Spatial associations in numerical cognition-From single digits to arithmetic

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1461-1483

  Fischer, Martin H ^a   Shaki, Samuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b ARIEL UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Mental arithmetic; Numerical cognition; Operational momentum; SNARC; Spatial numerical association of response codes

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; MATHEMATICS;

ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; HUMANS; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; MATHEMATICS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84904578678     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.927515     Document Type: Review

References (153)

1. Aiello, M., Merola, S., & Doricchi, F. (2013). Small numbers in the right brain: Evidence from patients without and with spatial neglect. Cortex, 49, 348-351. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.06.002
2. Andres, M., Michaux, N., & Pesenti, M. (2012). Common substrate for mental arithmetic and finger representation in the parietal cortex. NeuroImage, 62, 1520-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.047
3. Ashcraft, M., & Battaglia, J. (1978). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(5), 527-538.
4. Ashkenazi, S., & Henik, A. (2010). A disassociation between physical and mental number bisection in developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2861-2868. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.028
5. Bachot, J., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Roeyers, H. (2005). Number sense in children with visuospatial disabilities: Orientation of the mental number line. Psychology Science Quarterly, 47, 172-183.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
7. Ben Nathan, M., Shaki, S., Salti, M., & Algom, D. (2009). Numbers and space: Associations and dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(3), 578-582. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.578
8. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., & Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286-308. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2518
9. Bonato, M., Priftis, K., Marenzi, R., & Zorzi, M. (2009). Normal and impaired reflexive orienting of attention after central nonpredictive cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(4), 745-759. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21054
10. Brooks, J. L., Della Sala, S., & Darling, S. (2014). Representational pseudoneglect: A review. Neuropsychology Review, 24, 148-165. doi: 10.1007/s11065-013-9245-2
11. Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B (Biological Sciences), 364(1525), 1831-1840. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0028
12. Bull, R., Cleland, A. A., & Mitchell, T. (2013). Sex differences in the spatial representation of number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 181-192. doi: 10.1037/a0028387
13. Calabria, M., & Rossetti, Y. (2005). Interference between number processing and line bisection: A methodology. Neuropsychologia, 43, 779-783. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.027
14. Carlson, R. A., Avraamides, M. N., Cary, M., & Strasberg, S. (2007). What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 747-756.
15. Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102, 101-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.001
16. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367. doi: 10.1037/a0015854
17. Cattaneo, Z., Fantino, M., Tinti, C., Silvanto, J., & Vecchi, T. (2010). Crossmodal interaction between the mental number line and peripersonal haptic space representation in sighted and blind individuals. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(4), 885-890. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.885
18. Chen, Q., & Verguts, T. (2012). Spatial intuition in elementary arithmetic: A neurocomputational account. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e31180. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031180 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031180
19. Cipora, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2013). Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(10), 1974-1991. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.772215
20. Crollen, V., Dormal, G., Seron, X., Lepore, F., & Collignon, O. (2011). Embodied numbers: The role of vision in the development of number-space interactions. Cortex, 49, 276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.11.006
21. Cutini, S., Scarpa, F., Scatturin, P., Dell Aqua, R., & Zorzi, M. (2012). Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Cerebral Cortex, 24(2), 444-451. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs321
22. Dehaene, S. (2012). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (2nd ed.). Oxford: University Press.
23. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
24. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56(2), 384-398. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004
25. De Hevia, M. D., Girelli, L., & Vallar, G. (2006). Numbers and space: A cognitive illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 168, 254-264. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0084-0
26. De Hevia, M.-D., Izard, V., Coubart, A., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2014). Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, in press.
27. DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353-386. doi: 10.1080/09541440244000328
28. van Dijck, J.-P., Abrahamse, E. L., Acar, F., Ketels, B., & Fias, W. (2014). A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1500-1513.
29. van Dijck, J.-P., Abrahamse, E. L., Majerus, S., & Fias, W. (2013).Spatial attention interacts with serial-order retrieval from verbal working memory. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1854-1859. doi: 10.1177/0956797613479610
30. van Dijck, J.-P., Gevers, W., & Fias, W. (2009). Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task. Cognition, 113, 248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.005
31. Dodd, M. D., & van der Stigchl, S., Leghari, M. A., Fung, G., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Attentional SNARC: There's something special about numbers (let us count the ways). Cognition, 108, 810-818. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.006
32. Domahs, F., Kaufmann, L., & Fischer, M. H. (2012). Handy numbers: Finger counting and numerical cognition. Special Research Topic in Frontiers Media SA. ISBN: 978-2-88919-059-1.
