Ab initio protein structure prediction

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3-25

  Lee, Jooyoung ^a,b   Wu, Sitao ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900224348     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9058-5_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (117)

1. Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Wu CH, et al. (2005) The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 33 (Database issue):D154-159
2. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Van Gunsteren WF, et al. (1981) Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. Intermolecular forces. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
3. Berg BA, Neuhaus T (1992) Multicanonical ensemble: a new approach to simulate first-order phase transitions. Phys Rev Lett 68(1):9-12
4. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):235-242
5. Berrera M, Molinari H, Fogolari F (2003) Amino acid empirical contact energy definitions for fold recognition in the space of contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 4:8
6. Bowie JU, Eisenberg D (1994) An evolutionary approach to folding small alpha-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(10):4436-4440
7. Bradley P, Misura KM, Baker D (2005) Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309(5742):1868-1871
8. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, et al. (1983) CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4(2):187-217
9. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE (1993) An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 16(1):92-112
10. Case DA, Pearlman DA, Caldwell JA, et al. (1997) AMBER 5.0, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
11. Chen J, Brooks CL (2007) Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins 67(4):922-930
12. Cheng J, Baldi P (2006) A machine learning information retrieval approach to protein fold recognition. Bioinformatics 22(12):1456-1463
13. Colovos C, Yeates TO (1993) Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci 2(9):1511-1519
14. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, et al. (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117:5179-5197
15. Das R, Qian B, Raman S, et al. (2007) Structure prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive allatom refinement with Rosetta@home. Proteins 69(S8):118-128
16. Dominy BN, Brooks CL (2002) Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. J Comput Chem 23(1):147-160
17. Duan Y, Kollman PA (1998) Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 282(5389):740-744
18. Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU (1997) VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Method Enzymol 277:396-404
19. Fan H, Mark AE (2004) Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Protein Sci 13(1):211-220
20. Feig M, Brooks CL (2002) Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions. Proteins 49(2):232-245
21. Felts AK, Gallicchio E, Wallqvist A, et al. (2002) Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model. Proteins 48(2):404-422
22. Fischer D (2006) Servers for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16(2):178-182
23. Fujitsuka Y, Chikenji G, Takada S (2006) SimFold energy function for de novo protein structure prediction: consensus with Rosetta. Proteins 62(2):381-398
24. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, et al. (2003a) 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 19(8):1015-1018
25. Ginalski K, Pas J, Wyrwicz LS, et al. (2003b) ORFeus: detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 31(13):3804-3807
26. Hagler A, Euler E, Lifson S (1974) Energy functions for peptides and proteins I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals. J Am Chem Soc 96:5319-5327
27. Helles G (2008) A comparative study of the reported performance of ab initio protein structure prediction algorithms. J R Soc Interface 5(21):387-396
28. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, et al. (1990) Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 216(1):167-180
29. Hsieh MJ, Luo R (2004) Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction. Proteins 56(3):475-486
30. Im W, Lee MS, Brooks CL (2003) Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function. J Comput Chem 24(14):1691-1702
31. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li Z, et al. (2005) FFAS03: a server for profile-profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 33 (Web Server issue):W284-288
32. Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, et al. (2007) Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):57-67
33. Jonassen I, Klose D, Taylor WR (2006) Protein model refinement using structural fragment tessellation. Comput Biol Chem 30(5):360-366
34. Jones DT (1999) GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 287(4):797-815
35. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J (1988) The OPLS potential functions for proteins. Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc (110):1657-1666
36. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926-935
37. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225-11236
38. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, et al. (2001) Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 105:6474-6487
39. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R (1998) Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14:846-856
40. Kihara D, Lu H, Kolinski A, et al. (2001) TOUCHSTONE: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(18):10125-10130
41. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671-680
42. Klepeis JL, Floudas CA (2003) ASTRO-FOLD: a combinatorial and global optimization framework for Ab initio prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Biophys J 85(4):2119-2146
43. Klepeis JL, Wei Y, Hecht MH, et al. (2005) Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study. Proteins 58(3):560-570
44. Kocher JP, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ (1994) Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 235(5):1598-1613
45. Lazaridis T, Karplus M (1999a) Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 288(3):477-487
46. Lazaridis T, Karplus M (1999b) Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35(2):133-152
47. Lee J (1993) New Monte Carlo algorithm: entropic sampling. Phys Rev Lett 71(2):211-214
48. Lee J, Scheraga HA, Rackovsky S (1998) Conformational analysis of the 20-residue membranebound portion of melittin by conformational space annealing. Biopolymers 46(2):103-116
49. Lee J, Kim SY, Joo K, et al. (2004) Prediction of protein tertiary structure using PROFESY, a novel method based on fragment assembly and conformational space annealing. Proteins 56(4):704-714
50. Lee MC, Duan Y (2004) Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model. Proteins 55(3):620-634
51. Lee MR, Tsai J, Baker D, et al. (2001) Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 313(2):417-430
52. Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, et al. (1995) Potential-energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular-dynamics of proteins and nucleic-acids in solution. Comput Phys Commun 91(1-3):215-231
53. Li Z, Scheraga HA (1987) Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84(19):6611-6615
54. Lindahl E, Hess B, Van Der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7:306-317
55. Liwo A, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, et al. (1993) Calculation of protein backbone geometry from alpha-carbon coordinates based on peptide-group dipole alignment. Protein Sci 2(10):1697-1714
56. Liwo A, Lee J, Ripoll DR, et al. (1999) Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(10):5482-5485
