Towards methodologically inclusive research syntheses: Expanding possibilities

Towards Methodologically Inclusive Research Syntheses: Expanding Possibilities

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-191

  Suri, Harsh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917092371     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203383193     Document Type: Book

References (333)

1. Abrami, P. C., Cohen, P. A. and d’Apollonia, S., 1988. ‘Implementation Problems in Meta-Analysis’. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 151–179.
2. AERA, 2012. Review of Research Award [online]. American Educational Research Association website. Available from: http://www.aera.net/AboutAERA/AwardsandHonors/ReviewofResearchAward/tabid/12786/Default.aspx [Accessed 17 October 2012].
3. Amundsen, C. and Wilson, M., 2012. ‘Are We Asking the Right Questions?’ Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 90–126.
4. Anderson, G. L., 1989. ‘Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions’. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 249–270.
5. Apple, M. W., 1999. ‘What counts as legitimate knowledge? The social production and use of reviews’. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 343–346.
6. ARC, 2011. Discovery Early Career Researcher Award: Funding Rules for funding commencing in 2012 [online]. Australian Research Council website. Available from: http://www.arc.gov.au/ncgp/decra/fundingrules.htm [Accessed 24 September 2011].
7. Aronowitz, S. and Giroux, H. A., 1991. Postmodern education: Politics, culture, and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Bair, C. R., 1999. Meta-synthesis. ed. 24th annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, November 18–21 1999, San Antonio, 26.
9. Baker, B., 1999. ‘What is voice? Issues of identity and representation in the framing of reviews’. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 365–383.
10. Baldwin, R. G. and Austin, A. E., 1995. ‘Toward greater understanding of faculty research collaboration’. Review of Higher Education, 19(1), 45–70.
11. Barnett-Page, E. and Thomas, J., 2009. ‘Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review’. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59.
12. Barone, T., 2001. ‘Science, art, and the predispositions of educational researchers’. Educational Researcher, 30(7), 24–28.
13. Barone, T. and Eisner, E. W., 2006. ‘Arts-based educational research’ in Green, J. L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B., eds. Handbook of complementary methods in education research. 3rd ed. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 95–109.
14. Bassett, R. and McGibbon, E., 2012. ‘A critical participatory and collaborative method for scoping the literature’. Quality and quantity, (Published online 26 April 2012).
15. BEE, 2011. Best Evidence Encyclopedia [online]. John Hopkins University website. Available from: http://www.bestevidence.org/ [Accessed 24 June 2011].
16. Bernstein, R. J., 1986. ‘What is the difference that makes a difference?’ in Wachterhauser, B. R. ed. Hermeneutics and modern philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 343–376.
17. Bochner, A. P., 2000. ‘Criteria against ourselves’. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 266–272.
18. Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen, S. K., 1998. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Boote, D. N. and Beile, P., 2005. ‘Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation’. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15.
20. Booth, A., Carroll, C., Ilott, I., Low, L. L., and Cooper, K.., 2013. ‘Desperately Seeking Dissonance: Identifying the Disconfirming Case in Qualitative Evidence Synthesis’. Qualitative Health Research, 23(1), 126–141.
21. Borenstein, M., 2009. ‘Effect sizes for continuous data’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 221–235.
22. Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., and Brown, S.., 2003. ‘Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis’. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230.
23. Bowman, N., 2010. ‘College Diversity Experiences and Cognitive Development: A Meta-Analysis’. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 4.
24. Bransford, J. and Schwartz, D., 1999. ‘Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications’. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.
25. Briggs, D. C., 2008. ‘Synthesizing Causal Inferences’. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 15.
26. Buchanan, E. A. and Ess, C. M., 2009. ‘Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues’. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49.
27. Bullough, R. V., Jr and Pinnegar, S., 2001. ‘Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research’. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.
28. Burbules, N. C. and Warnick, B. R., 2006. ‘Philosophical inquiry’ in Green, J. L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B. eds. Handbook of complementary methods in education research. 3rd ed. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 489–502.
29. Bushman, B. J. and Wang, M. C., 2009. ‘Vote-counting procedures in meta-analysis’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 207–220.
30. Campbell Collaboration, 2001. Campbell Collaboration Guidelines (Version 1) [online]. The Campbell Collaboration website. Available from: http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/guidelines.html 2002 [Accessed 29 December 2001].
31. Campbell Collaboration, n.d. The Campbell Collaboration: What helps? What harms? Based on what evidence? [online]. The Campbell Collaboration website. Available from: http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/ [Accessed 20 September 2011].
32. Carr, S. and Coren, E., 2007. Collection of examples of service user and carer participation in systematic reviews [online]. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence website. Available from: http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/researchresources/rr02.asp [Accessed 24 September 2011].
33. Carroll, C., Booth, A. and Cooper, K., 2011. ‘A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents’. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 29.
34. Cassell, C., 2010. What is good qualitative research? [online]. The University of Manchester website. Available from: http://www.methods.manchester.ac.uk/methods/qualityinquali/index.shtml [Accessed 20 September 2011].
