Meta-analysis: The quantitative synthesis of research findings

Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 427-438

  Glass, Gene V ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084602924     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203874769-30     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Becker, B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In H. E. A Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds,), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499-525). San Diego, CA: Academic.
2. Cooper, H. M., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research.synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A non-parametric"trim and till" method of assessing publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89-98.
4. Fleiss, J. L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. M. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 245-260). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
6. Glass, G. V. (1978). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.
7. Glass, G. V. (2000, March). Meta-analysis at 25. Paper presented at the UC-Berkeley-Stanford Colloquium on Meta-Analysis, University of Califomia-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Retrieved March l, 2004, from http://glass.ed.asu.edulgenelpaperslmeta25.html
8. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981).Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.
10. Hedges, L. V, & Vevea, J. L. (1996). Estimating effect size under publication bias: Small sample properties and robustness of a random effects selection model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 21, 299-332.
11. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed and random effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 6, 486-504.
12. Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Kalaian, H. A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1996). A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 225-235.
14. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Orwin, R. G. (1994). Evaluating coding decisions. In H. M. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 139-176). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Pigott, T. D. (1994). Methods for handling missing data in research synthesis. In H. M. Cooper & L. V Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 139-176). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Rosenthal, R. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Wiley.
18. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. M. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
21. Rudner, L. M., Glass, G. V., Evartt, D. L., & Emery, P. J. (2002). A user's guide to the meta-analysis of research studies. Retreived December 28, 2005, from http://www.edres.Org/meta/http://www.edres.org/meta/metastat.htm
22. Shadish, W. R., Robinson, L., & Lu, C. (1999). ES: A computerprogram and manual for effect size calculation. St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems Corporation.
23. Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1989). Flunking grades: Research and policies on grade retention. New York: Falmer.
24. Slavin, R. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analysis and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5-11.
25. Smith, M. L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education, 4, 22-24.
26. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Stock, W. A. (1994). Systematic coding for research synthesis. In H. M. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 125-138). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28. Stock, W. A., Okun, M., Haring, M., Miller, W., Kenney, C., & Ceurvorst, R. (1982). Rigor in data synthesis: A case study of reliability in meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 11(6), 10-14.
29. Vevea, J. L., & Hedges, L. V. (1995). A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias. Psychometrika, 60, 419-435.
30. White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91,461-481.