Teaching and learning in collaborative group design projects

Architectural Engineering and Design Management

Volumn 2, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 19-30

  Tucker, Richard ^a   Rollo, John ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Design andragogy; Group assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 49549083157     PISSN: 17452007     EISSN: 17527589     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2006.9684602     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, K., 2004. Group Work in Higher Education:Report, Resources and Recommendations (unpublished)
2. Chambers, T., Manning, A., and Theriot, L., 2000. “ ‘A new theory for the assignment of members to engineering design teams’ ”. In Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Las Cruces, New Mexico 76–82. April 5–8
3. Chang, T., and Chang, D., 2000. ‘The role of Myers-Briggs type indicator in electrical engineering education’ http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2000/ Proceedings/papers/MD6–2.pdf (accessed 10 August 2005)
4. Chenail, R. J., and Maione, P., 1997. ‘Sensemaking in clinical qualitative research’. The Qualitative Report, 3 (1) http://www.nova.edu/ssss/ QR/QR3–1/sense.html (accessed October 2004)
5. Cuff, D., 1991. Architecture:The Story of Practice Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
6. Deibel, K., 2005. “ ‘Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work’, Source Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education ”. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Caparica, Portugal, 27–29 June 2005 291–295. http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/deibel/sigcse2005paper.pdf (accessed 13 September 2005)
7. Dillenbourg, P., 1999. “ ‘What do you mean by collaborative learning?’ ”. In Collaborative-learning:Cognitive and Computational Approaches Edited by:Dillenbourg, P., 1–16. Oxford:Pergamon.
8. Durling, D., Cross, N., and Johnson, J., 1996. ‘Personality and learning preferences of students in design and design-related disciplines’ IDATER. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/cd/research/idater/downloads96/durling96.pdf (accessed 13 September 2005)
9. Ellis, T. J., and Hafner, W., 2005. ‘Peer evaluations of collaborative learning experiences conveyed through an asynchronous learning network’, in System Sciences, 2005, HICSS apos 05. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Big Island, Hawaii, 2005
10. Falchikov, N., 1986. ‘Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessment’. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11 (2):146–166.
11. Fisher, A., 2000. “ ‘Developing skills with people:a vital part of architectural education’ ”. In Changing Architectural Education:Towards a New Professionalism Edited by:Nicol, C., and Pilling, S., 141London:Spon Press.
12. Gorla, N., and Lam, Y., 2004. ‘Who should work with whom?’. Communications of the ACM, 7 (5):79–82.
13. Grigg, L., Johnston, R., and Milsom, N., 2003. Emerging Issues for Cross-Disciplinary Research:Conceptual and Empirical Dimensions Canberra:Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training.
14. Jung, C. G., 1921. Psychological Types Edited by:Godwyn Baynes, H., 458–459. New York:Pantheon Books. (1923)
15. Keirsey, D., 1998. Please Understand Me II:Temperament, Character, Intelligence Del Mar, CA:Prometheus Nemesis Books.
16. McGourty, J., Dominick, P., Besterfieldsacre, M., Shuman, L., and Wolfe, H., 2000. “ ‘Improving student learning through the use of multisource assessment and feedback’ ”. In ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City, 18–21 October 2000.
17. Oakley, B., Felder, R., Brent, R., and Elhajj, I., 2004. ‘Turning student groups into effective teams’. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2 (1):9–33.
18. Plato. 1955. “ The ”. In Republic Edited by:Lee, D., Harmondsworth:Penguin Books.
19. Sanz-Menendez, L., Bordons, M., and Zulueta, M. A., 2000. ‘Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept’. Research Evaluation, 10 (1)
20. Rutherfoord, R., 2001. “ ‘Using personality inventories to help form teams for software engineering class projects’ ”. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Canterbury, 25–27 June 2001. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/380000/377486/p73-rutherfoord.pdf?key1=377486&key2=2836563211&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=50404268&CFTOKEN=32739954 (accessed 10 August 2005)
21. Schrage, M., 1995. No More Teams! Mastering the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration New York:Currency Doubleday.
22. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2004. University of Bath, course description http://www.bath.ac.uk
23. Smith, E., and Mackie, D., 2000. Social Psychology 94–5. Santa Barbara, CA:Psychology Press.