Event representation in language and cognition

Event Representation in Language and Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-282

  Bohnemeyer, Jürgen ^a   Pederson, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926083417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511782039     Document Type: Book

References (484)

1. Ahn, W. and Bailenson, J. 1996. ‘Mechanism-based explanations of causal attribution: An explanation of conjunction and discounting effect’, Cognitive Psychology 31: 82–123.
2. Ahn, W. and Kalish, C.W. 2000. ‘The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning’, in F. C. Keil and R. A. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, pp. 199–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., and Gelman, S.A. 1995. ‘The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution’, Cognition 54: 299–352.
4. Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.) 2006. Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., and Young, A. J. 2000. ‘Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture’, Language and Cognitive Processes 15(6): 593–613.
6. Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., and Sells, P. (eds.) 1997. Complex Predicates. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
7. Ameka, F. K. 2005a. ‘Ewe serial verb constructions in their grammatical context’, in A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 124–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. W. Dixon (eds.) 2005b. ‘Multiverb constructions on the West African littoral: Micro-variation and areal typology’, in M. Vulchanova and T. A. Åfarli (eds.), Grammar and Beyond: Essays in honor of Lars Hellan, pp. 15–42. Oslo: Novus Press.
9. Ameka, F. K. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.) 2007. ‘Special issue on locative predicates’, Linguistics 45(5/6).
10. Andersen, E. S. 1978. ‘Lexical universals in body-part terminology’, in J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 3, pp. 335–68. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Aronoff, M., Meir, I., and Sandler, W. 2005. ‘The paradox of sign language morphology’, Language 81(2): 301–44.
12. Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., and Sandler, W. 2003. ‘Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages’, in K. Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, pp. 53–84. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Aronson, J. L. 1971. ‘On the grammar of “CAUSE”’, Synthese 22: 414–30.
14. Aske, J. 1989. ‘Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look’, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 1–14. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
15. Bach, E. 1981. ‘On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 62–81. New York: Academic Press.
16. Baldwin, D. 2005. ‘Discerning intentions: Characterizing the cognitive system at play’, in B. D. Homer and C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (eds.), The Development of Social Cognition and Communication, pp. 117–44. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Barbey, A. K. and Wolff, P. 2006. ‘Causal reasoning from forces’, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 24–39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Barbey, A. K. and Wolff, P. 2007. ‘Learning causal structure from reasoning’, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 713–18. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. ms. ‘Composing causal relations in force dynamics’, manuscript, Emory University.
19. Barwise, J. and Perry, J. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Bavelas, J. B., Kenwood, C., Johnson, T., and Phillips, B. 2002. ‘An experimental study of when and how speakers use gestures to communicate’, Gesture 2(1): 1–17.
21. Beattie, G. and Shovelton, H. 1999a. ‘Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech?’ Semiotica 123(1/2): 1–30.
22. Beattie, G. and Shovelton, H. 1999b. ‘Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(4): 438–62.
23. Beattie, G. and Shovelton, H. 2002. ‘An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power’, British Journal of Psychology 93(2): 179–92.
24. Beebee, H. 2004. ‘Causing and Nothingness’, in J. Collins, N. Hall, and L. Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals, pp. 291–308. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Berlin, B. and Kay, P. 1969. Basic Color Terms. [Paperback edition, reprinted 1999] Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26. Berman, R. A. and Slobin, D. I. 1994. ‘Filtering and packaging in narrative’, in R. Berman and D. I. Slobin (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study, pp. 515–54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Berman, R. A. and Slobin, D. I. 1994b. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Berthele, R. 2004. ‘The typology of motion and posture verbs: A variationist account’, in B. Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology. Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 93–126. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Berthele, R. 2006. Ort und Weg. Die sprachlich Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Biederman, I. 1972. ‘Perceiving real world scenes’, Science 177: 77–80.
31. Biederman, I. 1987. ‘Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding’, Psychological Review 94: 115–17.
32. Biederman, I., Rabinowiz, J., Glass, A. L., and Stacy, E. W. Jr. 1974. ‘On the information extracted from a glance at a scene’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 103: 597–600.
33. Bock, K. and Levelt, W. J. M. 1994. ‘Language production. Grammatical encoding’, in M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, pp. 405–52. New York: Academic Press.
34. Bock, K., Irwin, D. E., Davidson, D. J., and Levelt, W. J. M. 2003. ‘Minding the clock’, Journal of Memory and Language 48: 653–85.
35. Bohnemeyer, J. 1999. ‘A questionnaire on event integration’, in D. P. Wilkins (ed.), “Manual” for the 1999 Field Season, pp. 87–95. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
36. Bohnemeyer, J. 2003. ‘The unique vector constraint’, in E. van der Zee and J. Slack (eds.), Representing Direction in Language and Space, pp. 86–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Bohnemeyer, J. 2004. ‘Split intransitivity, linking, and lexical representation: the case of Yukatek Maya’, Linguistics 42(1): 67–107.
38. Bohnemeyer, J. and Caelen, M. 1999. ‘The ECOM clips: A stimulus for the linguistic coding of event complexity’, in D. P. Wilkins (ed.), ‘Manual’ for the 1999 Field Season, pp. 74–86. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
39. Bohnemeyer, J. and Majid, A. 2002. ‘ECOM causality revisited version 4’, in S. Kita (ed.), 2002 Supplement (Version 3) for the ‘Manual’ for the Field Season 2001, pp. 35–58. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
40. Bohnemeyer, J., Eisenbeiß, S., and Narasimhan, B. 2006. ‘Ways to go: Methodological considerations in Whorfian studies on motion events’, Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 50: 1–20.
41. Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., and Ameka, F. K. 2007. ‘Principles of event representation in language: The case of motion events’, Language 83(3): 495–532.
42. Boroditsky, L. 2001. ‘Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time’, Cognitive Psychology 43(1): 1–22.
43. Boroditsky, L. 2003. ‘Linguistic relativity’, in L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, pp. 917–21. London: Macmillan Press.
44. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., and Turner, T. J. 1979. ‘Scripts in memory for text’, Cognitive Psychology 11: 177–220.
45. Bowerman, M. 1978. ‘Systematizing semantic knowledge: Changes over time in the child’s organization of word meaning’, Child Development 49(4): 987–97.
46. Bowerman, M. 1982. ‘Starting to talk worse: Clues to language acquisition from children’s late speech errors’, in S. Strauss and R. Stavy (eds.), U-shaped Behavioral Growth, pp. 101–46. New York: Academic Press.
47. Bowerman, M. 2005. ‘Why can’t you “open” a nut or “break” a cooked noodle? Learning covert object categories in action word meanings’, in L. Gershkoff-Stowe and D.Rakison (eds.), Building Object Categories in Developmental Time, pp. 209–44. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Bowerman, M. and Choi, S. 2001. ‘Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories’, in M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, pp. 475–511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Bowerman, M. and Pederson, E. ms. ‘Cross-linguistic perspectives on topological spatial relations’, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
50. Bowerman, M., Brown, P., Eisenbeiß, S., Narasimhan, B., and Slobin, D. I. 2002. ‘Putting things in places. Developmental consequences of linguistic typology’, in E. V. Clark (ed.), Space In Language. Location, Motion, Path, and Manner. The Proceedings of the 31st Stanford Child Language Research Forum, pp. S1–S122. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
51. Braun, J. 2003. ‘Natural scenes upset the visual applecart’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 7–9.
52. Brennan, M. 1992. ‘The visual world of BSL: An introduction’, in D. Brien (ed.), Dictionary of British Sign Language/English, pp. 1–133. London: Faber and Faber.
53. Bresnan, J. 1982. ‘Polyadicity’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 149–72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Brown, C. H. 1976. ‘General principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature’, American Ethnologist 3: 400–24.
