Designing, implementing and evaluating a self-and-peer assessment tool for e-learning environments

E-Learning Technologies and Evidence-Based Assessment Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 170-194

  Tucker, Richard ^a   Fermelis, Jan ^a   Palmer, Stuart ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900133073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-410-1.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.
2. Barber, P. (2004). Developing and assessing group design work: A case study. Paper presented at the 2nd International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference, Delft.
3. Brown, R. W. (1995, 1-4 November). Autorating: Getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
4. Clark, N., Davies, P., & Skeers, R. (2005). Self and peer assessment in software engineering projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 42, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
5. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
6. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37(4), 346-355.
7. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350.
8. Dominick, P. G., Reilly, R. R., & McGourty, J. (1997). Incorporating student peer review and feedback into the assessment process. Paper presented at the Best Assessment Processes in Engineering Education: A Working Symposium, Terre Haute, Indiana.
9. Ellis, T. J., & Hafner, W. (2005). Peer evaluations of collaborative learning experiences conveyed through an asynchronous learning network. Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Big Island, Hawaii.
10. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146-166.
11. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
12. Fermelis, J. (2006). Making teamwork work. Paper presented at the 71st Association for Business Communication Annual Convention.
13. Freeman, M., & McKenzie, J. (2000, 2-5 July). Self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Designing, implementing and evaluating spark, a confidential, web based system. Paper presented at the ASET-HERDSA 2000 Conference, Toowoomba, Qld.
14. Freeman, M., & McKenzie, J. (2002). Spark, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 551-569.
15. Garbett, D. (2004). Researching practice as a teacher educator. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/gar04590.pdf.
16. Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative learning en-hances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
17. Goldfinch, J., & Raeside, R. (1990). Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), 210-231.
18. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-70.
19. Hart, G., & Stone, T. (2002). Conversations with students: The outcomes of focus groups with QUT students. Retrieved from http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/main/papers/nonref/title.html
20. James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The Australian Universities Teaching Committee.
21. Johnston, L., & Miles, L. (2004). Assessing contributions to group assignments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 751-768.
22. Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 936-941.
23. Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2002). Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: Student attitudes to holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 569-577.
24. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420-432.
25. Luca, J., & McLoughlin, C. (2002, 8-11 December). A question of balance: Using self and peer assessment effectively in teamwork. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, Auckland.
26. McGourty, J., Dominick, P., & Reilly, R. R. (1998, 4-7 November). Incorporating student peer review and feedback into the assessment process. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, Arizona.
27. Miller, P. J. (2003). The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 383-394.
28. Monk-Turner, E., & Payne, B. (2005). Addressing issues in group work in the classroom. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16(1), 166-179.
29. Morris, R., & Hayes, C. (1997). Small group work: Are group assignments a legitimate form of assessment? Proceedings of the 6th Annual Teaching and Learning Forum. Retrieved from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1997morris.html
30. Mulder, R. A., & Pearce, J. M. (2007). Praze: Innovating teaching through online peer review. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, A. S. S. Kit, & C. Cheers (Eds.), 24th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 727-736). Singapore: ASCILITE
31. Raban, R., & Litchfield, A. (2006, 3-6 December). Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Sydney.
32. Raban, R., & Litchfield, A. (2007). Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 34-47.
33. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
34. Sharp, S. (2006). Deriving individual student marks from a tutor's assessment of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 329-343.
35. Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2003, 9-11 July). Web-based peer assessment in learning computer programming. Paper presented at the 3rd IEEE International Conference in Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, Greece.
36. Sivan, A. (2000). The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 193-213.
37. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment. Learning Environments Research, 1(3), 293-319.
38. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75.
39. Strauss, P., & Alice, U. (2007). Group assessments: Dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 147-161.
40. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
41. Tucker, R. (2008). The impact of assessment modes on collaborative group design projects. In S. Frankland (Ed.), Enhancing teaching and learning through assessment: Embedded strate- gies and their impacts, 2, 72-85. Hong Kong: The Assessment Resource Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
42. Tucker, R., Fermelis, J., & Palmer, S. (2007). Online self-and-peer-assessment for teamwork in architecture and business communications. In J. Coulson, D. Schwede & R. Tucker (Eds.), Towards solutions for a liveable future: Progress, practice, performance, people: The 41st annual conference of the Architectural Science Association ANZAScA (pp. 264-271). Geelong: Deak in University.
43. Tucker, R., & Reynolds, C. (2006). The impact of teaching models on collaborative learning in the student design studio. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 1(2), 39-56.
44. Tucker, R., & Rollo, J. (2006). Teaching and learning in collaborative group design projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering & Design Management, 2 (Teaching and Learning in the Built Environment), 19-30.
45. van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19-36.
46. Walker, A. (2001). British psychology students' perceptions of group-work and peer. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 28-36.
47. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 55-67.
48. Willey, K., & Freeman, M. (2006). Improving teamwork and engagement: The case for self and peer assessment. Retrieved 12 December, 2006, from http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2006/wil-ley0106.pdf