35. Chalmers, T. C. and Lau, J., 1993. ‘Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials’. Statistical methods in medical research, 2, 161–172.
36. Chase, S. E., 2011. ‘Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making’. in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 4211–4434.
37. Chatterji, M., 2008. ‘Synthesizing Evidence From Impact Evaluations in Education to Inform Action’. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 23.
38. Clandinin, D. J. and Connelly, F. M., 1996. ‘Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories – stories of teachers – school stories – stories of schools’. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30.
39. Clarke, D. J., 2003. ‘International comparative studies in mathematics education’. In Bishop, A. J., M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and F. K. S. Leung. eds. Second international handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 145–186.
40. Clegg, S., 2005. ‘Evidence-based practice in educational research: A critical realist critique of systematic review’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(3), 415–428.
41. Connelly, F. M. and Clandinin, D. J., 1999. ‘Narrative inquiry’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. New York: Pergamon, 132–140.
42. Constas, M. A., 1998. ‘Deciphering postmodern educational research’. Educational Researcher, 27(9), 36–42.
43. Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T., 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
44. Cooper, H. M., 1982. S’cientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews’. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291–302.
45. Cooper, H. M., 1988. ‘Organising knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews’. Knowledge in society, 1, 104–126.
46. Cooper, H. M., 1998. Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Cooper, H. M., 2009. ‘Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 19–35.
48. Cooper, H. M., 2010. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
49. Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V., 2009. ‘Research synthesis as a scientific process’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 3–16.
50. Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C., eds., 2009. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Sage.
51. Cooper, H. M. and Rosenthal, R., 1980. ‘A comparison of statistical and traditional procedures for summarising research’. Evaluation in Education, 4, 33–36.
52. CRD, 2009. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care [online]. the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York website. Available from: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/index_guidance.htm 2011 [Accessed 30 September 2001].
53. CRD, 2011. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination [online]. the University of York website. Available from: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/index.htm [Accessed 24 June 2011].
54. Creswell, J. W., 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Dabbs, J. M., Jr, 1982. ‘Making things visible’ in Van Maanen, J., Dabbs, J. M., Jr and Faulkner, R. R. eds. Varieties of qualitative research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 31–63.
56. Denzin, N. K., 2000. ‘Aesthetics and the practices of qualitative inquiry’. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256–265.
57. Denzin, N. K., 2008. ‘The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 21(4), 315–325.
58. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., 2011a. ‘Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1–32.
59. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., 2011b. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Dixon-Woods, M., 2011. ‘Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies’. BMC Medicine, 9(3), 39–40.
61. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B. and Sutton, A. J, 2005. ‘Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods’. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 45–53.
62. Dixon-Woods, M., Amalberti, R., Goodman, S., Bergman, B. and Glasziou, P. 2011. ‘Problems and promises of innovation: Why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new’. BMJ Quality and Safety 20(Suppl1), i47–i51.
63. Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A. and Young, B., 2006a. ‘How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective’. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27–44.
64. Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R. Katbamna, S. Olsen, R., Smith, L., Riley, R. and Sutton, A. J., 2006b. ‘Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups’. BMC Med Res Methodol, 6(35).
65. Donato, R. and Lazerson, M., 2000. ‘New directions in American educational history: Problems and prospects. Educational Researcher, 29(8), 4–15.
66. Dunkin, M. J., 1996. ‘Types of errors in synthesizing research in education’. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 87–97.
67. Dynarski, M., 2008. ‘Bringing Answers to Educators: Guiding Principles for Research Syntheses’. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 27.
68. Eastabrooks, C. A., Field, P. A. and Morse, J. M., 1994. ‘Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development’. Qualitative Health Research, 4(4), 503–511.
69. Edwards, T., 2000. ‘”All the evidence shows…”: Reasonable expectations of educational research’. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3&4), 299–311.
70. Eisenhart, M., 1998. ‘On the subject of interpretive reviews’. Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 391–399.
71. Eisenhart, M., 2001. ‘Educational ethnography past, present, and future: Ideas to think with’. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 16–27.
72. Eisenhart, M., 2005. ‘Hammers and saws for the improvement of educational research’. Educational Theory, 55(3), 245–261.
73. Eisner, E. W., 1992. ‘A Reply to Gabriele Lakomski’. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(2), 205–209.
74. Eisner, E. W., 1997. ‘The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation’. Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4–10.
75. Elmore, R. F., 1991. ‘Comment on “Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: Applying the exploratory case study method”’. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 293–297.
76. Ely, M., Vinz, R., Anzul, M., and Downing, M., 1997. On writing qualitative research: Living by words. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
77. Engberg, M. E., 2004. ‘Improving Intergroup Relations in Higher Education: A Critical Examination of the Influence of Educational Interventions on Racial Bias’. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 473.
78. EPPI-Centre, 2009. The Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre) [online]. the Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London website. Available from: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx [Accessed 1 September 2011].
79. EPPI-Centre, 2011. EPPI-Reviewer 4 (Verstion 4.2.1.0) [online]. the Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London website. Available from: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?alias=eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/er4 [Accessed 1 September 2011].
80. Evers, C. W., 1999. ‘From foundations to coherence in educational research’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 264–279.
