Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 822-851

  Hubbard, Timothy L ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644760382     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196775     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. ACTIS-GROSSO, R., & STUCCHI, N. (2003). Shifting the start: Backward mislocation of the initial position of a motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 675-691.
2. ACTIS-GROSSO, R., STUCCHI, N., & VICARIO, G. B. (1996). On the length of trajectories for moving dots. In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Fechner Day 1996: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 185-190). Padua, Italy: International Society for Psychophysics.
3. AMORIM, M. A., LANG, W., LINDINGER, G., MAYER, D., DEECKE, L., & BERTHOZ, A. (2000). Modulation of spatial orientation by mental imagery instructions: A MEG study of representational momentum. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 569-582.
4. ASHIDA, H. (2004). Action-specific extrapolation of target motion in human visual system. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1515-1524.
5. BERRY, M. J., JR., BRIVANLOU, I. H., JORDAN, T. A., & MEISTER, M. (1999). Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature, 398, 334-338.
6. BERTAMINI, M. (1993). Memory for position and dynamic representations. Memory & Cognition, 21, 449-457.
7. BRASS, M., BEKKERING, H., WOHLSCHLÄGER, A., & PRINZ, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain & Cognition, 44, 124-143.
8. BREHAUT, J. C., & TIPPER, S. P. (1996). Representational momentum and memory for luminance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 480-501.
9. BROUWER, A. M., FRANZ, V. H., & THORNTON, I. M. (2004). Representational momentum in perception and grasping: Translating versus transforming objects. Journal of Vision, 4, 575-584.
10. BRYANT, D. J., & SUBBIAH, I. (1994). Subjective landmarks in perception and memory for spatial location. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 119-139.
11. CONNERS, F. A., WYATT, B. S., & DULANEY, C. L. (1998). Cognitive representation of motion in individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102, 438-450.
12. COOPER, L. A., & MUNGER, M. P. (1993). Extrapolations and remembering positions along cognitive trajectories: Uses and limitations of analogies to physical momentum. In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy, & B. Brewer (Eds.), Spatial representation: Problems in philosophy and psychology (pp. 112-131). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
13. DAWSON, M. R. W. (1998). Understanding cognitive science. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. DESMURGET, M., & GRAFTON, S. (2003). Feedback or feedforward control: End of a dichotomy. In S. H. Johnson-Frey (Ed.), Taking action: Cognitive neuroscience perspectives on intentional acts (pp. 289-338). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. FAUST, M. (1990). Representational momentum: A dual process perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
16. FAVRETTO, A. (2002). Displaced representations of targets undergo ing luminance transformations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Trieste.
17. FAVRETTO, A., HUBBARD, T. L., BRANDIMONTE, M. A., & GERBINO, W. (1999). Effects of background luminance on representational momentum for lightness [Abstract]. Perception, 28(Suppl.), 77.
18. FINKE, R. A., & FREYD, J. J. (1985). Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 780-794.
19. FINKE, R. A., & FREYD, J. J. (1989). Mental extrapolation and cognitive penetrability: Reply to Ranney and proposals for evaluative criteria. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 403-408.
20. FINKE, R. A., FREYD, J. J., & SHYI, G. C. W. (1986). Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 175-188.
21. FINKE, R. A., & SHYI, G. C. W. (1988). Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 112-120.
22. FODOR, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. FOSTER, D. H., & GRAVANO, S. (1982). Overshoot of curvature in visual apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 411-420.
24. FREYD, J. J. (1983). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 575-581.
25. FREYD, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438.
26. FREYD, J. J., & FINKE, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 126-132.
27. FREYD, J. J., & FINKE, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 443-446.
28. FREYD, J. J., & JOHNSON, J. Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 259-269.
29. FREYD, J. J., & JONES, K. T. (1994). Representational momentum for a spiral path. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 968-976.
30. FREYD, J. J., KELLY, M. H., & DEKAY, M. L. (1990). Representational momentum in memory for pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 1107-1117.
31. FREYD, J. J., & MILLER, G. F. (1992, November). Creature motion. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
32. FREYD, J. J., & PANTZER, T. M. (1995). Static patterns moving in the mind. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 181-204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. FREYD, J. J., PANTZER, T. M., & CHENG, J. L. (1988). Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 395-407.
34. FUTTERWEIT, L. R., & BEILIN, H. (1994). Recognition memory for movement in photographs: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 163-179.
35. GELMAN, R., DURGIN, F., & KAUFMAN, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 150-184). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
36. GETZMANN, S. (2005). Representational momentum in spatial hearing does not depend on eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 229-238.
