Representational pseudoneglect: A review

Neuropsychology Review

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 148-165

  Brooks, Joanna L ^a,c   Sala, Sergio Della ^b   Darling, Stephen ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c Universita degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa   (Italy)

^d QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive ageing; Pseudoneglect; Representational; Spatial awareness

Indexed keywords

AGING; ANIMAL; ATTENTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; TOUCH;

AGING; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84904259095     PISSN: 10407308     EISSN: 15736660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-013-9245-2     Document Type: Review

References (204)

1. Aiello, M., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Merola, S., Ottaviani, T., Tomaiuolo, F., Bueti, D., et al. (2012). No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage. Brain, 135(8), 2492-2505.
2. Ashkenazi, S., & Henik, A. (2010). A dissociation between physical and mental number bisection in developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2861-2868.
3. Azañón, E., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2008). Spatial remapping of tactile events: assessing the effects of frequent posture changes. Communicative and Integral Biology, 1(1), 45-46.
4. Azañón, E., Camacho, K., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2010). Tactile remapping beyond space. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31(10), 1858-1867.
5. Bachmann, V., Fischer, M. H., Landolt, H. P., & Brugger, P. (2010). Asymmetric prefrontal cortex functions predict asymmetries in number space. Brain and Cognition, 74(3), 306-311.
6. Baek, M. J., Lee, B. H., Kwon, J. C., Park, J. M., Kang, S. J., Chin, J., et al. (2002). Influence of final search direction on tactile line bisection in normal subjects. Neurology, 58(12), 1833-1838. (Pubitemid 34663587)
7. Barnett-Cowan, M., Jenkin, H., Dyde, R., Jenkin, M., & Harris, L. (2013). Asymmetrical representation of body orientation. Journal of Vision, 13(2).
8. Bartolomeo, P., & Chokron, S. (2002). Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(2), 217-234. (Pubitemid 34145286)
9. Bartolomeo, P., D' Erme, P., & Gainotti, G. (1994). The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect. Neurology, 44(9), 1710-1714. (Pubitemid 24286653)
10. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., & Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74(4), 286-308.
11. Berteletti, I., Lucangeli, D., Piazza, M., Dehaene, S., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Numerical estimation in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 545-551.
12. Beschin, N., Cazzani, M., Della Sala, S., & Spinazzola, L. (1996). Ignoring left and far: an investigation of tactile neglect. Neuropsychologia, 34(1), 41-49. (Pubitemid 26059597)
13. Beschin, N., Cocchini, G., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. H. (1997a). What the eyes perceive, the brain ignores: a case of pure unilateral representational neglect. Cortex, 33(1), 3-26. (Pubitemid 27154109)
14. Beschin, N., Cubelli, R., Della Sala, S., & Spinazzola, L. (1997b). Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 63(4), 483-489. (Pubitemid 27423556)
15. Bisiach, E., & Luzzatti, C. (1978). Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex, 14(1), 129-133. (Pubitemid 8327459)
16. Bjoertomt, O., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2002). Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 125, 2012-2022.
17. Blankenburg, F., Ruff, C. C., Bestmann, S., Bjoertomt, O., Josephs, O., Deichmann, R., et al. (2010). Studying the role of human parietal cortex in visuospatial attention with concurrent TMS-fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 20(11), 2702-2711.
18. Bourlon, C., Duret, C., Pradat-Diehl, P., Azouvi, P., Loeper-Jeny, C., Merat-Blanchard, M., et al. (2010). Vocal response times to real and imagined stimuli in spatial neglect: a group study and singlecase report. Cortex, 47(5), 536-546.
19. Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect - effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18(4-5), 491-498. (Pubitemid 10053771)
20. Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C., Nathan, G., & Wilson, L. (1986). Tactual-kinesthetic matching of horizontal extents by the longterm blind-absence or reversal of normal left-side underestimation. Neuropsychologia, 24(2), 261-264. (Pubitemid 16108889)
21. Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C., Wilson, L. E., & Bradshaw, C. S. (1987). Line bisection by left-handed preschoolers: a phenomenon of symmetrical neglect. Brain and Cognition, 6(4), 377-385.