55. Brown, P. 2006. ‘A sketch of the grammar of space in Tzeltal’, in S. C. Levinson and D. P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, pp. 230–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Brown, P. 2008. ‘Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language’, in M. Bowerman and P. Brown (eds.), Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Language Acquisition, pp. 167–89. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57. Brown, P. forthcoming. ‘To “put” or to “take”? Verb semantics in Tzeltal placement and removal expressions’, in A. Kopecka and B. Narasimhan (eds.), Events of “putting” and “taking”: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
58. Brown, R.W. and Lenneberg, E. H. 1958. ‘Studies in linguistic relativity’, in E. Maccoby, T. H. Newcomb, and E. L. Hartley (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology 3rd edn, pp. 9–18. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
59. Bruce, L. 1986. The Alamblak Language of Papua New Guinea (East Sepik). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
60. Bruce, L. 1988. ‘Serialization: from syntax to lexicon’, Studies in Language 12(1):19–49.
61. Bruce, V., Green, P. R., and Georgson, M. A. 1996. Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology, and Ecology, 3rd edn. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, Erlbaum.
62. Brugman, H. and Kita, S. 1995. ‘Impact of digital video technology on transcription: a case of spontaneous gesture transcription’, KODIKAS/CODE: Ars Semiotica. An International Journal of Semiotics 18: 95–112.
63. Bullock, M., Gelman, R., and Baillargeon, R. 1982. ‘The development of causal reasoning’, in W. Friedman (ed.), The Developmental Psychology of Time, pp. 209–55. London: Academic Press.
64. Carlson, G. 1984. ‘Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation’, Linguistics 22: 259–79.
65. Carroll, M. and von Stutterheim, C. 2003. ‘Typology and information organization: perspective taking and language-specific effects in the construal of events’, in A. G. Ramat (ed.), Typology and Second Language Acquisition, pp. 365–402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
66. Carroll, M., Murcia-Serra, J., Watorek, M., and Bendiscoli, A. 2000. ‘The relevance of information organization to second language acquisition studies: The descriptive discourse of advanced adult learners of German’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(3): 441–66.
67. Carroll, M., Rossdeutscher, A., Lambert, M., and von Stutterheim, C. 2008. ‘Subordination in narratives and macrostructural planning: A comparative point of view’, in C. Fabricius Hansen and W. Ramm (eds.), Subordination versus Coordination in Sentence and Text – Froma Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 161–84. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
68. Carroll, M., Rossdeutscher, A., Lambert, M., and von Stutterheim, C. 1993. ‘The representation of spatial configurations in English and German and the grammatical structure of locative and anaphoric expressions’, Linguistics 31: 1011–41.
69. Casati, R. and Varzi, A. C. 1999. Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Casati, R. and Varzi, A. C. (eds.) 1996. Events. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
71. Cassell, J., McNeill, D., and McCullough, K.-E. 1999. ‘Speech–gesture mismatches: Evidence for one underlying representation of linguistic and nonlinguistic information’, Pragmatics and Cognition 7(1): 1–33.
72. Chafe, W. 1979. ‘The flow of thought and the flow of language’, in T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, pp. 159–81. New York: Academic Press.
73. Chafe, W. 1980. ‘The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative’, in W. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
74. Chafe, W. 1987. ‘Cognitive constraints on information flow’, in R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, pp. 21–51. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
75. Chafe, W. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
76. Chaigneau, S. E. and Barbey, A. K. 2008. ‘Assessing psychological theories of causal meaning and inference’, in B. C. Love, K. McRae, and V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1111–16. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
77. Chatterjee, S. H., Freyd, J. J., and Shiffrar, M. 1996. ‘Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22: 916–29.
78. Cheng, P. W. 1997. ‘From covariation to causation: A causal power theory’, Psychological Review 104: 367–405.
79. Cheng, P. W. and Novick, L. R. 1991. ‘Causes versus enabling conditions’, Cognition 40: 83–120.
80. Cheng, P. W. and Novick, L. R. 1992. ‘Covariation in natural causal induction’, Psychological Review 99: 365–82.
81. Chenu, F. and Jisa, H. 2006. ‘Caused motion constructions and semantic generality in early acquisition of French’, in E. V. Clark and B. F. Kelly (eds.), Constructions in Acquisition, vol. 174, pp. 233–61. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
82. Chierchia, G. 1998a. ‘Reference to kinds across languages’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405.
83. Chierchia, G. 1998b. ‘Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of semantic parameter’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
84. Choi, S., McDonough, M., Bowerman, M., and Mandler, J. 1999. ‘Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean’, Cognitive Development 14(2): 241–68.
85. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
86. Chung, S. and Ladusaw, W. A. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
87. Clahsen, H. 1982. Spracherwerb in der Kindheit: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Narr.
88. Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. 1990. ‘Quotations as demonstrations’, Language 66: 764–805.
89. Clark, H. H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. 1986. ‘Referring as a collaborative process’, Cognition 22(1): 1–39.
90. Clark, H. H., Carpenter, P. A., and Just, M. A. 1973. ‘On the meeting of semantics and perception’, in W. G. Chase (ed.), Visual Information Processing, pp. 311–82. New York: Academic Press.
91. Cohen, C. E. and Ebbesen, E. B. 1979. ‘Observational goals and schema activation: a theoretical framework for behavior perception’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15: 305–29.
92. Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
94. Conditt, M. A., Gandolfo, F., and Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. 1997. ‘The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience’, Journal of Neurophysiology 78: 554–60.
95. Croft, W. 1990. ‘Possible verbs and the structure of events’, in S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, pp. 48–73. London: Routledge.
96. Dahl, Ö. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. Davenport, J. L. and Potter, M. C. 2004. ‘Scene consistency in object and background perception’, Psychological Science 15: 559–64.
98. David, C. 2003. Les “verbs of putting”: Typologie, schéma syntaxiqueet organisation sémantique des constructions prépositionnelles en anglais contemporain. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers.
99. Davidson, D. 1967. ‘The logical form of action sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, pp. 81–95. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
100. Davidson, P. R. and Wolpert, D. M. 2004. ‘Internal models underlying grasp can be additively combined’, Experimental Brain Research 155: 334–40.
101. Davies, J. 1981. Kobon. Lingua Descriptiva Series 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
102. De Ruiter, J. P. 2000. ‘The production of gesture and speech’, in D. McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture: Window into Thought and Action, pp. 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. De Ruiter, J. P. 2007. ‘Postcards from the mind: The relationship between speech, gesture and thought’, Gesture 7(1): 21–38.
104. Delorme, A., Richard, G., and Fabre-Thorpe, M. 2000. ‘Ultra-rapid categorization of natural scenes does not rely on color cues: a study in monkeys and humans’, Vision Research 40: 2187–200.
105. Deringil, S. 2002. ˙Iktidarın Sembolleri ve ˙Ideoloji: II. Abdülhamid Dönemi (1876– 1909), [The symbols of power and ideology: The era of II. Abdülhamid (1876–1909)] ˙Istanbul: Yapi Kredi Press.
106. Deubel, H. and Schneider, W. X. 1996. ‘Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism’, Vision Research 36: 1827–37.
107. Dickinson, C. 2002. Complex predicates in Tsafiki. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
108. Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109. Dobel, C. ms. ‘Interaction of vision and language in the description of action events’. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
110. Dobel, C., Gumnior, H., Bölte, J., and Zwitserlood, P. 2007. ‘Describing scenes hardly seen’, Acta Psychologica 125: 129–43.
111. Dowe, P. 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Dowe, P. 2001. ‘A counterfactual theory of prevention and “causation” by omission’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79: 216–26.
113. Dowe, P. 2007. ‘Causal processes’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu.
114. Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Synthese Language Library. Dordrecht: Reidel.
115. Dowty, D. 1991. ‘Thematic roles and argument selection’, Language 67: 547–619.
116. Du Bois, J. 1987. ‘The discourse basis of ergativity’, Language 63(4): 805–55.
117. Duncan, S. 1996. Grammatical form and ‘thinking-for-speaking’ in Mandarin Chinese and English: An analysis based on speech-accompanying gesture. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.
