Functional Diversity and Structural Disorder in the Human Ubiquitination Pathway

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Bhowmick, Pallab ^a   Pancsa, Rita ^a   Guharoy, Mainak ^a   Tompa, Peter ^a,b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E1; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E2; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; HUMAN; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DEFECT; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; UBIQUITINATION;

DATABASES, GENETIC; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84878437599     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065443     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Powers ET, Morimoto RI, Dillin A, Kelly JW, Balch WE, (2009) Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 959-991.
2. Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M, (2011) Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475: 324-332.
3. Hershko A, Ciechanover A, (1998) The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 425-479.
4. van Wijk SJ, de Vries SJ, Kemmeren P, Huang A, Boelens R, et al. (2009) A comprehensive framework of E2-RING E3 interactions of the human ubiquitin-proteasome system. Mol Syst Biol 5: 295.
5. Hochstrasser M, (2006) Lingering mysteries of ubiquitin-chain assembly. Cell 124: 27-34.
6. Arrigoni A, Grillo B, Vitriolo A, De Gioia L, Papaleo E, (2012) C-terminal acidic domain of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes: A multi-functional conserved intrinsically disordered domain in family 3 of E2 enzymes. J Struct Biol 178: 245-259.
7. Bernassola F, Karin M, Ciechanover A, Melino G, (2008) The HECT family of E3 ubiquitin ligases: multiple players in cancer development. Cancer Cell 14: 10-21.
8. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA, (2009) RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 399-434.
9. Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ, (2005) Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 9-20.
10. Daub H, Olsen JV, Bairlein M, Gnad F, Oppermann FS, et al. (2008) Kinase-selective enrichment enables quantitative phosphoproteomics of the kinome across the cell cycle. Mol Cell 31: 438-448.
11. Li W, Bengtson MH, Ulbrich A, Matsuda A, Reddy VA, et al. (2008) Genome-wide and functional annotation of human E3 ubiquitin ligases identifies MULAN, a mitochondrial E3 that regulates the organelle's dynamics and signaling. PLoS One 3: e1487.
12. Zimmerman ES, Schulman BA, Zheng N, (2010) Structural assembly of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 20: 714-721.
13. Dyson HJ, (2011) Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins. Q Rev Biophys 44: 467-518.
14. Tompa P, (2011) Unstructural biology coming of age. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21: 419-425.
15. Uversky VN, Dunker AK, (2010) Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804: 1231-1264.
16. Fuxreiter M, Tompa P, Simon I, (2007) Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 23: 950-956.
17. Tompa P, Fuxreiter M, Oldfield CJ, Simon I, Dunker AK, et al. (2009) Close encounters of the third kind: disordered domains and the interactions of proteins. Bioessays 31: 328-335.
18. Tompa P, Szasz C, Buday L, (2005) Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. Trends Biochem Sci 30: 484-489.
19. Bothner B, Lewis WS, DiGiammarino EL, Weber JD, Bothner SJ, et al. (2001) Defining the molecular basis of Arf and Hdm2 interactions. J Mol Biol 314: 263-277.
20. Mark WY, Liao JC, Lu Y, Ayed A, Laister R, et al. (2005) Characterization of segments from the central region of BRCA1: an intrinsically disordered scaffold for multiple protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions? J Mol Biol 345: 275-287.
21. Mittag T, Marsh J, Grishaev A, Orlicky S, Lin H, et al. (2010) Structure/function implications in a dynamic complex of the intrinsically disordered Sic1 with the Cdc4 subunit of an SCF ubiquitin ligase. Structure 18: 494-506.
22. Rosenbaum JC, Fredrickson EK, Oeser ML, Garrett-Engele CM, Locke MN, et al. (2011) Disorder targets misorder in nuclear quality control degradation: a disordered ubiquitin ligase directly recognizes its misfolded substrates. Mol Cell 41: 93-106.
23. Kanehisa M, Goto S, (2000) KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 27-30.
24. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Hirakawa M, (2010) KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D355-360.
25. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, et al. (2006) From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D354-357.
26. Peng K, Radivojac P, Vucetic S, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, (2006) Length-dependent prediction of protein intrinsic disorder. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 208.