22. Braun, J. B., & Kirk, A. (1999). Line bisection performance of normal adults: two subgroups with opposite biases. Neurology, 53, 527-532. (Pubitemid 29382046)
23. Brodie, E. E. (2010). Reflecting upon line bisection: mirror reversal increases the magnitude of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1517-1520.
24. Brodie, E. E., & Pettigrew, L. E. L. (1996). Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia, 34(5), 467-470. (Pubitemid 26119036)
25. Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22(5), 349.
26. Brooks, J. L., & Brandimonte, M. (2013). Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-world scenes created from aural-verbal description. Cognitive Processing. (in press).
27. Brooks, J. L., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. (2011a). Tactile rod bisection in the absence of visuospatial processing in children, mid-age and older adults. Neuropsychologia, 49(12), 3392-3398.
28. Brooks, J. L., Logie, R. H., McIntosh, R. D., & Della Sala, S. (2011b). Representational pseudoneglect for an auditory-driven spatial working memory task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2168-2180.
29. Bultitude, J. H., & Davies, A. M. A. (2006). Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 1849-1858. (Pubitemid 43927997)
30. Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 85-100. (Pubitemid 34241215)
31. Cabeza, R., Grady, C. L., Nyberg, L., McIntosh, A. R., Tulving, E., Kapur, S., et al. (1997a). Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrieval: a positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(1), 391-400. (Pubitemid 27008878)
32. Cabeza, R., McIntosh, A. R., Tulving, E., Nyberg, L., & Grady, C. L. (1997b). Age-related differences in effective neural connectivity during encoding and recall. Neuroreport, 8(16), 3479-3483. (Pubitemid 27497468)
33. Cabeza, R., Anderson, N. D., Houle, S., Mangels, J. A., & Nyberg, L. (2000). Age-related differences in neural activity during item and temporal-order memory retrieval: a positron emission tomography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 197-206. (Pubitemid 30142794)
34. Cabeza, R., Anderson, N. D., Locantore, J. K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2002). Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuro Image, 17(3), 1394-1402. (Pubitemid 35339393)
35. Calabria, M., & Rossetti, Y. (2005). Interference between number processing and line bisection: amethodology. Neuropsychologia, 43(5), 779-783. (Pubitemid 40254346)
36. Cattaneo, Z., Silvanto, J., Pascual-Leone, A., & Battelli, L. (2009). The role of the angular gyrus in the modulation of visuospatial attention by the mental number line. Neuro Image, 44(2), 563-568.
37. Cattaneo, Z., Fantino, M., Tinti, C., Silvanto, J., & Vecchi, T. (2010). Crossmodal interaction between the mental number line and peripersonal haptic space representation in sighted and blind individuals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(4), 885-890.
38. Cattaneo, Z., Fantino, M., Silvanto, J., Tinti, C., & Vecchi, T. (2011a). Blind individuals show pseudoneglect in bisecting numerical intervals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 1021-1028.
39. Cattaneo, Z., Fantino, M., Silvanto, J., Vallar, G., & Vecchi, T. (2011b). Tapping effects on numerical bisection. Experimental Brain Research, 208, 21-28.
40. Cattaneo, Z., Fantino, M., Tinti, C., Pascual-Leone, A., Silvanto, J., & Vecchi, T. (2011c). Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(4), 1110-1121.
41. Cattaneo, Z., Fantino, M., Mancini, F., Mattioli, F. C., & Vallar, G. (2012a). Listening to numbers affects visual and haptic bisection in healthy individuals and neglect patients. Neuropsychologia, 50(5), 913-925.
42. Cattaneo, Z., Lega, C., Vecchi, T., & Vallar, G. (2012b). Listening to white noise counteracts visual and haptic pseudoneglect. Perception, 41(11), 1395-1398.
43. Chen, P., Goedert, K.M., Murray, E., Kelly, K., Ahmeti, S., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Spatial bias and right hemisphere function: sex-specific changes with aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(3), 455-462.
44. Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (1995). Reading habits and line bisection: a developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(1), 51-58. (Pubitemid 26009178)
45. Chokron, S., & Imbert, M. (1993). Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research, 1(4), 219-222. (Pubitemid 24271002)
46. Chokron, S., Colliot, P., Bartolomeo, P., Rhein, F., Eusop, E., Vassel, P., et al. (2002). Visual, proprioceptive and tactile performance in left neglect patients. Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 1965-1976.
