen, E. K. (1999). Distributed computer supported collaborative learning through shared practice and social participation. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference (pp. 12-15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
10. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
11. Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Towards a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
12. Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29-35.
13. Gräsel, C., Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., & Mandl, H. (2001). Let me tell you something you do know. A pilot study on discourse in cooperative learning with computer networks. In H. Jonassen, S. Dijkstra, & D. Sembill (Eds.), Learning with multimedia - Results and perspectives (pp. 111-137). Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.
14. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, X., Constance, A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397-431.
15. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
16. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
17. Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 567-589.
18. Jaspers, J., Broeken, M., & Erkens, G. (2004). Virtual Collaborative Research Institute (VCRI) (Version 2.0). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Onderwijskunde Utrecht, ICO/ISOR.
19. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25-39.
20. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 785-811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365-379.
23. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
24. Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
25. Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 403-420.
26. Klein, W. M. (2001). Post hoc construction of self-performance and other performance in self-serving social comparison. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 27(6), 744-754.
27. Koschmann, T. (1994). Toward a theory of computer-support for collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 218-224.
28. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
29. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2004). Measuring perceived quality of social space in distributed learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(5), 607-632. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.002
30. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2011). Measuring perceived social presence in distributed learning groups. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 365-381.
31. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL Environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48, 229-242.
32. Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., & van Buuren, H. (2014). Community of inquiry: Social presence revisited [Special Issue: Inquiry into 'Communities of Inquiry': Knowledge, Communication, Presence, Community]. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 5-19.
33. Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2000). Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(3), 41-45.
34. Mento, A. J., Steel, R. P., & Karren, R. J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52-83.
35. Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method affects learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149-158.
36. Neubert, M. J. (1998). The value of feedback and goal setting over goal setting alone and potential moderators of this effect: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 11, 321-335.
37. Oztok, M., & Brett, C. (2011). Social presence and online learning: A review of the research. Journal of Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/758/1299
38. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 151-161.
39. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1087-1102.
40. Saavedra, R., Early, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
41. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (1993). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450-462.
42. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a 'Big Five' in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555-599.
43. Savicki, V., Kelley, M., & Lingenfelter, D. (1996). Gender, group composition, and task type in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 549-565.
44. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2007). The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning: A matter of triangulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 353-380.
45. Tubbs, M. E. (1986). Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 474-483.
46. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
47. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
48. Van Meter, P., & Stevens, R. J. (2000). The role of theory in the study of peer collaboration. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 113-127.
49. Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western-Journal of Communication, 57(4), 381-398.
50. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
51. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative construction (Doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany). Retrieved from http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/00001120/01/Weinberger_Armin.pdf
52. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
53. Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 203-228.