The Trajectory of Emergence of Shared Group-Level Constructs

Small Group Research

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 352-390

  Allen, Natalie J ^a   O’Neill, Thomas A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

aggregation; emergence; group level shared constructs; groups; teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930335143     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496415584973     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adams S. J.,Roch S. G.,Ayman R.Communication medium and member familiarity: The effects on decision time, accuracy, and satisfaction.Small Group Research. 2005;36:321-353
2. Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research. Agnew C. R.Carlston D. E.Graziano W. G.Kelly J. R., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:
3. Alavi S. B.,McCormick J.The roles of perceived task interdependence and group members’ interdependence in the development of collective efficacy in university student group contexts.British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2008;78:375-393
4. Albright L.,Kenny D. A.,Malloy T. E.Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;55:387-395
5. Ambady N.,Bernieri F. J.,Richeson J. A.Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2000;32:201-271
6. Ambady N.,Rosenthal R.Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 1992;111:256-274
7. Arrow H.Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72:75-85
8. Arthur W.,Bell S. T.,Edwards B. D.A longitudinal examination of the comparative criterion-related validity of additive and referent-shift consensus operationalizations of team efficacy.Organizational Research Methods. 2007;10:35-58
9. Barry B.,Stewart G. L.Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1997;82:62-78
10. Bechtoldt M. N.,De Dreu C. K.,Nijstad B. A.,Choi H. S.Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;99:622-637
11. Beersma B.,De Dreu C. K.Integrative and distributive negotiation in small groups: Effects of task structure, decision rule, and social motive.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2002;87:227-252
12. Bell S. T.,Villado A. J.,Lukasik M. A.,Belau L.,Briggs A. L.Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis.Journal of Management. 2011;37:709-743
13. Bluedorn A. C.,Turban D. B.,Love M. S.The effects of stand-up and sit-down meeting formats on meeting outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1999;84:277-285
14. Borg I.,Braun M.,Baumgärtner M. K.Attitudes of demographic item non-respondents in employee surveys.International Journal of Manpower. 2008;29:146-160
15. Brown R. D.,Hauenstein N. M. A.Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rWG indices.Organizational Research Methods. 2005;8:165-184
16. Burke M. J.,Finkelstein L. M.,Dusig M. S.On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement.Organizational Research Methods. 1999;2:49-68
17. Carson J. B.,Tesluk P. E.,Marrone J. A.Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:1217-1234.f
18. Castano N.,Watts T.,Tekleab A. G.A re-examination of the cohesion-performance relationship meta-analyses: A comprehensive approach.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2013;17:207-231
19. Chan D.Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1998;83:234-246
20. Chen G.,Webber S. S.,Bliese P. D.,Mathieu J. E.,Payne S. C.,Zaccaro S. J.Simultaneous examination of the antecedents and consequences of efficacy beliefs at multiple levels of analysis.Human Performance. 2002;15:381-409
21. Curhan J. R.,Pentland A.Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92:802-811
22. Dalton D. R.,Aguinis H.,Dalton C. M.,Bosco F. A.,Pierce C. A.Revisiting the file drawer problem in meta-analysis: An assessment of published and nonpublished correlation matrices.Personnel Psychology. 2012;65:221-249
23. DeRue D. S.,Hollenbeck J.,Ilgen D.,Feltz D.Efficacy dispersion in teams: Moving beyond agreement and aggregation.Personnel Psychology. 2010;63:1-40
24. DeShon R. P.,Kozlowski S. W.,Schmidt A. M.,Milner K. R.,Wiechmann D.A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004;89:1035-1056
25. Durham C. C.,Locke E. A.,Poon J. M. L.,McLeod P. L.Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information-seeking strategy, and performance.Human Performance. 2000;12:115-138
26. George J. M.Personality, affect, and behavior in groups.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1990;75:107-116
27. Gino F.,Argote L.,Miron-Spektor E.,Todorova G.First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2010;111:102-115
28. Goncalo J. A.,Polman E.,Maslach C.Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2010;113:13-24
29. Greer L. L.,Jehn K. A.,Mannix E. A.Conflict transformation: A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between different types of intragroup conflict and the moderating role of conflict resolution.Small Group Research. 2008;39:278-302
30. Harrison D. A.,Price K. H.,Gavin J. H.,Florey A. T.Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning.Academy of Management Journal. 2002;45:1029-1045
31. Hirschfeld R. R.,Cole M. S.,Bernerth J. B.,Rizzuto T. E.Voluntary survey completion among team members: Implications of noncompliance and missing data for multilevel research.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013;98:454-468
32. Hofmann D. A.Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Rogelberg S., ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2002:247-274.