81. Faulkner, R. R., 1982. ‘Improvising on a triad’ in Van Maanen, J., Dabbs, J. M., Jr and Faulkner, R. R. eds. Varieties of qualitative research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 65–101.
82. Finfgeld, D. L., 2003. ‘Metasynthesis: The state of the art – So far’. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893–904.
83. Finfgeld-Connett, D. and Johnson, E. D., 2012. ‘Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Article first published online: 17 May 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06037.x.
84. Fitzgerald, J., 1995. ‘English as a second language learners’ cognitive reading processes: A review of research in the United States’. Review of Educational Research, 95(2), 145–190.
85. Fleiss, J. L. and Berlin, J. A., 2009. ‘Effect sizes for dichotomous data’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 237–253.
86. Foster, P. and Hammersley, M., 1998. ‘A review of reviews: Structure and function in reviews of educational research’. British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 609–628.
87. Franklin, B. M., 1999. ‘Discourse, rationality and educational research: A historical perspective of RER’. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 347–363.
88. Gallagher, D. J., 2004. ‘Educational research, philosophical orthodoxy and unfulfilled promises: The quandary of traditional research in US special education’ in Thomas, G. and Pring, R. eds. Evidence-based practice in education. Buckingham: Open University Press, 119–130.
89. Gaskell, J., 1988. ‘Policy Research and Politics’. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(4), 403–417.
90. Gaskell, P. J., Hepburn, G. and Robeck, E., 1998. ‘Re/presenting a gender equity project: Contrasting visions and versions’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 859–876.
91. Gijbels, D., et al., 2005. ‘Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment’. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61.
92. Gillborn, D. and Gipps, C., 1998. ‘Watching the watchers: Research, methods, politics and equity. A response to Foster & Hammersley’. British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 629–633.
93. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
94. Glass, G. V., 1976. ‘Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research’. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
95. Glass, G. V., 2000. Meta-analysis at 25 [online]. Available from: http://www.gvglass.info/papers/meta25.html [Accessed 4 June 2012].
96. Glass, G. V., 2006. ‘Meta-analysis: The quantitative synthesis of research findings’ in Green, J. L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B. eds. Handbook of complementary methods in education research. 3rd ed. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 427–438.
97. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. and Smith, M. L., 1981. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
98. Glass, G. V. and Smith, M. L., 1979. ‘Meta-analysis of research on the relationship of class-size and achievement’. Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2–16.
99. Gordon, B. M., 1999. ‘Who do you believe – Me or your eyes? Perceptions and issues in educational research: Reviews and the journals that validate them’. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 407–410.
100. Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J., 2012a. ‘Introducing systematic reviews’ in Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. eds. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage, 1–16.
101. Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J., eds., 2012b. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.
102. Gough, D. and Thomas, J., 2012. ‘Commonality and diversity in reviews’ in Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. eds. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage, 35–65.
103. Grant, C. A. and Graue, E., 1999. ‘(Re)viewing a review: A case history of the Review of Educational Research’. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 384–396.
104. Green, J. L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B., eds., 2006. Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
105. Green, J. L. and Skukauskaite, A., 2008. ‘Becoming Critical Readers: Issues in Transparency, Representation, and Warranting of Claims’. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 30.
106. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., and Peacock, R., 2005. ‘Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review’. Social Science & Medicine, 61(2), 417–430.
107. Greenhouse, J. B. and Iyengar, S., 2009. ‘Sensitivity analysis and diagnostics’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 417–433.
108. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V. and Laine, R. D., 1996. ‘The effect of school resources on student achievement’. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.
109. Greenwood, D. J. and Levin, M., 2000. ‘Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 85–106.
110. Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S., 1999. ‘Naturalistic and rationalistic enquiry’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. New York: Pergamon, 141–149.
111. Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A., 1997. The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
112. Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A., 2000. ‘Analyzing interpretive practice’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 487–508.
113. Haggis, T., 2009. ‘What have we been thinking of? A critical overview of 40 years of student learning research in higher education’. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 377–390.
114. Haig, B. D., 1999. ‘Feminist research methodology’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 222–231.
115. Hammersley, M., 2000. ‘The relevance of qualitative research’. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3&4), 393–405.
116. Hammersley, M., 2001. ‘On “systematic” reviews of research literatures: A “narrative” response to Evans & Benefield’. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 543–554.
117. Hammersley, M., 2003. Systematic or unsystematic, is that the question? Some reflections on the science, art, and politics of reviewing research. Paper presented at the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester.
118. Hammersley, M., 2004. ‘Some questions about evidence-based practice in education’ in Thomas, G. and Pring, R. eds. Evidence-based practice in education. Buckingham: Open University Press, 133–149.
119. Hammerstrøm, K., Wade, A. and Jørgensen, A.-M. K., 2010. Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2010: Supplement 1 [online]. The Campbell Collaboration website. Available from: http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/ [Accessed 20 September 2011].
