Bub3 reads phosphorylated MELT repeats to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling

eLife

Volumn 2013, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Primorac, Ivana ^a   Weir, John R ^a   Chiroli, Elena ^b   Gross, Fridolin ^b   Hoffmann, Ingrid ^a   van Gerwen, Suzan ^a   Ciliberto, Andrea ^b   Musacchio, Andrea ^a,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; NOCODAZOLE; BUB3 PROTEIN, HUMAN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; OLIGOPEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTALLIZATION; DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC MANIPULATION; HYDROGEN BOND; ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRY; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MELT PROTEIN MOTIF; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS REGULATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84884683570     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01030     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkóczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, et al. 2010. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:213-21. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925.
2. Bailer SM, Siniossoglou S, Podtelejnikov A, Hellwig A, Mann M, Hurt E. 1998. Nup116p and nup100p are interchangeable through a conserved motif which constitutes a docking site for the mRNA transport factor gle2p. EMBO J 17:1107-19. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.4.1107.
3. Barisic M, Sohm B, Mikolcevic P, Wandke C, Rauch V, Ringer T, et al. 2010. Spindly/CCDC99 is required for efficient chromosome congression and mitotic checkpoint regulation. Mol Biol Cell 21:1968-81. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-04-0356.
4. Bolanos-Garcia VM, Lischetti T, Matak-Vinkovic D, Cota E, Simpson PJ, Chirgadze DY, et al. 2011. Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 complex reveals an interaction crucial for kinetochore-mitotic checkpoint regulation via an unanticipated binding site. Structure 19:1691-700. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.09.017.
5. Brady DM, Hardwick KG. 2000. Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr Biol 10:675-8. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00515-7.
6. Chan YW, Fava LL, Uldschmid A, Schmitz MHA, Gerlich DW, Nigg EA, et al. 2009. Mitotic control of kinetochore-associated dynein and spindle orientation by human spindly. J Cell Biol 185:859-74. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200812167.
7. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A. 2006. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127:983-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.039.
8. Cheeseman IM, Niessen S, Anderson S, Hyndman F, Yates JR, Oegema K, et al. 2004. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev 18:2255-68. doi: 10.1101/gad.1234104.
9. Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, et al. 2010. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:12-21. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073.
10. Ciferri C, De Luca J, Monzani S, Ferrari KJ, Ristic D, Wyman C, et al. 2005. Architecture of the human ndc80-hec1 complex, a critical constituent of the outer kinetochore. J Biol Chem 280:29088-95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504070200.
11. De Antoni A, Pearson CG, Cimini D, Canman JC, Sala V, Nezi L, et al. 2005. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 15:214-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038.
12. DeLuca JG, Gall WE, Ciferri C, Cimini D, Musacchio A, Salmon ED. 2006. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127:969-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.047.
13. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. 2010. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:486-501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493.
14. Fernius J, Hardwick KG. 2007. Bub1 kinase targets Sgo1 to ensure efficient chromosome biorientation in budding yeast mitosis. PLOS Genet 3:e213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030213.
15. Foley EA, Kapoor TM. 2013. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:25-37. doi: 10.1038/nrm3494.
16. Gassmann R, Holland AJ, Varma D, Wan X, Civril F, Cleveland DW, et al. 2010. Removal of spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev 24:957-71. doi: 10.1101/gad.1886810.
17. Gillett ES, Espelin CW, Sorger PK. 2004. Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 164:535-46. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200308100.
18. Griffis ER, Stuurman N, Vale RD. 2007. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J Cell Biol 177:1005-15. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200702062.
19. Hao B, Oehlmann S, Sowa ME, Harper JW, Pavletich NP. 2007. Structure of a Fbw7-Skp1-cyclin E complex: multisite-phosphorylated substrate recognition by SCF ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell 26:131-43. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.022.
20. Hardwick KG, Weiss E, Luca FC, Winey M, Murray AW. 1996. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 273:953-6. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5277.953.
21. Heinrich S, Windecker H, Hustedt N, Hauf S. 2012. Mph1 kinetochore localization is crucial and upstream in the hierarchy of spindle assembly checkpoint protein recruitment to kinetochores. J Cell Sci 125:4720-7. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110387.
22. Howell BJ, Moree B, Farrar EM, Stewart S, Fang G, Salmon ED. 2004. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr Biol 14:953-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.053.
23. Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BT. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66:507-17. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3.
24. Hunter T. 2012. Why nature chose phosphate to modify proteins. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:2513-6. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0013.
25. Huse M, Kuriyan J. 2002. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell 109:275-82. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00741-9.
26. Ito D, Saito Y, Matsumoto T. 2011. Centromere-tethered Mps1 pombe homolog (Mph1) kinase is a sufficient marker for recruitment of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub1, but not Mad1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:209-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114647109.