37. GETZMANN, S., LEWALD, J., & GUSKI, R. (2004). Representational momentum in spatial hearing. Perception, 33, 591-599.
38. GOTTESMAN, C. V., & INTRAUB, H. (2002). Surface construal and the mental representation of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 589-599.
39. GRAY, R., & THORNTON, I. M. (2001). Exploring the link between time to collision and representational momentum. Perception, 30, 1007-1022.
40. HALPERN, A. R., & KELLY, M. H. (1993). Memory biases in left versus right implied motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 471-484.
41. HAYES, A. E., & FREYD, J. J. (2002). Representational momentum when attention is divided. Visual Cognition, 9, 8-27.
42. HAYES, A. E., SACHER, G., THORNTON, I. M., SERENO, M. E., & FREYD, J. S. (1996). Representational momentum in depth using stereopsis [ARVO Abstract 2120]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37(Suppl. 3), S467.
43. HEIDER, F., & SIMMEL, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
44. HOMMEL, B. (1996). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
45. HUBBARD, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition, 18, 299-309.
46. HUBBARD, T. L. (1993a). Auditory representational momentum: Musical schemata and modularity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 201-204.
47. HUBBARD, T. L. (1993b). The effects of context on visual representational momentum. Memory & Cognition, 21, 103-114.
48. HUBBARD, T. L. (1994). Judged displacement: A modular process? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 359-373.
49. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995a). Auditory representational momentum: Surface form, velocity, and direction effects. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 255-274.
50. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995b). Cognitive representation of motion: Evidence for representational friction and gravity analogues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 241-254.
51. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995c). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
52. HUBBARD, T. L. (1996a). Displacement in depth: Representational momentum and boundary extension. Psychological Research, 59, 33-47.
53. HUBBARD, T. L. (1996b). Representational momentum, centripetal force, and curvilinear impetus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1049-1060.
54. HUBBARD, T. L. (1997). Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: Effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1484-1493.
55. HUBBARD, T. L. (1998a). Representational momentum and other displacements in memory as evidence for nonconscious knowledge of physical principles. In S. R. Hameroff, A. W. Kaszniak, & A. C. Scott (Eds.), Toward a science of consciousness II: The second Tucson discussions and debates (pp. 505-512). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. HUBBARD, T. L. (1998b). Some effects of representational friction, target size, and memory averaging on memory for vertically moving targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 44-49.
57. HUBBARD, T. L. (1999). How consequences of physical principles influence mental representation: The environmental invariants hypothesis. In P. R. Killeen & W. R. Uttal (Eds.), Fechner Day 99: The end of 20th century psychophysics. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 274-279). Tempe, AZ: International Society for Psychophysics.
58. HUBBARD, T. L. (2001). The effect of height in the picture plane on the forward displacement of ascending and descending targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 325-330.
59. HUBBARD, T. L. (2004). The perception of causality: Insights from Michotte's launching effect, naive impetus theory, and representational momentum. In A. M. Oliveira, M. P. Teixeira, G. F. Borges, & M. J. Ferro (Eds.), Fechner Day 2004 (pp. 116-121). Coimbra, Portugal: International Society for Psychophysics.
60. HUBBARD, T. L. (in press-a). Approaches to representational momentum: Theories and models. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), Space and time perception and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. HUBBARD, T. L. (in press-b). Bridging the gap: Possible roles and contributions of representational momentum. Psicológica.
62. HUBBARD, T. L., & BHARUCHA, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 211-221.
63. HUBBARD, T. L., & BLESSUM, J. A. (2001). A structural dynamic of form: Displacements in memory for the size of an angle. Visual Cognition, 8, 725-749.
64. HUBBARD, T. L., BLESSUM, J. A., & RUPPEL, S. E. (2001). Representational momentum and Michotte's "launching effect" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 294-301.
65. HUBBARD, T. L., & COURTNEY, J. R. (in press). Evidence suggestive of separate visual dynamics in perception and in memory. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Visual thought: The depictive space of the mind. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
66. HUBBARD, T. L., & FAVRETTO, A. (2003). Naive impetus and Michotte's "tool effect": Evidence from representational momentum. Psychological Research, 67, 134-152.
67. HUBBARD, T. L., MATZENBACHER, D. L., & DAVIS, S. E. (1999). Representational momentum in children: Dynamic information and analogue representation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 88, 910-916.
68. HUBBARD, T. L., & MOTES, M. A. (2002). Does representational momentum reflect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectory? Cognition, 82, B89-B99.
