Optogenetic control of intracellular signaling pathways

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 92-100

  Zhang, Kai ^a   Cui, Bianxiao ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cryptochrome; Dronpa; Intracellular signaling pathways; Light induced protein protein interaction; LOV; Oligomerization; Optogenetics; Photoactivatable proteins; Phytochrome; Signal transduction; UVR8

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; OLIGOMERIZATION; PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIGNALING;

CRYPTOCHROMES; DRONPA; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PATHWAYS; LIGHT INDUCED PROTEINS; LOV; OPTOGENETICS; PHOTOACTIVATABLE; PHYTOCHROME; UVR8;

CELL SIGNALING;

MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; CRY2 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; CRYPTOCHROME; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; PHYB PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; PHYTOCHROME B; UVR8 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS;

APOPTOSIS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; LIGHT EXPOSURE; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; OPTOGENETICS; PHOTOACTIVATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECRETION; REVIEW; ARABIDOPSIS; CELL DEATH; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; GENETICS; HUMAN; LIGHT; METABOLISM; PHOTOTRANSDUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RADIATION RESPONSE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CELL DEATH; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; CRYPTOCHROMES; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMANS; LIGHT; LIGHT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; OPTOGENETICS; PHYTOCHROME B; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEOLYSIS;

EID: 84921617217     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.11.007     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Santos S.D., et al. Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:324-330.
2. Inoue T., et al. An inducible translocation strategy to rapidly activate and inhibit small GTPase signaling pathways. Nat. Methods 2005, 2:415-418.
3. Karginov A.V., et al. Engineered allosteric activation of kinases in living cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:743-747.
4. Deisseroth K. Optogenetics. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:26-29.
5. Airan R.D., et al. Temporally precise in vivo control of intracellular signalling. Nature 2009, 458:1025-1029.
6. Boyden E.S., et al. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1263-1268.
7. Zhang F., et al. Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical control of excitable cells. Nat. Methods 2006, 3:785-792.
8. Nagel G., et al. Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:13940-13945.
9. Karginov A.V., et al. Light regulation of protein dimerization and kinase activity in living cells using photocaged rapamycin and engineered FKBP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 133:420-423.
10. Liu Q.Y., Deiters A. Optochemical control of deoxyoligonucleotide function via a nucleobase-caging approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47:45-55.
11. Shestopalov I.A., et al. Light-controlled gene silencing in zebrafish embryos. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3:650-651.
12. Arbely E., et al. Photocontrol of tyrosine phosphorylation in mammalian cells via genetic encoding of photocaged tyrosine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:11912-11915.
13. Gautier A., et al. Light-activated kinases enable temporal dissection of signaling networks in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133:2124-2127.
14. Nguyen D.P., et al. Genetic encoding of photocaged cysteine allows photoactivation of TEV protease in live mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136:2240-2243.
15. Tucker C.L. Manipulating cellular processes using optical control of protein-protein interactions. Prog. Brain Res. 2012, 196:95-117.
16. Kim B., Lin M.Z. Optobiology: optical control of biological processes via protein engineering. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2013, 41:1183-1188.
17. Toettcher J.E., et al. Light control of plasma membrane recruitment using the Phy-PIF system. Methods Enzymol. 2011, 497:409-423.
18. Zoltowski B.D., Gardner K.H. Tripping the light fantastic: blue-light photoreceptors as examples of environmentally modulated protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry 2011, 50:4-16.
19. Tischer D., Weiner O.D. Illuminating cell signalling with optogenetic tools. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:551-558.
20. Wu Y.I., et al. A genetically encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells. Nature 2009, 461:104-108.
21. Yazawa M., et al. Induction of protein-protein interactions in live cells using light. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:941-945.
22. Strickland D., et al. Rationally improving LOV domain-based photoswitches. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:623-626.
23. Levskaya A., et al. Spatiotemporal control of cell signalling using a light-switchable protein interaction. Nature 2009, 461:997-1001.
24. Shimizu-Sato S., et al. A light-switchable gene promoter system. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20:1041-1044.
25. Kennedy M.J., et al. Rapid blue-light-mediated induction of protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:973-975.
26. Crefcoeur R.P., et al. Ultraviolet-B-mediated induction of protein-protein interactions in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1779.
27. Chen D., et al. A light-triggered protein secretion system. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 201:631-640.
28. Zhou X.X., et al. Optical control of protein activity by fluorescent protein domains. Science 2012, 338:810-814.
29. Kent K.P., Boxer S.G. Light-activated reassembly of split green fluorescent protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133:4046-4052.
30. Do K., Boxer S.G. GFP variants with alternative beta-strands and their application as light-driven protease sensors: a tale of two tails. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135:10226-10229.
31. Strickland D., et al. TULIPs: tunable, light-controlled interacting protein tags for cell biology. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:379-384.
32. Toettcher J.E., et al. Using optogenetics to interrogate the dynamic control of signal transmission by the Ras/Erk module. Cell 2013, 155:1422-1434.
33. Zhang K., et al. Light-mediated kinetic control reveals the temporal effect of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in PC12 cell neurite outgrowth. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e92917.