27. Kabsch W. 2010. XDS. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:125-32. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337.
28. Kadura SS, He XX, Vanoosthuyse VV, Hardwick KGK, Sazer SS. 2004. The A78V mutation in the Mad3-like domain of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Bub1p perturbs nuclear accumulation and kinetochore targeting of Bub1p, Bub3p, and Mad3p and spindle assembly checkpoint function. Mol Biol Cell 16:385-95. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-07-0558.
29. Kapuy O, Barik D, Sananes MRD, Tyson JJ, Novak B. 2009. Bistability by multiple phosphorylation of regulatory proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 100:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2009.06.004.
30. Karplus PA, Diederichs K. 2012. Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336:1030-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1218231.
31. Kim S, Sun H, Tomchick DR, Yu H, Luo X. 2012. Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:6549-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118210109.
32. Kiyomitsu T, Murakami H, Yanagida M. 2011. Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein Blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1. Mol Cell Biol 31:998-1011. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00815-10.
33. Kiyomitsu T, Obuse C, Yanagida M. 2007. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev Cell 13:663-76. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.005.
34. Klebig C, Korinth D, Meraldi P. 2009. Bub1 regulates chromosome segregation in a kinetochore-independent manner. J Cell Biol 185:841-58. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200902128.
35. Kõivomägi M, Valk E, Venta R, Iofik A, Lepiku M, Balog ERM, et al. 2011. Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase. Nature 480:128-31. doi: 10.1038/nature10560.
36. Krenn V, Wehenkel A, Li X, Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2012. Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1-kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction. J Cell Biol 196:451-67. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201110013.
37. Lara-Gonzalez P, Taylor SS. 2012. Cohesion fatigue explains why pharmacological inhibition of the APC/C induces a spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest. PLOS ONE 7:e49041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049041.
38. Lara-Gonzalez P, Westhorpe FG, Taylor SS. 2012. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 22:R966-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.006.
39. Larsen NA, Al-Bassam J, Wei RR, Harrison SC. 2007. Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1201-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610358104.
40. Li R, Murray AW. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519-31. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5.
41. Liu S-T, Rattner JB, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ. 2006. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J Cell Biol 175:41-53. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606020.
42. Logarinho E, Resende T, Torres C, Bousbaa H. 2008. The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Mol Biol Cell 19:1798-813. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-07-0633.
43. London N, Ceto S, Ranish JA, Biggins S. 2012. Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr Biol 22:900-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.052.
44. Maciejowski J, George KA, Terret M-E, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Jallepalli PV. 2010. Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J Cell Biol 190:89-100. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001050.
45. Maeder CI, Hink MA, Kinkhabwala A, Mayr R, Bastiaens PIH, Knop M. 2007. Spatial regulation of Fus3 MAP kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheromone signalling. Nat Cell Biol 9:1319-26. doi: 10.1038/ncb1652.
46. Maldonado M, Kapoor TM. 2011. Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat Cell Biol 13:475-82. doi: 10.1038/ncb2223.
47. Mariani L, Chiroli E, Nezi L, Muller H, Piatti S, Musacchio A, et al. 2012. Role of the mad2 dimerization interface in the spindle assembly checkpoint independent of kinetochores. Curr Biol 22:1900-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.028.
48. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. 2007. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40:658-74. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206.
49. McNicholas S, Potterton E, Wilson KS, et al. 2011. Presenting your structures: the CCP4mg molecular-graphics software. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67:386-94. doi: 10.1107/S0907444911007281.
50. Meadows JC, Shepperd LA, Vanoosthuyse V, Lancaster TC, Sochaj AM, Buttrick GJ, et al. 2011. Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and Kinesin-8 motors. Dev Cell 20:739-50. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.05.008.
51. Millband DND, Hardwick KGK. 2002. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 22:2728-42. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.8.2728-2742.2002.
52. Nash P, Tang X, Orlicky S, Chen Q, Gertler FB, Mendenhall MD, et al. 2001. Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature 414:514-21. doi: 10.1038/35107009.
53. Orlicky S, Tang X, Willems A, Tyers M, Sicheri F. 2003. Structural basis for phosphodependent substrate selection and orientation by the SCFCdc4 ubiquitin ligase. Cell 112:243-56. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00034-5.
54. Pagliuca C, Draviam VM, Marco E, Sorger PK, De Wulf P. 2009. Roles for the conserved spc105p/kre28p complex in kinetochore-microtubule binding and the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLOS ONE 4:e7640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007640.
55. Pawson T, Kofler M. 2009. Kinome signaling through regulated protein-protein interactions in normal and cancer cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21:147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.02.005.
56. Perera D, Tilston V, Hopwood JA, Barchi M, Boot-Handford RP, Taylor SS. 2007. Bub1 maintains centromeric cohesion by activation of the spindle checkpoint. Dev Cell 13:566-79. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008.
