The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1484-1499

  Viarouge, Arnaud ^a,b,c   Hubbard, Edward M ^b,c   Dehaene, Stanislas ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c SERVICE HOSPITALIER FRÉDÉRIC JOLIOT   (France)

^d sous section pédiatrie   (France)

Author keywords

Numerical cognition; Spatial reference frames; Spatial numerical association of response codes effect

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904542053     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.897358     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bächtold, D., Baumuller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36(8), 731-735.
2. Brozzoli, C., Ishihara, M., Göbel, S. M., Salemme, R., Rossetti, Y., & Farnè, A. (2008). Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(14), 5644-5648.
3. Committeri, G., Galati, G., Paradis, A.-L., Pizzamiglio, L., Berthoz, A., & LeBihan, D. (2004). Reference frames for spatial cognition: Different brain areas are involved in viewer-, object-, and landmark-centered judgments about object location. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1517-1535.
4. Conson, M., Mazzarella, E., & Trojano, L. (2009). Numbers are represented in egocentric space: Effects of numerical cues and spatial reference frames on hand laterality judgements. Neuroscience Letters, 452(2), 176-180.
5. Crowe, D. A., Averbeck, B. B., & Chafee, M. V. (2008). Neural ensemble decoding reveals a correlate of viewer- to object-centered spatial transformation in monkey parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 28(20), 5218-5228.
6. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
7. Domahs, F., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2010). Embodied numerosity: Implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition, 116(2), 251-266.
8. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 161-177.
9. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & D'Ydevalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC-effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110.
10. Fias, W., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43-54). Hove: Psychology Press.
11. Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44(4), 386-392.
12. Fischer, M. H., & Hill, R. L. (2004, January 25-30). A SNARC in the dark. 22st Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology, Bressanone, Italy.
13. Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L., & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 91-97.
14. Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(1), 180-190.
15. Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32-44.
16. Hartstra, E., Kühn, S., Verguts, T., & Brass, M. (2011). The implementation of verbal instructions: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 32(11), 1811-1824. doi:10.1002/hbm.21152
17. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 435-448.
18. Hung, Y.-hui, Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Wu, D. H. (2008). Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition, 106(3), 1441-1450.
19. Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 662-673.
20. Karnath, H.-O., & Rorden, C. (2012). The anatomy of spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 50(6), 1010-1017.
21. Kaufman, J., Gilmore, R. O., & Johnson, M. H. (2006). Frames of reference for anticipatory action in 4-month-old infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 29, 322-333.
22. Loetscher, T., Bockisch, C. J., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Brugger, P. (2010). Eye position predicts what number you have in mind. Current Biology, 20(6), R264-R265.
23. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
24. Müller, D., & Schwarz, W. (2007). Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 1151-1161.
25. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
26. Pellizzer, G., Bâ, M. B., Zanello, A., & Merlo, M. C. G. (2009). Asymmetric learning transfer between imagined viewer- and object-rotations: Evidence of a hierarchical organization of spatial reference frames. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 272-278.
27. Priftis, K., Zorzi, M., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Explicit versus implicit processing of representational space in Neglect: Dissociations in accessing the mental number line. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 680-688.
28. Riello, M., & Rusconi, E. (2011). Unimanual SNARC effect: Hand matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 372. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00372
29. Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 651-664.
30. Schwarz, W., & Müller, D. (2006). Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal Responses. Experimental Psychology, 53(1), 4-15.
31. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2012). Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 804-809.
32. Van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119(1), 114-119.
33. Wood, G., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Numbers, space, and action - From finger counting to the mental number line and beyond. Cortex, 44(4), 353-358.
34. Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2006). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: A failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). Cortex, 42(8), 1069-1079.
35. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 489-525.
36. Zaehle, T., Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Baudewig, J., Dechent, P., & Mast, F. W. (2007). The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Research, 1137(1), 92-103.
37. Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in english and arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 5(1-2), 165-190.