120. Hannes, K. and Lockwood, C., 2011a. ‘Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(7), 1632–1642.
121. Hannes, K. and Lockwood, C., 2011b. Synthesizing qualitative research: Choosing the right approach. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
122. Hannes, K., Lockwood, C. and Pearson, A., 2010. ‘A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments: Ability to assess validity in qualitative research’. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1736–1743.
123. Hannes, K. and Macaitis, K., 2012. ‘A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers’. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 402–442.
124. Harlen, W. and Crick, R. D., 2004. ‘Opportunities and challenges of using systematic reviews of research for evidence-based policy in education’. Evaluation and Research in Education, 18(1–2), 54–71.
125. Hatch, J. A., 2006. ‘Qualitative studies in the era of scientifically-based research: Musings of a former QSE editor’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19(4), 403–407.
126. Hattie, J., 2009. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
127. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H., 2007. ‘The power of feedback’. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–113.
128. Hedges, L. V., 2009. ‘Statistical consideration’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage.
129. Hedges, L. V. and Olkin, I., 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.
130. Hedges, L. V., Shymansky, J. A. and Woodworth, G., 1989. A practical guide to modern methods of meta-analysis. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
131. Hemsley-Brown, J. and Sharp, C., 2003. ‘The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature’. Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449.
132. Henry, A., 2006. ‘Historical studies: Groups/institutions’ in Green, J. L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B. eds. Handbook of complementary methods in education research. 3rd ed. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 333–355.
133. Herman, R., et al., 2006. ‘Reply to Comments from the What Works Clearinghouse on “What doesn’t work”’. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 22–23.
134. Heron, J. and Reason, P., 1997. ‘A participatory inquiry paradigm’. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274–294.
135. Heyvaert, M., 2011. ‘Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential’. Quality and quantity.
136. Hildebrand, G. M., 2001. ‘Re/Writing science from the margins’ in Barton, A. C. and Osborne, M. D. eds. Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses & classroom practice. New York: Peter Long, 161–198.
137. Hodder, I., 2000. ‘The interpretations of documents and material culture’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 703–715.
138. Hodkinson, P. and Smith, J. K., 2004. ‘The relationship between research, policy and practice’ in Thomas, G. and Pring, R. eds. Evidence-based practice in education. Buckingham: Open University Press, 150–163.
139. Hofer, B. K. and Pintrich, P. R., 1997. ‘The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning’. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
140. Howe, K. R., 2005. ‘The question of education science: Experimentism versus experimentalism’. Educational Theory, 55(3), 307–321.
141. Husen, T., 1999. ‘Research paradigms in education’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 31–39.
142. Hustler, D., Edwards, A. and Stronach, I., 1998. Editorial. British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 499–501.
143. Jackson, M., 1998. Minima ethnographica: Intersubjectivity and the anthropological project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
144. JBI, n.d. The Joanna Briggis Institute [online]. Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Adelaide, South Australia. Available from: http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/ [Accessed 3 July 2012].
145. Jensen, L. A. and Allen, M. N., 1994. ‘A synthesis of qualitative research on wellnessillness’. Qualitative Health Research, 4(4), 349–369.
146. Jensen, L. A. and Allen, M. N., 1996. ‘Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings’. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553–560.
147. Kaestle, C. F., 1997. ‘Recent methodological developments in the history of American education’ in Jaeger, R. M. ed. Complementary methods for research in education. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 119–129.
148. Kaestle, C. F., 1999. ‘Historical methods in educational research’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 121–131.
149. Kastner, M., et al., 2012. ‘What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review’. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 114.
150. Kasworm, C. E., 1990. ‘Adult undergraduates in higher education: A review of past research perspectives’. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 345–372.
151. Kelly, A. E. and Lesh, R. A., 2000. ‘Trends and shifts in research methods’ in Kelly, A. E. and Lesh, R. A. eds. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. London: Erlbaum Associates, 35–44.
152. Kemmis, S., 1999. ‘Action research’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. New York: Pergamon, 150–160.
153. Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R., 2000. ‘Participatory action research in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 567–605.
154. Kennedy, M. M., 2007. ‘Defining a literature’. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139–147.
155. Kennedy, M. M., 2008. ‘Contributions of qualitative research to research on teacher qualifications’. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 344–367.
156. Kennedy, M. M., 2010. ‘Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality’. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598.
157. Keogh, J. and Garrick, B., 2011. ‘Creating Catch 22: zooming in and zooming out on the discursive constructions of teachers in a news article’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(4), 419–434.
158. Kirk, R. E., 1996. ‘Practical significance: A concept whose time has come’. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746–759.
159. Kress, T. M., 2011a. ‘Inside the “thick wrapper” of critical pedagogy and research’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 261–266.
160. Kress, T. M., 2011b. ‘Stepping out of the academic brew: Using critical research to break down hierarchies of knowledge production’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 267–283.
161. Kuhn, T. S., 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
162. Kuhn, T. S., 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
163. L’Hommedieu, R., Menges, R. J. and Brinko, K. T., 1988. ‘Validity issues in metaanalysis: Suggestions for research and policy’. Higher Education Research & Development, 7(2), 119–128.
164. La Paro, K. and Pianta, R., 2000. ‘Predicting children’s competence in the early school years: A meta-analytic review’. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 443–484.
