It depends: Environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance

Organization Science

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 633-652

  Cooper, Danielle ^a   Patel, Pankaj C ^b   Thatcher, Sherry M B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization elaboration model; Faultlines; Organizational environment; Social identity theory; Subgroups; Top management teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897863976     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0855     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA (1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Acad. Management J. 42(5):507-525.
2. Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
3. Aldrich HE (1979) Organizations and Environments (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
4. Baixauli-Soler JS, Sanchez-Marin G (2011) Organizational governance and TMT pay level adjustment. J. Bus. Res. 64(8): 862-870.
5. Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107-124.
6. Barkema HG, Shvyrkov O (2007) Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion. Strategic Management J. 28(7):663-680.
7. Barker VL, Patterson PW Jr (1996) Top management team tenure and top manager causal attributions at declining firms attempting turnarounds. Group Organ. Management 21(3):304-336.
8. Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
9. Barsade SG, Ward AJ, Turner JDF, Sonnenfeld JA (2000) To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):802-836.
10. Bascle G (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 6(3):285-327.
11. Bell ST, Villado AJ, Lukasik MA, Belau L, Briggs AL (2011) Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. J. Management 37(3):709-743.
12. Berger PG, Ofek E (1995) Diversification's effect on firm value. J. Financial Econom. 37(1):39-65.
13. Bezrukova K, Spell CS, Perry JL (2010) Violent splits or healthy divides? Coping with injustice through faultlines. Personnel Psych. 63(3):719-751.
14. Bezrukova K, Jehn KA, Zanutto EL, Thatcher SMB (2009) Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):35-50.
15. Bezrukova K, Thatcher SMB, Jehn KA, Spell CS (2012) The effects of alignments: Examining group faultlines, organizational cultures, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):77-92.
16. Boyd B (1990) Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management J. 11(6):419-430.
17. Brewer MB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. 86(2):307-324.
18. Brocklebank JC, Dickey DA (2003) SAS for Forecasting Time Series (SAS Publishing, Cary, NC).
19. Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):875-893.
20. Bushman R, Dai Z, Wang X (2010) Risk and CEO turnover. J. Financial Econom. 96(3):381-398.
21. Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).
22. Cannella AA, Park JH, Lee HU (2008) Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 51(4):768-784.
23. Cannon AR, St. John CH (2007) Measuring environmental complexity. Organ. Res. Methods 10(2):296-321.
24. Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 44(3):533-545.
25. Carpenter MA, Sanders WM (2002) Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management J. 23(4):367-375.
26. Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30(6):749-778.
27. Carpenter MA, Pollock TG, Leary MM (2003) Testing a model of reasoned risk taking: Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high technology IPO firms. Strategic Management J. 24(9):803-820.
28. Carton AM, Cummings JN (2012) A theory of subgroups in work teams. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):441-470.
29. Castrogiovanni GJ (1991) Environmental munificence: A theoretical assessment. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):542-565.
30. Certo ST, Lester RH, Dalton CM, Dalton DR (2006) Top management teams, strategy and financial Performance: A meta analytic examination. J. Management Stud. 43(4):813-839.
31. Cho TS, Shen W (2007) Changes in executive compensation following an environmental shift: The role of top management team turnover. Strategic Management J. 28(7):747-754.
32. Choi JN, Sy T (2010) Group-level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 31(7):1032-1054.
33. Clark PB, Wilson JQ (1961) Incentive systems: A theory of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 6(2):129-166.
34. Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management 23(3):239-290.
35. Davidson R, Mackinnon J (1983) Estimation and Interference in Economics (Oxford University Press, New York).
36. Dean JW Jr, Sharfman MP (1996) Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 39(2):368-396.
37. De Dreu CKW (2003) Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(2): 280-295.
38. Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52-73.
39. DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147-160.
40. Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Validzic A (1998) Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):109-120.