57. Ren Y, Seo H-S, Blobel G, Hoelz A. 2010. Structural and functional analysis of the interaction between the nucleoporin Nup98 and the mRNA export factor Rae1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:10406-11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005389107.
58. Ricke RM, Jeganathan KB, Malureanu L, Harrison AM, van Deursen JM. 2012. Bub1 kinase activity drives error correction and mitotic checkpoint control but not tumor suppression. J Cell Biol 199:931-49. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201205115.
59. Rischitor PEP, May KMK, Hardwick KGK. 2006. Bub1 is a fission yeast kinetochore scaffold protein, and is sufficient to recruit other spindle checkpoint proteins to ectopic sites on chromosomes. PLOS ONE 2:e1342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001342.
60. Rosenberg JS, Cross FR, Funabiki H. 2011. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 21:942-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.011.
61. Salazar C, Höfer T. 2009. Multisite protein phosphorylation-from molecular mechanisms to kinetic models. FEBS J 276:3177-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07027.x.
62. Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J 28:2511-31. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.173.
63. Santaguida S, Tighe A, D'Alise AM, Taylor SS, Musacchio A. 2010. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J Cell Biol 190:73-87. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001036.
64. Schittenhelm RB, Chaleckis R, Lehner CF. 2009. Intrakinetochore localization and essential functional domains of Drosophila Spc105. EMBO J 28:2374-86. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.188.
65. Seet BT, Dikic I, Zhou M-M, Pawson T. 2006. Reading protein modifications with interaction domains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:473-83. doi: 10.1038/nrm1960.
66. Shah JV, Botvinick E, Bonday Z, Furnari F, Berns M, Cleveland DW. 2004. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr Biol 14:942-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.046.
67. Sharp-Baker H, Chen RH. 2001. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J Cell Biol 153:1239-50. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.6.1239.
68. Shepperd LA, Meadows JC, Sochaj AM, Lancaster TC, Zou J, Buttrick GJ, et al. 2012. Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr Biol 22:891-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.051.
69. Storchová Z, Becker JS, Talarek N, Kögelsberger S, Pellman D. 2011. Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 22:1473-85. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0673.
70. Strong M, Sawaya MR, Wang S, et al. 2006. Toward the structural genomics of complexes: crystal structure of a PE/PPE protein complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8060-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602606103.
71. Taylor SS, Ha E, McKeon F. 1998. The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J Cell Biol 142:1-11. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.1.1.
72. Taylor SS, McKeon F. 1997. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 89:727-35. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80255-X.
73. Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, et al. 2008. Iterative-build OMIT maps: map improvement by iterative model building and refinement without model bias. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 64:515-24. doi: 10.1107/S0907444908004319.
74. Ubersax JA, Ferrell JE. 2007. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:530-41. doi: 10.1038/nrm2203.
75. Vanoosthuyse V, Meadows JC, van der Sar SJA, Millar JBA, Hardwick KG. 2009. Bub3p facilitates spindle checkpoint silencing in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 20:5096-105. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-09-0762.
76. Vanoosthuyse V, Valsdottir R, Javerzat J-P, Hardwick KG. 2004. Kinetochore targeting of fission yeast Mad and Bub proteins is essential for spindle checkpoint function but not for all chromosome segregation roles of Bub1p. Mol Cell Biol 24:9786-801. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.22.9786-9801.2004.
77. Vigneron S, Prieto S, Bernis C, Labbé J-C, Castro A, Lorca T. 2004. Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: who controls whom? Mol Biol Cell 15:4584-96. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-01-0051.
78. Vleugel M, Hoogendoorn E, Snel B, Kops GJPL. 2012. Evolution and function of the mitotic checkpoint. Dev Cell 23:239-50. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.013.
79. Wang X, Babu JR, Harden JM, Jablonski SA, Gazi MH, Lingle WL, et al. 2001. The mitotic checkpoint protein hBUB3 and the mRNA export factor hRAE1 interact with GLE2p-binding sequence (GLEBS)-containing proteins. J Biol Chem 276:26559-67. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101083200.
80. Windecker H, Langegger M, Heinrich S, Hauf S. 2009. Bub1 and Bub3 promote the conversion from monopolar to bipolar chromosome attachment independently of shugoshin. EMBO Rep 10:1022-8. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.183.
81. Wu G, Xu G, Schulman BA, Jeffrey PD, Harper JW, Pavletich NP. 2003. Structure of a β-TrCP1-Skp1-β-catenin complex. Mol Cell 11:1445-56. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00234-X.
82. Yamagishi Y, Yang C-H, Tanno Y, Watanabe Y. 2012. MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat Cell Biol 14:1-9. doi: 10.1038/ncb2515.
83. Yamamoto TG, Watanabe S, Essex A, Kitagawa R. 2008. SPDL-1 functions as a kinetochore receptor for MDF-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 183:187-94. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200805185.