CENP-I and Aurora B act as a molecular switch that ties RZZ/Mad1 recruitment to kinetochore attachment status

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 205, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 541-554

  Matson, Daniel R ^a   Stukenberg, P Todd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; CENP I PROTEIN; CENTROMERE PROTEIN A; DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MONASTROL; N [4 [6 METHOXY 7 (3 MORPHOLINOPROPOXY) 4 QUINAZOLINYLAMINO]PHENYL]BENZAMIDE; NOCODAZOLE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD1; ROD PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZW10 PROTEIN; ZWILCH PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; KINETOCHORE MICROTUBULE; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SPINDLE POLE;

AURORA KINASE B; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DYNEINS; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; HEK293 CELLS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; NOCODAZOLE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; OSTEOSARCOMA; TUBULIN MODULATORS;

EID: 84901767349     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201307137     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Amaro, A.C., C.P. Samora, R. Holtackers, E. Wang, I.J. Kingston, M. Alonso, M. Lampson, A.D. McAinsh, and P. Meraldi. 2010. Molecular control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and chromosome oscillations. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:319-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2033
2. Banerjee, B., C.A. Kestner, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2014. EB1 enables spindle microtubules to regulate centromeric recruitment of Aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 204:947-963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201307119
3. Basto, R., R. Gomes, and R.E. Karess. 2000. Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:939-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35046592
4. Bharadwaj, R., and H. Yu. 2004. The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene. 23:2016-2027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207374
5. Burke, D.J., and P.T. Stukenberg. 2008. Linking kinetochore-microtubule binding to the spindle checkpoint. Dev. Cell. 14:474-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.015
6. Chan, G.K., S.A. Jablonski, D.A. Starr, M.L. Goldberg, and T.J. Yen. 2000. Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:944-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35046598
7. Cheeseman, I.M., and A. Desai. 2008. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:33-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2310
8. Chen, R.H. 2002. BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J. Cell Biol. 158:487-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200204048
9. Cochran, J.C., J.E. Gatial III, T.M. Kapoor, and S.P. Gilbert. 2005. Monastrol inhibition of the mitotic kinesin Eg5. J. Biol. Chem. 280:12658-12667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M413140200
10. De Antoni, A., C.G. Pearson, D. Cimini, J.C. Canman, V. Sala, L. Nezi, M. Mapelli, L. Sironi, M. Faretta, E.D. Salmon, and A. Musacchio. 2005. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15:214-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038
11. DeLuca, J.G., B.J. Howell, J.C. Canman, J.M. Hickey, G. Fang, and E.D. Salmon. 2003. Nuf2 and Hec1 are required for retention of the checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 13:2103-2109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.056
12. Ditchfield, C., V.L. Johnson, A. Tighe, R. Ellston, C. Haworth, T. Johnson, A. Mortlock, N. Keen, and S.S. Taylor. 2003. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161:267-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200208091
13. Emanuele, M.J., M.L. McCleland, D.L. Satinover, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2005. Measuring the stoichiometry and physical interactions between components elucidates the architecture of the vertebrate kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:4882-4892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E05-03-0239
14. Francisco, L., and C.S. Chan. 1994. Regulation of yeast chromosome segregation by Ipl1 protein kinase and type 1 protein phosphatase. Cell. Mol. Biol. Res. 40:207-213.
15. Gorbsky, G.J., R.H. Chen, and A.W. Murray. 1998. Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 141:1193-1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.141.5.1193
16. Hauf, S., R.W. Cole, S. LaTerra, C. Zimmer, G. Schnapp, R. Walter, A. Heckel, J. van Meel, C.L. Rieder, and J.M. Peters. 2003. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 161:281-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200208092
17. Howell, B.J., B.F. McEwen, J.C. Canman, D.B. Hoffman, E.M. Farrar, C.L. Rieder, and E.D. Salmon. 2001. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155:1159-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200105093
18. Howell, B.J., B. Moree, E.M. Farrar, S. Stewart, G. Fang, and E.D. Salmon. 2004. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14:953-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.053
19. Hoyt, M.A., L. Totis, and B.T. Roberts. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 66:507-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3
20. Jordan, M.A., D. Thrower, and L. Wilson. 1992. Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. Implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 102:401-416.
