Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 835-863

  Nuerk, Hans Christoph ^a   Iversen, Wiebke ^b   Willmes, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 3142757948     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000512     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13, 263-308.
2. Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75-106.
3. Bächthold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731-735.
4. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., & McDonough Ryan, P. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286-308.
5. Beringer, J. (1993). Handbook for ERTS: Experimental Run Time System, Version 3.00. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: BeriSoft Cooperation.
6. Borg, I., & Lingoes, J. (1987). Multidimensional similarity structure analysis. New York: Springer.
7. Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 434-452.
8. Buckley, P. B., & Gillman, C. B. (1974). Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1131-1136.
9. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
10. Campbell, J. I. D. (1992). In defense of the encoding-complex approach: Reply to McCloskey, Macaruso, & Whetstone. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 539-556). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
12. Campbell, J. I. D. (1998). Linguistic influences in cognitive arithmetic: Comment on Noel, Fias, and Brysbaert (1997). Cognition, 67, 353-364.
13. Campbell, J. I. D. (1999). The surface form × problem size interaction in cognitive arithmetic: Evidence against an encoding locus. Cognition, 70, B25-B33
14. Campbell, J. I. D., & Clark, J. M. (1988). An encoding-complex view of cognitive number processing: Comment on McCloskey, Sokol, and Goodman (1986). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 204-214.
15. Campbell, J. I. D., & Clark, J. M. (1992). Cognitive number processing: An encoding complex perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 457-491). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Cipolotti, L., & Butterworth, B. (1995). Toward a multiroute model of number processing: Impaired number transcoding with preserved calculation skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 375-390.
17. Clark, J. M., & Campbell, J. I. D. (1991). Integrated versus modular theories of number skills and acalculia. Brain and Cognition, 17, 204-239.
18. Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2000). Calculating without reading: Unsuspected residual abilities in pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 563-583.
19. Dehaene, S. (1989). The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 557-66
20. Dehaene, S. (1992). The varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
21. Dehaene, S., & Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2, 314-326.
22. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
23. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83-120.
24. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219-250.
25. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626-641.
26. Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 12, 415-423.
27. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC-effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110.
28. Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415-423.
29. Foltz, G. S., Poltrock, S. E., & Potts, G. R. (1984). Mental comparison of size and magnitude: Size congruity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 442-453.
30. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
31. Hines, T. M. (1990). An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits. Memory and Cognition, 18, 40-46.
32. Hinrichs, J. V., Yurko, D. S., & Hu, J.-M. (1981). Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 890-901.
33. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
34. Lingoes, J. C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.
35. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
36. Lyons, J. (1969). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107-57.
38. McCloskey, M., Macaruso, P., & Whetstone, T. (1992). The functional architecture of numerical processing mechanisms: Defending the modular model. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 493-537). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
39. Miller, K. F., & Gelman, R. (1983). The child's representation of number: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Child Development, 54, 1470-1479.
40. Miller, K. F., & Stigler, J. W. (1987). Counting in Chinese: Cultural variation in a basic cognitive skill. Cognitive Development, 2, 279-305.
41. Miller, K. F., & Stigler, J. W. (1991). Meanings of skill: Effects of abacus expertise on number representation. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 29-67.
42. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
43. Nuerk, H. C., Weger, U., & Willmes K. (2002) Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82, B25-33.
44. Nuerk, H. C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (in press). A unit-decade compatibility effect in German number word. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, & Cognition, 7, 19-38.
45. Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 32-45.
46. Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition, 72, 191-201.
47. Shepard, R. N., Kilpatric, D. W., & Cunningham, P. (1975). The internal representation of numbers. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82-138.
48. Sherman, M. A. (1973). Bound to be easier? The negative prefix and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 76-84.
49. Sherman, M. A. (1976). Adjectival negation and the comprehension of multiply negated sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 143-157.
50. Sokol, S. M., Goodman-Schulman, R., & McCloskey, M. (1989). In defense of a modular architecture for the number-processing system: Reply to Campbell and Clark. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 105-110.
51. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
52. Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Methods, models, and conceptual issues (2nd ed., pp. 703-863). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., & Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 166-179.
54. Willmes, K., & Iversen, W. (1995 April). On the Internal Representation of Number Parity. Paper presented at the Spring Annual Meeting of the British Neuropsychological Society, London.
55. Zimmer, K. (1964). Affixed negation in English and other languages: An investigation of restricted productivity. Word, 20, 2, Monograph No. 5.