No innate number line in the human brain

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 651-668

  Núñez, Rafael E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

cognitive; innate; number line; numerical cognition; universal

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956149648     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: 15525422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022022111406097     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2006). Back to the future. Science, 312, 1723.
2. Anderson, S., Damasio, A., & Damasio, H. (1990). Troubled letters but not numbers: Domain specific cognitive impairments following focal damage in frontal cortex. Brain, 113, 749-766.
3. Ansari, D. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 278-291.
4. Antell, S.E., & Keating, D.P. (1983). Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Development, 54, 695-701.
5. Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731-735.
6. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1991). How do four-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances? Developmental Psychology, 29, 711-721.
7. Booth, J.L., & Siegler, R.S. (2006) Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 41, 189-201.
8. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
9. Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D. (2008). Numerical thought with and without words: Evidence from indigenous Australian children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 13179-13184.
10. Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D. (this issue). Using mental representations of space when words are unavailable: Studies of enumeration and arithmetic in indigenous Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Studies.
11. Cantlon, J.F., Cordes, S., Libertus, M.E., & Brannon, E.M. (2009). Comment on "Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures." Science, 323, 38b.
12. Cohen Kadosh, R., & Walsh, V. (2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 313-373.
13. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
14. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83-120.
15. Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., & Spelke, E. (2006). Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 311, 381-384.
16. Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008a). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 320, 1217-1220.
17. Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008b). Supporting online material for "Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures." Science Online. Retrieved fromwww.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/320/5880/1217/DC1.
18. Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., & Spelke, E. (2009). Response to comment on "Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures." Science, 323, 38c.
19. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
20. Dehaene, S., Tzourio, N., Frak, V., Raynaud, L., Cohen, L., Mehler, J., & Mazoyer, B. (1996) Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1097-1106.
21. Descartes, R. (1637/1954). La géometrie. In D. E. Smith & M. L. Latham (Trans. Eds.), The geometry of René Descartes with a facsimile of the first edition (pp. vi-244). New York: Dover.
22. Doricchi, F., Guariglia, P., Gasparini, M., & Tomaiuolo, F. (2005). Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1663-1665.
23. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307-314.
24. Fischer, M.H. (2006). The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex, 42, 1066-1068.
25. Fowler, D. (1999). Inventive interpretations. Revue D'histoire des Mathématiques, 5, 149-153.
26. Fowler, D., & Robson, E. (1998). Square root approximations in Old Babylonian mathematics: YBC 7289 in context. Historia Mathematica, 25, 366-378.
27. Gallistel, C.R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43-74.
28. Galton, F. (1880). Visualised numerals. Nature, 21, 252-256.
29. Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia, disorientation for right and left, agraphia, and acalculia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 44, 398-408.
30. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representations of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87-B95.
31. Gibbs, R. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Göbel, G.M., Calabria, M., Farnè, A., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating "spatial" neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia, 44, 860-868.
33. Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words. Science, 306, 496-499.
34. Hauser, M.D., MacNeilage, P., & Ware, M. (1996). Numerical representations in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 1514-1517.
35. Izard, V., Dehaene, S., Pica, P., & Spelke, E. (2008). Reading between the number lines (response). Science, 321, 1293-1294.
36. Kaufmann, E.L., Lord, M.W., Reese, T.W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
37. Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324, 1583-1585.
38. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202-251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
41. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42. Matsuzawa, T. (1985). Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature, 315, 57-59.
43. Núñez, R. (2008a). Proto-numerosities and concepts of number: Biologically plausible and culturally mediated top-down mathematical schemas. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 665-666.
44. Núñez, R. (2008b). Reading between the number lines (letter). Science, 321, 1293.
45. Núñez, R. (2009). Numbers and arithmetic: Neither hardwired nor out there. Biological Theory, 4, 68-83.
46. Núñez, R., Cooperrider, K., & Wassmann, J. (under review). Number concepts without number lines: Evidence from an indigenous group of Papua New Guinea. Unpublished manuscript.
47. Núñez, R., Doan, D., & Nikoulina, A. (under review). Squeezing, clanging, and vocalizing: Number representation is not intrinsically spatial. Unpublished manuscript.
48. Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401-450.
49. Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499-503.
50. Pinhas, M., & Fischer, M. (2008). Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition, 109, 408-415.
51. Priftis, K., Zorzi, M., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Explicit versus implicit processing of representational space in neglect: Dissociations in accessing the mental number line. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 680-688.
52. Ratterman, M.J., & Gentner, D. (1998). The effect of language on similarity: The use of relational symbols improves young's children performance on a mapping task. In K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), Advance in analogy research (pp. 274-282). Sophia: New Bulgarian University.
53. Rips, L.J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J. (2008). From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 623-687.
54. Robson, E. (2002). Words and pictures: New light on Plimpton 322. American Mathematical Monthly, 109, 105-120.
55. Robson, E. (2008). Mathematics in Ancient Irak. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Roland, P., & Friberg, L. (1985). Localization of cortical areas activated by thinking. Journal of Neurophysiology, 53, 1219-1243.
57. Rueckert, L., Lange, N., Partiot, A., Appollonio, I., Litvar, I., Le Bihan, D., & Grafman, J. (1996). Visualizing cortical activation during mental calculation with functional MRI. Neuroimage, 3, 97-103.
58. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B.L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113-129.
59. Santens, S., & Gevers, W. (2008). The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition, 108, 263-270.
60. Saxe, G.B. (1981). Body parts as numerals: A developmental analysis of numeration among remote Oksapmin village populations in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 52, 306-316.
61. Siegler, R.S., & Booth, J.L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428-444.
62. Siegler, R.S., & Opfer, J.E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation. Psychological Science, 14, 237-243.
63. Strauss, M.S., & Curtis, L.E. (1981). Infant perception of numerosity. Child Development, 52, 1146-1152.
64. Strömer, C. (1932). Die Sprache der Mundurukú (The language of the Mundurukã°) Verlag der Internationalen Zeitschrift "Anthropos", 11, 1-146.
65. Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a cognitive semantics (Vols. 1 & 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. van Loosbroek, E., & Smitsman, A.W. (1990). Visual perception of numerosity in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 26, 916-922.
67. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483-488.
68. Wassman, J., & Dasen, P. (1994). Yupno number system and counting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 78-94.
69. Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749-750.
70. Xu, F., & Spelke, E. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1-B11.
71. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138-139.