Ethical considerations in online research methods

Online Research Methods in Urban and Planning Studies: Design and Outcomes

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 394-408

  Suri, Harsh ^a   Patel, Fay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898198857     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0074-4.ch023     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2000). Ethical Standards of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from https://www.aera.net/AboutAERA/Default.aspx?menu_id=90&id=222.
2. American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Opportunities/StandardsforReportingEmpiricalSocialScience_PDF.pdf.
3. American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2009). Standards for reporting on humanities-oriented research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 38(6), 481-486. doi:10.3102/0013189X09341833.
4. Baker, B. (1999). What is voice? Issues of identity and representation in the framing of reviews. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 365-383.
5. Bruckman, A. (2002). Ethical guidelines for research online. Retrieved August 2, 2010, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/>~asb/ethics.
6. Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2008). Internet research ethics: The field and its critical issues. In Himma, K. E., & Tavani, H. T. (Eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience. doi:10.1002/9780470281819.ch11.
7. Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43-49. doi:10.1145/1713066.1713069.
8. Capurro, R., & Pingel, C. (2002). Ethical issues of online communication research. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 189-194. doi:10.1023/A:1021372527024.
9. Capurro, R., & Pingel, C. (n.d.). Internet research ethics Ethical issues of online communication research. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_cap_full.html.
10. Castellano, M. B. (2004). Ethics of Aboriginal Research. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 98-114.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed method Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Dabbs, J. M. Jr. (1982). Making things visible. In Van Maanen, J., Dabbs, J. M. Jr, & Faulkner, R. R. (Eds.), Varieties of qualitative research (pp. 31-63). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Dillon, L. (2010). Listening for voices of self: Digital journaling among gifted young adolescents. Qualitative Research Journal, 10(1), 13-27. doi:10.3316/QRJ1001013.
14. Ess, C., & Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR). (2002). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.
15. Flinders, D. (1992). In search of ethical guidance: Constructing a basis for dialogue. Qualitative Studies in Education, 52(2), 101-115. doi:10.1080/0951839920050202.
16. Gaskell, J. (1988). Policy Research and Politics. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(4), 403-417.
17. Gurumurthy, A. (2004). Gender and ICTs Overview Report. Brighton, UK: Bridge Publications. Retrieved from http://www.bridge.ids.ac.uk/reports/CEP-ICTs-OR.pdf.
18. Hall, G. J., Frederick, D., & Johns, M. D. (2004). 'NEED HELP ASAP!!!': A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics. In Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S., & Hall, G. J. (Eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics (pp. 239-253). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
19. Hongladarom, S., & Ess, C. (Eds.). (2007). Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
20. Intellectual Property Law in Australia. (2010). Introduction. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/ip/introduction.shtml.
21. Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
24. Madge, C. (2007). Developing a geographers' agenda for online research ethics. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 654-674. doi:10.1177/0309132507081496.
25. Markham, A. (2007). Ethic as method, method as ethic: A case for reflexivity in qualitative ICT research. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37-54. doi:10.3172/JIE.15.2.37.
26. McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
27. McMichael, P. (2004). Development and Social Change a global perspective (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
28. Mowlana, H. (1995). The communications paradox. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 51(4), 40-46.
29. Murthy, D. (2008). Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. Sociology, 42, 837-855. doi:10.1177/0038038508094565.
30. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Australian Research Council (ARC), & Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee (AVCC). (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au.
31. Oriordan, K. (2010). Internet research ethics: revisiting the relations between technologies, spaces, texts and people. Retrieved February 27, 2011, from http://eresearch-ethics.org/position/internet-research-ethics-revisiting-the-relations-between-technologies-spaces-texts-and-people/.
32. Palomba, E. (2006). ICT technologies and intercultural issues. Retrieved July 28, 2010, from http://www.formatex.org/micte2006/pdf/82-86.pdf.
33. Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of educational research. London, UK: Continuum.
34. Rhodes, S. D., Bowie, D. A., & Hergenrather, K. C. (2003). Collecting behavioural data using the World Wide Web: considerations for researchers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 68-73. doi:10.1136/jech.57.1.68.
35. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
36. Rogers, E. M. (1995). The diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
37. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Dunedin, New Zealan: University of Otago Press.
38. Stern, S. (2003). Encountering distressing information in online research: a consideration of legal and ethical responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249-266. doi:10.1177/1461444803005002006.
39. Story, A. (2002). Study on intellectual property rights, the Internet, and copyright. London, UK: Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. Retrieved July 18, 2010, from http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/study_papers/sp5_story_study.pdf.
40. Stutchbury, K., & Fox, A. (2009). Ethics in educational research: Introducing a methodological tool for effective ethical analysis. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(4), 489-504. doi:10.1080/03057640903354396.
41. Suri, H. (2008). Ethical Considerations in Synthesising Research: Whose Representations? Qualitative Research Journal, 8(1), 62-73. doi:10.3316/QRJ0801062.
42. Whiteman, E. (2007). "Just Chatting": Research Ethics and Cyberspace. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 95-105.