27. Prilusky J, Felder CE, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, Rydberg EH, Man O, et al. (2005) FoldIndex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. Bioinformatics 21: 3435-3438.
28. Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 40: D71-75.
29. Aravind L, Koonin EV, (2000) The U box is a modified RING finger- a common domain in ubiquitination. Curr Biol 10: R132-134.
30. Tompa P, Kalmar L, (2010) Power law distribution defines structural disorder as a structural element directly linked with function. J Mol Biol 403: 346-350.
31. Dosztanyi Z, Chen J, Dunker AK, Simon I, Tompa P, (2006) Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution. J Proteome Res 5: 2985-2995.
32. Haynes C, Oldfield CJ, Ji F, Klitgord N, Cusick ME, et al. (2006) Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e100.
33. Petroski MD, Kleiger G, Deshaies RJ, (2006) Evaluation of a diffusion-driven mechanism for substrate ubiquitination by the SCF-Cdc34 ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell 24: 523-534.
34. Duda DM, Scott DC, Calabrese MF, Zimmerman ES, Zheng N, et al. (2011) Structural regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21: 257-264.
35. Wright PE, Dyson HJ, (2009) Linking folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19: 1-8.
36. Demarest SJ, Martinez-Yamout M, Chung J, Chen H, Xu W, et al. (2002) Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators. Nature 415: 549-553.
37. Cormont M, Meton I, Mari M, Monzo P, Keslair F, et al. (2003) CD2AP/CMS regulates endosome morphology and traffic to the degradative pathway through its interaction with Rab4 and c-Cbl. Traffic 4: 97-112.
38. Moncalian G, Cardenes N, Deribe YL, Spinola-Amilibia M, Dikic I, et al. (2006) Atypical polyproline recognition by the CMS N-terminal Src homology 3 domain. J Biol Chem 281: 38845-38853.
39. Szymkiewicz I, Kowanetz K, Soubeyran P, Dinarina A, Lipkowitz S, et al. (2002) CIN85 participates in Cbl-b-mediated down-regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem 277: 39666-39672.
40. Zhong X, Shen Y, Ballar P, Apostolou A, Agami R, et al. (2004) AAA ATPase p97/valosin-containing protein interacts with gp78, a ubiquitin ligase for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. J Biol Chem 279: 45676-45684.
41. Zhu H, Kavsak P, Abdollah S, Wrana JL, Thomsen GH, (1999) A SMAD ubiquitin ligase targets the BMP pathway and affects embryonic pattern formation. Nature 400: 687-693.
42. Niessen HE, Demmers JA, Voncken JW, (2009) Talking to chromatin: post-translational modulation of polycomb group function. Epigenetics Chromatin 2: 10.
43. Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A, Oren M, (1997) Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 387: 296-299.
44. Sheng Y, Saridakis V, Sarkari F, Duan S, Wu T, et al. (2006) Molecular recognition of p53 and MDM2 by USP7/HAUSP. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13: 285-291.
45. Mohan A, Oldfield CJ, Radivojac P, Vacic V, Cortese MS, et al. (2006) Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J Mol Biol 362: 1043-1059.
46. Fuxreiter M, Simon I, Friedrich P, Tompa P, (2004) Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 338: 1015-1026.
47. Fong JH, Shoemaker BA, Garbuzynskiy SO, Lobanov MY, Galzitskaya OV, et al. (2009) Intrinsic disorder in protein interactions: insights from a comprehensive structural analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000316.
48. Guharoy M, Chakrabarti P, (2007) Secondary structure based analysis and classification of biological interfaces: identification of binding motifs in protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 23: 1909-1918.
49. Dou H, Buetow L, Hock A, Sibbet GJ, Vousden KH, et al. (2012) Structural basis for autoinhibition and phosphorylation-dependent activation of c-Cbl. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 184-192.
50. Emekli U, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R, Haliloglu T, (2008) HingeProt: automated prediction of hinges in protein structures. Proteins 70: 1219-1227.
51. Foray N, Marot D, Gabriel A, Randrianarison V, Carr AM, et al. (2003) A subset of ATM- and ATR-dependent phosphorylation events requires the BRCA1 protein. EMBO J 22: 2860-2871.
