The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking Criteria in peer and Self-assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 309-323

  Orsmond, Paul ^a   Merry, Stephen ^a   Reiling, Kevin ^a  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544237253     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293022000001337     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CLAXTON, G. (1995) What kind of learning does self assessment drive? Developing a 'nose' for quality: comments on Klenowski, Assessment in Education, 2(3), pp. 339-343.
2. COOPER, N. J. (2000) Facilitating learning from formative feedback in level 3 assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), pp. 279-291.
3. DENICOLO, P., ENTWISTLE, N. & HOUNSELL, D. (1992) What is Active Learning? (Sheffield, CVCP Universitie s Staff Development and Training Unit).
4. DOCHY, F., SEGERS, M. & SLUIJSMANS, D. (1999) The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review, Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), pp. 331-350.
5. KLENOWSKI, V. (1995) Student self-evaluatio n processes in student-centre d teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England, Assessment in Education, 2(2), pp. 145-163.
6. ORNSTEIN, A. (1995) Beyond effective teaching, Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), pp. 2-23.
7. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (1996) The importance of marking criteria in peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 239-249.
8. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (1997) A study in self-assessment: tutor and students' perception s of performance criteria, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), pp. 357-369.
9. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (2000) The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), pp. 23-38.
10. PROSSER, M. & TRIGWELL, K. (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching. The Experience in Higher Education (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press).
11. REYNOLDS, M. & TREHAN, R. (2000) Assessment: a critical perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), pp. 267-278.
12. SADLER, D. R. (1987) Specifying and promulgating achievement standards, Oxford Review of Education, 13, pp. 191-209.
13. SADLER, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education, 5(1), pp. 77-84.
14. SIEGEL, S. & CASTELLAN Jr, N. J. (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Science (New York, McGraw Hill).
15. SIVAN, A. (2000) The implementation of peer assessment: an action research approach, Assessment in Education, 7(2), pp. 193-209.
16. STEELE, B. (1998) Exemplars: an interpretativ e and collaborativ e framework for assessment that works, English Quarterly, 30(1&2), pp. 82-86.
17. STEFANI, L. A. J. (1998) Assessment in partnership with learners, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), pp. 339-350.
18. STEFANI, L. A. J. & NICOL, D. J. (1997) From teacher to facilitato r of collaborativ e inquiry, in: S. ARMSTRONG, S. BROWN & G. THOMPSON (Eds) Facing up to Radical Changes in Universities and Colleges, pp. 131-140 (London, Kogan Page).
19. STEFANI, L. A. J., CLARKE, J. & LITTLEJOHN, A. H. (2000) Developing a student-centre d approach to releective learning, Innovation in Education and Training Internationa l, 37(2), pp. 163-171.
20. TRIGWELL, K., PROSSER, M. & WATERHOUSE, F. (1999a) Relation between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approache s to learning, Higher Education, 37, pp. 57-70.