34. Bugaj L.J., et al. Optogenetic protein clustering and signaling activation in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:249-252.
35. Wend S., et al. Optogenetic control of protein kinase activity in mammalian cells. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3:280-285.
36. Vanhaesebroeck B., et al. The emerging mechanisms of isoform-specific PI3K signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:329-341.
37. Cantley L.C. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science 2002, 296:1655-1657.
38. Toettcher J.E., et al. Light-based feedback for controlling intracellular signaling dynamics. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:837-839.
39. Kakumoto T., Nakata T. Optogenetic control of PIP3: PIP3 is sufficient to induce the actin-based active part of growth cones and is regulated via endocytosis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e70861.
40. Idevall-Hagren O., et al. Optogenetic control of phosphoinositide metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E2316-E2323.
41. Kim N., et al. Spatiotemporal control of fibroblast growth factor receptor signals by blue light. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21:903-912.
42. Grusch M., et al. Spatio-temporally precise activation of engineered receptor tyrosine kinases by light. EMBO J. 2014, 33:1713-1726.
43. Mills E., et al. Engineering a photoactivated caspase-7 for rapid induction of apoptosis. ACS Synth. Biol. 2012, 1:75-82.
44. Nagaraj S., et al. Programming membrane fusion and subsequent apoptosis into mammalian cells. ACS Synth. Biol. 2013, 2:173-179.
45. Tyszkiewicz A.B., Muir T.W. Activation of protein splicing with light in yeast. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:303-305.
46. Lee S., et al. Reversible protein inactivation by optogenetic trapping in cells. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:633-636.
47. Taslimi A., et al. An optimized optogenetic clustering tool for probing protein interaction and function. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:4925.
48. Jungbluth M., et al. Targeted protein depletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by activation of a bidirectional degron. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:176.
49. Renicke C., et al. A LOV2 domain-based optogenetic tool to control protein degradation and cellular function. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20:619-626.
50. Bonger K.M., et al. General method for regulating protein stability with light. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9:111-115.
51. Rivera V.M., et al. Regulation of protein secretion through controlled aggregation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 2000, 287:826-830.
52. Hughes R.M., et al. Light-mediated control of DNA transcription in yeast. Methods 2012, 58:385-391.
53. Liu H., et al. Optogenetic control of transcription in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e50738.
54. Motta-Mena L.B., et al. An optogenetic gene expression system with rapid activation and deactivation kinetics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10:196-202.
55. Polstein L.R., Gersbach C.A. Light-inducible spatiotemporal control of gene activation by customizable zinc finger transcription factors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:16480-16483.
56. Jullien N., et al. Regulation of Cre recombinase by ligand-induced complementation of inactive fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:e131.
57. Boulina M., et al. Live imaging of multicolor-labeled cells in Drosophila. Development 2013, 140:1605-1613.
58. Müller K., et al. Optogenetics for gene expression in mammalian cells. Biol. Chem. 2014, Published online August 2, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2014-0199.
59. Raftopoulou M., Hall A. Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev. Biol. 2004, 265:23-32.
60. Gaj T., et al. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31:397-405.
61. Konermann S., et al. Optical control of mammalian endogenous transcription and epigenetic states. Nature 2013, 500:472-476.
62. Lim W.A. Designing customized cell signalling circuits. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:393-403.
63. Chow B.Y., Boyden E.S. Optogenetics and translational medicine. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5:177ps5.
64. Ni M., et al. Binding of phytochrome B to its nuclear signalling partner PIF3 is reversibly induced by light. Nature 1999, 400:781-784.
65. Ni M., et al. PIF3, a phytochrome-interacting factor necessary for normal photoinduced signal transduction, is a novel basic helix-loop-helix protein. Cell 1998, 95:657-667.
66. Khanna R., et al. A novel molecular recognition motif necessary for targeting photoactivated phytochrome signaling to specific basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Plant Cell 2004, 16:3033-3044.
67. Liu H., et al. Photoexcited CRY2 interacts with CIB1 to regulate transcription and floral initiation in Arabidopsis. Science 2008, 322:1535-1539.
68. Brautigam C.A., et al. Structure of the photolyase-like domain of cryptochrome 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:12142-12147.
69. Yu X., et al. The cryptochrome blue light receptors. Arabidopsis Book 2010, 8:e0135.
70. Huala E., et al. Arabidopsis NPH1: a protein kinase with a putative redox-sensing domain. Science 1997, 278:2120-2123.
71. Harper S.M., et al. Structural basis of a phototropin light switch. Science 2003, 301:1541-1544.
72. Nihongaki Y., et al. Genetically engineered photoinducible homodimerization system with improved dimer-forming efficiency. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9:617-621.
73. Zoltowski B.D., et al. Mechanism-based tuning of a LOV domain photoreceptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:827-834.
74. Rizzini L., et al. Perception of UV-B by the Arabidopsis UVR8 protein. Science 2011, 332:103-106.
75. Heijde M., Ulm R. Reversion of the Arabidopsis UV-B photoreceptor UVR8 to the homodimeric ground state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:1113-1118.
76. Wu D., et al. Structural basis of ultraviolet-B perception by UVR8. Nature 2012, 484:214-219.
77. Christie J.M., et al. Plant UVR8 photoreceptor senses UV-B by tryptophan-mediated disruption of cross-dimer salt bridges. Science 2012, 335:1492-1496.
78. Rockwell N.C., et al. Phytochrome structure and signaling mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57:837-858.
79. Wagner J.R., et al. A light-sensing knot revealed by the structure of the chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome. Nature 2005, 438:325-331.