57. Liwo A, Khalili M, Scheraga HA (2005) Ab initio simulations of protein-folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(7):2362-2367
58. Lu H, Skolnick J (2001) A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 44(3):223-232
59. Luthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D (1992) Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356(6364):83-85
60. MacKerell Jr. AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, et al. (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102(18):3586-3616
61. McGuffin LJ (2007) Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition. BMC Bioinformatics 8:345
62. Melo F, Sanchez R, Sali A (2002) Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci 11(2):430-448
63. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, et al. (2001) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round I V. Proteins (Suppl 5):2-7
64. Nemethy G, Gibson KD, Palmer KA, et al. (1992) Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometric parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides. J Phys Chem B 96:6472-6484
65. Neria E, Fischer S, Karplus M (1996) Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 105(5):1902-1921
66. Nilges M, Brunger AT (1991) Automated modeling of coiled coils: application to the GCN4 dimerization region. Protein Eng 4(6):649-659
67. Oldziej S, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, et al. (2005) Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: assessment in two blind tests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(21):7547-7552
68. Park B, Levitt M (1996) Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from wellconstructed decoys. J Mol Biol 258(2):367-392
69. Petrey D, Honig B (2000) Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models. Protein Sci 9(11):2181-2191
70. Pettitt CS, McGuffin LJ, Jones DT (2005) Improving sequence-based fold recognition by using 3D model quality assessment. Bioinformatics 21(17):3509-3515
71. Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, et al. (2006) MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (Database issue):D291-295
72. Samudrala R, Moult J (1998) An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 275(5):895-916
73. Shen MY, Sali A (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 15(11):2507-2524
74. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K (2001) FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 310(1):243-257
75. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D (1998) Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(19):11158-11162
76. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, et al. (1997) Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 268(1):209-225
77. Sippl MJ (1990) Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 213(4):859-883
78. Sippl MJ (1993) Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17(4):355-362
79. Skolnick J (2006) In quest of an empirical potential for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16(2):166-171
80. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, et al. (1997) Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Science 6:676-688
81. Skolnick J, Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, et al. (2003) TOUCHSTONE: a unified approach to protein structure prediction. Proteins 53(Suppl 6):469-479
82. Skolnick J, Kihara D, Zhang Y (2004) Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR 3.0 threading algorithm. Protein 56:502-518
83. Soding J (2005) Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21(7):951-960
84. Sorin EJ, Pande VS (2005) Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. Biophys J 88(4):2472-2493
85. Summa CM, Levitt M (2007) Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(9):3177-3182
86. Taylor WR, Bartlett GJ, Chelliah V, et al. (2008) Prediction of protein structure from ideal forms. Proteins 70(4):1610-1619
87. Thomas PD, Dill KA (1996) Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol 257(2):457-469
88. Tosatto SC (2005) The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation. J Comput Biol 12(10):1316-1327
89. Tsai J, Bonneau R, Morozov AV, et al. (2003) An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 53(1):76-87
90. Van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA, et al. (1996) Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual and user guide. VDF Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH, Zurich.
91. Vieth M, Kolinski A, Brooks CL, et al. (1994) Prediction of the folding pathways and structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper. J Mol Biol 237(4):361-367
92. Wallner B, Elofsson A (2003) Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Sci 12(5):1073-1086
93. Wallner B, Elofsson A (2007) Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins 69(S8):184-193
94. Wang JM, Cieplak P, Kollman PA (2000) How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? JComput Chem 21(12):1049-1074
95. Wang K, Fain B, Levit M, et al. (2004) Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct Biol 4 (8)
96. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Case DA, et al. (1984) A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J Am Chem Soc 106:765-784
97. Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ (2007) ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 35 (Web Server issue):W407-410
98. Wroblewska L, Skolnick J (2007) Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking. J Comput Chem 28(12):2059-2066
99. Wu S, Zhang Y (2007) LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 35(10):3375-3382
100. Wu S, Zhang Y (2008) MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 72(2):547-556
101. Wu S, Skolnick J, Zhang Y (2007) Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol 5:17
102. Zagrovic B, Snow CD, Shirts MR, et al. (2002) Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. J Mol Biol 323(5):927-937
103. Zhang C, Kim SH (2000) Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(6):2550-2555
104. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, et al. (2004) An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci 13(2):400-411
105. Zhang Y (2007) Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):108-117
106. Zhang Y (2008) Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18(3):342-348
107. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004a) Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:7594-7599
108. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004b) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 57:702-710
109. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004c) SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J Comput Chem 25(6):865-871
110. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2005a) The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1029-1034
111. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2005b) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33(7):2302-2309
112. Zhang Y, Kihara D, Skolnick J (2002) Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding. Proteins 48(2):192-201
113. Zhang Y, Kolinski A, Skolnick J (2003) TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. Biophys J 85(2):1145-1164
114. Zhang Y, Hubner I, Arakaki A, et al. (2006) On the origin and completeness of highly likely single domain protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:2605-2610
115. Zhou H, Skolnick J (2007) Ab initio protein structure prediction using chunk-TASSER. Biophys J 93(5):1510-1518
116. Zhou H, Zhou Y (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structurederived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 11(11):2714-2726
117. Zhou H, Zhou Y (2005) Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 58(2):321-328