33. Huang R.,Kahai S.,Jestice R.The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams.Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26:1098-1110
34. Jackson M.,Moreland R. L.Transactive memory in the classroom.Small Group Research. 2009;40:508-534
35. Jehn K. A.,Greer L.,Levine S.,Szulanski G.The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states in group outcomes.Group Decision and Negotiation. 2008;17:465-495
36. Katz-Navon T. Y.,Erez M.When collective- and self-efficacy affect team performance: The role of task interdependence.Small Group Research. 2005;36:437-465
37. Kayes D.From climbing stairs to riding waves.Small Group Research. 2006;37:612-630
38. Kenny D. A.,Albright L.Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 1987;102:390-402
39. Klein K. J.,Conn A. B.,Smith D. B.,Sorra J. S.Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86:3-16
40. Klein K. J.,Dansereau F.,Hall R. J.Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis.Academy of Management Review. 1994;19:195-229
41. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Klein K. J.Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:
42. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Chao G. T.The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams.Managerial and Decision Economics. 2012;33:335-354
43. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Chao G. T.,Grand J. A.,Braun M. T.,Kuljanin G.Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence.Organizational Research Methods. 2013;16:581-615
44. Kozlowski S. W. J.,Klein K. J.Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Klein K. J.Kozlowski S. W. J., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:3-90.
45. Langfred C. W.Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams.Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47:385-399
46. Lindell M. K.,Brandt M. K.Measuring interrater agreement for ratings of a single target.Applied Psychological Measurement. 1997;21:271-278
47. Lira E. M.,Ripoll P.,Peiró J. M.,González P.The roles of group potency and information and communication technologies in the relationship between task conflict and team effectiveness: A longitudinal study.Computers in Human Behavior. 2007;23:2888-2903
48. Lira E. M.,Ripoll P.,Peiró J. M.,Zornoza A. M.The role of information and communication technologies in the relationship between group effectiveness and group potency.Small Group Research. 2008;39:728-745
49. Lizzio A.,Wilson K.Self-managed learning groups in higher education: Students’ perceptions of process and outcomes.British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;75:373-390
50. MacDonnell R. M.,O’Neill T.,Kline T.,Hambley L.Bringing group-level personality to the electronic realm: A comparison of face-to-face and virtual contexts.The Psychologist-Manager Journal. 2009;12:1-24
51. Maloney M. M.,Johnson S. G.,Zellmer-Bruhn M. E.Assessing group-level constructs under missing data conditions: A Monte Carlo simulation.Small Group Research. 2010;41:281-307
52. Marks M. A.,Mathieu J. E.,Zaccaro S. J.A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes.Academy of Management Review. 2001;26:356-376
53. Marrone J. A.,Tesluk P. E.,Carson J. B.A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:1423-1439
54. Martínez-Moreno E.,González-Navarro P.,Zornoza A.,Ripoll P.Relationship, task and process conflicts on team performance: The moderating role of communication media.International Journal of Conflict Management. 2009;20:251-268
55. McGrath J. E.,Kelly J. R.Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1986:
56. Meade A. W.,Eby L. T.Using indices of group agreement in multilevel construct validation.Organizational Research Methods. 2007;10:75-96
57. Mehta A.,Feild H.,Armenakis A.,Mehta N.Team goal orientation and team performance: The mediating role of team planning.Journal of Management. 2009;35:1026-1046
58. Miller D. L.Re-examining teamwork KSAs and team performance.Small Group Research. 2001;32:745-766
59. Mohammed S.,Angell L. C.Surface-and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2004;25:1015-1039
60. Moreland R. L.,Fetterman J. D.,Flagg J. J.,Swanenburg K. L.Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research. Agnew C. R.Carlston D. E.Graziano W. G.Kelly J. R., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:28-53.
