Events by hands and feet

Spatial Cognition and Computation

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 5-14

  Tversky, Barbara ^a   Zacks, Jeffrey M ^b   Lee, Paul ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Events; Maps; Partonomy; Parts; Routes; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

EVENTS; HUMAN MIND; PARTONOMY; PARTS; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; ROUTE DIRECTIONS; ROUTE MAP; ROUTES;

TAXONOMIES;

MAPS;

EID: 20844446439     PISSN: 13875868     EISSN: 15427633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15427633scc0401_2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen, G. L. (2000). Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 333.359.
2. Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (1999). Action analysis: A gateway to intentional inference. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life pp. (pp. 215.240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72, 708.717.
4. Byrne, R. W. (1999). Imitation without intentionality: Using string parsing to copy the organization of behaviour. Animal Cognition, 2, 63.72.
5. Casati, R., & Varzi, A. C. (Eds.). (1996). Events. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.
6. Casati, R. & Varzi, A. C (1999). Parts and places. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Couclelis, H. (1996). Verbal directions for way-finding: Space, cognition, and language. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 133. 153). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Denis, M. (1997). The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Current Psychology of Cognition, 16, 409. 458.
9. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 145.174.
10. Gelman, R., Durgin, F. & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A.J. Premack, (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 150.184). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Lovelace, K. L., Hegarty, M., & Montello, D. R. (1999). Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In C. Freksa & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science, COSIT.99, Vol. 1661 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 65.82). Berlin: Springer.
12. Morris, M. W., & Murphy, G. L. (1990). Converging operations on a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory & Cognition, 18, 407.418.
13. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28.38.
14. Rifkin, A. (1985). Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory & Cognition, 13, 538.556.
15. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2002). Cortical mechanisms for recognizing actions made by others. In Meltzoff, A. and Prinz, W. (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382. 439.
17. Spelke, E., S., Phillips, A. & Woodward, A. L. (1995). Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A.J. Premack, (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44.78). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
18. Tom, A. & Denis, M. (in press). Language and spatial cognition: Comparing the roles of landmarks and street names in route directions. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
19. Tversky, B. (1990). Where partonomies and taxonomies meet. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization (pp. 334-344). London: Routledge.
20. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Zacks, J. (2002). On bodies and events. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution and brain bases (pp. 221-232). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169-193.
22. Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In Freksa, C., & Mark, D. M. (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. (pp. 51-64.). Berlin: Springer.
23. Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1.34.
24. Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 29.58.
25. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3.21.