118. Durie, M. 1997. ‘Grammatical structure in verb serialization’, in A. Alsina, J. Bresnan and P. Sells (eds.), Complex Predicates, pp. 289–354. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
119. Emmorey, K. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
120. Emmorey, K. (ed.) 2003. Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
121. Emmorey, K. and Falgier, B. 1999. ‘Talking about space with space: Describing environments in ASL’, in E.Winston (ed.), Storytelling and Conversation: Discourse in Deaf Communities, pp. 3–26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
122. Engberg-Pedersen, E. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum Press.
123. Engberg-Pedersen, E. 1995. ‘Point of view expressed through shifters’, in K. Emmorey and J. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture and Space, pp. 133–55. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
124. Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C., and Thorpe, S. 2001. ‘A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13: 171–80.
125. Fair, D. 1979. ‘Causation and the flow of energy’, Erkenntnis 14: 219–50.
126. Farr, C. 1999. The Interface Between Syntax and Discourse in Korafe, a Papuan Language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
127. Ferreira, F. 2000. ‘Syntax in language production: An approach using tree-adjoining grammars’, in L. Wheeldon (ed.), Aspects of Language Production, pp. 291–330. London: Psychology Press.
128. von Fieandt, K. and Gibson, J. J. 1959. ‘The sensitivity of the eye to two kinds of continuous transformation of a shadow pattern’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 57: 344–7.
129. Fillmore, C. J. 1968. ‘The case for case’, in E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals of Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–90. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
130. Fillmore, C. J. 1972. ‘Subjects, speakers and roles’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 1–24. Dordrecht: Reidel.
131. Finkbeiner, M., Nicol, J., Greth, D., and Nakamura, K. 2002. ‘The role of language in memory for actions’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31(5): 447–57.
132. Fodor, J. 1970. ‘Three reasons not to derive “kill” from “cause to die”’, Linguistic Inquiry 1: 429–438.
133. Foley, W. and Olson, M. 1985. ‘Clausehood and verb serialization’, in J. Nichols and A. C. Woodbury (eds.), Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause, pp. 17–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Foley, W. and Van Valin, R. D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135. Foot, P. 1967. ‘The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect’, Oxford Review 5: 5–15. Reprinted in B. Steinbock and A. Norcross (eds.), Killing and Letting Die, 2nd edn, pp. 266–79. New York: Fordham University Press.
136. Frey, W. 2000. ‘Über die syntaktische Position des Satztopiks im Deutschen’, Issues on Topics. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 20: 137–72.
137. Freyd, J. J., Pantzer, T. M., and Cheng, J. L. 1988. ‘Representing statics as forces in equilibrium’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117: 395–407.
138. Fridman-Mintz, B. and Liddell, S. K. 1998. ‘Sequencing mental spaces in an ASL narrative’, in J. P. Koenig (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, pp. 255–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
139. Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., and Fitch, W. 2002. ‘Motion events in language and cognition’, Cognition 83(1): 49–79.
140. Gernsbacher, M. A. 1997. ‘Coherence cues mapping during comprehension’, in J. Costermans and M. Fayol (eds.), Processing Interclausal Relationships: Studies in the Production and Comprehension of Text, pp. 3–22. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
141. Givón, T. 1979. ‘From discourse to syntax: grammar as a processing strategy’, in T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, pp. 81–112. New York: Academic Press.
142. Givón, T. 1984. Syntax. A Functional-typological Introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
143. Givón, T. 1990. ‘Verb serialization in Tok Pisin and Kalam: a comparative study of temporal packaging’, in J. Verhaar (ed.), Melanesian Pidgin and Tok Pisin, pp. 19–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
144. Givón, T. 1991a. ‘Serial verbs and event cognition in Kalam: an empirical study of cultural relativity’, in C. Lefebvre (ed.), Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Universal Grammar, pp. 137–84. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
145. Givón, T. 1991b. ‘Serial verbs and the mental reality of “event”’, in E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1, pp. 81–227. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
146. Glanemann, R., 2008. ‘To See or Not to See: Action Scenes Out of the Corner of the Eye’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Münster, http://miami.unimeunster.de/resolver/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-84599565282.
147. Gleitman, L. R. 1990. ‘The structural sources of verb meanings’, Language Acquisition, 1(1): 3–55.
148. Godfrey-Smith, P. forthcoming. ‘Causal pluralism’, in H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, and P. Menzies (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Causation.
149. Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
150. Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
151. Goldman-Eisler, F. 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. New York: Academic Press.
152. Goldstein, E. B. 2002. Sensation and Perception. Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.
153. Goldvarg, E. and Johnson-Laird, P. 2001. ‘Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning’, Cognitive Science 25: 565–610.
154. Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D., Shulz, L., Kushnir, T., and Danks, D. 2004. ‘A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets’, Psychological Review 111: 1–31.
155. Grace, G. 1981. An Essay on Language. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.
156. Grace, G. 1987. The Linguistic Construction of Reality. London/New York/Sydney: Croom Helm.
157. Graham, J. A. and Argyle, M. 1975. ‘A cross-cultural study of the communication of extra-verbal meaning by gestures’, International Journal of Psychology 10(1): 56–67.
158. Green, D. W. 1998. ‘Bilingualism and thought’, Psychologica Belgica 38(3/4): 251–76.
159. Griffin, Z. M. 2001. ‘Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding’, Cognition 82: B1–B14.
160. Griffin, Z. M. 2004. ‘Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production’, in J. M. Henderson and F. Ferreira (eds.), The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World, pp. 213–48. New York: Psychology Press.
161. Griffin, Z. M. and Bock, K. 2000. ‘What the eyes say about speaking’, Psychological Science 4: 274–9.
162. Guariglia, C. and Antonucci, G. 1992. ‘Personal and extrapersonal space: A case of neglect dissociation’, Neuropsychologia 30(11): 1001–9.
163. Gullberg, M. 1998. Gesture as a Communication Strategy in Second Language Discourse. A Study of Learners of French and Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.
164. Gullberg, M. 2003. ‘Gestures, referents, and anaphoric linkage in learner varieties’, in C. Dimroth and M. Starren (eds.), Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition, pp. 311–28. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
165. Gullberg, M. 2006. ‘Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2’, Language Learning 56(1): 155–96.
166. Gullberg, M. 2009. ‘Why gestures are relevant to the multilingual mental lexicon’, in A. Pavlenko (ed.), The Multilingual Mental Lexicon, pp. 161–84. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. ms. ‘What learners mean. Gestures and semantic reorganisation of placement verbs in advanced second language production’.
167. Gullberg, M. and Burenhult, N. forthcoming. ‘Probing the linguistic encoding of placement and removal events in Swedish’, in A. Kopecka and B. Narasimhan (eds.), Events of “putting” and “taking”: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
168. Gullberg, M. and Narasimhan, B. 2010. ‘What gestures reveal about the development of Dutch children’s placement verbs’, Cognitive Linguistics 21: 239–62.
169. Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.) 1996a. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
170. Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. 1996b. ‘Introduction: Linguistic relativity reexamined’, in J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, pp. 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Hall, N. 2004. ‘Two concepts of causation’, in J. Collins, N. Hall, and L. Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals, pp. 225–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
172. Hansson, K. and Bruce, B. 2002. ‘Verbs of placement in Swedish children with SLI’, International Journal of Communication Disorders 37(4): 401–14.
173. Hard, B. M., Recchia, G., and Tversky, B. ms. ‘The shape of action’.
174. Hard, B. M., Tversky, B., and Lang, D. S. 2006. ‘Making sense of abstract events: Building event schemas’, Memory and Cognition 34: 1221–35.
175. Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, L. (eds.) 1997. Color Categories in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
176. Hasegawa, Y. 1996. ‘A study of Japanese clause linkage: the connectiveTEin Japanese’, Studies in Japanese Linguistics 5. Stanford: CSLI.
177. Hayashi, A. 2003. Lexicalization of motion events in Japanese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
178. Hazout, I. 2004. ‘The syntax of existential constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 393–430.
179. Heeschen, V. 2001. ‘Event-formulas: sentences as minimal narratives’, in A. Pawley, M. Ross, and D. Tryon (eds.), The Boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian Linguistics in Honour of Tom Dutton, pp. 155–73. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
180. Hegarty, M. 2004. ‘Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation’, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 8: 280–5.
181. Heider, F. and Simmel, M. 1944. ‘An experimental study of apparent behavior’, American Journal of Psychology 57: 243–59.
182. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreira, F. 2004a. ‘Scene perception for psycholinguists’, in J. M. Henderson and F. Ferreira (eds.), The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual Word, pp. 1–58. New York: Psychology Press.
183. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreira, F. (eds.) 2004b. The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual Word. New York: Psychology Press.
184. Hetzron, H. 1975. ‘The presentative movement, or why the ideal word order is V.S.O.P.’, in C. N. Li (ed.), Word Order and Word Order Change, pp. 345–88. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
185. Heuer, H. and Keele, S. W. (eds.) 1996. Handbook of Perception and Action, vol. 2: Motor Skills. London: Academic Press.
186. Hickmann, M. 2007. ‘Static and dynamic location in French: Developmental and crosslinguistic perspectives’, in M. Aurnague, M. Hickmann, and L. Vieu (eds.), The Categorization of Spatial Entities in Language and Cognition, pp. 205–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
187. Hickmann, M. and Hendriks, H. 2006. ‘Static and dynamic location in French and English’, First Language 26(1): 103–35.
188. Higginbotham, J. 2000. ‘On events in linguistic semantics’, in J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of Events, pp. 49–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
189. Higginbotham, J., Pianesi, F., and Varzi, A. C. 2000. Speaking of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
190. Hinder, M. R. and Milner, T. E. 2003. ‘The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement’, Journal of Physiology 549: 953–63.
191. Hitchcock, C. 2001. ‘The intransitivity of causation revealed in equations and graphs’, Journal of Philosophy 98: 273–99.
192. Hitchcock, C. 2002. ‘Probabilistic causation’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-probabilistic/
193. Hoffman, D. D. 2000. Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
194. Hoffman, D. D. and Richards, W. A. 1984. ‘Parts of recognition’, Cognition 18: 65–96.
195. Hoffman, J. E. and Subramaniam, B. 1995. ‘The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements’, Perception and Psychophysics 57: 787–95.
196. Holler, J. and Beattie, G. 2003. ‘Pragmatic aspects of representational gestures. Do speakers use them to clarify verbal ambiguity for the listener?’, Gesture 3(2): 127–54.
197. Hollingworth, A. and Henderson, J. 1998. ‘Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception?’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127: 398–415.
198. Hume, D. 1978 (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd edn, revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
199. Imamizu, H., Uno, Y., and Kawato, M. 1995. ‘Internal representations of the motor apparatus: Implications from generalization in visuomotor learning’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21: 1174–98.
200. Irwin, D. E. 1992. ‘Memory for position and identity across eye movements’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 307–17.
201. Irwin, D. E. and Gordon, R. D. 1998. ‘Eye movements, attention and trans-saccadic memory’, Visual Cognition 5: 127–55.
202. Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
203. Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
204. Jenkins, J. J., Wald, J., and Pittenger, J. B. 1986. ‘Apprehending pictorial events’, in V. McCabe and G. J. Balzano (eds.), Event Cognition: An Ecological Perspective, pp. 117–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
205. Jespersen, O. 1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, vol. VI: Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
206. Johansson, G. 1973. ‘Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis’, Perception and Psychophysics 14: 201–11.
207. Johansson, G. 1975. ‘Visual motion perception’, Scientific American 232(6): 76–88.
208. Kamp, H. 1979. ‘Events, instants and temporal reference’, in R. Bauerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, pp. 27–54. Berlin: Springer.
209. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
210. Kaufman, L. 1974. Sight and Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
211. Kawato, M. 1999. ‘Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9: 718–27.
212. Kay, P. and Kempton, W. 1984. ‘What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?’, American Anthropologist 86(1): 65–79.
213. Kellerman, E. 1995. ‘Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere?’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15: 125–50.
214. Kelly, S. D., Barr, D. J., Breckinridge Church, R., and Lynch, K. 1999. ‘Offering a hand to pragmatic understanding: The role of speech and gesture in comprehension and memory’, Journal of Memory and Language 40(4): 577–92.
215. Kemmer, S. and A. Verhagen 1994. ‘The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events’, Cognitive Linguistics 5: 115–56.
216. Kendon, A. 1980. ‘Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance’, in M. R. Key (ed.), The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, pp. 207–27. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
217. Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
218. Kita, S. 1999. ‘Japanese enter/exit verbs without motion semantics’, Studies in Language 23(2): 307–30.
219. Kita, S. and Özyürek, A. 2003. ‘What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking’, Journal of Memory and Language 48(1): 16–32.
220. Kita, S., van Gijn, I., and van der Hulst, H. 1998. ‘Movement phases in signs and cospeech gestures, and their transcription by human coders’, in I. Wachsmuth and M. Fröhlich (eds.), Gesture and Sign Language in Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 23–35. Berlin: Springer.
221. Klein, W. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.
222. Klein, W. 2006. ‘On finiteness’, in V. van Geenhoven (ed.), Semantics in Acquisition, pp. 245–72. Dordrecht: Springer.
223. Klein, W., Li, P., and Hendricks, H. 2000. ‘Aspect and assertion inMandarin Chinese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 723–70.
224. Kopecka, A. and Narasimhan, B. (eds.) forthcoming. Events of “putting” and “taking”: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
225. Kosslyn, S. M. 1980. Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
226. Krauss, R. K., Chen, Y., and Gottesman, R. F. 2000. ‘Lexical gestures and lexical access: a process model’, in D. McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture, pp. 261–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
227. Kreysa, H., Glanemann, R., Bölte, J., Zwitserlood, P., and Dobel, C. ms. ‘Where is the action? An eyetracking study on the description of photorealistic events’.
228. Krifka, M. 1998. ‘The origins of telicity’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
229. Kruschke, J. K. and Fragassi, M. M. 1996. ‘The perception of causality: Feature binding in interacting objects’, in G. W. Cottrell (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 441–6. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
230. Küntay, A. and Slobin, D. I. 1996. ‘Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition’, in D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, and J. Guo (eds.), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, pp. 265–86. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
231. Kurby, C. A., Zacks, J. M., Shriver, S., Mehta, R., and Brewer, S. 2008. ‘Event memory and hierarchical segmentation in younger and older adults’, Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
232. Kurtzer, I., Herter, T. M., and Scott, S. H. 2005. ‘Random change in cortical load representation suggests distinct control of posture and movement’, Nature Neuroscience 8: 498–504.
233. La Heij, W. 2005. ‘Selection processes in monolingual and bilingual lexical access’, in J. F. Kroll and A. M. De Groot (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism. Psycholinguistic Approaches, pp. 289–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
234. Labov, W. 1973. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
235. Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
236. Lane, J. 2007. Kalam Serial Verb Constructions. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
237. Lascarides, A. 1992. ‘Knowledges, causality, and temporal representation’, Linguistics 30(5): 941–73.
238. Lemmens, M. 2002a. ‘The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs’, in J. Newman (ed.), The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying, pp. 103–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
239. Lemmens, M. 2002b. ‘Tracing referent location in oral picture descriptions’, in A. Wilson, P. Rayson and T. McEnery (eds.), A Rainbow of Corpora. Corpus Linguistics and the Languages of the World, pp. 73–85. München: Lincom-Europa.
