Out-of-class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style

Communication Education

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 122-134

  Aylor, Brooks ^a   Oppliger, Patrice ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Humor; Out of class communication; Socio communicative style

Indexed keywords

EID: 29544443126     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520302469     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Armstrong, M. (1999). Models for faculty-student interaction outside of the classroom: The Duke University Faculty Associates program. College Student Affairs Journal, 19, 4-16.
3. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Aylor, B., & Oppliger, P. (2002). Understanding out-of-class communication between instructors and students: Student biological sex, psychological gender, and status as a communication major. Iowa Journal of Communication, 34, 52-66.
5. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 195-205.
6. Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1991). Individual differences in the communication of humorous messages. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 32-40.
7. Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1989). Using humor to promote learning in the classroom. In P. E. McGhee (Ed.), Humor and children's development: A guide to practical applications (pp. 49-78). NY: Haworth Press.
8. Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
9. Frymier, A., & Houser, M. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207-219.
10. Frymier, A. B., & Weser, B. (2001). The role of student predispositions on student expectations for instructor communication behavior. Communication Education, 50, 314-326.
11. Fusani, D. S. (1994). "Extra-class" communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 232-255.
12. Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39, 46-62.
13. Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationships of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41-47.
14. Kelley, L., Duran, R. L., & Zolten, J. J. (2001). The effect of reticence on college students' use of electronic mail to communicate with faculty. Communication Education, 50, 170-176.
15. Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123-144.
16. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 57, 135-148.
17. Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J., Whitt, E., & Associates (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside of the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Lamke, L., Sollie, D., Durbin, R., & Fitzpatrick, J. (1994). Masculinity, femininity, and relational satisfaction: The mediating role of interpersonal competence. Journal of Social and Personal Relations, 11, 535-554.
19. Lamport, M. A. (1993). Student-faculty interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 112, 971-990.
20. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1996). Fundamentals of human communication: An interpersonal perspective. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
21. Martin, M. M., Chesebro, J. L., & Mottet, T. P. (1997). Students' perceptions of instructors' socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 14, 431-440.
22. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (2002). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors. In J. Chesebro & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 35-46). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Merrill, D. W., & Reid, R. H. (1981). Personal styles and effective performance. Radnor, PA: Chilton.
24. Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 387-400.
25. Myers, S. A. (1998). Instructor socio-communicative style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 15, 141-151.
26. Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (2001). The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out-of-class communication between faculty and students. Women's Studies in Communication, 24, 241-261.
27. Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 47, 167-180.
28. Oppliger, P. A. (2002). Humor and learning. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotions: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmam. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50, 545-595.
30. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. Y. (1991). How college effects students: Findings and insights, from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Pike, G. R., Schroeder, C. C., & Berry, T. R. (1997). Enhancing the educational impact of residence halls: The relationship between residential learning communities and first-year college experiences and persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 609-621.
32. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.
33. Powell, J. P., & Andresen, L. W. (1985). Humor and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 10, 79-90.
34. Richmond, V. P. (2002). Socio-communicative style and orientation in instruction: Giving good communication and receiving good communication. In J. Chesebro & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 104-115). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1990). Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure. Psychological Reports, 67, 449-450.
36. Richmond, V. P., & Martin, M. M. (1998). Socio-communicative style and socio-communicative orientation. In J. McCroskey, J. Daly, M. Martin, & M. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 133-148). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
37. Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1996). Students' out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 149-162.
38. Teven, J. J. (2001). The relationships among teacher characteristics and perceived caring. Communication Education, 50, 159-169.
39. Thomas, C. E., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1994). The association between immediacy and socio-communicative style. Communication Research Reports, 11, 107-115.
40. Wanzer, M. B. (2002). Use of humor in the classroom: The good, the bad, and the not-so-funny things that teachers say and do. In J. Chesebro & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 116-126). Bston: Allyn & Bacon.
41. Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students' reports of learning. Communication Education, 48, 48-62.
42. Wanzer, M. B., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Teacher socio-communicative style as a correlate of student affect toward teacher and course material. Communication Education, 47, 43-52.
43. Wanzer, M. B., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1995). The funny people: A source orientation to the communication of humor. Communication Quarterly, 45, 142-154.
44. Wanzer, M. B., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1996). Are funny people popular? An examination of humor orientation, loneliness, and social attraction. Communication Quarterly, 44, 42-52.
45. Wilson, R. C., Woods, L., & Graff, J. G. (1974). Social-psychological accessibility and faculty-student interaction beyond the classroom. Sociology of Education, 47, 74-92.
46. Wooten, A. G., & McCroskey, J. C. (1996). Student trust of teacher as a function of socio-communicative style of teacher and socio-communicative orientation of student. Communication Research Reports, 13, 94-100.