When digits help digits: Spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue OCT, 2011, Pages

  Fischer, Martin H ^a   Brugger, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Finger counting; Numerical cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955174090     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260     Document Type: Short Survey

References (72)

1. Andres, M., Olivier, E., and Badets, A. (2008). Actions, words, and numbers: a motor contribution to semantic processing? Curr. Dir. Psy-chol. Sci. 17, 313-317.
2. Andres, M., Seron, X., and Olivier, E. (2007). Contribution of hand motor circuits to counting. J. Cogn. Neu-rosci. 19, 563-576.
3. Bachmann, V., Landolt, H.-P., Fischer, M. H., and Brugger, P. (2010). Asymmetric prefrontal cortex functions predict asymmetries in number space in healthy adults. Brain Cogn. 74, 306-311.
4. Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., and Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia 36, 731-735.
5. Bächtold, D., Brugger, P., and Regard, M. (2000). Processing of spatial locations: hemispace effects during encoding but not recall. Neuropsy-chologia 38, 864-872.
6. Badets, A., and Pesenti, M. (2010). Creating number semantics through finger movement perception. Cogni-tion 115, 46-53.
7. Badets, A., Pesenti, M., and Olivier, E. (2010). Response-effect compatibility of finger-numeral configurations in arithmetical context. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 63, 16-22.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol.59, 617-645.
9. Behrmann, M., and Moscovitch, M. (1994). Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: effects of left-right coordinates of objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6, 1-16.
10. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., and Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 74, 286-308.
11. Brozzoli, C., Ishihara, M., Goebel, S. M., Salemme, R., Rossetti, Y., and Farne, A. (2008). Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 5644-5648.
12. Bueti, D., and Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1831-1840.
13. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in rightand left-handers. J. Exp. Psy-chol. Gen. 138, 351-367.
14. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing The Mind: Embodiment, Action And Cognitive Extension. Oxford: University Press. De Cruz, H. (2008). An extended mind perspective on natural number representation. Philos. Psychol. 21, 475-490.
15. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., and Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 122, 371-396.
16. Di Luca, S., Grana, A., Semenza, C., Seron, X., and Pesenti, M. (2006). Finger-digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 59, 1648-1663.
17. Di Luca, S., LeFèvre, N., and Pesenti, M. (2010). Place and summation coding for canonical and non-canonical finger numeral representations. Cog-nition 117, 95-100.
18. Di Luca, S., and Pesenti, M. (2008). Masked priming effect with canonical finger numeral configurations. Exp. Brain Res. 185, 27-39.
19. Domahs, F., Krinzinger, H., and Willmes, K. (2008). Mind the gap between both hands: evidence for internal finger-based number representations in children's mental calculation. Cortex 44, 359-367.
20. Domahs, F., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Willmes, K., and Nuerk, H.-C. (2010). Embodied numerosity: implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition 116, 251-266.
21. Doricchi, F., Guariglia, P., Gasparini, M., and Tomaiuolo, F. (2005). Dissociation between physical and mental number line in right hemisphere brain patients. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1663-1665.
22. Fayol, M., Barrouillet, P., and Marinthe, C. (1998). Predicting arithmetical achievement from neuropsychological performance: a longitudinal study. Cognition 68, B63-B70.
23. Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatialnumerical associations. Cortex 44, 386-392.
24. Fischer, M. H. (2011). "The spatial mapping of numbers -its origin and flexibility," in Language and Action in Cognitive Neurosciences, edsY. Coello and A. Bartolo (London: Psychology Press).
25. Fischer, M. H., Mills, R. A., and Shaki, S. (2010). How to cook a SNARC: number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain Cogn. 72, 333-336.
26. Fischer, M. H., Shaki, S., and Cruise, A. (2009). It takes only one word to quash the SNARC. Exp. Psychol. 56, 361-366.
27. Gattis, M. (2002). Structure mapping in spatial reasoning. Cogn. Dev. 17, 1157-1183.
28. Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia, disorientation for right and left, agraphia and acalculia. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 44, 398-407.
29. Göbel, S. M., Shaki, S., and Fischer, M. H. (2011). The cultural number line: a review of cultural and linguistic influences on the development of number processing. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42, 543-565.
30. Goldin-Meadow, S., Wagner Cook, S., and Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychol. Sci. 20, 267-272.
31. Gulledge, J. P. (2006). Hemispheric Differences in Numerical Cognition: A Comparative Investigation of How Primates Process Numerosity. Psychology Dissertations. Available at: http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/psych_diss/12.
32. Haggard, P., Kitadono, K., Press, C., and Taylor-Clarke, M. (2006). The brain's fingers and hands. Exp. Brain Res. 172, 94-102.
33. Heed, T., Backhaus, J., and Roeder, B. (2011). Integration of hand and finger location in external spatial coordinates for tactile localization. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. doi: 10.1037/a0024059. [Epub ahead of print].
34. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., and Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between numbers and space in parietal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 435-448.