47. Çiçek, M., Deouell, L. Y., & Knight, R. T. (2009). Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks. Frontiers Human Neuroscience, 3, 7.
48. Cocchini, G., Watling, R., Della Sala, S., & Jansari, A. (2007). Pseudoneglect in back space. Brain and Cognition, 63(1), 79-84. (Pubitemid 44848375)
49. Coolican, J., Eskes, G. A., McMullen, P. A., & Lecky, E. (2008). Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion. Brain and Cognition, 66(2), 176-187. (Pubitemid 351187797)
50. Coudereau, J. P., Gueguen, N., Pratte, M., & Sampaio, E. (2006). Tactile precision in right-handed archery experts with visual disabilities: a pseudoneglect effect? Laterality, 11(2), 170-180. (Pubitemid 43347992)
51. Cowie, R., & Hamill, G. (1998). Variation among nonclinical subjects on a line bisection task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 834. (Pubitemid 128700848)
52. Danckert, J., & Ferber, S. (2006). Revisiting unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 987-1006.
53. Darling, S., Logie, R. H., & Della Sala, S. (2012). Representational pseudoneglect in line bisection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(5), 879-883.
54. De Agostini, M., Curt, F., Tzortzis, C., & Dellatolas, G. (1999). Comparing left and right hand in line bisection at different ages. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15(3), 379-394. (Pubitemid 29233065)
55. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371-396.
57. Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A., Allamano, N., & Wilson, L. (1999). Pattern span: a tool for unwelding visuospatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 37(10), 1189-1199. (Pubitemid 29376476)
58. Della Sala, S., Darling, S., & Logie, R. H. (2010). Items on the left are better remembered. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 848-855.
59. Dellatolas, G., Coutin, T., & De Agostini, M. (1996). Bisection and perception of horizontal lines in normal children. Cortex, 32, 705-715. (Pubitemid 27011695)
60. Di Luca, S., Pesenti, M., Vallar, G., & Girelli, L. (2013). Numbers reorient visuospatial attention during cancellation tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 225(4), 549-557.
61. Dickinson, C. A., & Intraub, H. (2009). Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: Consequences of an attentional bias? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(6), 1251-1262.
62. Dolcos, F., Rice, H. J., & Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry and aging: right hemisphere decline or asymmetry reduction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 819-825. (Pubitemid 35430286)
63. Ebersbach, M., Luwel, K., Frick, A., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The relationship between the shape of the mental number line and familiarity with numbers in 5-to 9-year old children: evidence for a segmented linear model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(1), 1-17.
64. Failla, C. V., Sheppard, D. M., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2003). Age and responding-hand related changes in performance of neurologically normal subjects on the line-bisection and chimeric-faces tasks. Brain and Cognition, 52(3), 353-363. (Pubitemid 36945418)
65. Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Shah, N. J., Weiss, P. H., Halligan, P. W., Grosse-Ruyken, M., et al. (2000a). Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology, 54(6), 1324-1331. (Pubitemid 30174054)
66. Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., Shah, N. J., Toni, I., Halligan, P. W., et al. (2000b). 'Where' depends on 'what': a differential functional anatomy for position discrimination in one-versus twodimensions. Neuropsychologia, 38(13), 1741-1748.
67. Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., & Zilles, K. (2001). The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuro Image, 14(1), S59-S67. (Pubitemid 32554531)
68. Fischer, M. H. (1996). Bisection performance indicates spatial word representation. Cognitive Brain Research, 4(3), 163-170. (Pubitemid 26356798)
69. Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44(4), 386-392. (Pubitemid 351722613)
70. Fischer, M. H., & Stumpp, T. (2001). An investigation of the time course of flanker effects in the landmark task. Neuropsychologia, 39(6), 586-596. (Pubitemid 32197530)
71. Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L., & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 91-97. (Pubitemid 38472467)
72. Foxe, J. J., McCourt, M. E., & Javitt, D. C. (2003). Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. Neuro Image, 19(3), 710-726. (Pubitemid 36918215)
73. Friedman, A., Mohr, C., & Brugger, P. (2012). Representational pseudoneglect and reference points both influence geographical location estimates. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(2), 277-284.