41. Duncan R (1973) Multiple decision-making structures in adapting to environmental uncertainty: The impact on organizational effectiveness. Human Relations 26(3):273-291.
42. Earley PC, Mosakowski E (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Management J. 43(1):26-49.
43. Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJ (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. 31(4):737-770.
44. Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR, Bingham CB (2010) Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1263-1275.
45. Emery F, Trist E (1965) The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18(1):21-32.
46. Esses VM, Dovidio JF, Jackson LM, Armstrong TL (2001) The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. J. Soc. Issues 57(3):389-412.
47. Evans DS (1987) The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. J. Indust. Econom. 35(4):567-581.
48. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2000) Reducing Intergroup Bias2 The Common Ingroup Identity Model (Psychology Press, Philadelphia).
49. Gibson C, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):202-239.
50. Gratton L, Voigt A, Erickson TJ (2007) Bridging faultlines in diverse teams. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 48(4):22-29.
51. Greening DW, Johnson RA (1997) Managing industrial and environmental crises: The role of heterogeneous top management teams. Bus. Soc. 36(4):334-361.
52. Hall BH (1993) The stock market's valuation of R&D investment during the 1980's. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(2):259-264.
53. Hart CM, Van Vugt M (2006) From faultline to group fission: Understanding membership changes in small groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(3):392-404.
54. Heeley MB, King DR, Covin JG (2006) Effects of firm R&D investment and environment on acquisition likelihood. J. Management Stud. 43(7):1513-1535.
55. Henderson AD, Fredrickson JW (1996) Information-processing demands as a determinant of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 39(3):575-606.
56. Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121-140.
57. Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2001) Social identity theory and organizational processes. Hogg MA, Terry DJ, eds. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (Psychology Press, Philadelphia), 1-12.
58. Hogg MA, Terry DJ, White KM (1995) A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 58(4):255-269.
59. Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189-1199.
60. Homan AC, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR, Van Kleef GA (2008) Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1204-1222.
61. Hornsey MJ, Hogg MA (1999) Subgroup differentiation as a response to an overly-inclusive group: A test of optimal distinctiveness theory. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 29(4):543-550.
62. Hornsey MJ, Hogg MA (2000a) Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 4(2):143-156.
63. Hornsey MJ, Hogg MA (2000b) Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(2):242-256.
64. Hylleberg S (1992) The X-11 Method in Modeling Seasonality (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).
65. Jackson JW (2001) Effects of endowment amount and attributions on responses to a subgroup social dilemma. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, Practice 5(2):67-80.
66. Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741-764.
67. Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52(3):599-627.
68. Judge WQ, Miller A (1991) Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts. Acad. Management J. 34(2):449-463.
69. Kaplan SN, Minton BA (2012) How has CEO turnover changed? Internat. Rev. Finance 12(1):57-87.
70. Keats BW, Hitt MA (1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. 31(3):570-598.
71. Keck SL (1997) Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organ. Sci. 8(2):143-156.
72. Klapper LF, Love I (2004) Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. J. Corporate Finance 10(5):703-728.
73. Kotha S, Nair A (1995) Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry. Strategic Management J. 16(7):497-518.
74. Krishnan HA, Miller A, Judge WQ (1997) Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic Management J. 18(5):361-374.
75. Lau DC, Murnighan JK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):325-340.
76. Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. 48(4):645-659.
77. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1-47.
78. Li J, Hambrick DC (2005) Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Management J. 48(5):794-813.
79. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley&Sons, New York).
80. Mehran H (1995) Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 38(2):163-184.
81. Michel JG, Hambrick DC (1992) Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Acad. Management J. 35(1):9-37.
82. Miller CC, Ogilvie D, Glick WH (2006) Assessing the external environment: An enrichment of the archival tradition. Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 97-122.
83. Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 21(2):402-433.
84. Molleman E (2005) Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decision Negotiation 14(3):173-193.
85. Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R, Nye JL, Brower AM (1996) Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What's Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 57-84.