35. Hung, Y. H., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., and Wu, D. H. (2008). Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition 106, 1441-1450.
36. Kaufmann, L., Vogel, S. E., Wood, G., Kremser, C., Schocke, M., Zimmerhackl, L.-B., and Koten, J. W. (2008). A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing. Cortex 44, 376-385.
37. Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbards, E. M., Michel, V., and Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science 324, 1583-1585.
38. Lakoff, G., and Nunez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From. NewYork: Basic Books.
39. Leuthard, J., Bächtold, D., and Brugger, P. (2005). Is "left" always where the thumb is right? Stimulus-response compatibilities as a function of posture and location of the responding hand. Cogn. Behav. Neurol.18, 173-178.
40. Lindemann, O., Alipour, A., and Fischer, M. H. (2011). Finger counting habits in Middle-Eastern and Western individuals: an online survey. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42, 566-578.
41. Loetscher, T., Bockisch, C., Nicholls, M. E. R., and Brugger, P. (2010). Eye position predicts what number ypu have in mind. Curr. Biol. 20, R264-R265.
42. Loetscher, T., and Brugger, P. (2007). Exploring number space by random digit generation. Exp. Brain Res. 180, 655-665.
43. Loetscher, T., and Brugger, P. (2009). Random number generation in neglect patients reveals enhanced response stereotypy, but no neglect in number space. Neuropsychologia 47, 276-279.
44. Loetscher, T., Schwarz, U., Schubiger, M., and Brugger, P. (2008). Head turns bias the brain's random number generator. Curr. Biol. 18, R60-R62.
45. Lubin, A., Poirel, N., Rossi, S., Lanoë, C., Pineau, A., and Houdé, O. (2010). Pedagogical effect of action on arithmetic performances in Wynn-like tasks solved by 2-year-olds. Exp. Psychol. 57, 405-411.
46. McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., and Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 1324-1333.
47. Nagy, E., Compagne, H., Orvos, H., Pal, A., Molnar, P., Janszky, I., Loveland, K. A., and Bardos, G. (2005). Index finger movement imitation by human neonates: motivation, learning, and left-hand preference. Pediatr. Res. 58, 749-753.
48. Noël, M.-P. (2005). Finger gnosia: a predictor of numerical abilities in children? Child Neuropsychol. 11, 413-430.
49. Nuerk, H. C., Iversen, W., and Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 57A, 835-863.
50. Nunez, R. (2006). "Do real numbers really move?" in 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics, ed. R. Hersch (New York: Springer), 160-181.
51. Opfer, J. E., and Furlong, E. E. (2011). How numbers bias preschoolers' spatial search. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42, 682-695.
52. Pinhas, M., and Fischer, M. H. (2008). Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition 109, 408-415.
53. Plaisier, M. A., and Smets, J. B. J. (2011). Number magnitude to finger mapping is disembodied and topological. Exp. Brain Res. 209, 395-400.
54. Poeck, K. (1964). Phantoms following amputation in early childhood and in congenital absence of limbs. Cortex 1, 269-275.
55. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 576-582.
56. Rugani, R., Kelly, D. M., Szelest, I., Regolin, L., and Vallortigara, G.
57. Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Vallini, B., and Regolin, L. (2011). Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 95, 231-238.
58. Rusconi, E., Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., and Kleinschmidt, A. (2010). The enigma of Gerstmann's syndrome revisited: a telling tale of the vicissitudes of neuropsychology. Brain 133, 320-332.
59. Rusconi, E., Walsh, V., and Butterworth, B. (2005). Dexterity with numbers: rTMS over left angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and number processing. Neuropsychologia 43, 1609-1624.
60. Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rizzolatti, G., and Gallese, V. (2007). Numbers within our hands: modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgement. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 684-693.
61. Sauls, C., and Beeson, B. F. (1976). The relationship of finger counting to certain pupil factors. J. Educ. Res. 70, 81-83.
62. Shaki, S., and Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers -a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition 108, 590-599.
63. Shaki, S., and Fischer, M. H. (2011). Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. (in press).
64. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., and Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 328-331.
65. Tang, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, K., Feng, S., Ji, Y., Shen, J., Reiman, E. M., and Liu, Y. (2006). Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 10775-10780.
66. Tschentscher, N., Hauk, O., Fischer, M. H., and Pulvermüller, F. (2010). "You can count on the motor cortex: fMRI reveals embodied number processing," in Poster Presented at the Festschrift in Honour of Brian Butterworth: "Numbers in the Brain", Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London.
67. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., and Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 515-557.
68. van Dijck, J.-P., Gevers, W., and Fias, W. (2009). Numbers are associated.
69. Wood, G., Nuerk, H. C., Willmes, K., and Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychol. Sci. Q. 50, 489-525.
70. Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., and Willmes, K. (2006). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: a failure to replicate.
71. Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux 1993. Cortex 42, 1069-1079.
72. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., and Umilta, C. (2002). Brain damage: neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 417, 138-139.