240. Lemmens, M. 2006. ‘Caused posture: experiential patterns emerging from corpus research’, in A. Stefanowitsch and S. Gries (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, pp. 263–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
241. Leslie, A. M. 1984. ‘Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants’, Perception 13: 287–305.
242. Leslie, A. M. and Keeble S. 1987. ‘Do six-month-old infants perceive causality?’, Cognition 25: 265–88.
243. Lesser, H. 1977. ‘The growth of perceived causality in children’, The Journal of Genetic Psychology 130: 145–52.
244. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
245. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. S. 1999. ‘A theory of lexical access in speech production’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1–75.
246. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
247. Levin, B. 2007. ‘The lexical semantics of verbs I: Introduction’, 2007 Summer Institute of Linguistics at Stanford University, manuscript handout.
248. Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. 1994. ‘A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English’, Lingua 92: 35–77.
249. Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
250. Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. 1996. ‘From lexical semantics to argument realization’, in H. Borer (ed.), Handbook of Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
251. Levinson, S. C. 1996. ‘Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence’, in P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Space and Language, pp. 109–69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
252. Levinson, S. C. 2000. ‘Yélî dnye and the theory of basic color terms’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10: 3–55.
253. Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
254. Levinson, S. C., Meira, S., and the Language and Cognition Group 2003. ‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: an exercise in semantic typology’, Language 79(3): 485–516.
255. Levinson, S. C. and Wilkins, D. P. 2006a. ‘The background to the study of the language of space’, in S. C. Levinson and D. P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of Space. Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, pp. 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
256. Levinson, S. C. and Wilkins, D. P. (eds.) 2006b. Grammars of Space: Towards a Semantic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
257. Levy, E. T. and McNeill, D. 1992. ‘Speech, gesture, and discourse’, Discourse Processes 15(3): 277–301.
258. Lewis, D. 1973. ‘Causation’, Journal of Philosophy 70: 556–67.
259. Lewis, D. 1986. On The Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
260. Lewis, D. 2000. ‘Causation as influence’, Journal of Philosophy 97: 182–97.
261. Li, F. F., Van Rullen, R., Koch, C., and Perona, P. 2002. ‘Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99: 9596–601.
262. Liddell, S. K. 1994. ‘Tokens and surrogates’, in I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman, and M. Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Structure. Papers from the 5th International Symposium on Sign Language Research held in Salamanca, Spain, May 25–30, 1992, vol. 1, pp. 105–19. Durham: Isla.
263. Liddell, S. K. 1995. ‘Real, surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL’, in K. Emmorey and J. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space, pp. 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
264. Liddell, S. K. 2003. Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
265. Liddell, S. K. and Metzger, M. 1998. ‘Gesture in sign language discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics 30: 657–97.
266. Lillo-Martin, D. 1995. ‘The point of view predicate in American Sign Language’, in K. Emmorey and J. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space, pp. 155–70. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
267. Lillo-Martin, D. and Klima, E. 1990. ‘Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory’, in S. Fischer and P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, vol. 1, pp. 191–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
268. Livengood, J. and Machery, E. 2007. ‘The folk probably don’t think what you think they think: Experiments on causation by absence’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31: 107–27.
269. Loftus, E. 1980 [1996]. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
270. Lucy, J. A. 1992. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
271. Lucy, J. A. and Gaskins, S. 2001. ‘Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach’, in S. C. Levinson and M. Bowerman (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, pp. 257–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
272. Luhtala, A. 2002. ‘On definitions in ancient grammar’, in P. Swiggers and A.Wouters (eds.), Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity, pp. 257–85. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.
273. Mackie, J. L. 1974. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
274. Majid, A., Staden, M. von, Boster, J., and Bowerman, M. 2004. ‘Event categorization: A cross-linguistic perspective’, in K. Forbus, D. Gentner, and T. Regier (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 885–90. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
275. Majnep, I. S. and Bulmer, R. 1983. ‘Some food plants in our Kalam forests’, Department of Anthropology Working Papers no. 63, University of Auckland.
276. Majnep, I. S. and Bulmer, R. 1990. Aps basd skop kmn ak pakñbelgpal. Kalam hunting traditions, Vols 1–6, ed. by A. Pawley. University of Auckland. Department of AnthropologyWorking Papers nos. 85–90.
277. Majnep, I. S. and Bulmer, R. n.d. Kalam hunting traditions. Department of Anthropology Working Papers nos. 7–12, ed. by A. Pawley. Printout. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
278. Majnep, I. S. and Pawley, A. n.d. Kalam plant lore. Computer printout. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
279. Mandel, D. R. and Lehman, D. R. 1996. ‘Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 450–63.
280. Margetts, A. and Austin, P. 2007. ‘Three-participant events in the languages of the world: towards a cross-linguistic typology’, Linguistics 45: 393–451.
281. Matsumoto, Y. 2003. ‘Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations’, in S. Chiba (ed.), Empirical and Theoretical Investigations into Language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita, pp. 403–18. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
282. Mayberry, R. I. and Jaques, J. 2000. ‘Gesture production during stuttered speech: insights into the nature of gesture–speech integration’, in D. McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture, pp. 199–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
283. Mayberry, R. I. and Nicoladis, E. 2000. ‘Gesture reflects language development: Evidence from bilingual children’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 9(6): 192–6.
284. Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.
285. McCabe, V. and Balzano, G. J. (eds.) 1986. Event Cognition: An Ecological Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
286. McClave, E. 2001. ‘The relationship between spontaneous gestures of the hearing and American Sign Language’. Gesture 1:1, 51–72.
287. McDonald, B. H. 1982. Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
288. McGrath, S. 2003. ‘Causation and the making/allowing distinction’, Philosophical Studies 114: 81–106.
289. McGrath, S. 2005. ‘Causation by omission: A dilemma’, Philosophical Studies 123: 125–48.
290. McMahan, J. 1993. ‘Killing, letting die, and withdrawing aid’, Ethics 103: 250–79.
291. McNally, L. 2009. ‘Properties, entity correlates of properties, and existentials’, in A. Giannakidou and M. Rathert (eds.), Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization, pp. 163–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
292. McNeill, D. 1985. ‘So you think gestures are nonverbal?’, Psychological Review 92(3): 271–95.
293. McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
294. McNeill, D. 2000a. ‘Analogic/Analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking’, Cognitive Linguistics 11(1/2): 43–60.
295. McNeill, D. 2000b. ‘Growth points, catchments, and contexts’, Cognitive Studies. Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society 7(1): 22–36.
296. McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
297. McNeill, D. and Duncan, S. D. 2000. ‘Growth points in thinking-for-speaking’, in D. McNeill (ed.), Language and Gesture, pp. 141–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
298. McNeill, D. and Levy, E. T. 1982. ‘Conceptual representations in language activity and gesture’, in R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, pp. 271–95. Chichester: John Wiley.
299. McNeill, D., Levy, E. T., and Cassell, J. 1993. ‘Abstract deixis’, Semiotica 95(1/2): 5–19.
300. Meier, R. P. 2002. ‘Why different, why the same?’, in R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, D. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, pp. 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
301. Melinger, A. and Levelt, W. J. M. 2004. ‘Gesture and the communicative intention of the speaker’, Gesture 4(2): 119–41.
302. Menzies, P. 2004. ‘Difference-making in context’, in J. Collins, N. Hall, and L. Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals, pp. 139–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
303. Metzger, M. 1995. ‘Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language’, in C. Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, pp. 255–71. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.
304. van der Meulen, F. F. 2001. Moving Eyes and Naming Objects. MPI series in psycholinguistics. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute.
305. Meyer, A. S. 2004. ‘The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation’, in J. M. Henderson and F. Ferreira (eds.), The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action, pp. 191–212. Hove: Psychology Press.
