Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct?

Protein Science

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 676-688

  Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a   Jaroszewski, Lukasz ^b   Kolinski, Andrzej ^a,b   Godzik, Adam ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

empirical parameter sets; inverse protein folding; protein structural database; protein threading; quasichemical approximation

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; BINDING AFFINITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 0030983768     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060317     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. 1991. The frequency of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitatively related to electrostatic potential. A statistical model for nonbonded interactions. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 9:108-119.
2. Finkelstein AV, Badretdinov AY, Gutin AM. 1995. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins Struct Fund Genet 23:142-150.
3. Flory PJ. 1953. Principles of polymer chemistry. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp 402-413.
4. Godzik A. 1996. Knowledge-based potentials for protein folding: What can we learn from protein structures? Structure 4:363-366.
5. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1995. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 4:2107-2117.
6. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L. 1997. Dominant effects in residue interaction in proteins. Analysis of energy parameter sets. Proteins. Submitted.
7. Godzik A, Skolnick J, Kolinski A. 1992. A topology fingerprint approach to the inverse folding problem. J Mol Biol 227:227-238.
8. Hansmann UHE, Okamoto Y. 1993. Prediction of peptide conformation by multicanonical algorithm: New approach to the multiple minima problem. J Comput Chem 14:1333-1338.
9. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. 1994. Statistical thermodynamics of protein folding: Sequence dependence. J Phys Chem 98:9882-9893.
10. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. 1995. Statistical thermodynamics of protein folding: Comparison of mean-field theory with Monte Carlo simulations. J Chem Phys 102:1334-1348.
11. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. 1996. Structure derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:195-209.
12. Kolinski A, Galazka W, Skolnick J. 1995. Computer design of idealized β-motifs. J Chem Phys 103:10286-10297.
13. Kolinski A, Galazka W, Skolnick J. 1996. On the origin of the cooperativity of protein folding. Implications from model simulations. Proteins 26:271-287.
14. Kolinski A, Godzik A, Skolnick J. 1993. A general method for the prediction of the three dimensional structure and folding pathway of globular proteins. Application to designed helical proteins. J Chem Phys 98:7420-7433.
15. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1996. Lattice models of protein folding, dynamics and thermodynamics. Austin, Texas: R.G. Landes Company.
16. Langley R. 1970. Practical statistics. New York: Dover.
17. Lavigne P, Sonnichsen FD, Kay CM, Hodges RS. 1996. Interhelical salt bridges, coiled-coil stability and specificity of dimerization. Science 271:1136-1137.
18. Lumb KJ, Kim PS. 1995a. Measurement of interhelical electrostatic interactions in the GCN4 leucine zipper. Science 268:436-439.
19. Lumb KJ, Kim PS. 1995b. A buried polar interaction imparts structural uniqueness in a designed heterodimeric coiled coil. Biochemistry 34:8642-8648.
20. Lumb KJ, Kim PS. 1996. Response to Lavigne et al. Science 271:1137-1138.
21. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. 1992. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 277:876-888.
22. Mattice WL, Suter UW. 1994. Conformational theory of large molecules. New York: Wiley.
23. Miyazawa S, Jemigan RL. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18:534-552.
24. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. 1996. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 256:623-644.
25. Olszewski KA, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1996. Folding simulations and computer redesign of protein A three helix bundle motifs. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 25:286-299.
26. Park B, Levitt M. 1996. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 258:367-392.
27. Skolnick J, Kolinski A. 1996. Monte Carlo lattice dynamics and the prediction of protein folds. In: Gunsteren WF, Weiner PK, Wilkinson AJ, eds. Computer simulations of biomolecular systems. ESCOM, Amsterdam.
28. Sun S. 1993. Reduced representation model of protein structure prediction: Statistical potential and genetic algorithms. Protein Sci 2:762-785.
29. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. 1976. Medium and long range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 9:945-950.