Correction to There Is More Than "More Is Up": Hand and Foot Responses Reverse the Vertical Association of Number Magnitudes [Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (2014)] http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036686;There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1401-1414

  Hartmann, Matthias ^a   Gashaj, Venera ^a   Stahnke, Antje ^a   Mast, Fred W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Embodied numerosity; Hand versus foot responses; Mental number line; Numerical cognition; Parity judgment task; SNARC effect; Spatial mapping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FOOT; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOOT; HAND; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904551059     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037201     Document Type: Erratum

References (76)

1. Andres, M., Davare, M., Pesenti, M., Olivier, E., & Seron, X. (2004). Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction. Neuroreport, 15, 2773-2777.
2. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365.
3. Bächtold, D., Baumuller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731-735
4. Badets, A., Bouquet, C., Ric, F., & Pesenti, M. (2012). Number generation bias after action observation. Experimental Brain Research, 221, 43-49
5. Bae, G. Y., Choi, J. M., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1506-1521
6. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645
7. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., & Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286-308
8. Brozzoli, C., Ishihara, M., Gobel, S. M., Salemme, R., Rossetti, Y., & Farne, A. (2008). Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5644-5648
9. Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1831-1840
10. Buetti, S., & Kerzel, D. (2008). Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: Evidence for a common mechanism. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 420-428
11. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London, UK: Macmillan.
12. Cappelletti, M., Freeman, E. D., & Cipolotti, L. (2007). The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2989 -3000
13. Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umilta, C. (2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102, 101-117
14. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367
15. Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579-593
16. Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2011). When left is "right." Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22, 419-422
17. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27- 63). New York, NY: Academic Press.
18. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396
19. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731
20. Dodd, M. D., Van der Stigchel, S., Adil Leghari, M., Fung, G., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Attentional SNARC: There's something special about numbers (let us count the ways). Cognition, 108, 810-818
21. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & D'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110
22. Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386-392
23. Fischer, M. H. (2012). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13, 161-164
24. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555-556
25. Fischer, M. H., Mills, R. A., & Shaki, S. (2010). How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain and Cognition, 72, 333-336
26. Gevers, W., & Lammertyn, J. (2005). The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science, 47, 10-21.
27. Gevers, W., Lammertyn, J., Notebaert, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 122, 221-233
28. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87-B95
29. Göbel, S. M., Calabria, M., Farne, A., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating 'spatial' neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia, 44, 860-868
30. Göbel, S. M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). The cultural number line: A review of cultural and linguistic influences on the development of number processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 543-565
31. Goffaux, V., Martin, R., Dormal, G., Goebel, R., & Schiltz, C. (2012). Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3419- 3428
32. Grade, S., Lefèvre, N., & Pesenti, M. (2013). Influence of gaze observation on random number generation. Experimental Psychology, 60, 122-130.
33. Hartmann, M., Farkas, R., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Self-motion perception influences number processing: Evidence from a parity task. Cognitive Processing, 13, 189-192
34. Hartmann, M., Grabherr, L., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1416-1427
35. Hoeckner, S. H., Moeller, K., Zauner, H., Wood, G., Haider, C., Gaßner, A., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2008). Impairments of the mental number line for two-digit numbers in neglect. Cortex, 44, 429-438
36. Hoffmann, D., Pigat, D., & Schiltz, C. (2014). The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number-space associations. Cognitive Processing.
37. Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2012). Orienting numbers in mental space: Horizontal organization trumps vertical. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1044-1051
38. Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2013). When numbers get heavy: Is the mental number line exclusively numerical? PLoS One, 8, e58381
39. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 102-110
40. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448
41. Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662-673
42. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 453- 486
43. Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G., & Bekkering, H. (2007). Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1400-1409
44. Loetscher, T., Bockisch, C. J., Nicholls, M. E., & Brugger, P. (2010). Eye position predicts what number you have in mind. Current Biology, 20, R264-265
45. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157
46. Lourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2010). General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science, 21, 873-881
47. Lugli, L., Baroni, G., Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2013). Counting is easier while experiencing a congruent motion. PLoS One, 8, e64500
48. Müller, D., & Schwarz, W. (2007). Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1151-1161
49. Myachykov, A., Scheepers, C., Fischer, M. H., & Kessler, K. (2013). TEST: A tropic, embodied, and situated theory of cognition. Topics in Cognitive Sciences
50. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 211-216
51. Noël, M. P. (2005). Finger gnosia: A predictor of numerical abilities in children? Child Neuropsychology, 11, 413- 430
52. Nuerk, H. C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 835- 863
53. Pecher, D., & Boot, I. (2011). Numbers in space: Differences between concrete and abstract situations. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 121
54. Pia, L., Corazzini, L. L., Folegatti, A., Gindri, P., & Cauda, F. (2009). Mental number line disruption in a right-neglect patient after a lefthemisphere stroke. Brain and Cognition, 69, 81-88
55. Pinhas, M., Tzelgov, J., & Ganor-Stern, D. (2012). Estimating linear effects in ANOVA designs: The easy way. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 788-794.
56. Plaisier, M. A., & Smeets, J. B. (2011). Number magnitude to finger mapping is disembodied and topological. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 395-400
57. Previtali, P., Rinaldi, L., & Girelli, L. (2011). Nature or nurture in finger counting: A review on the determinants of the direction of numberfinger mapping. Frontiers in Psychology, 363.
58. Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416-442
59. Proctor, R. W., Miles, J. D., & Baroni, G. (2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 242-266
60. Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 862- 868
61. Rossetti, Y., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Rode, G., Ota, H., Michel, C., & Boisson, D. (2004). Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuo-manual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychological Science, 15, 426-430
62. Santens, S., & Gevers, W. (2008). The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition, 108, 263-270
63. Santiago, J., & Lakens, D. (2013). Polarity matching does not explain the SNARC effect. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
64. Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 651-664
65. Schwarz, W., & Muller, D. (2006). Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses. Experimental Psychology, 53, 4-15
66. Sell, A. J., & Kaschak, M. P. (2012). The comprehension of sentences involving quantity information affects responses on the up-down axis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 708-714
67. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2012). Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 804
68. Tzelgov, J., Zohar-Shai, B., & Nuerk, H. C. (2013). On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 302
69. Vuilleumier, P., Ortigue, S., & Brugger, P. (2004). The number space and neglect. Cortex, 40, 399-410
70. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483-488
71. Winter, B., & Matlock, T. (2013). More is up . . . and right: Random number generation along two axes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
72. Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2006). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: A failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). Cortex, 42, 1069-1079
73. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science, 50, 489-525.
74. Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 1-2.
75. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1061-1067
76. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umilta, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138-139.