306. Meyer, A. S. and Dobel, C. 2003. ‘Application of eye tracking in speech production research’, in J. Hyönä, R. Radach, and H. Deubel (eds.), The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, pp. 253–72. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
307. Meyer, A. S. and van der Meulen, F. F. 2000. ‘Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7: 314–19.
308. Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., and Levelt, W. J. M. 1998. ‘Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production’, Cognition 66: B25–B33.
309. Michotte, A. E. 1963 [1946]. The Perception of Causality. New York: Basic Books.
310. Michotte, A. E. and Thinés, G. 1963. ‘La causalité perceptive [Perceptual causality]’, Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 60: 9–36. Reprinted [1991] in G. Thin`es, A. Costall and G. Butterworth (eds.), Michotte’s Experimental Phenomenology of Perception, pp. 66–87. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (English translation by the editors.)
311. Miles, M. 2000. ‘Signing in the Seraglio: Mutes, dwarfs and gestures at the Ottoman Court 1500–1700’, Disability & Society 15(1): 115–34.
312. Milner, T. E. and Franklin, D. W. 2005. ‘Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans’, Journal of Physiology 567: 651–64.
313. Milner, T. E., Franklin, D.W., Imamizu, H., and Kawato, M. 2007. ‘Central control of grasp: Manipulation of objectswith complex and simple dynamics’, Neuroimage 36: 388–95.
314. Morgan, G. 1999. ‘Event packaging inBSL discourse’, in E.Winston (ed.), Storytelling and Conversation: Discourse in Deaf Communities, pp. 27–58. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
315. Morgan, J. L. and Meyer, A. S. 2005. ‘Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 31: 428–42.
316. Morrison, J. B. and Tversky, B. 2005. ‘Bodies and their parts’, Memory and Cognition, 33: 696–709.
317. Müller, C. 1994. ‘Semantic structure of motional gestures and lexicalization patterns in Spanish and German descriptions of motion-events’, in K. Beals, J. M. Denton, R. Knippen, L. Melnar, H. Suzuki, andE. Zeinfeld (eds.), Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. The main session, vol. 30, pp. 281–95. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
318. Müller, C. 1998. Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte-Theorie-Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH.
319. Naigles, L. R. and Hoff-Ginsberg, E. 1998. ‘Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children’s early verb use’, Journal of Child Language 25: 95–120.
320. Naigles, L. R. and Terrazas, P. 1998. ‘Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax’, Psychological Science 9(5): 363–9.
321. Naigles, L. R., Eisenberg, A. R., Kako, E. T., Highter, M., and McGraw, N. 1998.
322. ‘Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish’, Language & Cognitive Processes 13(5): 521–49.
323. Narasimhan, B. and Brown, P. 2008. ‘Getting the INSIDE story: Learning to talk about containment in Tzeltal and Hindi’, in V. C. Mueller Gathercole (ed.), Routes to Language: Studies in Honor of Melissa Bowerman, pp. 97–132. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
324. Narasimhan, B. and Gullberg, M. 2006. ‘Perspective-shifts in event descriptions in Tamil child language’, Journal of Child Language 33(1): 99–124.
325. Narasimhan, B. and Gullberg, M. 2010. ‘The role of input frequency and semantic transparency in the acquisition of verb meaning: evidence from placement verbs in Tamil and Dutch.’ Journal of Child Language doi: 10.1017/S0305 00091 0000164.
326. Narasimhan, B., Eisenbeiß, S., and Brown, P. 2007a. ‘Two’s company, more is a crowd: the linguistic encoding of multiple-participant events’, Linguistics 45(3): 383–92.
327. Narasimhan, B., Eisenbeiß, S., and Brown, P. (eds.) 2007b. ‘Special issue on the linguistic encoding of multiple-participant events’, Linguistics 45(3): 383–681.
328. Neumann, O. and Sanders, A. F. (eds.) 1996. Handbook of Perception and Action, vol. 3: Attention. London: Academic Press.
329. Newman, J. 2002a. ‘A cross-linguistic overview of the posture verbs “sit”, “stand”, and “lie”’, in J. Newman (ed.), The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying, pp. 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
330. Newman, J. (ed.). 2002b. The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
331. Newman, J. and Rice, S. 2004. ‘Patterns of usage for English SIT, STAND, and LIE: A cognitively inspired exploration in corpus linguistics’, Cognitive Linguistics 15(3): 351–96.
332. Newport, E. and Supalla, T. 2000. ‘Sign language research at the millennium’, in K. Emmorey and H. Lane (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited. An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, pp. 103–14. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
333. Newtson, D. 1973. ‘Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28(1): 28–38.
334. Newtson, D. and Engquist, G. 1976. ‘The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 12(5): 436–50.
335. Nyst, V. 2004. ‘Verb series of non-agentive motion in Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana)’, poster presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 8, held in Barcelona, Spain, Sept. 30–Oct. 2, 2004.
336. Nyst, V. 2007. A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
337. Oakes, L. M. 1994. ‘The development of infants’ use of continuity cues in their perception of causality’, Developmental Psychology 30: 869–79.
338. Odlin, T. 2005. ‘Crosslinguistic influence and conceptual transfer: What are the concepts?’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 3–25.
339. Oh, K. J. 2003. Language, cognition, and development: motion events in English and Korean. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
340. Ohta, K. and Laboissiére, R. 2006. ‘Underlying principles of trajectory formation for human movement in dynamical environments’, International Congress Series 1291: 97–100.
341. Oliva, A. and Torralba, A. 2001. ‘Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope’, International Journal of Computer Vision 42: 145–75.
342. Oliva, A., Wolfe, J. M., and Arsenio, H. C. 2004. ‘Panoramic search: the interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30: 1132–46.
343. Ö zyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S. E. M., Furman, R., and Brown, A. 2005. ‘How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic variations and similarities’, Gesture 5(1/2): 219–40.
344. Özyürek, A., Willems, R. M., Kita, S., and Hagoort, P. 2007. ‘On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 605–16.
345. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., and Chase, P. 1981. ‘Canonical perspective and the perception of objects’, in J. B. Long and A. D. Baddeley (eds.), Attention and Performance, IX, pp. 135–51. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
346. Papafragou, A., Massey, C., and Gleitman, L. 2002. ‘Shake, rattle, ’n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition’, Cognition 84(2): 189–219.
347. Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., and McIntyre, J. 2005. ‘Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity’, Neuroscience 135: 371–83.
348. Parsons, P. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
349. Pauwels, P. 2000. Put, Set, Lay and Place: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Verbal Meaning. München: Lincom Europa.
350. Pavlenko, A. 1999. ‘New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3): 209–30.
351. Pawley, A. 1987. ‘Encoding events in Kalam and English: different logics for reporting experience’, in R. S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, pp. 329–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
352. Pawley, A. 1993. ‘A language which defies description by ordinary means’, in W. Foley (ed.), The Role of Theory in Language Description, pp. 87–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
353. Pawley, A. 2008. ‘Compact versus narrative serial verb constructions in Kalam’, in G. Senft (ed.), Serial Verb Constructions in Austronesian and Papuan Languages, pp. 171–202. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
354. Pawley, A. and Bulmer, R. 2003. A Dictionary of Kalam with Ethnographic Notes. Printout. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
355. Pawley, A. and Lane, J. 1998. ‘From event sequence to grammar: serial verb constructions in Kalam’, in A. Siewierska and S. J. Jung (eds.), Case, Typology and Grammar, pp. 201–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
356. Pawley, A. and Syder, F. 1983. ‘Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency’, in J. Richards and R. Schmidt (eds.), Language and Communication, pp. 191–225. London: Longman.
357. Pawley, A. and Syder, F. 2000. ‘The one clause at a time hypothesis’, in H. Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on Fluency, pp. 163–99. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
358. Pederson, E. 1995. ‘Language as context, language as means: Spatial cognition and habitual language use’, Cognitive Linguistics 6(1): 33–62.
359. Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Senft, G., and Wilkins, D. P. 1998. ‘Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization’, Language 74(3): 557–89.
360. Penfield, W. and Rasmussen, T. 1950. The Cerebral Cortex of Man. New York: Macmillan.
361. Perniss, P. 2007a. ‘Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: the use of classifiers and perspective’, Lingua 117: 1315–38.
362. Perniss, P. 2007b. ‘Locative functions of simultaneous perspective constructions in German Sign Language narratives’, in M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson, and O. Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function, pp. 27–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
363. Perniss, P. and Özyürek, A. 2004. ‘Differences in the expressions of spatial relationships in German (DGS) and Turkish (T˙ID) sign languages’, poster presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 8, held in Barcelona, Spain, Sept. 30–Oct. 2, 2004.
364. Perniss, P. and Özyürek, A. 2008. ‘Representations of action, motion and location in sign space: A comparison of German (DGS) and Turkish (T˙ID) sign language narratives’, in J. Quer (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR8. Hamburg: Signum Press.
365. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. 1956. The Child’s Conception of Space. London: Routledge.
366. Pianesi, F. and Varzi, A. C. 2000. ‘Events and event talk: An introduction’, in J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of Events, pp. 3–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
367. Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
368. Posner, M. I. 1980. ‘Orienting of attention’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32: 3–25.
369. Potter, M.C. 1975. ‘Meaning in visual search’, Science 187: 965–6.
370. Potter, M. C. and Levi, E. I. 1969. ‘Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 81: 10–15.
371. Prinz, W. 1997. ‘Perception and action planning’, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9: 129–54.
372. Prinz, W. and Bridgeman, B. (eds.) 1995. Handbook of Perception and Action, vol. 1: Perception. London: Academic Press.
373. Pulvermüller, F. 2005. ‘Brain mechanisms linking language and action’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(7): 576–82.
374. Rayner, K. 1998. ‘Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research’, Psychological Bulletin 124: 372–422.
375. Reinhart, T. 2002. ‘The theta system: An overview’, Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–90.
376. Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Emken, J. L., and Crammer, S. C. 2004. ‘Robotics, motor learning, and neurological recovery’, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 6: 497–525.
377. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., and Boyes-Braem, P. 1976. ‘Basic objects in natural categories’, Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439.
378. Rothstein, S. (ed.) 1998a. Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
379. Rothstein, S. (ed.) 1998b. ‘Introduction’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 1–11. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
380. Russell, B. 1936. ‘On order in time’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 32: 216–28.
381. Russell, B. 1948. Human Knowledge. New York: Simon and Schuster.
382. Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
383. Sachs, J. 1983. ‘Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced reference in parent–child discourse’, in K. E. Nelson (ed.), Children’s Language, vol. 4, pp. 1–28. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
384. Sakel, J. 2004. A Grammar of Mosetén. Berlin: de Gruyter.
385. Salmon, W. 1994. ‘Causality without counterfactuals’, Philosophy of Science 61: 297–312.
386. Salmon, W. 1998. Causality and Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
387. Sasse, H.-J. 2002. ‘Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non progressive state?’, Linguistic Typology 6(2): 199–271.
388. Schaffer, J. 2000. ‘Causation by disconnection’, Philosophy of Science 67: 285–300.
389. Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
390. Schembri, A. 2003. ‘Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages’, in K. Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, pp. 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
391. Schick, B. S. 1990. ‘Classifier predicates in American Sign Language’, International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1(1): 15–40.
392. Schlottman, A. and Anderson, N. H. 1993. ‘An information integration approach to phenomenal causality’, Memory and Cognition 21(6): 785–801.
393. Scholl, B. J. and Tremoulet, P. D. 2000. ‘Perceptual causality and animacy’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 299–309.
394. Schulz, L., Kushnir, T., and Gopnik, A. 2007. ‘Learning from doing: Intervention and causal inference’, in A. Gopnick and L. Schulz (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation, pp. 67–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
395. Schwartz, D. L. 1999. ‘Physical imagery: kinematic versus dynamic models’, Cognitive Psychology 38: 433–64.
396. Schwartz, D. L. and Black, J. B. 1996. ‘Analog imagery in mental model reasoning: Depictive models’, Cognitive Psychology 30: 154–219.
397. Serra Borneto, C. 1996. ‘Liegen and stehen in German: A study in horizontality and verticality’, in E. H. Casad (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods, pp. 459–505. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
398. Seyfeddinipur, M. 2006. Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
399. Shadmehr R. and Mussa-Ivaldi F. A. 1994. ‘Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task’, Journal of Neuroscience 14: 3208–24.
400. Shibatani, M. 1976a. The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York: Academic Press.
401. Shibatani, M. 1976b. ‘The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus’, in M. Shibatani
402. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, pp. 1–40. New York: Academic Press.
403. Shultz, T. R. 1982. ‘Rules of causal attribution’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 47: 1–51.
404. Sinha, C. and Kuteva, T. 1995. ‘Distributed spatial semantics’, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18(2): 167–99.
405. Slobin, D. I. 1987. ‘Thinking for speaking’, Berkeley Linguistic Society, BLS 13: 435–54.
406. Slobin, D. I. 1991. ‘Learning to think for speaking’, Pragmatics 1: 7–25.
407. Slobin, D. I. 1996a. ‘From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”’, in J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, pp. 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
408. Slobin, D. I. 1996b. ‘Twoways to travel:Verbs of motion in English and Spanish’, in M. Shibatani and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, pp. 70–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
409. Slobin, D. I. 2000. ‘Verbalized events: a dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism’, in S. Niemeier and R. Dirven (eds.), Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, pp. 107–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
410. Slobin, D. I. 2003. ‘Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity’, in D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, pp. 157–91. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
411. Slobin, D. I. 2004. ‘How people move. Discourse effects of linguistic typology’, in C. L.
412. Moder and A. Martinovic-Zic (eds.), Discourse Across Languages and Cultures, pp. 195–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
413. Slobin, D. I. 2006. ‘What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations of linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition’, in M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, pp. 59–81. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
414. Sloman, S. A. 2005. Causal Models: How People Think about the World and its Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
415. Sloman, S. A., Barbey, K. A., and Hotaling, J. M. 2009. ‘A causal model theory of the meaning of cause, enable, and prevent’, Cognitive Science 33: 21–50.
416. Smith, C. S. 1978. ‘Jespersen’s “move and change” class and causative verbs in English’, in M. A. Jazayery, E. C. Palome, and W. Winter (eds.), Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, vol. 2: Descriptive Linguistics, pp. 101–9. The Hague: Mouton.
417. Smith, C. S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
418. Song, G. 1996. ‘Causation, adicity and lexical aspect’, in M. Przezdziecki and L. Whaley (eds.), ESCOL ’95, pp. 299–307. Ithaca, NY: CLC.
419. Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A. T., and Woodward, A. L. 1995. ‘Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action’, in D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A. Premack (eds.), Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, pp. 44–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
420. Spellman, B. A. and Mandel, D. R. 1999. ‘When possibility informs reality: Counterfactual thinking as a cue to causality’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 8: 120–3.
421. Spellman, B. A., Kincannon, A. P., and Stose, S. J. 2005. ‘The relation between counterfactual and causal reasoning’, in D. R. Mandel, D. J. Hilton, and P. Catellani
422. Spellman, B. A., Kincannon, A. P., and Stose, S. J. (eds.), The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, pp. 28–43. London: Routledge Research.
423. van Staden, M. and Reesink, G. 2008. ‘A functional approach to verb serialization’, in G. Senft (ed.), Serial Verb Constructions in Austronesian and Papuan Languages, pp. 17–54. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
424. van Staden, M., Bowerman, M., and Verhelst, M. 2006. ‘Some properties of spatial description in Dutch’, in S. C. Levinson and D. P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of Space. Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, pp. 475–511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
425. van Staden, M., Senft, G., Enfield, N., and Bohnemeyer, J. 2001. ‘Staged events’, in N. Enfield (ed.), ‘Manual’ for the Field Season 2001, pp. 115–25. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
426. Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.