52. van Leeuwen HC, Strating MJ, Rensen M, de Laat W, van der Vliet PC, (1997) Linker length and composition influence the flexibility of Oct-1 DNA binding. Embo J 16: 2043-2053.
53. von Ossowski I, Eaton JT, Czjzek M, Perkins SJ, Frandsen TP, et al. (2005) Protein disorder: conformational distribution of the flexible linker in a chimeric double cellulase. Biophys J 88: 2823-2832.
54. Kiss R, Bozoky Z, Kovacs D, Rona G, Friedrich P, et al. (2008) Calcium-induced tripartite binding of intrinsically disordered calpastatin to its cognate enzyme, calpain. FEBS Lett 582: 2149-2154.
55. Smock RG, Rivoire O, Russ WP, Swain JF, Leibler S, et al. (2010) An interdomain sector mediating allostery in Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Mol Syst Biol 6: 414.
56. Leung DW, Rosen MK, (2005) The nucleotide switch in Cdc42 modulates coupling between the GTPase-binding and allosteric equilibria of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 5685-5690.
57. Vuzman D, Azia A, Levy Y, (2010) Searching DNA via a "Monkey Bar" mechanism: the significance of disordered tails. J Mol Biol 396: 674-684.
58. Clerici M, Mourao A, Gutsche I, Gehring NH, Hentze MW,et al. (2009) Unusual bipartite mode of interaction between the nonsense-mediated decay factors, UPF1 and UPF2. EMBO J.
59. Cox CJ, Dutta K, Petri ET, Hwang WC, Lin Y, et al. (2002) The regions of securin and cyclin B proteins recognized by the ubiquitination machinery are natively unfolded. FEBS Lett 527: 303-308.
60. Sowa ME, Harper JW, (2006) From loops to chains: unraveling the mysteries of polyubiquitin chain specificity and processivity. ACS Chem Biol 1: 20-24.
61. Zheng N, Schulman BA, Song L, Miller JJ, Jeffrey PD, et al. (2002) Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature 416: 703-709.
62. Liu J, Nussinov R, (2009) The mechanism of ubiquitination in the cullin-RING E3 ligase machinery: conformational control of substrate orientation. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000527.
63. Deffenbaugh AE, Scaglione KM, Zhang L, Moore JM, Buranda T, et al. (2003) Release of ubiquitin-charged Cdc34-S- Ub from the RING domain is essential for ubiquitination of the SCF(Cdc4)-bound substrate Sic1. Cell 114: 611-622.
64. Duda DM, Borg LA, Scott DC, Hunt HW, Hammel M, et al. (2008) Structural insights into NEDD8 activation of cullin-RING ligases: conformational control of conjugation. Cell 134: 995-1006.
65. Tompa P, Fuxreiter M, (2008) Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 33: 2-8.
66. Ma J, (2005) Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. Structure 13: 373-380.
67. Kales SC, Ryan PE, Nau MM, Lipkowitz S, (2010) Cbl and human myeloid neoplasms: the Cbl oncogene comes of age. Cancer Res 70: 4789-4794.
68. Hagai T, Azia A, Toth-Petroczy A, Levy Y, (2011) Intrinsic disorder in ubiquitination substrates. J Mol Biol 412: 319-324.
69. Inobe T, Fishbain S, Prakash S, Matouschek A, (2011) Defining the geometry of the two-component proteasome degron. Nat Chem Biol 7: 161-167.
70. Zhao M, Zhang NY, Zurawel A, Hansen KC, Liu CW, (2010) Degradation of some polyubiquitinated proteins requires an intrinsic proteasomal binding element in the substrates. J Biol Chem 285: 4771-4780.
71. Fishbain S, Prakash S, Herrig A, Elsasser S, Matouschek A, (2011) Rad23 escapes degradation because it lacks a proteasome initiation region. Nat Commun 2: 192.
72. Hao B, Oehlmann S, Sowa ME, Harper JW, Pavletich NP, (2007) Structure of a Fbw7-Skp1-cyclin E complex: multisite-phosphorylated substrate recognition by SCF ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell 26: 131-143.
