Language-Related ERP Components

The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Swaab, Tamara Y ^a   Ledoux, Kerry ^b   Camblin, C Christine ^c   Boudewyn, Megan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Discourse processing; Event related potentials; Lexical processing; N400; Non literal language; Nref; P600; Sentence processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893688604     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0197     Document Type: Chapter

References (270)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H. G., & Boland, J.E. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 112-130.
2. Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Kravetz, S. (1998). Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36(4), 353-362.
3. Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport, 15(3), 545-548.
4. Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8(6), 493-512.
5. Becker, C.A. (1985). What do we really know about semantic context effects during reading?. In Besner, D., Waller, T.G., & MacKinnon, G.E. (Eds.), Reading research: advances in theory and practice (pp. 125-166). New York: Academic Press.
6. Beeman, M., & Chiarello, C. (Eds.). (1998). Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60(4), 343-355.
8. Bentin, S., & Peled, B. (1990). The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 359-366.
9. Bentin, S., Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S.A. (1995). Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 54-67.
10. Besson, M., & Kutas, M. (1993). The many facets of repetition: A cued-recall and event-related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1115-1133.
11. Besson, M., & Macar, F. (1987). An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. Psychophysiology, 24, 14-25.
12. Boddy, J. (1986). Event-related potentials in chronometric analysis of primed word recognition with different stimulus onset asynchronies. Psychophysiology, 23, 232-245.
13. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(3), 645-652.
14. Bonte, M. L., & Blomert, L. (2004). Developmental dyslexia: ERP correlates of anomalous phonological processing during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 21(3), 360-376.
15. Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006). The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review, 113(4), 787-821.
16. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 55-73.
17. Boudewyn, M., Gordon, P., Long, D., Polse, L., & Swaab, T. Y. (in press). (i). Does discourse congruence influence spoken language comprehension before lexical association? Evidence from event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes.
18. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
19. Bright, P., Moss, H. E., Longe, O., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Conceptual structure modulates anteromedial temporal involvement in processing verbally presented object properties. Cerebral Cortex, 17(5), 1066-1073.
20. Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34-44.
21. Brown, C. M., van Berkum, J. J. A., & Hagoort, P. (2000). Discourse before gender: An event-related brain potential study on the interplay of semantic and syntactic information during spoken language understanding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 53-68.
22. Calhoun, V. D., Adali, T., Pearlson, G. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2006). Neuronal chronometry of target detection: Fusion of hemodynamic and event-related potential data. Neuroimage, 30, 544-553.
23. Camblin, C. C., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007a). The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 103-128.
24. Camblin, C. C., Ledoux, K., Boudewyn, M., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007b). Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Research, 1146, 172-184.
25. Caplan, D., Chen, E., & Waters, G. (2008). Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing. Cortex, 44(3), 257-275.
26. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77-126.
27. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language, Pantheon.
28. Chwilla, D. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading activation versus semantic matching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A(3), 531-560.
29. Chwilla, D. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2000). Mediated priming in the lexical decision task: Evidence from eventrelated potentials and reaction time. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(3), 314-341.
30. Chwilla, D. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Vissers, C. T. W. M. (2007). Immediate integration of novel meanings: N400 support for an embodied view of language comprehension. Brain Research, 1183, 109-123.
31. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
32. Connolly, J. F., & Phillips, N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 256-266.
33. Coulson, S., Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2005). Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 129-147.
34. Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain responses to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
35. Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316, 71-74.
36. Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2004). Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 275-288.
37. Coulson, S., & Severens, E. (2007). Hemispheric asymmetry and pun comprehension: When cowboys have sore calves. Brain and Language, 100, 172-187.
38. Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition, 30, 958-968.
39. Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2007). A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research, 1146, 128-145.
40. Coulson, S., & Williams, R. F. (2005). Hemishperic asymmetries and joke comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 43, 128-141.
41. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., et al (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380(6574), 499-505.
42. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
43. Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2007). An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing. Brain Research, 1158, 81-92.
44. Deacon, D., Hewitt, S., Yang, C., & Nagata, M. (2000). Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: Evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cognitive Brain Research, 9(2), 137-146.
45. De Groot, A. M. (1985). Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 37, 281-297.
46. DeLong, K.A., Urbach, T.P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117-1121.
47. Deutsch, A. & Bentin, S. (2001). Syntactic and semantic factors in processing gender agreement in Hebrew: evidence from ERPs and eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 200-224.
48. Diaz, M. T., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts. Brain Research, 1146, 85-100.
49. Ditman, T., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies. Psychophysiology, 44, 927-935.
50. Domalski, P., Smith, M. E., & Halgren, E. (1991). Cross-modal repetition effects on the N4. Psychological Science, 2, 173-178.
51. Elston-Güttler, K. E., Paulmann, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2005). Who's in control? Proficiency and L1 influence on L2 processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1593-1610.
52. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-187.