69. HUBBARD, T. L., & MOTES, M. A. (2005). An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich effect or an onset repulsion effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 961-979.
70. HUBBARD, T. L., & RUPPEL, S. E. (1999). Representational momentum and landmark attraction effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 242-256.
71. HUBBARD, T. L., & RUPPEL, S. E. (2000). Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychological Research, 59, 41-55.
72. HUBBARD, T. L., & RUPPEL, S. E. (2002). A possible role of naïve impetus in Michotte's "launching effect": Evidence from representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 153-176.
73. HUBBARD, T. L., RUPPEL, S. E., & COURTNEY, J. R. (2005). The force of appearance: Gamma movement, naive impetus, and representational momentum. Psicológica, 26, 209-228.
74. INTRAUB, H. (2002). Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momentum without movement? Visual Cognition, 9, 93-119.
75. INTRAUB, H., BENDER, R. S., & MANGELS, J. A. (1992). Looking at pictures but remembering scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 180-191.
76. INTRAUB, H., GOTTESMAN, C. V., & BILLS, A. J. (1998). Effects of perceiving and imaging scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 186-201.
77. JARRETT, C. B., PHILLIPS, M., PARKER, A., & SENIOR, C. (2002). Implicit motion perception in schizotypy and schizophrenia: A representational momentum study. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 7, 1-14.
78. JOHANSSON, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
79. JOHNSTON, H. M., & JONES, M. R. (in press). Higher-order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
80. JONES, L. A. (1988). Motor illusions: What do they reveal about proprioception? Psychological Bulletin, 103, 72-86.
81. JOORDENS, S., SPALEK, T. M., RAZMY, S., & VAN DUIJN, M. (2004). A Clockwork Orange: Compensation opposing momentum in memory for location. Memory & Cognition, 32, 39-50.
82. JORDAN, J. S. (1998). Recasting Dewey's critique of the reflex-arc concept via a theory of anticipatory consciousness: Implications for theories of perception. New Ideas in Psychology, 16, 165-187.
83. JORDAN, J. S., & KNOBLICH, G. (2004). Spatial perception and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 54-59.
84. JORDAN, J. S., STORK, S., KNUF, L., KERZEL, D., & MÜSSELER, J. (2002). Action planning affects spatial localization. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 158-176). New York: Oxford University Press.
85. KELLY, M. H., & FREYD, J. J. (1987). Explorations of representational momentum. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 369-401.
86. KERZEL, D. (2000). Eye movements and visible persistence explain themislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research, 40, 3703-3715.
87. KERZEL, D. (2002a). Attention shifts and memory averaging. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 425-443.
88. KERZEL, D. (2002b). The locus of "memory displacement" is at least partially perceptual: Effects of velocity, expectation, friction, memory averaging, and weight. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 680-692.
89. KERZEL, D. (2002c). A matter of design: No representational momentum without predictability. Visual Cognition, 9, 66-80.
90. KERZEL, D. (2003a). Attention maintains mental extrapolation of target position: Irrelevant distractors eliminate forward displacement after implied motion. Cognition, 88, 109-131.
91. KERZEL, D. (2003b). Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses. Vision Research, 43, 2623-2635.
92. KERZEL, D. (2003c). Centripetal force draws the eyes, not memory of the target, toward the center. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 458-466.
93. KERZEL, D., & GEGENFURTNER, K. R. (2003). Neuronal processing delays are compensated in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Current Biology, 13, 1975-1978.
94. KERZEL, D., JORDAN, J. S., & MÜSSELER, J. (2001). The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 829-840.
95. KOSELEFF, P. (1957). Studies in the perception of heaviness: 1. Some relevant facts concerning the size-weight-effect (SWE). Acta Psychologica, 13, 242-252.
96. KOURTZI, Z., & KANWISHER, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST for static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1-8.
97. KOZHEVNIKOV, M, & HEGARTY, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439-453.
98. LIBERMAN, A. M., & MATTINGLY, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
99. MARR, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
100. MCCLOSKEY, M., & KOHL, D. (1983). Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 146-156.
101. MCINTYRE, J., ZAGO, M., BERTHOZ, A., & LACQUANITI, F. (2001). Does the brain model Newton's laws? Nature Neuroscience, 4, 693-694.
102. MICHOTTE, A. (1963). The perception of causality (T. R. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1946)
103. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
104. MUNGER, M. P., & MINCHEW, J. H. (2002). Parallels between remembering and predicting an object's location. Visual Cognition, 9, 177-194.
105. MUNGER, M. P., & OWENS, T. R. (2004). Representational momentum and the flash-lag effect. Visual Cognition, 11, 81-103.
