Developing teacher‐student relationships through out of class communication

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 211-223

  Dobransky, Nicole D ^a   Frymier, Ann Bainbridge ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Control; Intimacy; Learning; Out of class communication; Teacher student relationship; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744469061     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370409370193     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersen, J. F., 1979. “ Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: Nimmo, D., Vol. 3, 543–559. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L., and deTurck, M. A., 1984. Relatinal messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10: 351–378.
3. Christophel, D. M., 1990. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323–340.
4. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., and Bowers, J., 1995. Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44: 251–266.
5. Eiss, A. B., 1969. Behavioral objectives in the affective domain, Washington, DC: National Science Supervisors Association.
6. Ellis, K., 2000. Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26: 264–291.
7. Feldman, K. A., and Newcomb, T. M., 1969. The Impact of College on Students, Vol. 2, San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
8. Frymier, A. B., 1994. The use of affinity‐seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 87–105.
9. Frymier, A. B., and Houser, M., 1999. The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50: 1–12.
10. Frymier, A. B., and Houser, M. L., 2000. The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49: 207–219.
11. Frymier, A. B., and Thompson, C. A., 1992. Perceived teacher affinity‐seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41: 388–399.
12. Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., and Houser, M., 1996. The development of a learning empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45: 181–199.
13. Fusani, D. S., 1994. “Extra‐class”; communication: Frequency, immediacy, self‐disclosure, and satisfaction in the student‐faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 232–255.
14. Gorham, J., 1988. The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37: 40–53.
15. Jaasma, M. A., and Koper, R. J., 1999. The relationship of student‐faculty out‐of‐class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48: 41–47.
16. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Smith, V. R., and Soresen, G., 1988. Effects of teacher immediacy and strategy type on college student resistance to on‐task demands. Communication Education, 37: 54–67.
17. Lawrence, K., 2001. “ Learning oriented and grade oriented students’ reports of learning in student‐centered and instructor‐centered classrooms ”. Oxford, Ohio: Miami University. Unpublished master's thesis.
18. McCroskey, J. C., 1992. An introduction to communication in the classroom, Edina, MN: Burgess.
19. Millar, F., and Rogers, L., 1976. “ A relational approach to interpersonal communication ”. In Explorations in interpersonal communication, Edited by: Miller, G., Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Miller, G. R., and Steinberg, M., 1975. Between people, 7–29. Chicago: Science Research Associates, Inc.
21. Morganett, L., 1995. Ten tips for improving teacher‐student relationships. Social Education, 59: 27–28.
22. Mottet, T. P., and Richmond, V. P., 1998. Newer is not necessarily better: A reexamination of affective learning measurement. Communication Research Reports, 15: 370–378.
23. Nadler, M. K., and Nadler, L. B., 2001. The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out‐of‐class communication between faculty and students. Women's Studies in Communication, 24: 241–261.
24. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35: 43–55.
25. Richmond, V. P., 1992. Nonverbal communication in the classroom, Edina, MN: Burgess.
26. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J., and McCroskey, J. C., 1987. “ The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: McLaughlin, M., Vol. 10, 574–590. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1992. Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Sorensen, G., 1989. The relationships among teachers’ self‐disclosive statements, students’ perceptions, and affective learning. Communication Education, 38: 259–276.
29. West, R., 1994. Teacher‐student communication: A descriptive typology of students’ interpersonal experiences with teachers. Communication Reports, 7: 109–118.
30. Wilson, R. C., Woods, L., and Gaff, J. G., 1974. Social‐psychological accessibility and faculty‐student interaction beyond the classroom. Sociology of Education, 47: 74–92.
31. Wheeless, L. R., 1978. A follow‐up study of the relationship among trust, disclosure, and solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4: 143–157.
32. Wheeless, L. R., and Grotz, J., 1977. The measurement of trust and its relationship to self‐disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3: 249–257.
33. Wood, J. T., 2002. Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters, (3rd ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34. Wooten, A. G., and McCroskey, J. C., 1996. Student trust of teacher as a function of socio‐communicative style of teacher and socio‐communicative orientation of student. Communication Research Reports, 13: 94–100.