Bimodal activation of BubR1 by Bub3 sustains mitotic checkpoint signaling

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 40, 2014, Pages E4185-E4193

  Han, Joo Seek ^a,b   Vitre, Benjamin ^a,b   Fachinetti, Daniele ^a,b   Cleveland, Don W ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; BUB1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; BUB3 PROTEIN, HUMAN; CDC20 PROTEIN, HUMAN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; CYCLIN B1; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE;

BINDING SITE; CENTROMERE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; GENETICS; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RNA INTERFERENCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; TUMOR CELL LINE; UBIQUITINATION;

ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEX-CYCLOSOME; BINDING SITES; CDC20 PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CYCLIN B1; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RNA INTERFERENCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84907811647     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1416277111     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Skibbens RV, Rieder CL, Salmon ED (1995) Kinetochore motility after severing between sister centromeres using laser microsurgery: Evidence that kinetochore directional instability and position is regulated by tension. J Cell Sci 108(Pt 7):2537-2548.
2. Lara-Gonzalez P, Westhorpe FG, Taylor SS (2012) The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 22(22):R966-R980.
3. Jia L, Kim S, Yu H (2013) Tracking spindle checkpoint signals from kinetochores to APC/C. Trends Blochem Sci 38(6):302-311.
4. Foley EA, Kapoor TM (2013) Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(1):25-37.
5. Shah JV, et al. (2004) Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr Biol 14(11):942-952.
6. De Antoni A, et al. (2005) The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 15(3):214-225.
7. Vink M, et al. (2006) In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics. Curr Biol 16(8):755-766.
8. Kulukian A, Han JS, Cleveland DW (2009) Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev Cell 16(1):105-117.
9. Lad L, Lichtsteiner S, Hartman J J, Wood KW, Sakowicz R (2009) Kinetic analysis of Mad2-Cdc20 formation: Conformational changes in Mad2 are catalyzed by a C-Mad2-ligand complex. Biochemistry 48(40):9503-9515.
10. Simonetta M, et al. (2009) The influence of catalysis on mad2 activation dynamics. PLoS Biol 7(1):e10.
11. Luo X, Yu H (2008) Protein metamorphosis: The two-state behavior of Mad2. Structure 16(11):1616 -1625.
12. Mapelli M, Musacchio A (2007) MAD contortions: Conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17(6):716-725.
13. Han JS, et al. (2013) Catalytic assembly of the mitotic checkpoint inhibitor BubR1-Cdc20 by a Mad2-induced functional switch in Cdc20. Mol Cell 51(1):92-104.
14. Chao WC, Kulkarni K, Zhang Z, Kong EH, Barford D (2012) Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 484(7393):208-213.
15. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ (2001) Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J Cell Biol 154(5): 925-936.
16. Lau DT, Murray AW (2012) Mad2 and Mad3 cooperate to arrest budding yeast in mitosis. Curr Biol 22(3):180-190.
17. Nilsson J, Yekezare M, Minshull J, Pines J (2008) The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat Cell Biol 10(12):1411-1420.
18. Murray AW, Marks D (2001) Can sequencing shed light on cell cycling? Nature 409(6822):844-846.
19. Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BT (1991) S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66(3):507-517.
20. Kalitsis P, Earle E, Fowler KJ, Choo KH (2000) Bub3 gene disruption in mice reveals essential mitotic spindle checkpoint function during early embryogenesis. Genes Dev 14(18):2277-2282.
21. Campbell L, Hardwick KG (2003) Analysis of Bub3 spindle checkpoint function in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Sci 116(Pt 4):617-628.
22. Lopes CS, Sampaio P, Williams B, Goldberg M, Sunkel CE (2005) The Drosophila Bub3 protein is required for the mitotic checkpoint and for normal accumulation of cyclins during G2 and early stages of mitosis. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 1):187-198.
23. Logarinho E, Resende T, Torres C, Bousbaa H (2008) The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Mol Biol Cell 19(4):1798-1813.
24. Primorac I, et al. (2013) Bub3 reads phosphorylated MELT repeats to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. eLlfe 2:e01030.
25. Shepperd LA, et al. (2012) Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/ KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr Biol 22(10):891-899.
26. Yamagishi Y, Yang CH, Tanno Y, Watanabe Y (2012) MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylâtes the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat Cell Biol 14(7): 746-752.