106. MUNGER, M. P., OWENS, T. R., & CONWAY, J. E. (2005). Are boundary extension and representational momentum related? Visual Cognition, 12, 1041-1056.
107. MUNGER, M. P., SOLBERG, J. L., & HORROCKS, K. K. (1999). The relationship between mental rotation and representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1557-1568.
108. MUNGER, M. P., SOLBERG, J. L., HORROCKS, K. K., & PRESTON, A. S. (1999). Representational momentum for rotations in depth: Effects of shading and axis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 157-171.
109. MÜSSELER, J., STORK, S., & KERZEL, D. (2002). Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 120-138.
110. NAGAI, M., KAZAI, K., & YAGI, A. (2002). Larger forward memory shift in the direction of gravity. Visual Cognition, 9, 28-40.
111. NAGAI, M., & YAGI, A. (2001). The pointedness effect on representational momentum. Memory & Cognition, 29, 91-99.
112. NIJHAWAN, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 387-393.
113. POLJANSEK, A. (2002). The effect of motion acceleration on displacement of continuous and staircase motion in the frontoparallel plane. Psiholoska Obzorja/Horizons of Psychology, 11, 7-21.
114. PRATT, J., SPALEK, T. M., & BRADSHAW, F. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 730-746.
115. PREMACK, D., & PREMACK, A. J. (1995). Intention as psychological cause. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 185-199). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
116. PRINZ, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20.
117. PRINZ, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
118. RANNEY, M. (1989). Internally represented forces may be cognitively penetrable: Comment on Freyd, Pantzer, and Cheng (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 399-402.
119. RAO, H., HAN, S., JIANG, Y., XUE, Y., GU, H., CUI, Y., & GAO, D. (2004). Engagement of the prefrontal cortex in representational momentum: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23, 98-103.
120. REED. C. L., & VINSON, N. G. (1996). Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 839-850.
121. SAKATA, H., KUSUNOKI, M., & TANAKA, Y. (1993). Neural mechanisms of perception of linear and rotary movement in depth in the parietal association cortex of the monkey. In T. Ono, L. R. Squire, M. E. Raichle, D. I. Perrett, & M. Fukuda (Eds.), Brain mechanisms of perception and memory (pp. 166-182). New York: Oxford University Press.
122. SENIOR, C., BARNES, J., GIAMPIETROC, V., SIMMONS, A., BULLMORE, E. T., BRAMMER, M., & DAVID, A. S. (2000). The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or "representational momentum." Current Biology, 10, 16-22.
123. SENIOR, C., WARD, J., & DAVID, A. S. (2002). Representational momentum and the brain: An investigation of the functional necessity of V5/MT. Visual Cognition, 9, 81-92.
124. SHIFFRAR, M., & FREYD, J. J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257-264.
125. SHIFFRAR, M., & FREYD, J. J. (1993). Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science, 4, 379-384.
126. SILLITO, A. M., JONES, H. E., GERSTEIN, G. L., & WEST, D. C. (1994). Feature-linked synchronization of thalamic relay cell firing induced by feedback from the visual cortex. Nature, 369, 479-482.
127. SNYDER, J. J., SCHMIDT, W. C., & KINGSTONE, A. (2001). Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1420-1432.
128. STEWART, J. A. (1982). Perception of animacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
129. THORNTON, I. M. (1998). The perception of dynamic human faces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon, Eugene.
130. THORNTON, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spatial Vision, 15, 219-243.
131. THORNTON, I. M., & HAYES, A. E. (2004). Anticipating action in complex scenes. Visual Cognition, 11, 341-370.
132. THORNTON, I. M., & HUBBARD, T. L. (EDS.) (2002). Representational momentum: New findings, new directions. Hove, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, Psychology Press.
133. VERFAILLIE, K., & DAEMS, A. (2002). Representing and anticipating human actions in vision. Visual Cognition, 9, 217-232.
134. VERFAILLIE, K., DE TROY, A., & VAN RENSBERGEN, J. (1994). Transsaccadic integration of biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 649-670.
135. VERFAILLIE, K., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1991). Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 302-313.
136. VINSON, N. G., & REED, C. L. (2002). Sources of object-specific effects in representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 41-65.
137. WHITE, H., MINOR, S. W., MERRELL, J., & SMITH, T. (1993). Representational-momentum effects in the cerebral hemispheres. Brain & Cognition, 22, 161-170.
138. WHITNEY, D., & CAVANAGH, P. (2002). Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli. Visual Cognition, 9, 139-152.