Bidirectional syntactic priming across cognitive domains: From arithmetic to language and back

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1643-1654

  Scheepers, Christoph ^a   Sturt, Patrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arithmetic; Domain generality; Language; Priming; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEMANTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904555550     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.873815     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
2. Desmet, T., & Declercq, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 610-632. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.007
3. Fedorenko, E., Behr, M. K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 16428-16433. doi:10.1073/pnas.1112937108
4. 0. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 3 (pp. 87-105). Dodrecht: Foris.
5. Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Friedrich, R., & Makuuchi, M. (2011). The neural basis of recursion and complex syntactic hierarchy. Biolinguistics, 5, 87-104.
6. Hanley, J. A., Negassa, A., Edwardes, M. D., & Forrester, J. E. (2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 364-375. doi:10.1093/aje/kwf215
7. Hardin, J., & Hilbe, J. (2003). Generalized estimating equations. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
8. Makuuchi, M., Bahlmann, J., & Friederici, A. D. (2012). An approach to separating the levels of hierarchical structure building in language and mathematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 2033-2045. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0095
9. Pan, W. (2001). Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics, 57, 120-125. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00120.x
10. Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633-651. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
11. Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 136-141. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01293-0
12. Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427-459. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
13. Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89, 179-205. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00119-7
14. Scheepers, C., Sturt, P., Martin, C. J., Myachykov, A., Teevan, K., & Viskupova, I. (2011). Structural priming across cognitive domains: From simple arithmetic to relative clause attachment. Psychological Science, 22, 1319-1326. doi:10.1177/0956797611416997
15. Varley, R. A., Klessinger, N. J. C., Romanowski, C. A. J., & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 3519-3524. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407470102