Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue , 2004, Pages 497-525

  Reinkensmeyer, David J ^a   Emken, Jeremy L ^a   Cramer, Steven C ^b  

^a University of California at Irvine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Motor adaptation; Neural systems; Neuromuscular control; Neuroplasticity; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALGORITHM; ARM; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GAIT; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MUSCLE TRAINING; NOISE REDUCTION; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEURONS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 4444256476     PISSN: 15239829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140223     Document Type: Review

References (129)

1. Wolpert D, Ghahramani Z, Flanagan J. 2001. Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5:487-94
2. Davidson P, Wolpert D. 2003. Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13:232-37
3. Sanes J. 2003. Neocortical mechanisms in motor learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13:225-31
4. Doyon J, Penhune V, Ungerleider L. 2003. Distinct contribution of the corticostriatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia 41:252-62
5. Woldag H, Hummelsheim H. 2002. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review. J. Neurol. 249:518-28
6. van der Lee J, Snels I, Beckerman H, Lankhorst G, Wagenaar R, Bouter L. 2001. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 15:20-31
7. Butefisch C, Davis B, Wise S, Sawaki L, Kopylev L, et al. 2000. Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3661-65
8. Hesse S, Werner C. 2003. Partial body weight supported treadmill training for gait recovery following stroke. Adv. Neurol. 92:423-28
9. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. 1994. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14:3208-24
10. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Aisen ML, Hogan N. 2000. Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37:639-52
11. Conditt MA, Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. 1997. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J. Neurophysiol. 78:554-60
12. Takahashi C, Scheidt R, Reinkensmeyer D. 2001. Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment. J. Neurophysiol. 86:1047-51
13. Robinson DW, Pratt JE, Paluska DJ, Pratt GA. 1999. Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot. 1999 IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatronics, pp. 561-68
14. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D. 1999. Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 81:1045-56
15. Lackner JR, Dizio P. 1998. Adaptation in a rotating artificial gravity environment. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 28:194-202
16. Dingwell J, Mah C, Mussa-Ivaldi F. 2002. Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. J. Neurophysiol. 88:222-35
17. Mah C, Mussa-Ivaldi F. 2003. Evidence for a specific internal representation of motion-force relationships during object manipulation. Biol. Cybern. 88:60-72
18. Conditt MA, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. 1999. Central representation of time during motor learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11625-30
19. Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi A. 2002. Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp. Brain Res. 143:520-24
20. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E. 1996. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:3843-46
21. Shadmehr R, Moussavi ZMK. 2000. Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements. J. Neurosci. 20:7807-15
22. Malfait N, Shiller DM, Ostry DJ. 2002. Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations. J. Neurosci. 22:9656-60
23. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R. 2003. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J. Neurophysiol. 89:168-76
24. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. 2000. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407:742-47
25. Witney AG, Wolpert DM. 2003. Spatial representation of predictive motor learning. J. Neurophysiol. 89:1837-43
26. Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. 1998. Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J. Neurophysiol. 79:1825-38
27. Lee D, Port NL, Kruse W, Georgopoulos AP. 1998. Variability and correlated noise in the discharge of neurons in motor and parietal areas of the primate cortex. J. Neurosci. 18:1161-70
28. Jones K, Hamilton A, Wolpert D. 2002. Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J. Neurophysiol. 88:1533-44
29. Takahashi CD, Nemet D, Rose-Gottron CM, Larson JK, Cooper DM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2003. Neuromotor noise limits motor performance, but not motor adaptation, in children. J. Neurophysiol. 90:703-11
30. Kamper DG, McKenna AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2002. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relationship to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83:702-7
31. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. 2001. Learning to move amid uncertainty. J. Neurophysiol. 86:971-85
32. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M. 2001. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414:446-49
33. Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Conditt MA, Rymer WZ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. 2000. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J. Neurophysiol. 84:853-62
34. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. 1996. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252-55
35. Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T. 1997. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J. Neurosci. 17:409-19
36. Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M. 2003. Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields. Neurosci. Res. 46:319-31
37. Karniel A. 2002. Three creatures named 'forward model'. Neural Netw. 15:305-7
38. Mehta B, Schaal S. 2002. Forward models in visuomotor control. J. Neurophysiol. 88:942-53
39. Wolpert D, Kawato M. 1998. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11:1317-29
40. Blakemore S, Wolpert D, Frith C. 2000. Why can't you tickle yourself? Neuroreport 11:R11-16
41. Bhushan N, Shadmehr R. 1999. Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol. Cybern. 81:39-60
42. Ariff G, Donchin O, Nanayakkara T, Shadmehr R. 2002. A real-time state predictor in motor control: study of saccadic eye movements during unseen reaching movements. J. Neurosci. 22:7721-29
43. Takahashi CD, Nemet D, Rose-Gottron C, Larson JK, Cooper DM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2002. Computational motor adaptation - a kindergarten skill. Proc. Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conf. 3:2418-19
44. Gribble P, Ostry D. 2000. Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control. Exp. Brain Res. 135:474-82
45. Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. 2002. Linear combinations of nonlinear models for predicting human-machine interface forces. Biol. Cybern. 86:73-87
46. Wang T, Dordevic GS, Shadmehr R. 2001. Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses. Biol. Cybern. 85:437-48
47. Sanner RM, Kosha M. 1999. A mathematical model of the adaptive control of human arm motion. Biol. Cybern. 80:369-82
48. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. 1999. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat. Neurosci. 2:1026-31
49. Tong C, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. 2002. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J. Neurosci. 22:1108-13
50. Flanagan JR, Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. 1999. Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematics and dynamics environments. J. Neurosci. 19(20):RC34
51. Reinkensmeyer D, Wynne J, Harkema S. 2002. A robotic tool for studying locomotor adaptation and rehabilitation. Second Joint Meet. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Biomed. Eng. Soc. pp. 2353-54
52. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2003. Evidence for an internal model dedicated to locomotor control. Presented at 25th Annu. Int. IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico
53. Timoszyk W, de Leon R, London N, Roy R, Edgerton V, Reinkensmeyer D. 2001. The lumbosacral spinal cord adapts to robotic loading during stance. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. No. 297.20
54. Edgerton VR, de Leon RD, Harkema SJ, Hodgson JA, London N, et al. 2001. Retraining the injured spinal cord. J. Physiol. (London) 533:15-22
55. Lum PS, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Lehman SL, Li PY, Stark LW. 1992. Feedforward stabilization in a bimanual unloading task. Exp. Brain Res. 89:172-80
56. Jansen-Osmann P, Richter S, Konczak J, Kalveram KT. 2002. Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models. Exp. Brain Res. 143:212-20
57. Konczak J, Jansen-Osmann P, Kalveram K. 2003. Development of force adaptation during childhood. J. Mot. Behav. 35:41-52
58. Takahashi CD, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2003. Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement. Exp. Brain Res. 149:131-40
59. Krebs H, Hogan N, Hening W, Adamovich S, Poizner H. 2001. Procedural motor learning in Parkinson's disease. Exp. Brain Res. 141:425-37
60. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. 1997. Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science 277:821-25
61. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. 1999. Inhibitory control of competing motor memories. Exp. Brain Res. 126:235-51
62. Krebs H, Brashers-Krug T, Rauch S, Savage C, Hogan N, et al. 1998. Robot-aided functional imaging: application to a motor learning study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6:59-72
63. Nezafat R, Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. 2001. Long-term adaptation to dynamics of reaching movements: a PET study. Exp. Brain Res. 140:66-76
64. Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, et al. 2000. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403:192-95
65. Flament D, Ellermann J, Kim S, Ugurbil K, Ebner T. 1996. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar activation during the learning of a visuomotor dissociation task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 4:210-26
66. Donchin O, Sawaki L, Madupu G, Cohen LG, Shadmehr R. 2002. Mechanisms influencing acquisition and recall of motor memories. J. Neurophysiol. 88:2114-23
67. Gandolfo F, Li C, Benda BJ, Schioppa CP, Bizzi E. 2000. Cortical correlates of learning in monkeys adapting to a new dynamical environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:2259-63
68. Li CS, Padoa-Schioppa C, Bizzi E. 2001. Neuronal correlates of motor performance and motor learning in the primary motor cortex of monkeys adapting to an external force field. Neuron 30:593-607
69. Rijntjes M, Weiller C. 2002. Recovery of motor and language abilities after stroke: the contribution of functional imaging. Prog. Neurobiol. 66:109-22
70. Cramer S. 2003. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in stroke recovery. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 14:S47-55
71. Gresham G, Duncan P, Stason W, Adams H, Adelman A, et al. 1995. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Dep. Health Hum. Serv. Public Health Serv. Agency Health Care Policy Res.
