Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 8, 2007, Pages 184-193

  Wallner, Björn ^a,b   Elofsson, Arne ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Consensus; MQAP; Quality assessment

Indexed keywords

CASPASE 7;

CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 36749049687     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21774     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Wallner B, Larsson P, Elofsson A. Pcons.net: protein structure prediction meta server. Nucleic Acids Res (Web Server issue) 2007;35:W369-W374.
2. Fischer D. Servers for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:178-182.
3. Lundstrm J, Rychlewski L, Bujnicki J, Elofsson A. Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci 2001;10(11):2354-2362.
4. Fischer D. 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor. Proteins 2003;51:434-441.
5. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3d-jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018.
6. Wallner B, Fang H, Elofsson A. Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Pcons, ProQ, and Pmodeller. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):534-541.
7. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores. Bioinformatics 2005;21:4248-4254.
8. Sippl M. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
9. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258:367-392.
10. Park B, Huang E, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
11. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 1999;288:477-487.
12. Gatchell D, Dennis S, Vajda S. Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions. Proteins 2000;41:518-534.
13. Petrey D, Honig B. Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models. Protein Sci 2000;9:2181-2191.
14. Vendruscolo M, Najmanovich R, Domany E. Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading? Proteins 2000;38:134-148.
15. Vorobjev Y, Hermans J. Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability. Protein Sci 2001;10:2498-2506.
16. Felts A, Gallicchio E, Wallqvist A, Levy R. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model. Proteins 2002;48:404-422.
17. Dominy B, Brooks C. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. J Comput Chem 2002;23:147-160.
18. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Sci 2003;12:1073-1086.
19. Sippl M. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:355-362.
20. Luethy R, Bowie J, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 1992;356:283-85.
21. Eisenberg D, Luethy R, Bowie J. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:396-404.
22. Kosinski J, Cymerman IA, Feder M, Kurowski MA, Sasin JM, Bujnicki JM. A "FRankenstein's monster" approach to comparative modeling: merging the finest fragments of fold-recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):369-379.
23. von Grotthuss M, Pas J, Wyrwicz L, Ginalski K, Rychlewski L. Application of 3D-jury, GRDB, and Verify3D in fold recognition. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):418-423.
24. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Identification of correct regions in protein models using structural, alignment, and consensus information. Protein Sci 2006;15:900-913.
25. Cristobal S, Zemla A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L, Elofsson A. A study of quality measures for protein threading models. BMC Bioinformatics 2001;2(5).
26. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. Maxsub: an automated measure to assess the quality of protein structure predictions. Bionformatics 2000;16:776-785.
27. Zemla A, Veclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:22-29.
28. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.