21. Kallio, M.J., M.L. McCleland, P.T. Stukenberg, and G.J. Gorbsky. 2002. Inhibition of aurora B kinase blocks chromosome segregation, overrides the spindle checkpoint, and perturbs microtubule dynamics in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 12:900-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00887-4
22. Kapoor, T.M., T.U. Mayer, M.L. Coughlin, and T.J. Mitchison. 2000. Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5. J. Cell Biol. 150:975-988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.150.5.975
23. Kasuboski, J.M., J.R. Bader, P.S. Vaughan, S.B. Tauhata, M. Winding, M.A. Morrissey, M.V. Joyce, W. Boggess, L. Vos, G.K. Chan, et al. 2011. Zwint-1 is a novel Aurora B substrate required for the assembly of a dynein-binding platform on kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:3318-3330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E11-03-0213
24. Khodjakov, A., L. Copenagle, M.B. Gordon, D.A. Compton, and T.M. Kapoor. 2003. Minus-end capture of preformed kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 160:671-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200208143
25. Kiyomitsu, T., C. Obuse, and M. Yanagida. 2007. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell. 13:663-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.005
26. Kops, G.J., Y. Kim, B.A. Weaver, Y. Mao, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, M. Tagaya, and D.W. Cleveland. 2005a. ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 169:49-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200411118
27. Kops, G.J., B.A. Weaver, and D.W. Cleveland. 2005b. On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 5:773-785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1714
28. Kops, G.J., A.T. Saurin, and P. Meraldi. 2010. Finding the middle ground: how kinetochores power chromosome congression. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67:2145-2161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0321-y
29. Krenn, V., A. Wehenkel, X. Li, S. Santaguida, and A. Musacchio. 2012. Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1-kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction. J. Cell Biol. 196:451-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201110013
30. Li, R., and A.W. Murray. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 66:519-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5
31. Liu, S.T., J.C. Hittle, S.A. Jablonski, M.S. Campbell, K. Yoda, and T.J. Yen. 2003. Human CENP-I specifies localization of CENP-F, MAD1 and MAD2 to kinetochores and is essential for mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:341-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb953
32. Liu, S.T., J.B. Rattner, S.A. Jablonski, and T.J. Yen. 2006. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 175:41-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200606020
33. Maldonado, M., and T.M. Kapoor. 2011. Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:475-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2223
34. Maliga, Z., T.M. Kapoor, and T.J. Mitchison. 2002. Evidence that monastrol is an allosteric inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin Eg5. Chem. Biol. 9:989-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(02)00212-0
35. Martin-Lluesma, S., V.M. Stucke, and E.A. Nigg. 2002. Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science. 297:2267-2270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075596
36. Matson, D.R., P.B. Demirel, P.T. Stukenberg, and D.J. Burke. 2012. A conserved role for COMA/CENP-H/I/N kinetochore proteins in the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 26:542-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.184184.111
37. McCleland, M.L., R.D. Gardner, M.J. Kallio, J.R. Daum, G.J. Gorbsky, D.J. Burke, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2003. The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity. Genes Dev. 17:101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1040903
38. McCleland, M.L., M.J. Kallio, G.A. Barrett-Wilt, C.A. Kestner, J. Shabanowitz, D.F. Hunt, G.J. Gorbsky, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2004. The vertebrate Ndc80 complex contains Spc24 and Spc25 homologs, which are required to establish and maintain kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Curr. Biol. 14:131-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.058
39. Mishra, R.K., P. Chakraborty, A. Arnaoutov, B.M. Fontoura, and M. Dasso. 2010. The Nup107-160 complex and γ-TuRC regulate microtubule polymerization at kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:164-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2016