72. Volpe B, Krebs H, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. 2000. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 54:1938-44
73. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. 2002. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function following stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83:952-59
74. Kahn LE, Zygman M, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2001. Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reaching in chronic hemiparesis. Proc. Annu. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Conf., 23rd, Istanbul, October 25-28:39-44
75. Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T, Konrad M, Hesse S. 2002. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study. Stroke 33:2895-901
76. Fasoli S, Krebs H, Stein J, Frontera W, Hogan N. 2003. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84:477-82
77. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. 2003. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84:915-20
78. Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. 2000. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients with a robotic orthosis. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37:693-700
79. Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D. 2000. A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37:701-8
80. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Hogan N, Krebs HI, Lehman SL, Lum PS. 2000. Rehabilitators, robots, and guides: new tools for neurological rehabilitation. In Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement, ed. J Winters, P Crago, pp. 516-33. New York: Springer-Verlag
81. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. 2001. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 14:745-52
82. Reinkensmeyer D, Lum P, Winters J. 2002. Emerging technologies for improving access to movement therapy following neurologic injury. In Emerging and Accessible Telecommunications, Information and Healthcare Technologies: Engineering Challenges in Enabling Universal Access, ed. J Winters, C Robinson, R Simpson, G Vanderheiden, pp. 136-50. Arlington, VA: RESNA
83. Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer W. 2002. Robotic devices for movement therapy following stroke: current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Topics Stroke Rehabil. 8:40-53
84. Reinkensmeyer D. 2003. Rehabilitators. In Standard Handbook of Biomedical Engineering & Design, ed. M Kutz, chapter 35. New York: McGraw-Hill
85. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Takahashi CD, Timoszyk WK, Reinkensmeyer AN, Kahn LE. 2000. Design of robot assistance for arm movement therapy following stroke. Adv. Robotics 14:625-37
86. Patton J, Mussa-Ivaldi F, Rymer W. 2001. Altering movement patterns in healthy and brain-injured subjects via custom designed robotic forces. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 23rd, 2:1356-59
87. Lum PS, Lehman SL, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 1995. The bimanual lifting rehabilitator: a device for rehabilitating bimanual control in stroke patients. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 3:166-74
88. Lum PS, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Lehman SL. 1993. Robotic assist devices for bimanual physical therapy: preliminary experiments. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 1:185-91
89. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. 1998. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 6:75-87
90. Volpe B, Krebs H, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels C, Aisen M. 1999. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology 53:1874-76
91. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole AN, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. 2000. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM Guide. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37:653-62
92. Kahn LE, Averbuch M, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2000. Comparison of robot-assisted reaching to free reaching in promoting recovery from chronic stroke. In Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age, ed. M Mokhtari, pp. 39-44. Amsterdam: IOS
93. Kahn L, Zygman M, Rymer W, Reinkensmeyer D. 2001. Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reaching in chronic hemiparesis. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Conf., Istanbul, pp. 1344-47
94. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K. 1995. Repetitive training of isolated movement improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J. Neurol. Sci. 130:59-68
95. Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner W, Taub E, Weiller C. 2000. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31:1210-16
96. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. 1996. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272:1791-94
97. Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen L. 2003. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain 126:866-72
98. Burdea G, Popescu V, Hentz V, Colbert K. 2000. Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8:430-32
99. Amirabdollahian F, Loureiro R, Driessen B, Harwin W. 2001. Error correction movement for machine assisted stroke rehabilitation. In Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age, ed. M Mokhtari, pp. 60-65. Amsterdam: IOS