74. Fujii, T., Fukatsu, R., Yamadori, A., & Kimura, I. (1995). Effect of age on the line bisection test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(6), 941-944. (Pubitemid 26020994)
75. Gainotti, G. (2010). The role of automatic orienting of attention towards ipsilesional stimuli in non-visual (tactile and auditory) neglect: a critical review. Cortex, 46(2), 150-160.
76. Gamberini, L., Seraglia, B., & Priftis, K. (2008). Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1298-1304.
77. Garza, J. P., Eslinger, P. J., & Barrett, A. M. (2008). Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space. Brain and Cognition, 68(1), 9-14.
78. Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., et al. (2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of numberspace interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(1), 180-190.
79. Gilmore, C. S., Clementz, B. A., & Berg, P. (2009). Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73(3), 326-333.
80. Giorgio, A., Watkins, K. E., Chadwick, M., James, S., Winmill, L., Douaud, G., et al. (2010). Longitudinal changes in grey and white matter during adolescence. Neuro Image, 49(1), 94-103.
81. Gobel, S. M., Calabria, M., Farne, A., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). Parietal rTMS distorts themental number line: simulating 'spatial' neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 860-868.
82. Goldstein, G., & Shelly, C. (1981). Does the right hemisphere age more rapidly than the left. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3(1), 65-78. (Pubitemid 11038484)
83. Gottlieb, J., & Snyder, L. H. (2010). Spatial and non-spatial functions of the parietal cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(6), 731-740.
84. Guariglia, C., Padovani, A., Pantano, P., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1993). Unilateral neglect restricted to visual-imagery. Nature, 364(6434), 235-237.
85. Hach, S., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2012). Touching base: the effect of participant and stimulus modulation factors on a haptic line bisection task. Laterality, 17(2), 180-201.
86. Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., & Wade, D. T. (1989). Visuospatial neglect-underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet, 2(8668), 908-911.
87. Halligan, P. W., Manning, L., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Hemispheric activation vs spatiomotor cueing in visual neglect-a case-study. Neuropsychologia, 29(2), 165-176.
88. Halligan, P. W., Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., & Vallar, G. (2003). Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 125-133. (Pubitemid 36294173)
89. Hartman, M., & Warren, L. H. (2005). Explaining age differences in temporal working memory. Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 645-656. (Pubitemid 43119636)
90. Harvey, M., Milner, A. D., & Roberts, R. C. (1995). An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task. Brain and Cognition, 27(1), 59-78.
91. Harvey, M., Pool, T. D., Roberson, M. J., & Olk, B. (2000). Effects of visible and invisible cueing procedures on perceptual judgments in young and elderly subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 22-31.
92. Hatin, B., Sykes, L., & Tottenham, C. (2012). The relationship between collisions and pseudoneglect: is it right? Cortex, 48(8), 997-1008.
93. Hatta, T., & Yamamoyto, M. (1986). Hemispheric asymmetries in a tactile bisection task - effects of hemispace of presentation. Neuropsychologia, 24(2), 265-269. (Pubitemid 16108890)
94. Hausmann, M., Ergun, G., Yazgan, Y., & Gunturkun, O. (2002). Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand. Neuropsychologia, 40(3), 235-240. (Pubitemid 33001603)
95. Hausmann, M., Waldie, K. E., & Corballis, M. C. (2003). Developmental changes in line bisection: a result of callosal maturation? Neuropsychology, 17(1), 155-160. (Pubitemid 36194094)
96. Hausmann, M., Kirk, I. J., & Corballis, M. C. (2004). Influence of task complexity on manual asymmetries. Cortex, 40(1), 103-110. (Pubitemid 38380488)
97. Heber, I. A., Siebertz, S., Wolter, M., Kuhlen, T., & Fimm, B. (2010). Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space. Brain and Cognition, 73(3), 160-166.
98. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5(2), 166-170. (Pubitemid 9195816)
99. Heilman, K. M., & Van Den Abell, T. (1979). Right hemispheric dominance formediating cerebral activation. Neuropsychologia, 17(3-4), 315-321. (Pubitemid 10241635)
100. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 435-448. (Pubitemid 40769170)
101. Izard, V., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Distinct cerebral pathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLoS Biology, 6(2), e11.
102. Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: a review and metaanalysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 93-110.