73. Ravid T, Hochstrasser M, (2008) Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 679-690.
74. Dinkel H, Michael S, Weatheritt RJ, Davey NE, Van Roey K, et al. (2012) ELM-the database of eukaryotic linear motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D242-251.
75. Wu G, Xu G, Schulman BA, Jeffrey PD, Harper JW, et al. (2003) Structure of a beta-TrCP1-Skp1-beta-catenin complex: destruction motif binding and lysine specificity of the SCF(beta-TrCP1) ubiquitin ligase. Mol Cell 11: 1445-1456.
76. Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M, Howley PM, (1993) Localization of the E6-AP regions that direct human papillomavirus E6 binding, association with p53, and ubiquitination of associated proteins. Mol Cell Biol 13: 4918-4927.
77. Xie Y, Varshavsky A, (1999) The E2-E3 interaction in the N-end rule pathway: the RING-H2 finger of E3 is required for the synthesis of multiubiquitin chain. EMBO J 18: 6832-6844.
78. Swaminathan G, Tsygankov AY, (2006) The Cbl family proteins: ring leaders in regulation of cell signaling. J Cell Physiol 209: 21-43.
79. Mathias N, Steussy CN, Goebl MG, (1998) An essential domain within Cdc34p is required for binding to a complex containing Cdc4p and Cdc53p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 273: 4040-4045.
80. Iakoucheva LM, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, O'Connor TR, Sikes JG, et al. (2004) The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1037-1049.
81. Wiesner S, Ogunjimi AA, Wang HR, Rotin D, Sicheri F, et al. (2007) Autoinhibition of the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase Smurf2 through its C2 domain. Cell 130: 651-662.
82. Ryan PE, Sivadasan-Nair N, Nau MM, Nicholas S, Lipkowitz S, (2010) The N terminus of Cbl-c regulates ubiquitin ligase activity by modulating affinity for the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. J Biol Chem 285: 23687-23698.
83. McCoy MA, Gesell JJ, Senior MM, Wyss DF, (2003) Flexible lid to the p53-binding domain of human Mdm2: implications for p53 regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 1645-1648.
84. Shimizu H, Hupp TR, (2003) Intrasteric regulation of MDM2. Trends Biochem Sci 28: 346-349.
85. Vidal M, Cusick ME, Barabasi AL, (2011) Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 144: 986-998.
86. Pickart CM, (2001) Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem 70: 503-533.
87. Guda C, Subramaniam S, (2005) pTARGET [corrected] a new method for predicting protein subcellular localization in eukaryotes. Bioinformatics 21: 3963-3969.
88. Dosztanyi Z, Csizmok V, Tompa P, Simon I, (2005) The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 347: 827-839.
89. Dosztanyi Z, Csizmok V, Tompa P, Simon I, (2005) IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics 21: 3433-3434.
90. Vucetic S, Brown CJ, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, (2003) Flavors of protein disorder. Proteins 52: 573-584.
91. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, et al. (2011) The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D561-568.
92. Ekman D, Light S, Bjorklund AK, Elofsson A, (2006) What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genome Biol 7: R45.
93. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
94. Suhre K, Sanejouand YH, (2004) ElNemo: a normal mode web server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W610-614.
95. Yang L, Song G, Jernigan RL, (2007) How well can we understand large-scale protein motions using normal modes of elastic network models? Biophys J 93: 920-929.
96. Tama F, Gadea FX, Marques O, Sanejouand YH, (2000) Building-block approach for determining low-frequency normal modes of macromolecules. Proteins 41: 1-7.
97. Hildebrand PW, Goede A, Bauer RA, Gruening B, Ismer J, et al. (2009) SuperLooper-a prediction server for the modeling of loops in globular and membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 37: W571-574.
98. Vriend G (1990) WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graph 8:52-56, 29.
99. Christen M, Hunenberger PH, Bakowies D, Baron R, Burgi R, et al. (2005) The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05. Journal of Computational Chemistry 26: 1719-1751.
100. Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, et al. (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. Journal of Computational Chemistry 26: 1701-1718.
101. Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M, (2007) Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 126: 014101.
102. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM, (1997) LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 18: 1463-1472.
103. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K, (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33-38, 27-38.