Consumption of a high-fat soup preload leads to differences in short-term energy and fat intake between PROP non-taster and super-taster women

Appetite

Volumn 89, Issue , 2015, Pages 196-202

  Shafaie, Yasmine ^a   Hoffman, Daniel J ^a   Tepper, Beverly J ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy compensation; Fat intake; Preload; PROP status

Indexed keywords

PROPYLTHIOURACIL; FAT INTAKE; WATER;

ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CALORIC INTAKE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPENSATION; DIET; ENERGY; ENERGY BALANCE; FAT INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; GENETIC MARKER; HEART PRELOAD; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESTING ENERGY EXPENDITURE; RISK FACTOR; THREE-FACTOR-EATING-QUESTIONNAIRE; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PREFERENCE; GENETICS; HYPERPHAGIA; MEAL; METABOLISM; OBESITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADIPOSITY; ADULT; DIET; DIETARY FATS; EATING; ENERGY INTAKE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; HYPERPHAGIA; MEALS; OBESITY; PROPYLTHIOURACIL; TASTE; TASTE PERCEPTION; WATER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923867447     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Akhavan T., Luhovyy B.L., et al. Effect of premeal consumption of whey protein and its hydrolysate on food intake and postmeal glycemia and insulin responses in young adults. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010, 91:966-975.
2. Appleton K.M., Martins C., et al. Age and experience predict accurate short-term energy compensation in adults. Appetite 2011, 56:602-606.
3. Bartoshuk L.M. Comparing sensory experiences across individuals. Recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chemical Senses 2000, 25:447-460.
4. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., et al. PTC/PROP tasting. Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiology and Behavior 1994, 56:1165-1171.
5. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., et al. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales. The gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiology and Behavior 2004, 82:109-114.
6. Behrens M., Gunn H.C., et al. Genetic, functional, and phenotypic diversity in TAS2R38-mediated bitter taste perception. Chemical Senses 2013, 38:475-484.
7. Biarnes X., Marchiori A., et al. Insights into the binding of Phenyltiocarbamide (PTC) agonist to its target human TAS2R38 bitter receptor. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12394.
8. Bouthoorn S.H., van Lenthe F.J., et al. Genetic taste blindness to bitter and body composition in childhood. A Mendelian randomization design. International Journal of Obesity (2005) 2014, 38:1005-1010.
9. Bray G.A., Paeratakul S., et al. Dietary fat and obesity. A review of animal, clinical and epidemiological studies. Physiology and Behavior 2004, 83:549-555.
10. Brunkwall L., Ericson U., et al. Genetic variation in the fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) in association with food preferences in healthy adults. Food & Nutrition Research 2013, 57. 10.3402/fnr.v57i0.20028.
11. Bufe B., Breslin P.A., et al. The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception. Current Biology 2005, 15:322-327.
12. Cabras T., Melis M., et al. Responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is associated with salivary levels of two specific basic proline-rich proteins in humans. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e30962.
13. Calo C., Padiglia A., et al. Polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype. Physiology and Behavior 2011, 104:1065-1071.
14. Caputo F.A., Mattes R.D. Human dietary responses to covert manipulations of energy, fat, and carbohydrate in a midday meal. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1992, 56:36-43.
15. Cecil J.E., Tavendale R., et al. An obesity-associated FTO gene variant and increased energy intake in children. The New England Journal of Medicine 2008, 359:2558-2566.
16. Drewnowski A., Henderson S.A., et al. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil has no influence on dietary patterns, body mass indexes, or plasma lipid profiles of women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2007, 107:1340-1348.
17. Erlanson-Albertsson C. Fat-rich food palatability and appetite regulation. Fat detection. Taste, texture, and post ingestive effects 2010, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. J.P. Montmayeur, J. le Coutre (Eds.).
18. Essick G.K., Chopra A., et al. Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects. Physiology and Behavior 2003, 80:289-302.
19. Feeney E.L., Hayes J.E. Exploring associations between taste perception, oral anatomy and polymorphisms in the carbonic anhydrase (gustin) gene CA6. Physiology and Behavior 2014, 128:148-154.
20. Feeney E., O'Brien S., et al. Genetic variation in taste perception. Does it have a role in healthy eating?. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2011, 70:135-143.
