Prediction of protein tertiary structure using PROFESY, a novel method based on fragment assembly and conformational space annealing

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 704-714

  Lee, Julian ^a,b   Kim, Seung Yeon ^a   Joo, Keehyoung ^a,c   Kim, Ilsoo ^a,c   Lee, Jooyoung ^a  

^a Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

^b Soongsil University   (South Korea)

^c Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ab initio prediction; Fragment assembly; Global optimization; Protein folding; Tertiary structure prediction

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL SPACE ANNEALING; ENERGY; EXPERIMENT; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICT METHOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROFESY METHOD; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

CASPASES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYSTEINE ENDOPEPTIDASES; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PEPTIDES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 4043058565     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20150     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Moult J, Hubbard T, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round III. Proteins 1999;(Suppl)3:2-6.
2. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:2-7.
3. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96.
4. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
5. Browne WJ, North ACT, Phillips DC, Brew K, Vanaman TC, Hill RL. A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine alpha-lactalbumin based on that of hen's egg-white lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1969:42;65-86.
6. Greer J. Comparative model building of the mammalian serine proteases. J Mol Biol 1981;153:1027-1042.
7. Blundell TL, Sibanda BL, Sternberg MJE, Thornton JM. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. Nature 1987;326:347-352.
8. Havel TF, Snow ME. A new method for building protein conformations from sequence alignments with homologues of known structure. J Mol Biol 1991;217:1-7.
9. Levitt M. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J Mol Biol 1992;226:507-533.
10. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
11. Bower M, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL. Sidechain prediction from a backbonedependent rotamer library: a new tool for homology modeling. J Mol Biol 1997;267:1268-1282.
12. Yang AS, Honig B. Sequence to structure alignment in comparative modeling using PrISM. Proteins 1999;(Suppl)3:66-72.
13. Fiser A, Do RKG, Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2000;9:1753-1773.
14. Kolinski A, Betancourt MR, Kihara D, Rotkiewicz P, Skolnick J. Generalized Comparative Modeling (GENECOMP): a combination of sequence comparison, threading, lattice and off lattice modeling for protein structure prediction and refinement. Proteins 2001;44:133-149.
15. Bates PA, Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJE. Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. Proteins 2001; (Suppl)5:39-46.
16. Venclovas C. Comparative modeling of CASP4 target proteins: combining results of sequence search with three-dimensional structure assessment. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:47-54.
17. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
18. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for preteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5;229-235.
19. Jones DT, Thornton JM. Potential energy functions for threading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:210-216.
20. Sippl MJ, Flockner H. Threading thrills and threats. Structure 1996;4;15-19.
21. Bohm G. New approaches in molecular structure prediction. Biophys Chem 1996;59:1-32.
22. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
23. Torda AE. Perspectives in protein-fold recognition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:200-205.
24. Koretke KK, Russell RB, Lupas AN. Fold recognition from sequence comparisons. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:68-75.
25. Murzin AG, Bateman A. CASP2 knowledge-based approach to distant homology recognition and fold prediction in CASP4. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:76-85.
26. Karplus K, Karchin R, Barrett C, Tu S, Cline M, Diekhans M, Grate L, Casper J, Hughey R. What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? Proteins 2001; (Suppl)5:86-91.
27. Williams MG, Shirai H, Shi J, Nagendra HG, Mueller J, Mizuguchi K, Miguel RN, Lovell SC, Innis CA, Deane CM, Chen L, Campillo N, Burke DF, Blundell TL, de Bakker PIW. Sequence-structure homology recognition by iterative alignment refinement and comparative modeling. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:92-97.
28. Lesk AM, Conte LL, Hubbard TJP. Assessment of novel fold targets in CASP4: predictions of three-dimensional structures, secondary structures, and interresidue contacts. Proteins 2001; (Suppl)5:98-118.
29. Lee J, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice united-residue force field: application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and to apo calbindin D9K. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999;96:2025-2030.
30. Lee J, Liwo A, Ripoll DR, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. Calculation of protein conformation by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proteins 1999;(Suppl)3:204-208.