33. Dotan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2013). How do we convert a number into a finger trajectory? Cognition, 129, 512-529. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.007
34. Fias, W., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43-54). New York: Psychology Press.
35. Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology, 57(5), 822-826. doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.5.822
36. Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing-Evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10(4), 493-508. doi: 10.1080/13506280244000186
37. Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004
38. Fischer, M. H. (2012a). The spatial mapping of numbers-Its origin and flexibility. In Y. Coello & A. Bartolo (Eds.), Language and action in cognitive neurosciences (pp. 225-242). London: Psychology Press.
39. Fischer, M. H. (2012b). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13, S161-S164. doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5 doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5
40. Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
41. Fischer, M. H., & Campens, H. (2009). Pointing to numbers and grasping magnitudes. Experimental Brain Research, 192(1), 149-153. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1622-3
42. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555-556. doi: 10.1038/nn1066
43. Fischer, M. H., & Mills, R. A., & Shaki, S. (2010). How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain and Cognition, 72, 333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.010
44. Fischer, M. H., Shaki, S., & Cruise, A. (2009). It takes only one word to quash the SNARC. Experimental Psychology, 56(5), 361-366. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.361
45. Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L., & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 91-97. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.91
46. Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language-A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825-850. doi: 10.1080/17470210701623605
47. Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children's counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.
48. van Galen, M., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Developing access to number magnitude: A study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.001
49. Galfano, G., Rusconi, E., & Umilta, C. (2006). Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one's will. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 869-874. doi: 10.3758/BF03194011
50. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87-B95. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00234-2
51. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organised: Evidence from days of the week. Cortex, 40, 171-172. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70938-9
52. Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 180-190. doi: 10.1037/a0017688
53. Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32-44.
54. Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573-585. doi: 10.1177/1745691613498098
55. Göbel, S. M., Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Experience counts: Transmitting culture through space. Poster at the European workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology. Bressanone, Italy.
56. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture's role in speaking, learning and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257-283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802
57. Goldstone, R. L., Landy, D. H., & Son, Y. L. (2013). The education of perception. Topics in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 265-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01055.x
58. Hartmann, M., Gashaj, V., Stahnke, A., & Mast, F. W. (2014). There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi: 10.1037/a0036686
59. Hartmann, M., Grabherr, L., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1416-1427. doi:10.1037/a0026706
60. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301-307. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
61. Herrera, A., Macizo, P., & Semenza, C. (2008). The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. Acta Psychologica, 128, 225-237. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.01.002
62. Hoffmann, D., Hornung, C., Martin, R., & Schiltz, C. (2013). Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a colour-discrimination task in 5 year olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 775-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.013
63. Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2012). Orienting numbers in mental space: Horizontal organization trumps vertical. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1044-1051. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.685079
64. Hubbard, T. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 822-851. doi: 10.3758/BF03196775
65. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1684
66. Hung, Y. H., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wu, D. H. (2008). Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition, 106(3), 1441-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.017
67. Hutchinson, S., & Louwerse, M. (2014). Language statistics explain the spatial-numerical association of response codes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 470-478. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0492-2
68. Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662-673. doi: 10.3758/BF03195857
69. Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition, 106(3), 1221-1247.
70. Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10382-10385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812142106
71. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition. Oxford: University Press.
72. Jiang, M., Cooper, J., & Alibali, M. (2014). Spatial factors influence arithmetic performance: The case of the minus sign. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1626-1642.
73. Klein, E., Huber, S., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2014). Operational momentum affects eye fixation behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1614-1625.
74. Knops, A., Dehaene, S., Berteletti, I., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Can Approximate Mental Calculation Account for Operational Momentum in Addition and Subtraction? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1541-1556.
75. Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009b). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324, 1583-1585. doi: 10.1126/science.1171599
76. Knops, A., Viarouge, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009a). Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 803-821. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.803
77. Knops, A., Zitzmann, S., & McCrink, C. (2013). Examining the presence and determinants of operational momentum in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00325
78. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
79. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33(4), 720-733.
80. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). Proximity and precedence in arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 1953-1968. doi: 10.1080/17470211003787619
81. Landy, D. H., Jones, M. N., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). How the appearance of an operator affects its formal precedence. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2109-2114). Washington, DC: Cognitive Science Society.
82. Lefevre, J., Bisanz, J., & Mrkonjic, L. (1988). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for obligatory activation of arithmetic facts. Memory & Cognition, 16, 45-53. doi: 10.3758/BF03197744
83. Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Pratt, J., & Bekkering, H. (2007). Coding strategies in number space: Memory requirements influence spatial-numerical associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 515-524. doi: 10.1080/17470210701728677
84. Lindemann, O., & Tira, M. D. (2011). Operational Momentum in Numerosity Production Judgments of Multi-Digit Number Problems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219(1), 50-57. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000046
85. Link, T., Nuerk, H. C., & Moeller, K. (2014). On the relation between the mental number line and arithmetic competencies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1597-1613.
86. Loetscher, T., Bockisch, C., Nicholls, M., & Brugger, P. (2010). Eye position predicts what number you have in mind. Current Biology, 20(6), 264-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.015
87. Loetscher, T., Schwarz, U., Schubiger, M., & Brugger, P. (2008). Head turns bias the brain's internal random generator. Current Biology, 18(2), 60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.015
88. Luchins, A. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54, 1-22. doi: 10.1037/h0093502
89. Lugli, L., Baroni, G., Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2013). Counting is easier while experiencing a congruent motion. PLoS One, 8, e64500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064500
90. Marghetis, T., Núñez, R., & Bergen, B. (2014). Doing arithmetic by hand: Hand movements during exact arithmetic reveal systematic, dynamic spatial processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1579-1596.
91. Masson, N., & Pesenti, M. (2014). Attentional bias induced by solving simple and complex addition and subtraction problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1514-1526.
92. McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(8), 1324-1333. doi: 10.3758/BF03192949
93. McCrink, K., & Opfer, J. (in press). Development of Spatial-Numerical Associations. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
94. McCrink, K., & Wynn, K. (2009). Operational momentum in large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.013
95. Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243-247.
96. Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2011). Psychophysics of number representation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219(1), 64-70. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000048
97. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520. doi: 10.1038/2151519a0
98. Nicholls, M. E. R., Loftus, A. M., & Gevers, W. (2008). Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 413-418. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.413
99. Nuerk, H. C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC effect and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 835-863. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000512
100. Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219(1), 3-22. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000041
101. Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82, B25-33. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00142-1
102. Nuerk, H. C., Wood, G., & Willmes, K. (2005). The universal SNARC effect. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187-194. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.187
103. Nunez, R. (2011). No Innate Number Line in the Human Brain. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 651-668. doi: 10.1177/0022022111406097
104. Nunez, R., Douan, D., & Nikoulina, A. (2011). Squeezing, striking, and vocalizing: Is number representation fundamentally spatial? Cognition, 120, 220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.001
105. Opfer, J. E., Thompson, C. A., & Furlong, E. E. (2010). Early development of spatial numeric associations: Evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Developmental Science, 13(5), 761-771. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00934.x
106. Pasqualotto, A., Taya, S., & Proulx, M. J. (2014). Sensory deprivation: Visual experience alters the mental number line. Behavioral Brain Research, 261, 110-113. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.017
107. Patro, K., & Haman, M. (2012). The spatial-numerical congruity effect in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 534-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.09.006
108. Pinhas, M. & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition, 109, 408-415. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.003
109. Pinhas, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2009, January). Addition is where the big numbers are: Evidence for an inverse operational momentum effect. Poster presented at the 27th European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology, Bressanone, Italy.
110. Pinhas, M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Heed the signs: Operation signs have spatial associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, this issue.
