INO80 and SWR complexes: Relating structure to function in chromatin remodeling

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 619-631

  Gerhold, Christian B ^a   Gasser, Susan M ^a,b  

^a FRIEDRICH MIESCHER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Arp subcomplexes; Chromatin remodeling; INO80 C; Nucleosome binding; SWR C

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; DIMER; HISTONE; INO80 C PROTEIN; INO80 PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; SWR C PROTEIN; SWR PROTEIN; SWR1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHROMATIN; DNA HELICASE; INO80 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PROTEIN BINDING; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; GENOMICS; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; REVIEW; CHROMATIN; GENETICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA HELICASES; HISTONES; HUMANS; NUCLEOSOMES; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84925397108     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. Luger K., et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8Å resolution. Nature 1997, 389:251-260.
2. Luger K., et al. New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: an ordered state or a disordered affair?. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13:436-447.
3. Clapier C., Cairns B. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78:273-304.
4. Narlikar G.J., et al. Mechanisms and functions of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Cell 2013, 154:490-503.
5. Flaus A., et al. Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:2887-2905.
6. Hopfner K.P., et al. Swi2/Snf2 remodelers: hybrid views on hybrid molecular machines. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22:225-233.
7. Auble D.T., Hahn S. An ATP-dependent inhibitor of TBP binding to DNA. Genes Dev. 1993, 7:844-856.
8. Wu W-H., et al. Swc2 is a widely conserved H2AZ-binding module essential for ATP-dependent histone exchange. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:1064-1071.
9. Chen L., et al. Subunit organization of the human INO80 chromatin remodeling complex: an evolutionarily conserved core complex catalyzes ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:11283-11289.
10. Chen L., et al. Multiple modes of regulation of the human Ino80 SNF2 ATPase by subunits of the INO80 chromatin-remodeling complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:20497-20502.
11. Jha S., Dutta A. RVB1/RVB2: running rings around molecular biology. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:521-533.
12. Szerlong H., et al. The HSA domain binds nuclear actin-related proteins to regulate chromatin-remodeling ATPases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:469-476.
13. Nguyen V.Q., et al. Molecular architecture of the ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complex SWR1. Cell 2013, 154:1220-1231.
14. Tosi A., et al. Structure and subunit topology of the INO80 chromatin remodeler and its interaction with the nucleosome. Cell 2013, 154:1207-1219.
15. Jónsson Z.a.O., et al. Rvb1p/Rvb2p recruit Arp5p and assemble a functional Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:465-477.
16. Niewiarowski A., et al. Oligomeric assembly and interactions within the human RuvB-like RuvBL1 and RuvBL2 complexes. Biochem. J. 2010, 429:113-125.
17. Leschziner A.E., et al. Conformational flexibility in the chromatin remodeler RSC observed by electron microscopy and the orthogonal tilt reconstruction method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:4913-4918.
18. Chaban Y., et al. Structure of a RSC-nucleosome complex and insights into chromatin remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:1272-1277.
19. Dechassa M.L., et al. Architecture of the SWI/SNF-nucleosome complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:6010-6021.
20. Racki L.R., et al. The chromatin remodeller ACF acts as a dimeric motor to space nucleosomes. Nature 2009, 462:1016-1021.
21. Yamada K., et al. Structure and mechanism of the chromatin remodelling factor ISW1a. Nature 2011, 472:448-453.
22. Grüne T., et al. Crystal structure and functional analysis of a nucleosome recognition module of the remodeling factor ISWI. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:449-460.
23. Ryan D.P., et al. The DNA-binding domain of the Chd1 chromatin-remodelling enzyme contains SANT and SLIDE domains. EMBO J. 2011, 30:2596-2609.
24. Mueller-Planitz F., et al. Nucleosome sliding mechanisms: new twists in a looped history. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:1026-1032.
25. Ranjan A., et al. Nucleosome-free region dominates histone acetylation in targeting SWR1 to promoters for H2A.Z. replacement. Cell 2013, 154:1232-1245.
26. Dechassa M.L., et al. SWI/SNF has intrinsic nucleosome disassembly activity that is dependent on adjacent nucleosomes. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:590-602.
27. Shen X., et al. Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:147-155.
28. Billon P., CÔté J. Precise deposition of histone H2A.Z. in chromatin for genome expression and maintenance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819:290-302.
29. Krogan N.J., et al. Regulation of chromosome stability by the histone H2A variant Htz1, the Swr1 chromatin remodeling complex, and the histone acetyltransferase NuA4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:13513-13518.