31. Lee J, Liwo A, Ripoll DR, Pillardy J, Saunders JA, Gibson KD, Scheraga HA. Hierarchical energy-based approach to protein-structure prediction: blind-test evaluation with CASP3 targets. Int J Quant Chem 2000;77:90-117.
32. Liwo A, Lee J, Ripoll DR, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999;96:5482-5485.
33. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
34. Simons KT, Strauss C, Baker D. Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics. J Mol Biol 2001;306:1191-1199.
35. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Chivian D, Rohl C, Strauss CEM, Baker D. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:119-126.
36. Jones DT. Predicting novel protein folds by using FRAGFOLD. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:127-132.
37. Standley DM, Eyrich VA, An Y, Pincus DL, Gunn JR, Friesner RA. Protein structure prediction using a combination of sequence-based alignment, constrained energy minimization, and structural alignment. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:133-139.
38. Xu D, Crawford OH, LoCascio PF, Xu Y. Application of PROSPECT in CASP4: characterizing protein structures with new folds. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:140- 148.
39. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Kihara D, Betancourt M, Rotkiewicz P, Boniecki M. Ab initio protein structure prediction via a combination of threading, lattice folding, clustering, and structure refinement. Proteins 2001;(Suppl)5:149-156.
40. Kihara D, Lu H, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Touchstone: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading based tertiary restraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2001;98:10125-10130.
41. Anfinsen CB. Studies on the principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223-230.
42. Joo K, Lee J, Kim SY, Kim I, Lee SJ, Lee J. Profile-based nearest neighbor method for pattern recognition. J Korean Phys Soc 2004;44:599-604.
43. Lee J, Scheraga HA, Rackovsky S. New optimization method for conformational energy calculations on polypeptides: conformational space annealing. J Comp Chem 1997;18:1222-1232.
44. Lee J, Scheraga HA, Rackovsky S. Conformational analysis of the 20-residue membrane-bound portion of melittin by conformational space annealing. Biopolymers 1998;46:103-115.
45. Lee J, Scheraga HA. Conformational space annealing by parallel computations: extensive conformational search of met-enkephalin and the 20-residue membrane-bound portion of melittin. Int J Quant Chem 1999;75:255-265.
46. Kim SY, Lee SJ, Lee J. Conformational space annealing and an off-lattice frustrated model protein. J Chem Phys 2003;119:10274-10279.
47. Lee J, Lee IH, Lee J. Unbiased global optimization of Lennard-Jones clusters for N≤201 using conformational space annealing method. Phys Rev Lett 2003;91:0802011-0802014.
48. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, JosephMcCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
49. McQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: LeCam LM, Neyman J, editors. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Volume I, Statistics. University of Califormia Press.
50. Auspurger JD, Scheraga H. An efficient, differentiable hydration potential for peptides and proteins. J Comp Chem 1996;17:1549-1558.
51. Kortemme T, Ramirez-Alvardo M, Serrano L. Design of a 20-amino acid, three-stranded β-sheet protein. Science 1998;281:253-256.
52. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 1997;278:82-87.
53. Gouda H, Torigoe H, Saito A, Sato M, Arata Y, Shimada I. Three-dimensional solution structure of the B domain of staphylococcal protein A: comparisons of the solution and crystal structures. Biochemistry 1992;31:9665-9672.
54. Martinez JC, Pisabarro MT, Serrano L. Obligatory steps in protein folding and the conformational diversity of the transition state. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:721-729.
55. Ooi T, Oobatake M, Nemethy G, Scheraga HA. Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1987;84:3086-3090.
56. Chivian D, Kim DE, Malmström L, Bradley P, Robertson T, Murphy P, Strauss C, Bonneau R, Rohl CA, Baker D. Automated prediction of CASP5 structures using the Robetta server. Proteins 2003;53:524-533.
57. Lee J, Ripoll DR, Czaplewski C, Pillardy J, Wedemeyer WJ, Scheraga HA. Optimization of parameters in macromolecular potential energy functions by conformational space annealing. J Phys Chem B 2001;105:7291-7298.
58. Pillardy J, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, Wedemeyer WJ, Lee J, Ripoll D, Arlukowicz P, Oldziej S, Arnautova YA, Scheraga HA. Development of physics-based energy functions that predict medium-resolution structures for proteins of the α, β, and α/β structural classes. J Phys Chem B 2001;105:7299-7311.
59. Lee J, Park K, Lee J. Full optimization of linear parameters of a united residue protein potential. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:11647-11657.
60. Liwo A, Arlukowicz P, Czaplewski C, Oldziej S, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. A method for optimizing potential-energy functions by a hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape: application to the UNRES force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002;99:1937-1942.
61. Koradi R, Billeter M, and Wuthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph 1996;14:51-55.