86. Mottola GR, Bachman BA, Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (1997) How groups merge: The effects of merger integration patterns on anticipated commitment to the merged organization. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 27(15):1335-1358.
87. Mullen B, Brown R, Smith C (1992) Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 22(2):103-122.
88. Nishii LH, Goncalo JA (2008) Demographic faultlines and creativity in groups. Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale M, eds. Diversity and Groups, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 11 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 1-26.
89. O'Brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality Quantity 41(5):673-690.
90. O'Leary MB, Mortensen M (2010) Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 21(1):115-131.
91. Ormiston ME, Wong EM (2012) The gleam of the double-edged sword: The benefits of subgroups for organizational ethics. Psych. Sci. 23(4):400-403.
92. Orton JD, Weick KE (1990) Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 59(2):203-223.
93. Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. 21(2): 155-174.
94. Pearsall MJ, Ellis APJ, Evans JM (2008) Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):225-234.
95. Phillips KW (2003) The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1):3-13.
96. Phillips KW, Loyd D (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):143-160.
97. Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH (2004) Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(4):497-510.
98. Polzer JT, Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL, Kim JW (2006) Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. 49(4):679-692.
99. Rink F, Ellemers N (2006) What can you expect? The influence of gender diversity in dyads on work goal expectancies and subsequent work commitment. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 9(4):577-588.
100. Rink R, Ellemers N (2010) Benefiting from deep-level diversity: How congruence between knowledge and decision rules improves team decision making and team perceptions. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 13(3):345-359.
101. Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J (2003) Model Assisted Survey Sampling (Springer-Verlag, New York).
102. Scott WR (2003) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
103. Sharfman MP, Dean JW (1991) Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. J. Management 17(4):681-700.
104. Simons T, Pelled LH, Smith KA (1999) Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. 42(6):662-673.
105. Stasser G, Stewart DD, Wittenbaum GM (1995) Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(3):244-265.
106. Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many instruments. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, New York), 109-120.
107. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33-47.
108. Tegarden DP, Tegarden LF, Sheetz SD (2009) Cognitive factions in a top management team: Surfacing and analyzing cognitive diversity using causal maps. Group Decision Negotiation 18(6):537-566.
109. Thatcher SM, Patel PC (2011) Demographic faultlines: A metaanalysis of the literature. J. Appl. Psych. 96(6):1119-1139.
110. Thatcher SM, Patel PC (2012) Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. J. Management 38(4):969-1009.
111. Thatcher SM, Jehn KA, Zanutto E (2003) Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision Negotiation 12(3):217-241.
112. Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw Hill, New York).
113. Tosi HL (1984) Theories of Organization (John Wiley&Sons, New York).
114. Tuggle CS, Schnatterly K, Johnson RA (2010) Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Acad. Management J. 53(3):550-571.
115. Tung RL (1979) Dimensions of organizational environment: An exploratory study of their impact on organizational structure. Acad. Management J. 22(4):672-693.
116. Turner JC (1985) Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Lawler EJ, ed. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, Vol. 2 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77-122.
117. Turner JC (1999) Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B, eds. Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content, (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 6-34.
118. Turner JC, Reynolds KJ (1987) A self-categorization theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume Two (Sage, London), 399-417.
119. van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58:515-541.
120. van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CK, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008-1022.
121. van Knippenberg D, Dawson JF, West MA, Homan AC (2011) Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations 64(3):307-336.
122. Waller MJ (1999) The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Acad. Management J. 42(2):127-137.
123. Wernerfelt B, Montgomery CA (1988) Tobin's q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):246-250.
124. Wholey DR, Brittain J (1989) Characterizing environmental variation. Acad. Management J. 32(4):867-882.
125. Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. 35(1):91-121.
126. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
127. Yuchtman E, Seashore S (1967) A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(6):891-903.