100. Johnson MJ, Van der Loos HFM, Burgar CG, Leifer L, Shor PC. 2000. Control strategies for a split-wheel carsteering simulator for upper limb stroke therapy. Proc. Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., San Francisco, pp. 1372-77
101. Merians A, Jack D, Boiau R, Tremaine M, Burdea G, et al. 2002. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys. Ther. 82:898-915
102. Buerger SP, Krebs HI, Hogan N. 2001. Characterization and control of a screwdriven robot for neurorehabilitation. Proc. 2001 IEEE Int. Conf. Control Appl., pp. 388-94
103. Williams DJ, Krebs HI, Hogan N. 2001. A robot for wrist rehabilitation. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 23rd, 2:1336-39
104. Reinkensmeyer D, Pang C, Nessler J, Painter C. 2002. Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper-extremity after stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural Sci. Rehabil. Eng. 10:1-7
105. Barbeau H, Norman K, Fung J, Visintin M, Ladouceur M. 2000. Does neurorehabilitation play a role in the recovery of walking in neurological populations? Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 860:377-92
106. Harkema SJ. 2001. Neural plasticity after human spinal cord injury: application of locomotor training to the rehabilitation of walking. Neuroscientist 7:455-68
107. Edgerton VR, Leon RD, Harkema SJ, Hodgson JA, London N, et al. 2001. Retraining the injured spinal cord. J. Physiol. 533:15-22
108. Dietz V, Wirz M, Colombo G, Curt A. 1998. Locomotor capacity and recovery of spinal cord function in paraplegic patients: a clinical and electrophysiological evaluation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophys. 109:140-53
109. Wernig A, Nanassy A, Muller S. 1999. Laufband (treadmill) therapy in incomplete paraplegia and tetraplegia. J. Neurotrauma 16:719-26
110. Colombo G, Wirz M, Dietz V. 2001. Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord 39:252-55
111. Ichinose W, Reinkensmeyer D, Aoyagi D, Lin J, Ngai K, et al. 2003. A robotic device for measuring and controlling pelvic motion during locomotor rehabilitation. Proc. 2003 IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Meet.
112. Timoszyk WK, Merlo M, de Leon RD, Emken JL, Roy RR, et al. 2002. Second generation robotic systems for studying rodent locomotion following spinal cord injury. Proc. Second Joint Meet. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Biomed. Eng. Soc., October 23-26, 2002, Houston, Texas, pp. 2358-59
113. Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S, Bernhardt R. 2002. Robotic walking simulator for neurological gait rehabilitation. Proc. Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conf. 3:2356-57
114. Krebs HI, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, Hogan N. 1999. Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci USA 96:4645-49
115. Reinkensmeyer D, Iobbi M, Kahn L, Kamper D, Takahashi C. 2003. Modeling reaching impairment after stroke using a population vector model of movement control that incorporates neural firing rate variability. Neural Comput. 11:In press
116. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Kenney DE, Van der Loos HF. 1999. Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:652-62
117. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Dewald JPA, Rymer WZ. 1999. Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: a pilot study. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 7:1-11
118. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. 1999. Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27:805-14
119. Dietz V, Mueller R, Colombo G. 2002. Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain 125:2626-34
120. Smith MA, Brandt J, Shadmehr R. 2000. Motor disorder in Huntington's disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control. Nature 403:544-49
121. Reinkensmeyer D. 2003. How to retrain movement after neurologic injury: a computational rationale for incorporating robot (or therapist) assistance. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Meet., Cancun, Mexico, pp. 1479-82
122. Harkema SJ, Hurley SL, Patel UK, Requejo PS, Dobkin BH, Edgerton VR. 1997. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J. Neurophysiol. 77:797-811
123. Lam T, Pearson KG. 2002. The role of proprioceptive feedback in the regulation and adaptation of locomotor activity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 508:343-55
124. Feygin D, Keehner M, Tendick F. 2002. Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. Proc. 10th Int. Symp. Haptic Interfaces Virtual Environ. Teleoperator Syst. (Haptics 2002), Orlando, Florida, pp. 40-47
125. Patton J, Mussa-Ivaldi F. 2003. Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51:636-46
126. Raasch CC, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Rymer WZ. 1997. Motor learning in reaching movements by hemiparetic subjects. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 23:2374
127. Kahn LE, Lum PS, Reinkensmeyer DJ. 2003. Selection of robotic therapy algorithms for the upper extremity in chronic stroke: Insights from MIME and ARM Guide results. Proc. Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot, Daejeon, Korea pp. 208-10
128. STAIR II. 2001. Recommendations for clinical trial evaluation of acute stroke therapies. (Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable II). Stroke 32:1598-606
129. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe B. 1997. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch. Neurol. 54:443-46