Energy intake and diet selection during buffet consumption in women classified by the 6-N-Propylthiouracil bitter taste phenotype1-3

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1583-1591

  Shafaie, Yasmine ^a   Koelliker, Yvonne ^a   Hoffman, Daniel J ^b   Tepper, Beverly J ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROPYLTHIOURACIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BITTER TASTE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CALORIC INTAKE; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; FAST FOOD; FAT INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; MACRONUTRIENT; MEAL; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY;

ADULT; ANTIMETABOLITES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COHORT STUDIES; DIETARY FATS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPHAGIA; MEALS; NEW JERSEY; OVERWEIGHT; PROPYLTHIOURACIL; SNACKS; TASTE DISORDERS; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888212598     PISSN: 00029165     EISSN: 19383207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.058818     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010;303:235-41.
2. World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 916. Geneva, Switzerland: 2003.
3. Nielsen SJ, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake in U.S. between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups. Obes Res 2002;10:370-8.
4. Jeffery RW, Rydell S, Dunn C, Harnac L, Levine A, Pentel P, Baxter J, Walsh E. Effects of portion size on chronic energy intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007;4:27.
5. de Castro JM, King GA, Duarte-Gardea M, Gonzalez-Ayala S, Kooshian CH. Overweight and obese humans overeat away from home. Appetite 2012;59:204-11.
6. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake Is sustained for 11 days. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:1535-43.
7. Larson N, Neumark-Sztainer D, Laska MN, Story M. Young adults and eating away from home: associations with dietary intake patterns and weight status differ by choice of restaurant. JAm Diet Assoc 2011;111: 1696-703.
8. Berte'us Forslund H, Torgerson JS, Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK. Snacking frequency in relation to energy intake and food choices in obese men and women compared to a reference population. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29:711-9.
9. McCrory MA, Fuss PJ, McCallum JE, Yao M, Vinken AG, Hays NP, Roberts SB. Dietary variety within food groups: association with energy intake and body fatness in adult men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:440-7.
10. Sea MM, Woo J, Tong PC, Chow CC, Chan JC. Associations between food variety and body fatness in Hong Kong Chinese adults. J Am Coll Nutr 2004;23:404-13.
11. Rolls BJ, Rowe EA, Rolls ET, Kingston B, Megson A, Gunary R. Variety in a meal enhances food intake in man. Physiol Behav 1981;26: 215-21.
12. Rolls BJ. Experimental analyses of the effects of variety in a meal on human feeding. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:932-9.
13. Stubbs RJ, Johnstone AM, Mazlan N, Mbaiwa SE, Ferris S. Effect of altering the variety of sensorially distinct foods, of the same macronutrient content, on food intake and body weight in men. Eur J Clin Nutr 2001;55:19-28.
14. Brondel L, Romer M, Van Wymelbeke V, Pineau N, Jiang T, Hanus C, Rigaud D. Variety enhances food intake in humans: role of sensoryspecific satiety. Physiol Behav 2009;97:44-51.
15. Norton GN, Anderson AS, Hetherington MM. Volume and variety: relative effects on food intake. Physiol Behav 2006;87:714-22.
16. Blundell JE, Stubbs RJ, Golding C, Croden F, Alam R, Whybrow S, Le Noury J, Lawton CL. Resistance and susceptibility to weight gain: individual variability in response to a high-fat diet. Physiol Behav 2005;86:614-22.
17. Tepper BJ, Neilland M, Ullrich NV, Koelliker Y, Belzer LM. Greater energy intake from a buffet meal in lean, young women is associated with the 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) non-taster phenotype. Appetite 2011;56:104-10.
18. Ullrich NV, Touger-Decker R, O'Sullivan-Maillet J, Tepper BJ. PROP taster status and self-perceived food adventurousness influence food preferences. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:543-9.
19. Tepper BJ, Nurse RJ. PROP taster status is related to the perception and preference for fat. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;855:802-4.
20. Keller KL, Steinmann L, Nurse RJ, Tepper BJ. Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite 2002;38:3-12.
21. Hayes JE, Duffy VB. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiol Behav 2008;95:77-87.
22. Tepper BJ. Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr 2008; 28:367-88.
