The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 315-325

  Denzin, Norman K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249093663     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390802136995     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AERA (American Education Research Association). 2006. Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. www.aera.net/opportunities/?id=1480 (accessed February 6, 2007).
2. Bell, V. 2006. The Cochrane qualitative methods group. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/ihr/research/ publich/cochrane.htm
3. Biesta, G.J. 2004. Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory 54, no. 3: 233-50.
4. Briggs, J. 2006. Cochrane qualitative research methods group. The Cochrane Collaboration. http:// www.joannabriggs.eduau/cqrmg/role.html
5. Brinkmann, S. and S. Kvale. 2008. Ethics in qualitative psychological research. In Handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers, 261-79. London: Sage.
6. Bryman, A, et al. 2006. Qualitative Research. Special Issue: Mixed Methods Research 6, no. 1: 5-115.
7. Cannella, G.S. and Y.S. Lincoln. 2004. Dangerous discourses II: Comprehending and countering the redeployment of discourses (and resources) in the generation of liberatory inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 10, no. 2: 165-74.
8. Christians, C. 2005. Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 3rd ed., 139-64. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Creswell, J.W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Denzin, N.K. 2007. The secret downing street memo, the one percent doctrine, and the politics of truth: A performance text. Symbolic Interaction 30, no. 4: 447-64.
11. Dixon-Woods, M., B. Shelia, B. Andrew, R.J. David, M. Tina, J.S. Alex, L.S. Rachel, A.S. Jonathan, and Y. Bridget. 2006. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 6, no. 1: 27-44.
12. Donmoyer, R. 2006. Take my paradigm ... please! The legacy of Kuhn's construct in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 6: 11-34.
13. Eisenhart, M. 2006. Qualitative science in experimental time. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 6: 697-707.
14. Eisenhart, M. and R.L. DeHaan. 2005. Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education research. Educational Researcher 34, no. 4: 3-14.
15. Flyvberg, B. 2001. Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gage, N.L. 1989. The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A 'historical' sketch of research and teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher 18, no. 7: 4-10.
17. Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
18. Guba, E., ed. 1990a. The paradigm dialog. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. _. 1990b. Carrying on the dialog. In The paradigm dialog, ed. E. Guba, 368-78. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Guba, E. and Y.S. Lincoln. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 105-17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. _. 2005. Paradigmatic controversies, and emerging confluences. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 3rd ed., 191-216. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Hatch, A. 2006. Qualitative studies in the era of scientifically-based research: Musings of a former QSE editor. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 4: 403-9.
23. Kvale, S. 2008. Qualitative inquiry between scientistic evidendialism, ethical objectivism and the free market. International Review of Qualitative Research 1, no. 1: 5-18.
24. Lather, P. 2004. This is your father's paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry 10, no. 1: 15-34.
25. _. 2006a. Paradigm prolifferation as a good think to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 6: 35-57.
26. _. 2006b. Foucauldian scientificity: Rethinking the nexus of qualitative research and educational policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 6: 783-92.
27. Morse, J.M. 2006. The politics of evidence. In Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge, ed. N.K. Denzin and M. Giardina, 79-92. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
28. National CASP Collaboration. 2006. 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research, Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). The Cochrane Collaboration. Milton Keyenes: Primary Care Trust. http://www.joannabriggs. eduau/cqrmg/role.html
29. Preissle, J. 2006. Envisioning qualitative inquiry: A view across four decades. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 6: 685-96.
30. Ryan, K.E. and L. Hood. 2004. Guarding the castle and opening the gates. Qualitative Inquiry 10, no. 1: 79-95.
31. Scheurich, J.J. and M.C. Clark. 2006. Qualitative studies in education at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 4: 401.
32. Schwandt, T.A. 2000. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics and social constructism. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 2nd ed., 189-214. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Skrla, L. and J.J. Scheurich, eds. 2004. Educational equity and accountability: High schools and high stakes. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
34. St. Pierre, E.A. 2006. Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly 56, no. 3: 239-66.
35. St. Pierre, E.A. and K. Roulston. 2006. The state of qualitative inquiry: A contested science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19, no. 6: 673-84.
36. Teddlie, C. and A. Tashakkori. 2003a. Preface. In Handbook of mixed-methods in social and behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 9-15. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. _. 2003b. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In Handbook of mixed-methods in social and behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 3-50. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Torrance, H. 2006. Research quality and research governance in the United Kingdom: From methodology to management. In Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge, ed. N.K. Denzin and M.D. Giardina, 127-48. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.