Assessment talk in design: The multiple purposes of assessment in he

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 41-52

  Harman, Kerry ^a   Mcdowell, Liz ^b  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic identities; Assessment practices; Disciplinary cultures; Discourse theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751623461     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507309     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Biggs, J. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 32, no. 3: 347-64.
2. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5, no. 1: 7-71.
3. Blythman, M., S. Orr, and B. Blair. 2007. Critiquing the crit. Brighton: Art, Design and Media Subject Centre.
4. Clegg, S. 2008. Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal 34, no. 3: 329-45.
5. Delandshere, G. 2001. Implicit theories, unexamined assumptions and the status quo of educational assessment. Assessment in Education 8, no. 2: 113-33.
6. Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving assessment through student involvement. London: Routledge- Falmer.
7. Gee, J. 2001. Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education 25, no. 1: 99-125.
8. Hall, S. 1996. Introduction: Who needs identity? In Questions of cultural identity, ed. S. Hall and P. du Gay, 1-17. London: Sage.
9. Havnes, A., and L. McDowell, eds., 2008. Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education. New York: Routledge.
10. Hounsell, D., and C. Anderson. 2005.Ways of thinking and practising in Biology and History: Disciplinary aspects of teaching-learning environments. Paper read at higher education colloquium,'Teaching and Learning within the Disciplines', June 10-11, at University of Edinburgh, in Edinburgh.
11. James, M. 2006. Assessment, teaching and theories of learning. In Assessment and learning, ed. J. Gardner, 47-60. London: Sage.
12. Kemmis, S. 2005. Knowing practice: Searching for saliences. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 13, no. 3: 391-424.
13. Knight, P.T., and P. Trowler. 2000. Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education 25, no. 1: 69-83.
14. Lea, M.R., and B. Stierer. 2009. Lecturers' everyday writing as professional practice in the university as workplace: New insights into academic identities. Studies in Higher Education 34, no. 4: 417-28.
15. MacLure, M. 2003. Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. Morley, L. 2003. Quality and power in higher education. Berkshire: SRHE and Open University Press.
17. Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2007. A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education 34, no. 1: 1-20.
18. Reimann, N. 2009. Exploring disciplinarity in academic development: Do 'ways of thinking and practicing' help faculty to think about learning and teaching? In The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries, ed. by C. Kreber, 84-95. London: Routledge.
19. Rose, N. 1999. Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self, 2nd ed. London: Free Association Books.
20. Shulman, L.S. 2005. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus 134, no. 3: 52-59.
21. Smart, J., and S. Dixon. 2002. The discourse of assessment: Language and value in the assessment of group practice in the performing arts. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 1, no. 2: 185-204.
22. Trowler, P. 2001. Captured by the discourse? The socially constitutive power of new higher education discourse in the UK. Organization 8, no. 2: 183-201.
23. Tunstall, P. 2001. Assessment discourse and constructions of social reality in infant classrooms. Journal of Education Policy 16, no. 3: 215-31.
24. Weedon, C. 1987. Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.