165. Lakomski, G., 1999. ‘Critical theory and education’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 174–183.
166. Lather, P., 1986. ‘Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place’. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84.
167. Lather, P., 1993. ‘Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism’. The Sociological Quaterly, 34(4), 673–693.
168. Lather, P., 1996. ‘Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language’. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 524–545.
169. Lather, P., 1999. ‘To be of use: The work of reviewing’. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2–7.
170. Lather, P., 2004a. ‘Scientific research in education: A critical perspective’. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 759–772.
171. Lather, P., 2004b. ‘This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education’. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15–34.
172. Lather, P., 2006. ‘Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19(1), 35–37.
173. Lawson, M. J., 1997. ‘Concept mapping’ in Keeves, J. P. ed. Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook. 2nd ed. New York: Pergamon, 290–296.
174. Layton, D., 1994. ‘STS in the School Curriculum: A movement overtaken by history?’ in Solomon, J. and Aikenhead, G. eds. STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform. N.Y: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 32–44.
175. Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C. and Taylor, K. H., 2010. ‘The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities’. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329–394.
176. LeCompte, M. D., 1995. ‘Some notes on power, agenda, and voice: A researcher’s personal evolution toward critical collaboration research’ in McLaren, P. L. and Giarelli, J. M. eds. Critical theory and educational research. New York: State University of New York Press.
177. LeCompte, M. D. and Goetz, J. P., 1982. ‘Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research’. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31–60.
178. LeCompte, M. D. and Preissle, J., 1993. Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
179. Light, R. J. and Pillemer, D. B., 1984. Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
180. Light, R. J., Singer, J. D. and Willett, J. B., 1994. ‘The visual presentation and interpretation of meta-analyses’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 439–454.
181. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G., 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
182. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G., 1986. ‘But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation’ in Williams, D. ed. Naturalistic evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 73–84.
183. Lincoln, Y. S., Linham, S. A. and Guba, E. G., 2011. ‘Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 97–128.
184. Lipsey, M. W., 2009. ‘Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 147–158.
185. Lipsey, M. W. and Wilson, D. B., 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Sage.
186. Livingston, G., 1999. ‘Beyond watching over established ways: A review as recasting the literature, recasting the lived’. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 9–19.
187. Lloyd Jones, M., 2004. ‘Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: Practical issues’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(3), 271–278.
188. Lou, Y., P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., and d’Apollonia, S., 1996. ‘Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis’. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423–458.
189. Louis, T. A. and Zelterman, D., 1994. ‘Bayesian approaches to research synthesis’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 411–422.
190. Lucas, S. R. and Beresford, L., 2010. ‘Naming and classifying: Theory, evidence and equity in education’. Review of Research in Education, 34, 25–84.
191. Luke, A., Green, J. and Kelly, G. J., 2010. ‘What counts as evidence and equity?’ Review of Research in Education, 34, vii–xvi.
192. MacLure, M., 2005. ‘“Clarity bordering on stupidity”: Where’s the quality in systematic review?’ Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 393–416.
193. Major, C. H. and Savin-Baden, M., 2010. An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. London: Routledge
194. Marshall, J. and Peters, M., 1999. ‘Postmodernism’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. New York: Pergamon, 242–248.
195. Mason, J., 2002. Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge.
196. Matt, G. E. and Cook, T. D., 1994. ‘Threats to the validity of research synthesis’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 503–520.
197. Matt, G. E. and Cook, T. D., 2009. ‘Threats to the validity of generalized inferences’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 537–560.
198. Maxcy, S. J., 2003. ‘Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism’ in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 51–90.
199. Maxwell, J. A. and Loomis, D. M., 2003. ‘Mixed methods design: An alternative approach’ Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 241–272.
200. Mayer, R. E., 2000. ‘What is the place of science in educational research’. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 29–36.
201. Mayer, R. E., 2001. ‘Resisting the assault on science: The case for evidence-based reasoning in educational research’. Educational Researcher, 30(7), 29–30.
202. Mays, N., Pope, C. and Popay, J., 2005a. Details of approaches to synthesis. A methodological appendix to the paper: Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy making in the health field [online]. the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation website. Available from: http://www.chsrf.ca/funding_opportunities/commissioned_research/projects/msynth_e.php [Accessed 4 July 2006].
203. Mays, N., Pope, C. and Popay, J., 2005b. ‘Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy making in the health field’. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 6–20.
204. Meacham, S. J., 1998. ‘Threads of a new language: A response to Eisenhart’s “On the subject of interpretive reviews”’. Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 401–407.
205. Mertens, D. M., 2005. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
206. Mertens, D. M., Bledsoe, K. L., Sullivan, M., and Wilson, A., 2010. ‘Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes’ in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 193–214.
207. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M., 1984. ‘Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft’. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
208. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
209. Miller, N. and Pollock, V. E., 1994. ‘Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 457–484.
210. Moss, P. A., 2005a. ‘Toward “epistemic reflexivity” in educational research: A response to Scientific Research in Education’. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 19–29.
211. Moss, P. A., 2005b. ‘Understanding the other/understanding ourselves: Toward a constructive dialogue about “principles” in educational research’. Educational Theory, 55(3), 263–283.
