Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams

Leadership Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 343-357

  Purvanova, Radostina K ^a   Bono, Joyce E ^b,c  

^a DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; e leadership; Leadership; Transformational leadership; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349134163     PISSN: 10489843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Albright L., and Forziati C. Cross-situational consistency and perceptual accuracy in leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12 (1995) 1269-1276
2. Antonakis J., Avolio B.J., and Sivasubramaniam N. Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly 14 (2003) 261-295
3. Armstrong D.J., and Cole P. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed Work (2002), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 167-186
4. Avolio B.J., and Kahai S.S. Placing the "E" in e-leadership: Minor tweak or fundamental change. In: Murphy S.E., and Riggio R.E. (Eds). The Future of Leadership Development (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 49-70
5. Avolio B.J., and Kahai S.S. Adding the "E" to e-leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics 31 (2003) 325-338
6. Avolio B.J., Kahai S.S., and Dodge G.E. E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Leadership Quarterly 11 (2001) 615-668
7. Barnlund D.C. Consistency of emergent leadership in groups with changing tasks and members. Speech Monographs 29 (1962) 45-52
8. Barrow J.C. Work performance and task complexity as causal determinants of leader behavior style and flexibility. Journal of Applied Psychology 61 (1976) 433-440
9. Bass B.M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations (1985), Free Press, New York
10. Bass B.M., and Avolio B.J. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
11. Bell G.B., and French R.L. Consistency of individual leadership position in small groups of varying membership. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 45 (1950) 764-767
12. Bell B.S., and Kozlowski S.J. A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organizational Management 21 (2002) 14-49
13. Bliese P.D. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: Klein K.J., and Kozlowski S.W.J. (Eds). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (2000), Jossey- Bass, San Francisco 349-381
14. Bono J.E., and Judge T.A. Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal 46 (2003) 554-571
15. Bordia P. Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication 34 (1997) 99-120
16. Borgatta E.F. Analysis of social interaction and sociometric perception. Sociometry 17 (1954) 7-32
17. Carter L.F., and Nixon M. An investigation of the relationship between four criteria of leadership ability for three different tasks. Journal of Psychology 27 (1949) 245-261
18. Chidambaram L. Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly 20 (1996) 143-165
19. Conger J.A., and Kanungo R. Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review 12 (1987) 637-647
20. Cornelius C., and Boos M. Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training: Trade-offs in judgmental tasks. Communication Research 30 (2003) 147-177
21. Daft R.L., and Lengel R.H. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (1984) 191-233
22. Dansereau F., Alutto J.A., and Yammarino F.J. Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach (1984), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
23. Dansereau F., and Yammarino F.J. Within and between analysis: The varient paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building and testing. In: Klein K.J., and Kozlowski S.W.J. (Eds). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (2000), Jossey- Bass, San Francisco 425-466
24. DeSanctis G., and Poole M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive Structuation Theory. Organization Science 5 (1994) 121-147
25. Driskell J.E., Radtke P.H., and Salas E. Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7 (2003) 297-323
26. Dundis S., and Benson S. Building more effective virtual teams: An examination of the task variable in online group problem-solving. International Journal of E-Learning 2 (2003) 24-38
27. Eagly A.H., and Carli L.L. Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. Leadership Quarterly 14 (2003) 851-859
28. Edwards J.R. Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology 46 (1993) 641-665
29. Edwards J.R. Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management 20 (1994) 683-689
30. Geier J.G. A trait approach to the study of leadership in small groups. Journal of Communication 17 (1967) 316-323
31. Gibb C.A. The sociometry of leadership in temporary groups. Sociometry 13 (1950) 226-243
32. Gordon L.V., and Medland F.F. The cross-group stability of peer ratings of leadership potential. Personnel Psychology 18 (1965) 173-177
33. Griffith T.L., Sawyer J.E., and Neale M.A. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly 27 (2003) 265-287
34. Hambley L.A., O'Neill T.A., and Kline T.J.B. Virtual team leadership: Perspectives from the field. International Journal of E-Collaboration 3 1 (2007) 40-64
35. Hancock J.T. Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23 (2004) 447-463
36. Hart R.K., and McLeod P.L. Rethinking team building in geographically dispersed teams: One message at a time. Organizational Dynamics 31 (2003) 352-361
37. Herold D.M. Two-way influence processes in leader-follower dyads. Academy of Management Journal 20 (1977) 224-237
38. Hill W.A. Leadership style: Rigid or flexible. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 11 (1973) 83-96
39. Hill W.A., and Hughes D. Variation in leader behavior as a function of task type. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 11 (1974) 83-96
40. Hofmann D.A., and Jones L.M. Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005) 509-522