23. Keller KL, Tepper BJ. Inherited taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil in diet and body weight in children. Obes Res 2004;12:904-12.
24. Goldstein GL, Daun H, Tepper BJ. Influence of PROP taster status and maternal variables on energy intake and body weight of pre-adolescents. Physiol Behav 2007;90:809-17.
25. Goldstein GL, Daun H, Tepper BJ. Adiposity in middle-aged women is associated with genetic taste blindness to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Obes Res 2005;13:1017-23.
26. Tepper BJ, Ullrich NV. Influence of genetic taste sensitivity to 6-npropylthiouracil (PROP), dietary restraint and disinhibition on body mass index in middle-aged women. Physiol Behav 2002;75:305-12.
27. Tepper BJ, Koelliker Y, Zhao L, Ullrich NV, Lanzara C, d'Adamo P, Ferrara A, Ulivi S, Esposito L, Gasparini P. Variation in the bitter-taste receptor gene TAS2R38, and adiposity in a genetically isolated population in Southern Italy. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:2289-95.
28. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 1985;29:71-83.
29. Garner DM, Olmsted MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE. The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med 1982; 12:871-8.
30. Zhao L, Kirkmeyer SV, Tepper BJ. A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Physiol Behav 2003; 78:625-33.
31. Rankin KM, Godinot N, Christensen CM, Tepper BJ, Kirkmeyer SV. Assessment of different methods for 6-n-propylthiouracil status classification. In: Prescott J, Tepper BJ, eds. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 2004:63-88.
32. Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J. Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 1996;21:323-34.
33. Tepper BJ, Christensen CM, Cao J. Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status. Physiol Behav 2001;73:571-7.
34. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Release 18, Nutrient Data Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service. Available at: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/ (cited 11 November 2012).
35. Guo SW, Reed DR. The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception. Ann Hum Biol 2001;28:111-42.
36. Chang WI, Chung JW, Kim YK, Chung SC, Kho HS. The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine. Arch Oral Biol 2006;51:427-32.
37. McCrory MA, Suen V, Roberts SB. Biobehavioral influences on energy intake and adult weight gain. J Nutr 2002;132:3830S-4S.
38. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary guidelines for Americans, appendix 7: USDA food patterns. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2010.
39. Newby PK, Muller D, Hallfrisch J, Qiao N, Andres R, Tucker KL. Dietary patterns and changes in body mass index and waist circumference in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1417-25.
40. Schulz M, Nothlings U, Hoffmann K, Bergmann MM, Boeing H. Identification of a food pattern characterized by high-fiber and low-First American Title food choices associated with low prospective weight change in the EPIC-Potsdam cohort. J Nutr 2005;135:1183-9.
41. Karelis AD, Lavoie ME, Fontaine J, Messier V, Strychar I, Rabasa- Lhoret R, Doucet E. Anthropometric, metabolic, dietary and psychosocial profiles of underreporters of energy intake: a doubly labeled water study among overweight/obese postmenopausal women-a Montreal Ottawa New Emerging Team study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010;64: 68-74.
42. Lumeng JC, Cardinal TM, Sitto JR, Kannan S. Ability to taste 6-n-propylthiouracil and BMI in low-income preschool-aged children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:1522-8.
43. Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Cockroft JE. Genetic sensitivity to 6-N-Propylthiouracil has no influence on dietary patterns, body mass indexes, or plasma lipid profiles of women. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107: 1340-8.
44. Bell KI, Tepper BJ. Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:245-51
45. Dinehart ME, Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Lanier SL, Duffy VB. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiol Behav 2006;87:304-13.
46. Sacerdote C, Guarrera S, Smith GD, Grioni S, Krogh V, Masala G, Mattiello A, Palli D, Panico S, Tumino R, et al. Lactase persistence and bitter taste response: instrumental variables and Mendelian randomization in epidemiologic studies of dietary factors and cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:576-81.
47. Burd C, Senerat A, Chambers E, Keller KL. PROP taster status interacts with the built environment to influence children's food acceptance and body weight status. Obesity 2013;21:786-94.
48. Rudkowska I, Perusse L, Bouchard C, Ordovas JM. Individualized weight management: what can be learned from nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2012;108:347-82.