61. Morgeson F. P.,Hofmann D. A.The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:249-265
62. Newman D. A.,Sin H.How do missing data bias estimates of within-group agreement? Sensitivity of SDWG, CVWG, rWG(J), rWG(J)*, and ICC to systematic nonresponse.Organizational Research Methods. 2009;12:113-147
63. Ng K. Y.,Van Dyne L.Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work group: A multilevel analysis.Group & Organization Management. 2005;30:514-540
64. O’Neill T. A.,Allen N. J.,Hastings S. E.Examining the “pros” and “cons” of team conflict: A team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict.Human Performance. 2013;26:236-260
65. Passos A. M.,Caetano A.Exploring the effects of intragroup conflict and past performance feedback on team effectiveness.Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2005;20:231-244
66. Paunonen S. V.On the accuracy of ratings of personality by strangers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;61:471-477
67. Ployhart R. E.,Schneider B.Handbook of personnel selection. Evers A.Smit-Voskuyl O.Anderson N., ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2005:495-516.
68. Porter C. O. L. H.Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005;90:811-818
69. Porter C. O. L. H.,Gogus C. I.,Yu R. C. F.When does teamwork translate into improved team performance? A resource allocation perspective.Small Group Research. 2010;41:221-248
70. Porter C. O. L. H.,Webb J. W.,Gogus C. I.When goal orientations collide: Effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;95:935-943
71. Potter R. E.,Balthazard P. A.Virtual team interaction styles: Assessment and effects.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2002;56:423-443
72. Purvanova R. K.,Bono J. E.Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams.The Leadership Quarterly. 2009;20:343-357
73. Resick C. J.,Dickson M. W.,Mitchelsen J. K.,Allison L. K.,Clark M. A.Team composition, cognition, and effectiveness: Examining mental model similarity and accuracy.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2010;14:174-191
74. Robert C.,Cheung Y. H.An examination of the relationship between conscientiousness and groups performance on a creative task.Journal of Research in Personality. 2010;44:222-231
75. Rogelberg S. G.,Luong A.,Sederburg M. E.,Cristol D. S.Employee attitude surveys: Examining the attitudes of noncompliant employees.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85:284-293
76. Rousseau D. M.Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives.Research in Organizational Behavior. 1985;7:1-37
77. Sinclair A. L.The effects of justice and cooperation on team effectiveness.Small Group Research. 2003;34:74-100
78. Small E. E.,Rentsch J. R.Shared leadership in teams: A matter of distribution.Journal of Personnel Psychology. 2010;9:203-211
79. Sonnentag S.,Volmer J.What you do for you team comes back to you: A cross-level investigation of individual goal specification, team-goal clarity, and individual performance.Human Performance. 2010;23:116-130
80. Stajkovic A. D.,Lee D.,Nyberg A. J.Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2009;94:814-828
81. Stanley D. J.,Allen N. J.,Williams H. M.,Ross S. J.Examining workgroup diversity effects: Does playing by the (group-retention) rules help or hinder?.Behavior Research Methods. 2011;43:508-521
82. Tasa K.,Taggar S.,Seijts G. H.The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92:17-27
83. Tekleab A. G.,Quigley N. R.,Tesluk P. E.A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness.Group & Organization Management. 2009;34:170-205
84. van Ginkel W. P.,Tindale R. S.,van Knippenberg D.Team reflexivity, development of shared task representations, and the use of distributed information in group decision making.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2009;13:265
85. van Ginkel W. P.,van Knippenberg D.Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2008;105:82-97
86. Van Mierlo H.,Kleingeld A.Goals, strategies, and group performance: Some limits of goal setting in groups.Small Group Research. 2010;41:524-555
87. Wegge J.,Haslam S. A.Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: The effects of three group goal-setting strategies.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2005;14:400-430
88. Yammarino F. J.,Markham S. E.On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena?.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1992;77:168-176