103. Jimenez-Jimenez, J. F., Calleja, M., Alonso-Navarro, H., Rubio, L., Navacerrada, F., Pilo-de-la-Fuente, B., et al. (2011). Influence of age and gender in motor performance in healthy subjects. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 302(1-2), 72-80.
104. Johnson, W., Logie, R. H., & Brockmole, J. R. (2010). Working memory tasks differ in factor structure across age cohorts: implications for dedifferentiation. Intelligence, 38, 513-528.
105. Kadosh, R. C., Muggleton, N., Silvanto, J., & Walsh, V. (2010). Double dissociation of format-dependent and number-specific neurons in human parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 20(9), 2166-2171.
106. Kazandjian, S., Cavezian, C., Zivotofsky, A. Z., & Chokron, S. (2010). Bisections in two languages: When number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact. Neuropsychologia, 48(14), 4031-4037.
107. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). Cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica, 33, 193.
108. Klisz, D. (1978). Neuropsychological evaluation in older persons.
109. Laeng, B., Buchtel, H. A., & Butter, C. M. (1996). Tactile rod bisection: hemispheric activation and sex differences. Neuropsychologia, 34(11), 1115-1121. (Pubitemid 26345289)
110. Lazzouni, L., Ross, B., Voss, P., & Lepore, F. (2010). Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121(2), 200-207.
111. Levander, M., Tegner, R., & Caneman, G. (1993). Tactile line-bisection in normal subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(3), 831-836.
112. Loetscher, T., & Brugger, P. (2007). Exploring number space by random digit generation. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 655-665. (Pubitemid 46988112)
113. Loetscher, T., Bockisch, C. J., & Brugger, P. (2008a). Looking for the answer: The mind's eye in number space. Neuroscience, 151(3), 725-729.
114. Loetscher, T., Schwarz, U., Schubiger, M., & Brugger, P. (2008b). Head turns bias the brain's internal randomgenerator. Current Biology, 18, R60-R62.
115. Loetscher, T., Nicholls, M. E. R., Towse, J. N., Bradshaw, J. L., & Brugger, P. (2010). Lucky numbers: spatial neglect affects physical, but not representational, choices in a lotto task. Cortex, 46(5), 685-690.
116. Loftus, A. M., Nicholls, M. E. R., Mattingley, J. B., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2008a). Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation. Cognition, 107(3), 1048-1058. (Pubitemid 351551402)
117. Loftus, A. M., Nicholls, M. E. R., Mattingley, J. B., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2008b). Numerical processing overcomes left neglect for the Greyscales task. Neuroreport, 19(8), 835-838. (Pubitemid 351655151)
118. Loftus, A. M., Nicholls, M. E. R., Mattingley, J. B., Chapman, H. L., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2009). Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 925-945.
119. Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2006). On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 977-981.
120. Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2007). Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia, 45(7), 1400-1407. (Pubitemid 46097000)
121. Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2010). Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space. Brain and Cognition, 72(3), 362-367.
122. Longo, M. R., Lourenco, S. F., & Francisco, A. (2012). Approaching stimuli bias attention in numerical space. Acta Psychologica, 140, 129-132.
123. Lourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2009). Multiple spatial representations of number: evidence for co-existing compressive and linear scales. Experimental Brain Research, 193(1), 151-156.
124. Manning, L., Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1990). Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 28, 647-655. (Pubitemid 20252625)
125. Mattingley, J. B., Pierson, J. M., Bradshaw, J. L., Phillips, J. G., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1993). To see or not to see-the effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgments in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31(11), 1201-1215. (Pubitemid 23344998)
126. Mattingley, J. B., Berberovic, N., Corben, L., Slavin, M. J., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2004). The Greyscales task: a perceptual measure following unilateral hemispheric of attentional bias damage. Neuropsychologia, 42(3), 387-394. (Pubitemid 37518321)
127. McCourt, M. E., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cortex, 36(5), 715-731. (Pubitemid 32041045)
128. McCourt, M. E., Garlinghouse, M., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2005). Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex, 41(4), 499-511. (Pubitemid 40932313)
129. McGeorge, P., Beschin, N., Colnaghi, A., Rusconi, M. L., & Della Sala, S. (2007). A lateralized bias in mental imagery: evidence for representational pseudoneglect. Neuroscience Letters, 421(3), 259-263. (Pubitemid 46950908)
130. McGregor, K.M., Craggs, J. G., Benjamin, M. L., Crosson, B., & White, K. D. (2009). Age-related changes in motor control during unimanual movements. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 3(4), 317-331.