111. Pinhas, M., Tzelgov, J. & Ganor-Stern, D. (2012). Estimating linear effects in ANOVA designs: The easy way. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 788-794. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0172-y
112. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3-25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
113. Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416-442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
114. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576-582. doi: 10.1038/nrn1706
115. Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends on Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458-470. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
116. Rashidi-Ranjbar, N., Goudarzvand, M., Jahangiri, S., Brugger, P., & Loetscher, T. (2014). No horizontal numerical mapping in a culture with mixed reading habits. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 72. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00072
117. Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2), 274-278. doi: 10.1037/h0028573
118. Riello, M., & Rusconi, E. (2011). Unimanual SNARC effect: Hand matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 372. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00372 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00372
119. Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 862-868. doi: 10.3758/BF03194010
120. Rugani, R., Salva, O. R., & Regolin, L. (2014). Lateralized mechanisms for encoding of object. Behavioral evidence from an animal model: The domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 150. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00150 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00150
121. Rusconi, E., Dervinis, M., Verbruggen, F., & Chambers, C. D. (2013). Critical time course of right fronto-parietal involvement in mental number space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 465-483. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00330
122. Rusconi, E., Galfano, G., Speriani, V., & Umilta, C. (2004). Capacity and contextual constraints on product activation: Evidence from task-irrelevant fact retrieval. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A(8), 1485-1511. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000873
123. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004
124. Scheepers, C., & Sturt, P. (2014). Bi-directional syntactic priming across cognitive domains: From arithmetic to language and back. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1643-1654.
125. Schneider, E., Maruyama, M., Dehaene, S., & Sigman, M. (2012). Eye gaze reveals a fast, parallel extraction of the syntax of arithmetic formulas. Cognition, 125(3), 475-490. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.015
126. Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with manual and saccadic responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 651-664. doi: 10.3758/BF03194909
127. Schwarz, W., & Müller, D. (2006). Spatial associations in number-related tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 4-15. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.4
128. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers-A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108, 590-599. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.001
129. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2012). Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 804-809.
130. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Random Walks on the Mental Number Line. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 43-49. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3718-7
131. Shaki, S., Fischer, M., & Göbel, S. (2012). Direction counts: A comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(2), 275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.005
132. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 328-331. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.328
133. Shaki, S., Sery, N., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). 1+2 is more than 2+1: Violation of commutativity and unit invariance in mental arithmetic. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (in revision).
134. Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Develoopment, 75(2), 428-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x
135. Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237-243. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02438
136. Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Numerical comparison in a visually guided manual reaching task. Cognition, 106, 994-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.014
137. Stoianov, I., Kramer, P., Umilta, C., & Zorzi, M. (2008). Visuospatial priming of the mental number line. Cognition, 106, 770-779. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.013
138. Towse, J. N., & Cheshire, A. (2007). Random number generation and working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 374-394. doi: 10.1080/09541440600764570
139. Tschentscher, N., Hauk, O., Fischer, M. H., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). You can count on the motor cortex: Finger counting habits modulate motor cortex activation evoked by numbers. NeuroImage, 59, 3139-3148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.037
140. Tzelgov, J., Zohar-Shai, B., & Nuerk, H. C. (2013). On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 302. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00302 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00302
141. Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117(2), 126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.001
142. Van Gompel, R. P. G., Fischer, M. H., Murray, W., & Hill, R. L. (2007). Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. Oxford: Elsevier.
143. Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E., & Dehaene, S. (2014). The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1484-1499.
144. Wasner, M., Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., & Nuerk, H. C. (in press). How situated cognition influences memory retrieval: The case of finger counting habits. Cognitive Processing.
145. Werner, K., & Raab, M. (2013). Moving to solution. Experimental Psychology, 60, 403-409. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000213
146. Werner, K., & Raab, M. (2014). Moving your eyes to solution: Effects of movement on the perception of a problem-solving task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1571-1578.
147. White, S. L. J., Szucs, D., & Soltész, F. (2011). Symbolic number: The integration of magnitude and spatial representations in children aged 6 to 8 years. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 392. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00392 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00392
148. Wiemers, M., Bekkering, H., & Lindemann, O. (2014). Spatial Interferences in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence from the Motion-Arithmetic Compatibility Effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1557-1570.
149. Winter, B., & Matlock, T. (2013). More is up... and right: Random number generation along two axes. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3789-3974). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
150. Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 489-525.
151. Zhou, F., Zhao, Q., Chen, C., & Zhou, X. (2012). Mental representations of arithmetic facts: Evidence from eye movement recordings supports the preferred operand-order specific representation hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 661-674. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.616213
152. Zorzi, M., Bonato, M., Treccani, B., Scalambrin, G., Marenzi, R., & Priftis, K. (2012). Neglect impairs explicit processing of the mental number line. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 125. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00125
153. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138-139. doi: 10.1038/417138a