212. Murray, F. B. and Raths, J., 1996. ‘Factors in the peer review of reviews’. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 417–421.
213. Murray, F. B., Raths, J. and Blanteno, L., 1996. ‘The decoupling of RER articles, critiques, and rejoinders in the educational literature’. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 657–658.
214. Nisbet, J., 1999. ‘Policy-oriented research’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 64–78.
215. Noblit, G. W. and Hare, R. D., 1988. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage.
216. Norris, J., 2003. Arts-based research is for everyone: Exploring the methodological potential of arts-based research. Banff, Canada. (Powerpoint file and Audiotape available from Kennedy Recordings).
217. Oakley, A., 2003. ‘Research evidence, knowledge management and educational practice: Early lessons from a systematic approach’. London Review of Education, 1(1), 21–33.
218. Oancea, A., 2005. ‘Criticisms of educational research: key topics and levels of analysis’. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 157–183.
219. Ödman, P. and Kerdeman, D., 1999. ‘Hermeneutics’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 184–197.
220. Ogawa, R. T. and Malen, B., 1991a. ‘A response to commentaries on “Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures…”’. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 307–313.
221. Ogawa, R. T. and Malen, B., 1991b. ‘Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: Applying the exploratory case study method’. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 265–286.
222. Oliver, S., Dickson, K. and Newman, M., 2012. ‘Getting started with a review’ in Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. eds. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage, 66–82.
223. Oliver, S. R., et al., 2008. ‘A multidimensional conceptual framework for analyzing public involvement in health services research’. Health Expectations, 11(1), 72–84.
224. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Teddlie, C., 2003. ‘A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research’ in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 351–384.
225. Orwin, R. G., 1994. ‘Evaluating coding decisions’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 139–162.
226. Orwin, R. G. and Vevea, J. L., 2009. ‘Evaluating coding decisions’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 177–203.
227. Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., and Wong, R., 2010. ‘Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: Consideration of a range of search techniques’. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27(2), 114–122.
228. Pascarella, E. T. and Terenzini, P. T., 2005. How college affects students a third decade of research. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
229. Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., and Jillings, C., 2001. Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
230. Patton, M. Q., 1991. ‘Towards utility in reviews of multivocal literatures’. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 287–292.
231. Patton, M. Q., 1999. ‘Myths as normative frames for qualitative interpretation of life stories’. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(3), 338–352.
232. Patton, M. Q., 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
233. Paugh, P. and Robinson, E., 2011. ‘Keeping a “vigilant critique”: Unpacking critical praxis as teacher educators’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 363–378.
234. Paul, J. L. and Marfo, K., 2001. ‘Preparation of educational researchers in philosophical foundations of inquiry’. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 525–547.
235. Pawson, R., 2006. Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
236. Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., and Walshe, K., 2005. ‘Realist Review: A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions’. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 21–34.
237. Peile, C., 1994. The creative paradigm: Insight, synthesis and knowledge development. Sydney: Avebury.
238. Peshkin, A., 2001. ‘Angles of vision: Enhancing perception in qualitative research’. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 238–253.
239. Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H., 2006. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
240. Phillips, D. C., 2006. ‘A guide for the perplexed: Scientific educational research, methodolatory, and the gold versus platinum standards’. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 15–26.
241. Phillips, R., McNaught, C. and Kennedy, G., 2012. Evaluating e-learning: Guiding research and practice. NY: Routledge.
242. Pigott, T. D., 2009. ‘Handling missing data’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 399–416.
243. Popay, J., Rogers, A. and Williams, G., 1998. ‘Rationale and standards for the systematics review of qualitative literature in health services research’. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341–351.
244. Pope, C., Mays, N. and Popay, J., 2007. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: A guide to methods. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
245. Popkewitz, T. S., 1999. Reviewing reviews: RER, research and the politics of educational knowledge’. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 397–404.
246. Popkewitz, T. S., 2004. ‘Is the National Research Council Committee’s report on Scientific Research in Education scientific? On trusting the manifesto’. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 62–78.
247. Popper, K. R., 1965. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
248. Posavac, E. J., 1992. ‘Communicating applied social psychology to users: A challenge and an art’ in Bryant, F. B., J. Edwards, R. S. Tindale, E. J. Posavac, L. Heath, E. Henderson and Y. Suarez-Balcazar eds. Methodological issues in applied social psychology. New York: Plenum Press, 269–293.
249. Rees, R. and Oliver, S., 2012. ‘Stakeholder perspectives and participation in reviews’ in Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. eds. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage, 17–34.
250. Richardson, L., 2000a. ‘Evaluating ethnography’. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 235–255.
251. Richardson, L., 2000b. ‘Writing: A method of Inquiry’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 923–948.
252. Richardson, L., 2001. ‘Getting personal: Writing-stories’. Qualitative studies in education, 33–38.
253. Ridgway, J., Zawojewski, J. S. and Hoover, M. N., 2000. ‘Problematising evidencebased policy and practice’. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3&4), 181–192.
