Changes in executive compensation following an environmental shift: The role of top management team turnover

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 747-754

  Cho, Theresa S ^a   Shen, Wei ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Deregulation; Executive compensation; Top management team; Turnover

Indexed keywords

DEREGULATION; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

AIRLINE INDUSTRY; EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM (TMT);

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34250779963     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.600     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Baysinger B, Hoskisson RE. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control. Academy of Management Review 15: 72-87.
2. Carpenter MA. 2000. The price of change: the role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management 26: 1179-1198.
3. Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal 44: 533-545.
4. Carpenter MA, Sanders WMG. 2002. Top management team compensation: the missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal 23(4): 367-375.
5. Carpenter MA, Wade JB. 2002. Microlevel opportunity structures as determinants of non-CEO executive pay. Academy of Management Journal 45: 1085-1103.
6. Ezzell JR, Miles JA. 1995. Bank CEO pay-performance relations and the effects of deregulation. Journal of Business 68: 231-256.
7. FeitlerJN, Corsi T. Grimm C. 1998. Strategic and performance changes among LTL motor carriers: 1976-1993. Transportation Journal 4: 5-13.
8. Finkelstein S, Boyd B. 1998. How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41: 179-199.
9. Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations: West Publishing: New York.
10. Grimm CM, Smith KG. 1991. Management and organizational change: a note on the railroad industry. Strategic Management Journal 12(7): 557-562.
11. Hambrick DC, Mason PA. 1984. Upper echelon: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9: 193-206.
12. Henderson AD, Fredrickson JW. 1996. Information-processing demands as a determinant of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal 39: 575-607.
13. Holmstrom B, Milgrom P. 1990. Regulating trade among agents. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 146: 85-105.
14. Hubbard RG, Palia D. 1995. Executive pay and performance evidence from the U.S. banking industry. Financial Economics 39: 105-130.
15. Jensen MC, Murphy KJ. 1990. Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98: 225-264.
16. Kole S, Lehn K. 1997. Deregulation, the evolution of corporate governance structure, and survival. American Economic Review 87: 421-425.
17. Kole S, Lehn K. 1999. Deregulation and governance structure: the case of the U.S. airline industry. Journal of Financial Economics 52: 79-117.
18. Kmenta J. 1986. Elements of Econometrics (2nd edn). Macmillan: New York.
19. Levine ME. 1987. Airline competition in deregulated markets: theory, firm strategy and public policy. Yale Journal on Regulation 4: 393-494.
20. O'ReillyCA III, Main BG, Crystal G S. 1988. CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: a tale of two theories. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 257-274.
21. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row: New York.
22. Rajagopalan N, Finkelstein S. 1992. Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 13: 127-142.
23. Sanders WMG, Carpenter MA. 1998. Intel-nationalization and firm governance: the roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal 41: 158-178.
24. Shen W, Cannella AA Jr. 2002. Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: the impacts of successor type, post-succession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal 45: 717-733.
25. Tushman ML, Rosenkopf L. 1996. Executive succession, strategic reorientation, and performance growth. Management Science 42: 939-953.