Correction: Sex Differences in the Spatial Representation of Number [Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1, (2013) (181-192)] DOI: 10.1037/a0028387;Sex differences in the spatial representation of number

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 181-192

  Bull, Rebecca ^a,b   Cleland, Alexandra A ^b   Mitchell, Thomas ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

NDE; Number line; Parietal; Sex differences; SNARC

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; JUDGMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877106146     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000264     Document Type: Erratum

References (70)

1. Ansari, D., & Dhital, B. (2006). Age-related changes in the activation of the intraparietal sulcus during nonsymbolic magnitude processing: An even-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1820-1828. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1820
2. Ansari, D., Dhital, B., & Siong, S. C. (2006). Parametric effects of numerical distance on the intraparietal sulcus during passive viewing of rapid numerosity changes. Brain Research, 1067, 181-188. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.083
3. Ashkenazi, S., & Henik, A. (2010). A dissociation between physical and mental number bisection in developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsycholo-gia, 48, 2861-2868. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.028
4. Ashkenazi, S., Mark-Zigdon, N., & Henik, A. (2009). Numerical distance effect in developmental dyscalculia. Cognitive Development, 24, 387-400. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.006
5. Bull, R., & Cleland, A. A. (2012). Conditions under which making a color decision can activate spatial-numerical associations. Manuscript in preparation.
6. Bull, R., Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Davidson, W. A., Murphy, D., & Nordmann, E. (2011). Numerical estimation in deaf and hearing adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 453-457. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.001
7. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (1999). Cortical regions associated with perceiving, naming, and knowing about colors. Journal of Cognitive Neu-roscience, 11, 25-35. doi:10.1162/089892999563229
8. Cohen Kadosh, R., Brodsky, W., Levin, M., & Henik, A. (2008). Mental representation: What can pitch tell us about the distance effect? Cortex, 44, 470-477. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.002
9. Cohen Kadosh, R., Cohen Kadosh, K., Kaas, A., Henik, A., & Goebel, R. (2007). Notation-dependent and -independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron, 53, 307-314. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.025
10. De Gennaro, L., Bertini, M., Pauri, F., Cristiani, R., Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., & Rossini, P. M. (2004). Callosal effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): The influence of gender and stimulus parameters. Neuroscience Research, 48, 129-137. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2003.10.004
11. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N
12. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
13. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506. doi:10.1080/02643290244000239
14. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974. doi:10.1126/science.284.5416.970
15. Delazer, M., Karner, E., Zamarian, L., Donnemiller, E., & Benke, T. (2006). Number processing in posterior cortical atrophy: A neuropsy-chological case study. Neuropsychologia, 44, 36-51. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.013
16. De Smedt, B., Vershaffel, L., & Ghesquiere, P. (2009). The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 469-479. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.010
17. Edin, F., Klingberg, T., Johansson, P., McNab, F., Tegnér, J., & Compte, A. (2009). Mechanisms of top down control of working memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 6802-6807. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901894106
18. Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2003). A supramodal number representation in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 37, 719-726. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00036-9
19. Faillenot, I., Sunaert, S., Van Hecke, P., & Orban, G. A. (2001). Orientation discrimination of objects and gratings compared: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 585-596. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01399.x
20. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110. doi: 10.1080/135467996387552
21. Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415-423. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00078-7
22. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555-556. doi:10.1038/nn1066
23. Frederikse, M. E., Lu, A., Aylward, E., Barta, P., & Pearlson, G. (1999). Sex differences in the inferior parietal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 896-901. doi:10.1093/cercor/9.8.896
24. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343-1359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x
25. Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 337-353. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2594
26. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87-B95. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00234-2
27. Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, M., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness, V. S., Jr., Faraone, S. V., & Tsuang, M. T. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 490-497. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.490
28. Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Reishofer, G., Stern, E., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2007). Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal activation during mental calculation. NeuroImage, 38, 346-356. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.041
29. Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25, 320-327. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.019
30. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Shibley Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1-51.
31. Herrera, A., Macizo, P., & Semenza, C. (2008). The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. Acta Psychologica, 128, 225-237. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.01.002
32. Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 17-29. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001
33. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuro-science, 6, 435-448. doi:10.1038/nrn1684
34. Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Heinze, H.-J., Peters, M., & Jäncke, L. (2002). Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2397-2408. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00076-3
35. Keus, I. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin. Memory & Cognition, 33, 681-695. doi:10.3758/BF03195335
36. Knops, A., Nuerk, H.-C., Sparing, R., Foltys, H., & Willmes, K. (2006). On the functional role of human parietal cortex in number processing: How gender mediates the impact of a "virtual lesion" induced by rTMS. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2270-2283. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia .2006.05.011
37. Koscik, T., O'Leary, D., Moser, D. J., Andreasen, N. C., & Nopoulos, P. (2009). Sex differences in parietal lobe morphology: Relationship to mental rotation performance. Brain and Cognition, 69, 451-459. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.09.004
38. Kucian, K., Loenneker, T., Dietrich, T., Martin, E., & Von Aster, M. (2005). Gender differences in brain activation patterns during mental rotation and number related cognitive tasks. Psychology Science, 47, 112-131.
39. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.149
40. Mitchell, T., Bull, R., & Cleland, A. A. (in press). Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: Evidence using a neural overlap paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
41. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520. doi:10.1038/2151519a0
42. Müller, D., & Schwarz, W. (2007). Exploring the mental number line: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Psychological Research, 71, 598-613. doi:10.1007/s00426-006-0070-6
43. Mundy, E., & Gilmore, C. K. (2009). Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 490-502. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009 .02.003
44. Mussolin, C., Mejias, S., & Noel, M.-P. (2010). Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Cognition, 115, 10-25. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.006
45. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0767
46. Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185-208. doi:10.1146/annurev .neuro.051508.135550
47. Noël, M. P., Rousselle, L., & Mussolin, C. (2005). Magnitude representation in children: Its development and dysfunction. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 179-195). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
48. Opfer, J. E., & Thompson, C. A. (2008). The trouble with transfer: Insights from microgenetic changes in the representation of numerical magnitude. Child Development, 79, 788-804. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01158.x
49. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116 .2.220
50. Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547-555. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014
51. Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in the human intra-parietal cortex. Neuron, 53, 293-305. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.022
52. Price, G. R., Holloway, I., Rasanen, P., Vesterinen, M., & Ansari, D. (2007). Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dys-calculia. Current Biology, 17, R1042-R1043. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.013
53. Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79, 375-394. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01131.x
54. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltá, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113-129. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004
55. Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512-516. doi:10.3758/BF03194099
56. Schneider, M., Grabner, R. H., & Paetsch, J. (2009). Mental number line, number line estimation, and mathematical achievement: Their interrelations in grades 5 and 6. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 359-372. doi:10.1037/a0013840
57. Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428-444. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x
58. Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2008). Costs and benefits of representational change: Effects of context on age and sex differences in symbolic magnitude estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 20-51. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.02.003
59. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3-18. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3
60. Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745-757. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67
61. Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117, 126-138. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.001
62. Vallesi, A., Binns, M. A., & Shallice, T. (2008). An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: Understanding the cognitive representations of time. Cognition, 107, 501-527. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.011
63. van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119, 114-119. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013
64. Van Opstal, F., Fias, W., Peigneux, P., & Verguts, T. (2009). The neural representation of extensively trained ordered sequences. NeuroImage, 47, 367-375. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.035
65. Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., De Moor, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 419-425. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.419
66. Van Opstal, F., & Verguts, T. (2011). The origins of the numerical distance effect: The same-different task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 112-120. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.466796
67. Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-second UK edition. London, England: Harcourt Assessment.
68. Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 426-430. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.426
69. Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 7780-7785. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701644104
70. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science, 50, 489-525.