A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1423-1439

  Marrone, Jennifer A ^a   Tesluk, Paul E ^b   Carson, Jay B ^c  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949126206     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.28225967     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. 1976. Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure. Academy of Management Journal, 2: 217-230.
2. Ancona, D. G. 1990. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 334-365.
3. Ancona, D., Bresman, H., & Kaeufer, K. 2002. The comparative advantage of X-teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3): 33-40.
4. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634-665.
5. Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative frame-work and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49: 571-582.
6. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
7. Beehr, T. A., Walsh, J. T., & Taber, T. D. 1976. Relationship of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61: 41-47.
8. Blau, P. M. 1960. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
9. Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Bunderson, S. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 875-893.
11. Carlisle, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15: 555-568.
12. Chan, D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234-246.
13. Choi, J. N. 2002. External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33: 181-208.
14. Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. 2002. Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice. Personnel Psychology, 55: 83-109.
15. Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. 2003. Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 435-457.
16. Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.
17. Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. 1990. Habitual routines in task performing groups. Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Processes, 44: 65-97.
18. Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
19. Hackman, J. R. 1987. The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Hackman, J. R. 1992. Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. H. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 199-267. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
21. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82-111.
22. Hargadon, A. B. 1998. Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursing continuous innovation, California Management Review, 40(3): 209-227.
23. Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P., & Munson, C. 2003. Team level antecedents of team members' network building in innovation projects. Decision Sciences, 34: 741-770.
24. Hoffman, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. 1998. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24: 623-641.
25. Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 1991. The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 165-207. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219-229.
27. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.
28. Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. 1964. Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley.
29. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
30. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. 2006 Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3): 77-124.
31. Levi, D. 2001. Group dynamics for teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Lewis, M. W. 2000. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25: 760-776.
33. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Marks, M. A., De Church, L. A., Mathieu, J. E., Panzer, F., & Alonso, A. 2005. Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 964-971.
35. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-376.
36. Parker, S. K. 1998. Role breadth self-efficacy: Relationship with work enrichment and other organizational practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 835-852.
37. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879-903.
38. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. 1998. Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Test of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 150-163.
40. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. 1979. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 420-428.
41. Š\molek, J., Hoffman, D., & Moran, L. 1999. Organizing teams for success. In E. Sundstrom & associates (Eds.), Supporting work team effectiveness: 24-62. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
43. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. 1990. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45: 120-133.
44. Tushman, M. 1977. Specialty boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 587-605.
45. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 20: 77-140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.