40. Moyle, M.W., T. Kim, N. Hattersley, J. Espeut, D.K. Cheerambathur, K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2014. A Bub1-Mad1 interaction targets the Mad1-Mad2 complex to unattached kinetochores to initiate the spindle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 204:647-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311015
41. Murray, A.W., and M.W. Kirschner. 1989. Dominoes and clocks: the union of two views of the cell cycle. Science. 246:614-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2683077
42. Musacchio, A., and E.D. Salmon. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:379-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2163
43. Okada, M., I.M. Cheeseman, T. Hori, K. Okawa, I.X. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, A. Desai, and T. Fukagawa. 2006. The CENP-H-I complex is required for the efficient incorporation of newly synthesized CENP-A into centromeres. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:446-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1396
44. Quintyne, N.J., S.R. Gill, D.M. Eckley, C.L. Crego, D.A. Compton, and T.A. Schroer. 1999. Dynactin is required for microtubule anchoring at centrosomes. J. Cell Biol. 147:321-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.147.2.321
45. Rieder, C.L., and H. Maiato. 2004. Stuck in division or passing through: what happens when cells cannot satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint. Dev. Cell. 7:637-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.002
46. Salimian, K.J., E.R. Ballister, E.M. Smoak, S. Wood, T. Panchenko, M.A. Lampson, and B.E. Black. 2011. Feedback control in sensing chromosome biorientation by the Aurora B kinase. Curr. Biol. 21:1158-1165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.015
47. Santaguida, S., and A. Musacchio. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28:2511-2531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.173
48. Santaguida, S., A. Tighe, A.M. D'Alise, S.S. Taylor, and A. Musacchio. 2010. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190:73-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201001036
49. Santaguida, S., C. Vernieri, F. Villa, A. Ciliberto, and A. Musacchio. 2011. Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction. EMBO J. 30:1508-1519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.70
50. Shah, J.V., E. Botvinick, Z. Bonday, F. Furnari, M. Berns, and D.W. Cleveland. 2004. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr. Biol. 14:942-952.
51. Shepperd, L.A., J.C. Meadows, A.M. Sochaj, T.C. Lancaster, J. Zou, G.J. Buttrick, J. Rappsilber, K.G. Hardwick, and J.B. Millar. 2012. Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22:891-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.051
52. Tulu, U.S., C. Fagerstrom, N.P. Ferenz, and P. Wadsworth. 2006. Molecular requirements for kinetochore-associated microtubule formation in mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 16:536-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.060
53. Vader, G., R.H. Medema, and S.M. Lens. 2006. The chromosomal passenger complex: guiding Aurora-B through mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 173:833-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200604032
54. van der Waal, M.S., A.T. Saurin, M.J. Vromans, M. Vleugel, C. Wurzenberger, D.W. Gerlich, R.H. Medema, G.J. Kops, and S.M. Lens. 2012. Mps1 promotes rapid centromere accumulation of Aurora B. EMBO Rep. 13:847-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.93
55. Wang, H., X. Hu, X. Ding, Z. Dou, Z. Yang, A.W. Shaw, M. Teng, D.W. Cleveland, M.L. Goldberg, L. Niu, and X. Yao. 2004. Human Zwint-1 specifies localization of Zeste White 10 to kinetochores and is essential for mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279:54590-54598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M407588200
56. Waters, J.C., R.H. Chen, A.W. Murray, and E.D. Salmon. 1998. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141:1181-1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.141.5.1181
57. Yamagishi, Y., C.H. Yang, Y. Tanno, and Y. Watanabe. 2012. MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:746-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2515
58. Yamamoto, A., V. Guacci, and D. Koshland. 1996a. Pds1p is required for faithful execution of anaphase in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 133:85-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.133.1.85
59. Yamamoto, A., V. Guacci, and D. Koshland. 1996b. Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J. Cell Biol. 133:99-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.133.1.99
60. Zou, H., T.J. McGarry, T. Bernal, and M.W. Kirschner. 1999. Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science. 285:418-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5426.418