21. Flegal K.M., Carroll M.D., et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2010, 303:235-241.
22. Garner D.M., Olmsted M.P., et al. The Eating Attitudes Test. Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine 1982, 12:871-878.
23. Geliebter A. Gastric distension and gastric capacity in relation to food intake in humans. Physiology and Behavior 1988, 44:665-668.
24. Golay A., Bobbioni E. The role of dietary fat in obesity. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 1997, 21(Suppl. 3):S2-S11.
25. Goldstein G.L., Daun H., et al. Adiposity in middle-aged women is associated with genetic taste blindness to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Obesity Research 2005, 13:1017-1023.
26. Goldstein G.L., Daun H., et al. Influence of PROP taster status and maternal variables on energy intake and body weight of pre-adolescents. Physiology and Behavior 2007, 90:809-817.
27. Green B.G., Dalton P., et al. Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chemical Senses 1996, 21:323-334.
28. Guo S.W., Reed D.R. The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception. Annals of Human Biology 2001, 28:111-142.
29. Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., et al. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chemical Senses 2008, 33:255-265.
30. Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures. Sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. Chemical Senses 2007, 32:225-236.
31. Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiology and Behavior 2008, 95:77-87.
32. Karelis A.D., Lavoie M.E., et al. Anthropometric, metabolic, dietary and psychosocial profiles of underreporters of energy intake. A doubly labeled water study among overweight/obese postmenopausal women. A Montreal Ottawa New Emerging Team study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010, 64:68-74.
33. Keller K.L., Liang L.C., et al. Common variants in the CD36 gene are associated with oral fat perception, fat preferences, and obesity in African Americans. Obesity 2012, 20:1066-1073.
34. Keller K.L., Reid A., et al. Sex differences in the effects of inherited bitter thiourea sensitivity on body weight in 4-6-year-old children. Obesity 2010, 18:1194-1200.
35. Keller K.L., Tepper B.J. Inherited taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil in diet and body weight in children. Obesity Research 2004, 12:904-912.
36. Kim U.K., Jorgenson E., et al. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 2003, 299:1221-1225.
37. Kirkmeyer S.V., Tepper B.J. Understanding creaminess perception of dairy products using free-choice profiling and genetic responsivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Chemical Senses 2003, 28:527-536.
38. Lipchock S.V., Mennella J.A., et al. Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2012, 98:1136-1143.
39. Long S.J., Hart K., et al. The ability of habitual exercise to influence appetite and food intake in response to high- and low-energy preloads in man. The British Journal of Nutrition 2002, 87:517-523.
40. Melis M., Aragoni M.C., et al. Marked increase in PROP taste responsiveness following oral supplementation with selected salivary proteins or their related free amino acids. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e59810.
41. Melis M., Atzori E., et al. The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a mechanistic link between PROP tasting and fungiform taste papilla density and maintenance. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e74151.
42. Meyerhof W., Batram C., et al. The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chemical Senses 2010, 35:157-170.
43. Mifflin M.D., St Jeor S.T., et al. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1990, 51:241-247.
44. Oftedal K.N., Tepper B.J. Influence of the PROP bitter taste phenotype and eating attitudes on energy intake and weight status in pre-adolescents. A 6-year follow-up study. Physiology and Behavior 2013, 118:103-111.
45. Padiglia A., Zonza A., et al. Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010, 92:539-545.
46. Pepino M.Y., Love-Gregory L., et al. The fatty acid translocase gene CD36 and lingual lipase influence oral sensitivity to fat in obese subjects. Journal of Lipid Research 2012, 53:561-566.
47. Potier M., Fromentin G., et al. The satiety effect of disguised liquid preloads administered acutely and differing only in their nutrient content tended to be weaker for lipids but did not differ between proteins and carbohydrates in human subjects. The British Journal of Nutrition 2010, 104:1406-1414.
48. Prescott J., Soo J., et al. Responses of PROP taster groups to variations in sensory qualities within foods and beverages. Physiology and Behavior 2004, 82:459-469.
49. Prodi D.A., Drayna D., et al. Bitter taste study in a sardinian genetic isolate supports the association of phenylthiocarbamide sensitivity to the TAS2R38 bitter receptor gene. Chemical Senses 2004, 29:697-702.