427. von Stutterheim, C. and Klein, W. 2002. ‘Quaestio and L-perspectivation’, in C. F. Graumann and W. Kallmeyer (eds.), Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse, pp. 59–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
428. von Stutterheim, C. and Nüse, R. 2003. ‘Processes of conceptualisation in language production’, Linguistics (Special Issue: Perspectives in language production), 41: 851–81.
429. von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M., and Klein, W. 2003. ‘Two ways of construing complex temporal structures’, in F. Lenz (ed.), Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person, pp. 97–133. Berlin: de Gruyter.
430. von Stutterheim, C., Nüse, R., and Murcia-Serra, J. 2002. ‘Cross-linguistic differences in the conceptualization of events’, in H. Hasselg°ard, S. Johansson, B. Behrens, and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), Information Structure in a Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 179–98. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
431. Supalla, T. 1986. ‘The classifier system in American Sign Language’, in C. Craig (ed.), Noun Classification and Categorization, pp. 181–213. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
432. Supalla, T. and Webb, R. 1995. ‘The grammar of international sign’, in K. Emmorey and J. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space, pp. 333–54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
433. Talmy, L. 1985. ‘Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms’, in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
434. Talmy, L. 1988. ‘Force dynamics in language and cognition’, Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.
435. Talmy, L. 1991. ‘Path to realization:Atypology of event conflation’, Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 480–520.
436. Talmy, L. 2000a. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
437. Talmy, L. 2000b. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
438. Talmy, L. 2003a. ‘Concept structuring systems in language’, in M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language.Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 2, pp. 15–46. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
439. Talmy, L. 2003b. ‘The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language’, in K. Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, pp. 169–96. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
440. Talmy, L. 2008. ‘Aspects of attention in language’, in N. C. Ellis and P. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, pp. 27–38. London: Routledge.
441. Taylor, H. A. and Tversky, B. 1992. ‘Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions’, Journal of Memory and Language 31: 261–82.
442. Tenny, C. and Pustejovsky, J. 2000. ‘A history of events in linguistic theory’, in C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, pp. 3–37. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
443. Thinés, G., Costall, A., and Butterworth, G. 1991. Michotte’s Experimental Phenomenology of Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
444. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., and Marlot, C. 1996. ‘Speed of processing in the human visual system’, Nature 381: 520–2.
445. Thorpe, S., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Fabre-Thorpe, M., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2001. ‘Detection of animals in natural images using far peripheral vision’, European Journal of Neuroscience 14: 869–76.
446. Tomlin, R. S. 1997. ‘Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: the role of attention in grammar’, in J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (eds.), Language and Conceptualization, pp. 162–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
447. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. 1980. ‘A feature-integration theory of attention’, Cognitive Psychology 12: 97–136.
448. Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K. 1984. ‘Objects, parts, and categories’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 169–93.
449. Tversky, B. and Tuchin, M. 1989. ‘A reconciliation of evidence on eyewitness testimony: Comments on McCloskey and Zaragoza (1985)’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 86–91.
450. Tversky, B., Lee, P., and Zacks, J. M. 2004. ‘Events by hand and feet’, Spatial Cognition and Computation 4: 5–14.
451. Tversky, B., Zacks, J. M., and Hard, B. M. 2008. ‘The structure of experience’, in T. Shipley and J. M. Zacks (eds.), Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events, pp. 436–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
452. Van Oosten, J. 1984. ‘Sitting, standing and lying in Dutch: A cognitive approach to the distribution of the verbs zitten, staan, and liggen’, in J. van Oosten and J. Snapper (eds.), Dutch Linguistics at Berkeley, pp. 137–60. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.
453. Van Rullen, R. and Thorpe, S. J. 2001. ‘The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13: 454–61.
454. VanValin, R. D. Jr. and LaPolla, R. J. 1997. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
455. Vendler, Z. 1957. ‘Verbs and times’, Philosophical Review 56: 143–60.
456. Verfaillie, K. and Daems, A. 1996. ‘The priority of the agent in visual event perception: On the cognitive basis of grammatical agent–patient asymmetries’, Cognitive Linguistics 7(2): 131–47.
457. Verhagen, A. and Kemmer, S. 1997. ‘Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch’, Journal of Pragmatics 27: 61–82.
458. Vogel, H. 1999. ‘Geschichte der Gehörlosenbildung’, in A. Beecken, J. Keller, S. Prillwitz, and H. Zienert (eds.), Grundkurs Deutsche Gebärdensprache, Stufe I, Arbeitsbuch, pp. 46–9. Hamburg: Signum Press.
459. Volterra, V., Caselli, M. C., Capirci, O., and Pizzuto, E. 2005. ‘Gesture and the emergence and development of language’, in M. Tomasello and D. I. Slobin (eds.), Beyond Nature–Nurture: Essays in Honor of Elizabeth Bates, pp. 3–40. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
460. Warren, W. H. Jr. and Shaw, R. E. (eds.) 1985. Persistence and Change. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Event Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
461. Weinstein, S. 1968. ‘Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality’, in D. R. Kenshalo (ed.), The Skin Senses, pp. 195–222. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
462. White, P. A. 1999. ‘Towards a causal realist theory of causal understanding’, American Journal of Psychology 112: 605–42.
463. White, P. A. 2006. ‘Theoretical notes: A causal asymmetry’, Psychological Review 113: 132–47.
464. Whorf, B. L. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality, ed. by J. B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
465. Wierzbicka, A. 1980. Lingua Mentalis. Sydney: Academic Press.
466. Wolfe, J. M. 1998. ‘Visual search’, in H. Pashler (ed.), Attention, pp. 13–73. Hove: Psychology Press.
467. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., and Dahlen, K. 2000. ‘Postattentive vision’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 693–716.
468. Wolff, P. 2003. ‘Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events’, Cognition 88: 1–48.
469. Wolff, P. 2007. ‘Representing causation’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 136: 82–111.
470. Wolff, P. 2008. ‘Dynamics and the perception of causal events’, in T. Shipley and J. Zacks (eds.), Understanding Events, pp. 555–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
471. Wolff, P. and Zettergren, M. 2002. ‘A vector model of causal meaning’, in W. D. Gray and C. D. Schunn (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 944–9. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
472. Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
473. Woodward, J. 2006. ‘Sensitive and insensitive causation’, Philosophical Review 115: 1–50.
474. Woodward, J. 2007. ‘Interventionist theories of causation in psychological perspective’, in A. Gopnik and L. Schulz (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation, pp. 19–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
475. Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
476. Wunderlich, D. (ed.) 2006. Advances in the Theory of the Lexicon. Berlin: de Gruyter.
477. Yoshioka, K. and Kellerman, E. 2006. ‘Gestural introduction of Ground reference in L2 narrative discourse’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 44(2): 171–93.
478. Zacks, J. M. 2004. ‘Using movement and intentions to understand simple events’, Cognitive Science 28: 979–1008.
479. Zacks, J. M. and Swallow, K. M. 2007. ‘Event segmentation’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 16: 80–4.
480. Zacks, J. M. and Tversky, B. 2001. ‘Event structure in perception and conception’, Psychological Bulletin 127: 3–21.
481. Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., and Iyer, G. 2001. ‘Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136: 29–58.
482. Zacks, J. M., Kumar, S., Abrams, R. A., and Mehta, R. 2009. ‘Using movement and intentions to understand human activity’, Cognition 112: 201–16.
483. Zeshan, U. 2002. ‘Sign language in Turkey: The story of a hidden language’, Journal of Turkic Languages, 6(2): 229–74.
484. Zwitserlood, I. 2003. Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht, LOT.