41. Hollenbeck J.R., Ilgen D.R., and Sego D.J. Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly 5 (1994) 3-23
42. Hollingshead A.B. Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research 23 (1996) 193-219
43. House R.J., and Aditya R.N. The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis?. Journal of Management 23 (1997) 409-473
44. James L.R., and White III J.F. Cross-situational specificity in managers' perceptions of subordinate performance, attributions, and leader behaviors. Personnel Psychology 36 (1983) 809-856
45. Judge T.A., and Bono J.E. Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000) 751-765
46. Judge T.A., Bono J.E., Ilies R., and Gerhardt M.W. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002) 765-780
47. Judge T.A., Colbert A.E., and Ilies R. Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 542-552
48. Judge T.A., and Piccolo R.F. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 755-768
49. Kahai S.S., Sosik J.J., and Avolio B.J. Effects of leaderships style, anonymity, and rewards of creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. Leadership Quarterly 14 (2003) 499-524
50. Kark R., Shamir B., and Chen G. The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 246-255
51. Kirkman B.L., and Mathieu J.E. The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management 31 (2005) 700-718
52. Kirkpatrick S.A., and Locke E.A. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (1996) 36-51
53. Klein K.J., Bliese P.D., Kozlowski S.W., Dansereau F., Gavin M.B., Griffin M.A., et al. Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In: Klein K.J., and Kozlowski S.W.J. (Eds). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (2000), Jossey- Bass, San Francisco 349-381
54. Lord R.G. An information processing approach to social perception, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 7 (1985) 87-128
55. Lord R.G., and Maher K.J. Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette M.D., and Hough L.M. (Eds). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. 2nd ed. (1991), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA 1-62
56. Lowe K.B., Kroeck K.G., and Sivasubramaniam N. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly 7 (1996) 385-425
57. Malhotra A., Majchrzak A., and Rosen B. Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives 21 (2007, February) 60-70
58. Martins L.L., Gilson L.L., and Maynard M.T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?. Journal of Management 30 (2004) 805-835
59. Olson J.S., Olson G.M., and Meader D. Face-to-face group work compared to remote group work with and without video. In: Finn K., Sellen A., and Wilbur S. (Eds). Video-Mediated Communication (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 157-172
60. Reicher S.D., Spears R., and Postmes T. A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology 6 (1995) 161-198
61. Schultz B. Characteristics of emergent leaders of continuing problem-solving groups. Journal of Psychology 88 (1974) 167-173
62. Shannon C., and Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication (1949), University of Illinois Press, Urbana-Champaign
63. Shamir B. Attribution of influence and charisma to the leader: The romance of leadership revisited. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (1992) 386-407
64. Shamir B., and Howell J.M. Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly 10 (1999) 257-283
65. Short J., Williams E., and Christie B. The social psychology of telecommunications (1976), Wiley & Sons, New York
66. Sosik J.J. Effects of transformational leadership and anonymity on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Group and Organization Management 22 (1997) 460-487
67. Sosik J.J., Avolio B.J., and Kahai S.S. Inspiring group creativity: Comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research 29 (1998) 3-31
68. Sosik J.J., Kahai S.S., and Avolio B.J. Leadership style, anonymity, and creativity in group decision support systems: The mediating role of optimal flow. Journal of Creative Behavior 33 (1999) 227-256
69. Spears R., Postmnes T., Lea M., and Watt S.E. A SIDE view of social influence. In: Forgas J., and Williams K. (Eds). Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (2001), Psychology, Philadelphia 331-350
70. Sproull L., and Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32 (1986) 1492-1512
71. Straus S.G. Technology, group processes, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction 12 (1997) 227-266
72. Thompson L.F., and Coovert M.D. Teamwork online: The effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and postdiscussion accuracy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7 (2003) 135-151
73. Waldman D.A., and Yammarino F.J. CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review 24 (1999) 266-285
74. Walther J.B. Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication 57 (1993) 381-398
75. Walther J.B. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23 (1996) 1-43
76. Walther J.B., and Burgoon J.K. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research 19 (1992) 50-88
77. Weisband S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. In: Hinds P., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Distributed work (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 311-333
78. Wiesenfeld B.M., Raghuram S., and Garud R. Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science 10 (1999) 777-790
79. Yukl G. Leadership in organizations. 4th ed. (1998), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
80. Zaccaro S.J., and Bader P. E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams: Minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. Organizational Dynamics 31 (2003) 377-387
81. Zaccaro S.J., Foti R.J., and Kenny D.A. Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (1991) 308-315
82. Zigurs I. Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity?. Organizational Dynamics 31 (2003) 339-351