27. London N, Ceto S, Ranish JA, Biggins S (2012) Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr Biol 22(10):900-906.
28. Johnson VL, Scott Ml, Holt SV, Hussein D, Taylor SS (2004) Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J Cell Sci 117(Pt 8):1577-1589.
29. Kim S, Sun H, Tomchick DR, Yu H, Luo X (2012) Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(17):6549-6554.
30. Moyle MW, et al. (2014) A Bub1-Mad1 interaction targets the Mad1-Mad2 complex to unattached kinetochores to initiate the spindle checkpoint. J Cell Biol 204(5):647-657.
31. Heinrich S, et al. (2014) Mad1 contribution to spindle assembly checkpoint signalling goes beyond presenting Mad2 at kinetochores. EMBO Rep 15(3):291-298.
32. London N, Biggins S (2014) Madi kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 28(2):140-152.
33. Vanoosthuyse V, Meadows JC, van der Sar SJ, Millar JB, Hardwick KG (2009) Bub3p facilitates spindle checkpoint silencing in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 20(24):5096-5105.
34. Larsen NA, Al-Bassam J, Wei RR, Harrison SC (2007) Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(4):1201-1206.
35. Ji Z, Yu H (2014) A protective chaperone for the kinetochore adaptor Bub3. Dev Cell 28(3):223-224.
36. Jiang H, et al. (2014) A microtubule-associated zinc finger protein, BuGZ, regulates mitotic chromosome alignment by ensuring Bub3 stability and kinetochore targeting. Dev Cell 28(3):268-281.
37. Toledo CM, et al. (2014) BuGZ is required for Bub3 stability, Bub1 kinetochore function, and chromosome alignment. Dev Cell 28(3):282-294.
38. Taylor SS, Ha E, McKeon F (1998) The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J Cell Biol 142(1):1-11.
39. Malureanu LA, et al. (2009) BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev Cell 16(1):118-131.
40. Elowe S, et al. (2010) Uncoupling of the spindle-checkpoint and chromosomecongression functions of BubR1. J Cell Sci 123(Pt 1):84-94.
41. Lara-Gonzalez P, Scott MI, Diez M, Sen O, Taylor SS (2011) BubR1 blocks substrate recruitment to the APC/C in a KEN-box-dependent manner. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 24): 4332-4345.
42. Tang Z, Bharadwaj R, Li B, Yu H (2001) Mad2-independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev Cell 1 (2):227-237.
43. Kallio M, Weinstein J, Daum JR, Burke DJ, Gorbsky GJ (1998) Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/ anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J Cell Biol 141 (6):1393-1406.
44. Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(5):379-393.
45. Guo Y, Kim C, Ahmad S, Zhang J, Mao Y (2012) CENP-E-dependent BubR1 auto-phosphorylation enhances chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol 198(2):205-217.
46. Suijkerbuijk SJ, et al. (2012) The vertebrate mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1 is an unusual pseudokinase. Dev Cell 22(6):1321-1329.
47. Li D, Morley G, Whitaker M, Huang JY (2010) Recruitment of Cdc20 to the kinetochore requires BubR1 but not Mad2 in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 30(13): 3384-3395.
48. Conde C, et al. (2013) Drosophila Polo regulates the spindle assembly checkpoint through Mps1-dependent BubR1 phosphorylation. EMBO J 32(12):1761-1777.
49. Hauf S (2013) The spindle assembly checkpoint: Progress and persistent puzzles. Biochem Soc Trans 41 (6):1755-1760.
50. D'Arcy S, Davies OR, Blundell TL, Bolanos-Garcia VM (2010) Defining the molecular basis of BubR1 kinetochore interactions and APC/C-CDC20 inhibition. J Biol Chem 285(19): 14764-14776.
51. Suijkerbuijk SJ, Vleugel M, Teixeira A, Kops G J (2012) Integration of kinase and phosphatase activities by BUBR1 ensures formation of stable kinetochoremicrotubule attachments. Dev Cell 23(4):745-755.
52. Kruse T, et al. (2013) Direct binding between BubR1 and B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression. J Cell Sci 126(Pt 5):1086-1092.
53. Xu P, Raetz EA, Kitagawa M, Virshup DM, Lee SH (2013) BUBR1 recruits PP2A via the B56 family of targeting subunits to promote chromosome congression. Biol Open 2(5):479-486.
54. Herzog F, Peters JM (2005) Large-scale purification of the vertebrate anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Methods Enzymol 398:175-195.
55. Gassmann R, et al. (2010) Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev 24(9):957-971.
56. Holland AJ, Lan W, Niessen S, Hoover H, Cleveland DW (2010) Polo-like kinase 4 kinase activity limits centrosome overduplication by autoregulating its own stability. J Cell Biol 188(2):191-198.
57. Tighe A, Johnson VL, Taylor SS (2004) Truncating APC mutations have dominant effects on proliferation, spindle checkpoint control, survival and chromosome stability. J Cell Sci 117(Pt 26):6339-6353.
58. Meraldi P, Draviam VM, Sorger PK (2004) Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev Cell 7(1):45-60.
59. Tang Z, Yu H (2004) Functional analysis of the spindle-checkpoint proteins using an in vitro ubiquitination assay. Methods Mol Biol 281:227-242.