131. McIntosh, R. D., Schindler, I., Birchall, D., & Milner, A. D. (2005). Weights and measures: a new look at bisection behaviour in neglect. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 833-850. (Pubitemid 41774448)
132. Milner, A. D., Brechmann, M., & Pagliarini, L. (1992). To halve and to halve not-an analysis of line bisection judgments in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 30(6), 515-526.
133. Moeller, K., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2009). Children's Early mental number line: logarithmic or decomposed linear? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 503-515.
134. Mohr, H. M., Mues, Robol, V., & Sireteanu. (2010). Altered mental number line in Amblyopia: reduced pseudoneglect corresponds to a decreased bias in number estimation. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1775-1781.
135. Morgan, M. J., Hole, G. J., & Glennerster, A. (1990). Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Vision Research, 30(11), 1793-1810. (Pubitemid 20360280)
136. Mort, D. J., Malhotra, P., Mannan, S. K., Rorden, C., Pambakian, A., Kennard, C., et al. (2003). The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain, 126, 1986-1997. (Pubitemid 37059438)
137. Nalcaci, E., Cicek, M., Kalaycioglu, C., & Yavuzer, S. (1997). Pseudoneglect ofmales and females on a spatial, short-termmemory task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(1), 99-105. (Pubitemid 127728060)
138. Nichelli, P., Rinaldi, M., & Cubelli, R. (1989). Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 9(1), 57-70.
139. Nicholls, M. E. R., & Loftus, A.M. (2007). Pseudoneglect and neglect for mental alphabet lines. Brain Research, 1152, 130-138. (Pubitemid 46802511)
140. Nicholls, M. E. R., & McIlroy, A. M. (2010). Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections. Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 315-319.
141. Nicholls, M. E. R., & Roberts, G. R. (2002). Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases? Cortex, 38(2), 113-136. (Pubitemid 34594135)
142. Nicholls, M. E. R., Mattingley, J. B., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2005). The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 71-77. (Pubitemid 41278486)
143. Nicholls, M. E. R., Loftus, A., Mayer, K., & Mattingley, J. (2007). Things that go bump in the right: the effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 1122-1126. (Pubitemid 44958762)
144. Nicholls, M. E. R., Kramer, A., & Loftus, A. (2008a). Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, 191(1), 109-115.
145. Nicholls, M. E. R., Loftus, A.M., & Gevers, W. (2008b). Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 413-418.
146. Nicholls, M. E. R., Loftus, A. M., Orr, C. A., & Barre, N. (2008c). Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect. Brain and Cognition, 68(2), 166-170.
147. Nijboer, T. C. W., Kollen, B. J., & Kwakkel, G. (2013). Time course of visuospatial neglect early after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study original research article. Cortex, 49(8), 2021-2027.
148. Norman, J. F., & Bartholomew, A. N. (2011). Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D shape discrimination. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2323-2331.
149. Nuerk, H. C., Kaufmann, L., Zoppoth, S., & Willmes, K. (2004). On the development of the mental number line:More, less, or never holistic with increasing age? Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1199-1211. (Pubitemid 39454167)
150. Oliveri, M., Rausei, V., Koch, G., Torriero, S., Turriziani, P., & Caltigrone, C. (2004). Overestimation of numerical distances in the left side of space. Neurology, 63(11), 2139-2141. (Pubitemid 39636266)
151. Opfer, J. E., & Furlong, E. E. (2011). How numbers bias preschoolers' spatial search. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 682-695.
152. Opfer, J. E., Thompson, C. A., & Furlong, E. E. (2010). Early development of spatial-numeric associations: evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Developmental Science, 13(5), 761-771.
153. Paiement, P., Champoux, F., Bacon, B. A., Lassonde, M., Gagne, J. P., Mensour, B., et al. (2008). Functional reorganization of the human auditory pathways following hemispherectomy: an fMRI demonstration. Neuropsychologia, 46(12), 2936-2942.
154. Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299-320. (Pubitemid 34568644)
155. Paterson, A., & Zangwill, O. L. (1944). Disorders of visual space perception associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 67, 331-358.
156. Philip, J., & Hatwell, Y. (1998). Effects of cueing and of the direction of scanning on the tactile line bisection of normal adults. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition, 17(1), 31-51. (Pubitemid 128366691)
157. Porac, C., Searleman, A., & Karagiannakis, K. (2006). Pseudoneglect: evidence for both perceptual and attentional factors. Brain and Cognition, 61(3), 305-311.
158. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4(7), 1863-1874. (Pubitemid 14055541)
159. Prakash, R. S., Erickson, K. I., Colcombe, S. J., Kim, J. S., Voss, M.W., & Kramer, A. F. (2009). Age-related differences in the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 328-335.
160. Prodan, C. I., Orbelo, D. M., & Ross, E. D. (2007). Processing of facial blends of emotion: support for right hemisphere cognitive aging. Cortex, 43(2), 196-206. (Pubitemid 46421190)
161. Przybyla, A., Haaland, K. Y., Bagesteiro, L. B., & Sainburg, R. L. (2011). Motor asymmetry reduction in older adults. Neuroscience Letters, 489(2), 99-104.
162. Pulsipher, D. T., Seidenberg, M., & Hermann, B. P. (2009). Corpus callosum maturation and line bisection performance in healthy children. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 3(4), 307-316.
163. Regolin, L. (2006). The case of the line-bisection: when both humans and chickens wander left. Cortex, 42, 101-103. (Pubitemid 43772595)
164. Reuter Lorenz, P. A., Kinsbourne, M., & Moscovitch, M. (1990). Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain and Cognition, 12(2), 240-266.
165. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Hartley, A., Miller, A., Marshuetz, C., et al. (2000). Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 174-187. (Pubitemid 30142792)
166. Robertson, I. H., & Marshall, J. (1993). Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hove: Erlbaum.
167. Rock, I., & Palmer, S. (1990). The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Scientific American, 263(6), 84-90.
168. Roig, M., & Cicero, F. (1994). Hemisphericity style, sex, and performance on a line-bisection task-an exploratory-study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(1), 115-120.
169. Roman, A., Fathi, E., & Santiago, J. (2013). Spatial biases in understanding descriptions of static scenes: the role of reading and writing direction. Memory and Cognition, 41(4), 588-599.
170. Rorden, C., & Karnath, H. O. (2004). Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(10), 813-819. (Pubitemid 39336218)
171. Rusconi, E., Dervinis, M., Verbruggen, F., & Chambers, C. (2013). Critical time course of right fronto-parietal involvement in mental number space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(3), 465-483.
172. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403-428. (Pubitemid 126432206)
173. Salthouse, T. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging, 30(4), 507-514.
174. Sampaio, E., & Chokron, S. (1992). Pseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 30(9), 797-805.
175. Sampaio, E., & Philip, J. (1991). Sensory and motor aspects of pseudoneglect, hemifield, and hemispace in the tactile modality. Brain and Cognition, 16(1), 74-82.
176. Sampaio, E., Gouarir, C., & Mvondo, D. (1995). Tactile and visual bisection tasks by sighted and blind children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11(1), 109-127.
177. Schindler, I., Clavagnier, S., Karnath, H. O., Derex, L., & Perenin, M. T. (2006). A common basis for visual and tactile exploration deficits in spatial neglect? Neuropsychologia, 44(8), 1444-1451.
178. Schmitz, R., & Peigneux, P. (2011). Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect. Brain and Cognition, 76(3), 382-389.
179. Schmitz, R., Dehon, H., & Peigneux, P. (2013). Lateralized processing of false memories and pseudoneglect in aging. Cortex, 49(5), 1314-1324.
180. Schoenwiesner, M., Krumbholz, K., Ruebsamen, R., Fink, G. R., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2007). Hemispheric asymmetry for auditory processing in the human auditory brain stem, thalamus, and cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17(2), 492-499. (Pubitemid 46052786)
181. Sisk, C. L., & Zehr, J. L. (2005). Pubertal hormones organize the adolescent brain and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 26(3-4), 163-174. (Pubitemid 41772653)
182. Stam, C. J., & Bakker, M. (1990). The prevalence of neglect-superiority of neuropsychological over clinical methods of estimation. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 92(3), 229-235. (Pubitemid 20265579)
183. Sullivan, J. L., Juhasz, B. J., Slattery, T. J., & Barth, H. C. (2011). Adults' number-line estimation strategies: evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 557-563.
184. Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Urbanski, M., Duffau, H., Volle, E., Lévy, R., Dubois, P., et al. (2005). Direct evidence for a parietal-frontal pathway subserving spatial awareness in humans. Science, 309(5744), 2226-2228. (Pubitemid 41396074)
185. Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Dell'Acqua, F., Frokel, S., Simmons, A., Vergani, F., Murphy, D., et al. (2011). A lateralised brain network for visuospatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 14(10), 1245-1246.
186. Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Tomaiuolo, F., Aiello, M., Merola, S., Silvetti, M., Lecce, F., et al. (2012). Damage to white matter pathways in subacute and chronic spatial neglect: a group study and 2 single-case studies with complete virtual "in vivo" tractography dissection. Cerebral Cortex, 11.
187. Thiel, A., & Sireteanu. (2009). Strabismic amblyopes show a bilateral rightward bias in a line bisection task: evidence for a visual attention deficit. Vision Research, 49, 287-294.
188. Toba, M.-N., Cavanagh, P., & Bartolomeo, P. (2011). Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines. Neuropsychologia, 49(2), 238-246.
189. Turnbull, O. H., & McGeorge, P. (1998). Lateral bumping: a normal subject analogue to the behaviour of patients with hemispatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 37, 31-33. (Pubitemid 128383145)
190. Umilta, C., Priftis, K., & Zorzi, M. (2009). The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 561-569.
191. Urbanski, M., & Bartolomeo, P. (2008). Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right. Cortex, 44(7), 782-793. (Pubitemid 351722649)
192. Vallesi, A., McIntosh, A. R., Kovacevic, N., Chan, S. C. C., & Stuss, D. T. (2010). Age effects on the asymmetry of the motor system: evidence from cortical oscillatory activity. Biological Psychology, 85(2), 213-218.
193. van Dijck, J. P., Gevers, W., Lafosse, C., Doricchi, F., & Fias, W. (2011). Non-spatial neglect for the mental number line. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2570-2583.
194. van Dijck, J., Gevers, W., Lafosse, C., & Fias, W. (2012). The heterogeneous nature of number-space interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 182.
195. van Vugt, P., Fransen, I., Creten, W., & Paquier, P. (2000). Line bisection performances of 650 normal children. Neuropsychologia, 38(6), 886-895. (Pubitemid 30109465)
196. Varnava, A., & Halligan, P. W. (2007). Influence of age and sex on line bisection: a study of normal performance with implications for visuospatial neglect. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(6), 571-585. (Pubitemid 350175319)
197. Varnava, A., & Halligan, P.W. (2009). Line bisection: does introspection inform cognitive strategy? Neuropsychologia, 47(1), 280-283.
198. Varnava, A., McCarthy, M., & Beaumont, J. G. (2002). Line bisection in normal adults: direction of attentional bias for near and far space. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1372-1378. (Pubitemid 34249847)
199. Varnava, A., Dervinis, M., & Chambers, C. (2013). The predictive nature of pseudoneglect for visual neglect: evidence from parietal theta burst stimulation. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e65851.
200. Velanova, K., Lustig, C., Jacoby, L. L., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Evidence for frontally mediated controlled processing differences in older adults. Cerebral Cortex, 17(5), 1033-1046. (Pubitemid 46598844)
201. Wolfe, H. K. (1923). On the estimation of the middle of lines. American Journal of Psychology, 34, 313-358.
202. Wong, M., Gnanakumaran, V., & Goldreich, D. (2011). Tactile spatial acuity enhancement in blindness: evidence for experience-dependent mechanisms. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(19), 7028-7037.
203. Zhu, C., Guo, X., Jin, Z., Sun, J., Qiu, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2011). Influences of brain development and ageing on cortical interactive networks. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(2), 278-283.
204. Zivotofsky, A. Z. (2004). Choosing sides: lateralization in line trisection and quadrisection as a function of reading direction and handedness. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(2), 206-211. (Pubitemid 38748704)