50. Rankin K.M., Godinot N., et al. Assessment of different methods for 6-n-propylthiouracil status classification. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity 2004, 63-88. Marcel Dekker, New York. J. Prescott, B.J. Tepper (Eds.).
51. Rolls B.J., Bell E.A., Thorwart M.A. Water incorporated into a food but not served with a food decreases energy intake in lean women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999, 70:448-455.
52. Rolls B.J., Bell E.A., et al. Energy density but not fat content of foods affected energy intake in lean and obese women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999, 69:863-871.
53. Rolls B.J., Castellanos V.H., et al. Sensory properties of a nonabsorbable fat substitute did not affect regulation of energy intake. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997, 65:1375-1383.
54. Rolls B.J., Dimeo K.A., et al. Age-related impairments in the regulation of food intake. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1995, 62:923-931.
55. Rolls B.J., Hammer V.A. Fat, carbohydrate, and the regulation of energy intake. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1995, 62(5 Suppl.):1086S-1095S.
56. Rolls B.J., Kim S., et al. Time course of effects of preloads high in fat or carbohydrate on food intake and hunger ratings in humans. The American Journal of Physiology 1991, 260(4 Pt. 2):R756-R763.
57. Rolls B.J., Kim-Harris S., et al. Satiety after preloads with different amounts of fat and carbohydrate. Implications for obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1994, 60:476-487.
58. Shafaie Y., Koelliker Y., et al. Energy intake and diet selection during buffet consumption in women classified by the 6-n-propylthiouracil bitter taste phenotype. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2013, 98:1583-1591.
59. Shide D.J., Rolls B.J. Information about the fat content of preloads influences energy intake in healthy women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1995, 95:993-998.
60. Stewart J.E., Keast R.S. Recent fat intake modulates fat taste sensitivity in lean and overweight subjects. International Journal of Obesity (2005) 2012, 36:834-842.
61. Stewart J.E., Newman L.P., et al. Oral sensitivity to oleic acid is associated with fat intake and body mass index. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2011, 30:838-844.
62. Stunkard A.J., Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1985, 29:71-83.
63. Tepper B.J. Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation. The role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annual Review of Nutrition 2008, 28:367-388.
64. Tepper B.J., Christensen C.M., et al. Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status. Physiology and Behavior 2001, 73:571-577.
65. Tepper B.J., Koelliker Y., et al. Variation in the bitter-taste receptor gene TAS2R38, and adiposity in a genetically isolated population in Southern Italy. Obesity 2008, 16:2289-2295.
66. Tepper B.J., Neilland M., et al. Greater energy intake from a buffet meal in lean, young women is associated with the 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) non-taster phenotype. Appetite 2011, 56:104-110.
67. Tepper B.J., Nurse R.J. Fat perception is related to PROP taster status. Physiology and Behavior 1997, 61:949-954.
68. Tepper B.J., Nurse R.J. PROP taster status is related to fat perception and preference. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1998, 855:802-804.
69. Tepper B.J., Ullrich N.V. Influence of genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), dietary restraint and disinhibition on body mass index in middle-aged women. Physiology and Behavior 2002, 75:305-312.
70. Tepper B.J., White E.A., et al. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and its relationship to taste perception and food selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, 1170:126-139.
71. U.S.Department of Agriculture and U.S.Department of Health and Human Services Dietary guidelines for Americans 2010, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 7th ed.
72. U.S.Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Nutritive Value of Foods Home and Garden Bulletin No. 72 (HG-72), Last accessed 10.06.14. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=6282.
73. Wang Y.C., McPherson K., et al. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet 2011, 378:815-825.
74. Wooding S., Kim U.K., et al. Natural selection and molecular evolution in PTC, a bitter-taste receptor gene. American Journal of Human Genetics 2004, 74:637-646.
75. Yackinous C.A., Guinard J.X. Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women. Appetite 2002, 38:201-209.
76. Yeomans M.R., Tepper B.J., et al. Human hedonic responses to sweetness. Role of taste genetics and anatomy. Physiology and Behavior 2007, 91:264-273.
77. Zhao L., Kirkmeyer S.V., et al. A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Physiology and Behavior 2003, 78:625-633.