254. Riessman, C. K., 1993. Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
255. Ritchie, S. M. and Rigano, D. L., 2007. ‘Solidarity through collaborative research’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 129–150.
256. Rosenthal, M. C., 1994. ‘The fugitive literature’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 85–94.
257. Rosenthal, R., 1980. ‘Combining probabilities and the file drawer problem’. Evaluation in Education, 4, 18–21.
258. Rothstein, H. R., College, B., Turner, H. M., and Lavenberg, J. G., 2004. The Campbell Collaboration information retrieval policy brief [online]. The Campbell Collaboration website. Available from: http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/MG/IRMGPolicyBriefRevised.pdf [Accessed 5 June 2006].
259. Rothstein, H. R. and Hopewell, S., 2009. ‘Grey literature’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 103–125.
260. Ryan, K. E. and Hood, L. K., 2004. ‘Guarding the castle and opening the gates’. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 79–95.
261. Sandelowski, M. and Barroso, J., 2002. ‘Reading qualitative studies’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods.
262. Sandelowski, M. and Barroso, J., 2007. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York Springer.
263. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., Leeman, J., and Crandell, J. L., 2012. ‘Mapping the Mixed Methods–Mixed Research Synthesis Terrain’. Journal of mixed methods research, 6(4), 317–331.
264. Schmid, C. H. and Lipsey, M. W., 2011. Author guidelines: Research Synthesis Methods [online]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291759-2887/homepage/ForAuthors.html#general [Accessed 23 September 2011].
265. Schoenfeld, A. H., 2006. ‘What doesn’t work: The challenge and failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula’. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 13–21.
266. Schön, D. A., 1992. ‘The Theory of Inquiry: Dewey’s Legacy to Education’. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(2), 119–139.
267. Schwandt, T. A., 1998. ‘The interpretive review of educational matters: Is there any other kind?’ Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 409–412.
268. Schwandt, T. A., 2005. ‘A diagnostic reading of scientifically based research for education’. Educational Theory, 55(3), 286–305.
269. Seale, C., 1999. The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
270. Segall, A., 2001. ‘Critical ethnography and the invocation of voice: From the field/in the field – single exposure, double standard?’ Qualitative studies in education, 14(4), 579–592.
271. Shadish, W. R., n.d. Links to meta-analysis software [online]. The School of Social Sciences, University of California, Merced website. Available from: http://faculty.ucmerced.edu/wshadish/MetaAnalysis%20Software.htm [Accessed 4 July 2012].
272. Shimpuku, Y. and Norr, K. F., 2012. ‘Working with interpreters in cross-cultural qualitative research in the context of a developing country: systematic literature review’. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Article first published online: 15 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05951.x.
273. Sholle, D., 1992. ‘Authority on the left: Critical pedagogy, postmodernism and vital strategies’. Cultural Studies, 6(2), 271–289.
274. Shulha, L. M. and Wilson, R. J., 2003. ‘Collaborative mixed methods research’ in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 639–670.
275. Silverman, D., 2000. ‘Analyzing talk and text’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 821–834.
276. Sipe, T.-A. and Curlette, W. L., 1997. ‘’A meta-synthesis of factors related to educational achievement: A methodological approach to summarizing and synthesizing meta-analyses’. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(7), 583–698.
277. Sirin, S. R., 2005. ‘Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research’. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
278. Slavin, R. E., 1986. ‘Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews’. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5–11.
279. Slavin, R. E., 2002. ‘Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research’. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
280. Slavin, R. E., 2008a. ‘Evidence-Based Reform in Education: Which Evidence Counts?’ Educational Researcher, 37(1), 47–50.
281. Slavin, R. E., 2008b. ‘Perspectives on evidence-based research in education—What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations’. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5–14.
282. Smith, M. L. and Glass, G. V., 1977. ‘Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies’. The American psychologist, 32(9), 752–760.
283. Smyth, J. and Hattam, R., 2000. ‘Intellectual as hustler: Researching against the grain of the market’. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 157–175.
284. SRSM, nd. Society for Research Synthesis Methodology [online]. Available from: http://www.srsm.org/AboutSRSM.htm [Accessed 22 September 2011].
285. Stake, R. E., 1998. Case studies in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 86–109.
286. Stock, W. A., 1994. ‘Systematic coding for research synthesis’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 125–138.
287. Stock, W. A., Benito, J. G. and Lasa, N. B., 1996. ‘Research synthesis: Coding and conjectures’. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 19(1), 104–117.
288. Strathern, M., 2000. ‘The tyranny of transparency’. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 309–321.
289. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
290. Strike, K. A. and Posner, G., 1983. ‘Epistemological problems in organizing social science knowledge for application’ in Ward, S. A. and Reed, L. J. eds. Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 47–83.
291. Stronach, I. and MacLure, M., 1997. Educational research undone: The postmodern embrace. Buckingham: Open University Press.
292. Suri, H., 1999. A methodologically inclusive model for research synthesis. Joint conference of AARE and NZARE, Melbourne.
293. Suri, H., 2007. Expanding possibilities within research syntheses: A methodologically inclusive research synthesis framework. PhD Thesis. The University of Melbourne.