30. Krogan N.J., et al. A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:1565-1576.
31. Mizuguchi G., et al. ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 2004, 303:343-348.
32. Luk E., et al. Stepwise histone replacement by SWR1 requires dual activation with histone H2A.Z. and canonical nucleosome. Cell 2010, 143:725-736.
33. Papamichos-Chronakis M., et al. Global regulation of H2A.Z. localization by the INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 2011, 144:200-213.
34. Yen K., et al. SWR-C and INO80 chromatin remodelers recognize nucleosome-free regions near +1 nucleosomes. Cell 2013, 154:1246-1256.
35. Wu W.H., et al. N terminus of Swr1 binds to histone H2AZ and provides a platform for subunit assembly in the chromatin remodeling complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:6200-6207.
36. Hong J., et al. The catalytic subunit of the SWR1 remodeler is a histone chaperone for the H2A.Z-H2B eimer. Mol. Cell 2014, 53:498-505.
37. Watanabe S., et al. A histone acetylation switch regulates H2A.Z. deposition by the SWR-C remodeling enzyme. Science 2013, 340:195-199.
38. Li B., et al. Preferential occupancy of histone variant H2AZ at inactive promoters influences local histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:18385-18390.
39. Schulze J.M., et al. Reading chromatin: insights from yeast into YEATS domain structure and function. Epigenetics 2010, 5:573-577.
40. Auger A., et al. Eaf1 is the platform for NuA4 molecular assembly that evolutionarily links chromatin acetylation to ATP-dependent exchange of histone H2A variants. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:2257-2270.
41. Downs J.A., et al. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:979-990.
42. Kashiwaba S-I., et al. The mammalian INO80 complex is recruited to DNA damage sites in an ARP8 dependent manner. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 402:619-625.
43. Harata M., et al. An essential gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae coding for an actin-related protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91:8258-8262.
44. Galarneau L., et al. Multiple links between the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and epigenetic control of transcription. Mol. Cell 2000, 5:927-937.
45. Shen X., et al. A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 2000, 406:541-544.
46. Nishimoto N., et al. Heterocomplex formation by Arp4 and β-actin is involved in the integrity of the Brg1 chromatin remodeling complex. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:3870-3882.
47. Wang W., et al. Diversity and specialization of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Genes Dev. 1996, 10:2117-2130.
48. Zhao K., et al. Rapid and phosphoinositol-dependent binding of the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex to chromatin after T lymphocyte receptor signaling. Cell 1998, 95:625-636.
49. Cairns B.R., et al. Two actin-related proteins are shared functional components of the chromatin-remodeling complexes RSC and SWI/SNF. Mol. Cell 1998, 2:639-651.
50. Peterson C.L., et al. Subunits of the yeast SWI/SNF complex are members of the actin-related protein (ARP) family. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:23641-23644.
51. Harata M., et al. The nuclear actin-related protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Act3p/Arp4, interacts with core histones. Mol. Biol. Cell 1999, 10:2595-2605.
52. Gerhold C.B., et al. Structure of actin-related protein 8 and its contribution to nucleosome binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:11036-11046.
53. van Attikum H., et al. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 2007, 26:4113-4125.
54. Tsukuda T., et al. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2005, 438:379-383.
55. Udugama M., et al. The INO80 ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex is a nucleosome spacing factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:662-673.
56. Marques M., et al. Reconciling the positive and negative roles of histone H2A.Z. in gene transcription. Epigenetics 2010, 5:267-272.
57. Venter U., et al. A nucleosome precludes binding of the transcription factor Pho4 in vivo to a critical target site in the PHO5 promoter. EMBO J. 1994, 13:4848-4855.
58. Steger D.J., et al. Regulation of chromatin remodeling by inositol polyphosphates. Science 2003, 299:114-116.
59. Barbaric S., et al. Redundancy of chromatin remodeling pathways for the induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:27610-27621.
60. Musladin S., et al. The RSC chromatin remodeling complex has a crucial role in the complete remodeler set for yeast PHO5 promoter opening. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:4270-4282.
61. Neumann F.R., et al. Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:369-383.
62. Hogan C.J., et al. Fission yeast Iec1-ino80-mediated nucleosome eviction regulates nucleotide and phosphate metabolism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30:657-674.
63. Lorch Y., et al. Selective removal of promoter nucleosomes by the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:881-885.
64. Chambers A.L., Downs J.A. The RSC and INO80 chromatin-remodeling complexes in DNA double-strand break repair. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2012, 110:229-261.
65. Chen X., et al. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 2012, 489:576-580.
66. Costelloe T., et al. The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 2012, 489:581-584.
67. Bakshi R., et al. Characterization of a human SWI2/SNF2 like protein hINO80: demonstration of catalytic and DNA binding activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 339:313-320.
68. Zlatanova J., Thakar A. H2A.Z: view from the top. Structure 2008, 16:166-179.
69. Draker R., Cheung P. Transcriptional and epigenetic functions of histone variant H2A.Z. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 87:19-25.
70. Robyr D., et al. Microarray deacetylation maps determine genome-wide functions for yeast histone deacetylases. Cell 2002, 109:437-446.
71. Kobor M.S., et al. A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z. into euchromatin. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:E131.
72. Raisner R.M., et al. Histone variant H2A.Z. marks the 5' ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin. Cell 2005, 123:233-248.
73. Neumann H., et al. A method for genetically installing site-specific acetylation in recombinant histones defines the effects of H3 K56 acetylation. Mol. Cell 2009, 36:153-163.
74. Kusch T., et al. Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions. Science 2004, 306:2084-2087.
75. Jiang C., Pugh B.F. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:161-172.
76. Segal E., Widom J. What controls nucleosome positions?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:335-343.
77. Zhang Z., et al. A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 2011, 332:977-980.
78. Yen K., et al. Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and directionality of chromatin remodelers. Cell 2012, 149:1461-1473.
79. Shimada K., et al. Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:566-575.
80. van Attikum H., et al. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2004, 119:777-788.
81. Fenn S., et al. Structural biochemistry of nuclear actin-related proteins 4 and 8 reveals their interaction with actin. EMBO J. 2011, 30:2153-2166.
82. Yoshida T., et al. Actin-related protein Arp6 influences H2A.Z-dependent and -independent gene expression and links ribosomal protein genes to nuclear pores. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000910.
83. Morrison A.J., et al. INO80 and γ-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 2004, 119:767-775.
84. Bennett G., et al. DNA repair choice defines a common pathway for recruitment of chromatin regulators. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2084.
85. Dion V., et al. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:502-509.
86. Mine-Hattab J., Rothstein R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:510-517.
87. Horigome C., et al. SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodelers contribute to DNA double-strand break anchorage site choice at the nuclear periphery. Mol. Cell 2014, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.027.
88. Seeber A., et al. Checkpoint kinases and the INO80 nucleosome remodeling complex enhance global chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1999-2008.
89. Nagai S., et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008, 322:597-602.
90. Oza P., et al. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:912-927.
91. Kalocsay M., et al. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:335-343.
92. Morrison A.J., et al. Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 2007, 130:499-511.
93. Chen S-h., et al. A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:12803-12812.
94. Cairns B.R. Chromatin remodeling: insights and intrigue from single-molecule studies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:989-996.
95. Ebbert R., et al. The product of the SNF2/SWI2 paralogue INO80 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae required for efficient expression of various yeast structural genes is part of a high-molecular-weight protein complex. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 32:741-751.
96. Saravanan M., et al. Interactions between the nucleosome histone core and Arp8 in the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:20883-20888.
97. Kapoor P., et al. Evidence for monomeric actin function in INO80 chromatin remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:426-432.
98. Ray S., Grove A. Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMO2 domains with distorted DNA. Biochemistry 2012, 51:1825-1835.
99. Dastidar R., et al. The nuclear localization of SWI/SNF proteins is subjected to oxygen regulation. Cell Biosci. 2012, 2:30.
100. Krogan N.J., et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006, 440:637-643.
101. Yu E.Y., et al. Regulation of telomere structure and functions by subunits of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:5639-5649.
102. Gavin A-C., et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 2006, 440:631-636.
103. Matias P.M., et al. Crystal structure of the human AAA+ protein RuvBL1. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:38918-38929.
104. Gribun A., et al. Yeast Rvb1 and Rvb2 are ATP-dependent DNA helicases that form a heterohexameric complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 376:1320-1333.
105. Matangkasombut O., et al. Bromodomain factor 1 corresponds to a missing piece of yeast TFIID. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:951-962.
106. Ladurner A.G., et al. Bromodomains mediate an acetyl-histone encoded antisilencing function at heterochromatin boundaries. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:365-376.
107. Wang A.Y., et al. Asf1-like structure of the conserved Yaf9 YEATS domain and role in H2A.Z. deposition and acetylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:21573-21578.
108. Zhou B.O., et al. SWR1 complex poises heterochromatin boundaries for antisilencing activity propagation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30:2391-2400.