294. Suri, H., 2011. ‘Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis’. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75.
295. Suri, H., 2012. ‘Epistemological pluralism in qualitative research synthesis’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (DOI:10.1080/09518398.2012.691565).
296. Suri, H. and Hattie, J., in press. ‘Meta-analysis and research synthesis in education’. Oxford Bibliographies Online.
297. Suri, H. and Patel, F., 2012. ‘Ethical considerations in online research methods’ in Silva, C. ed. Online research methods in urban and planning studies: Design and outcomes. Hershey PA: IGI Global, 394–408.
298. Sutton, A. J., 2009. ‘Publication Bias’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 435–452.
299. Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C., 2003. ‘The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs’ in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 671–702.
300. Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C., eds., 2010. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
301. Taylor, C., 1982. ‘Interpretation and the sciences of man’ in Bredo, E. and Feinberg, W. eds. Knowledge and values in social and eduational research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
302. Te Manatu Taonga Ministry for Culture and Heritage, 2005. Review of Cultural Well-Being Related Activity [online]. The Ministry for Culture and Heritage with Local Authorities website. Available from: http://www.mch.govt.nz/cwb/pdfs/review-of-cultural-wellbeing-activity.pdf [Accessed 19 February 2006].
303. Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A., 2003. ‘Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences’ in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 3–50.
304. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration [online]. The Cochrane Collaboration: Working together to provide the best evidence for health care. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/ [Accessed 20 September 2011].
305. Thomas, G., 2004. ‘Introduction: Evidence and practice’ in Thomas, G. and Pring, R. eds. Evidence-based practice in education. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1–18.
306. Thomas, J. and Harden, A., 2008. ‘Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews’. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45–54.
307. Thompson, B., 2006. ‘Research synthesis: Effect sizes’ in Green, J. L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B. eds. Handbook of complementary methods in education research. 3rd ed. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 583–603.
308. Thorne, S., 2001. ‘Conceptual and theoretical challenges in meta-synthesis’. Advances in Qualitative Methods Conference. Edmonton Alberta.
309. Tierney, W. G., 2000. ‘Undaunted courage: Life history and postmodern courage’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 537–553.
310. Torrance, H., 2004. ‘Using action research to generate knowledge about educational practice’ in Thomas, G. and Pring, R. eds. Evidence-based practice in education. Buckingham: Open University Press, 187–200.
311. Tuchman, G., 1998. ‘Historical social science: Methodologies, methods, and meanings’ in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. eds. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
312. Valentine, J. C., 2009. ‘Judging the quality of primary research’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 129–146.
313. Van Maanen, J., 1988. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
314. Veenman, S., 1995. ‘Cognitive and noncognitive effects of multigrade and multi-age classes: A best-evidence synthesis’. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 319–381.
315. Walker, J. C. and Evers, C. W., 1999. ‘Research in education: Epistemological issues’ in Keeves, J. P. and Lakomski, G. eds. Issues in educational research. 1st ed. New York: Pergamon, 40–56.
316. Ward, S. A., 1983. ‘Knowledge structure and knowledge synthesis’ in Ward, S. A. and Reed, L. J. eds. Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 21–42.
317. Warschauer, M. and Matuchniak, T., 2010. ‘New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes’. Review of Research in Education, 179–225, vii–xvi.
318. White, H. D., 2009. ‘Scientific communication and literature retrievel’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 51–77.
319. Wickens, C. M., 2010. ‘The investigation of power in written texts through the use of multiple textual analytic frames’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 151–164.
320. Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J. and Moon, B., 1998. ‘A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry’. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.
321. Wilczynski, N. L., Marks, S. and Haynes, R. B., 2007. ‘Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL’. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 705–710.
322. Willinsky, J., 2005. ‘Scientific research in a democratic culture: Or what’s a social science for?’ Teachers College Record, 107(1), 38–51.
323. Wilson, D. B., 2009. ‘Systematic coding’ in Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. eds. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Sage, 159–176.
324. Windschitl, M., 2002. ‘Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers’. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.
325. Wink, J., 1997. Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. New York: Longman.
326. Wiseman, A. W., 2010. ‘The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends’. Review of Research in Education, 34, 1–24.
327. Wortman, P. M., 1994. ‘Judging research quality’ in Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage, 97–110.
328. Wright, S. and Coultas, S., 2007. The Cochrane Qualitative Methods Group. Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University website. Available from: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/shm/dhr/research/public/cochrane.htm [Accessed 20 September 2011].
329. Yeager, D. S. and Walton, G. M., 2011. ‘Social-Psychological Interventions in Education: They’re Not Magic’. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267.
330. Yin, R. K., 1991. ‘Advancing rigorous methodologies: A review of “Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures…”’. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 299–305.
331. Yu, K., 2011. ‘Exploring the nature of the researcher-practitioner relationship in qualitative educational research publications’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (First published on: 06 January 2011 at iFirst).
332. Zhao, S., 1991. ‘Meta-theory, meta-method, meta-data-analysis: What, why, and how?’ Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 377–390.
333. Zimmer, L., 2006. ‘Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 311–318.