53. Faust, M. (1998). Obtaining evidence of language comprehension from sentence priming. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 161-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Faust, M., Babkoff, H., & Kravets, S. (1995). Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: Implications for modularity vs. interactionism. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 171-192.
55. Faust, M., & Gernsbacher, M. (1996). Cerebral mechanisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 53, 234-259.
56. Faust, M., Kravetz, S., & Babkoff, H. (1993). Hemisphericity and top-down processing of language. Brain and Language, 53, 234-259.
57. Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491-505.
58. Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469-495.
59. Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75-84.
60. Felser, C., Clahsen, H., & Munte, T. F. (2003). Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German. Brain and Language, 87, 345-354.
61. Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic working memory and the establishment of fillergap dependencies: insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 321-338.
62. Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250-272.
63. Fodor, J.A., Bever, T.G., & Garrett, M. (1974). The psychology of language: an introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. Fodor, J. D., Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Tasks and timing in the perception of linguistic anomaly. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 25-57.
65. Ford, J. M., Roach, B. J., Hoffman, R. S., & Mathalona, D. H. (2008). The dependence of P300 amplitude on gamma synchrony breaks down in schizophrenia. Brain Research, 1235, 133-142.
66. Forster, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In W. Marslen Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 75-107), Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
67. Frazier, L. (1999). On sentence interpretation. The Hague: Kluwer.
68. Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259-281.
69. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78-84.
70. Friederici, A. D., Gunter, T. C., Hahne, A., & Mauth, K. (2004). The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Neuroreport, 15, 165-169.
71. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late eventrelated brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1219-1248.
72. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 45-63.
73. Friederici, A. D., & Kotz, S. A. (2003). The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. Neuroimage, 20, 8-17.
74. Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183-192.
75. Friederici, A. D., Rüschemeyer, S., Hahne, A., & Fiebach, C. J. (2003). The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex, 13(2), 170-177.
76. Friederici, A. D., & Weissenborn, J. (2007). Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research, 1146, 50-58.
77. Friedrich, C. K., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Event-related potential evidence of form and meaning coding during online speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 594-604.
78. Friedrich, C. K., Kotz, S. A., Friederici, A. D., & Gunter, T. C. (2004). ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 541-552.
79. Frisch, S., Kotz, S. A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Why the P600 is not just a P300: The role of the basal ganglia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(2), 336-340.
80. Gabrieli, J.D.E., Poldrack, R.A., & Desmond, J.E. (1998). The role of the left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 906-913.
81. Ganis, G., Kutas, M., & Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for "common sense": An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(2), 89-106.
82. Gibson, W. (1957). The Miracle Worker. New York: Simon & Schuster.
83. Giesbrecht, B., Camblin, C. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2004). Separable effects of semantic priming and imageability on word processing in human cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 521-529.
84. Gold, B. T., & Buckner, R. L. (2002). Common prefrontal regions co-activate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks. Neuron, 35, 803-812.
85. Gordon, P. C., Camblin, C. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2004). On-line measures of coreferential processing. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond (pp. 103-128). New York: Psychology Press.
86. Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1997). Intuitive knowledge of linguistic coreference. Cognition, 62, 325-370.
87. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Ledoux K. (2000). Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 766-775.
88. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 353-379.
89. Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3(1), 128-156.
90. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1021-1026.
91. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
92. Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556-568.
93. Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34, 660-676.
94. Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. Neuroimage, 20, S18-S29.
95. Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416-423.
96. Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R.M. (2009). Semantic unification. In: M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences. (pp. 1-49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1994). Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 45-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
98. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1531-1549.
99. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
100. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
101. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Swaab, T. Y. (1996). Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. Brain, 119, 627-649.
102. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441.
103. Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. (2003). Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100(7), 4340-4345.
104. Hahne, A. & Friederici, A.D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194-205.
105. Hahne, A. & Friederici, A.D. (2003). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(3), 339-356.
106. Hald, L. A., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., & Hagoort, P. (2007). The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400. Brain Research, 1146, 210-218.
107. Halgren, E., Boujon, C., Clarke, J., Wang, C. & Chauvel, P. (2002). Rapid distributed fronto-parieto-occipital processing stages during working memory in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 710-728.
108. Hamberger, M. & Friedman, D. (1992). Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming and stimulus classification in young, middle-aged, and older adults. The Journal of Geruntology, 47(6), 395-405.
109. Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 59-73.
110. Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30(1), 47-61.
111. Holcomb, P. J., Anderson, J., & Grainger, J. (2005). An electrophysiological study of cross-modal repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 42, 493-507.
112. Holcomb, P. J, & Grainger, J. (2007). Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1180, 39-58.
113. Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 938-950.
114. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, context availability, and concreteness effects n sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 721-742.
115. Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(4), 281-312.
116. Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1991). Natural speech processing: an analysis using event-related potentials. Psychobiology, 19(4), 286-300.
117. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: University Press.
118. Jackendoff, R. (2007). A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2-22.
119. Janata, P. (1995). ERP measures assay the degree of expectancy violation of harmonic contexts in music. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 153-164.
120. January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca's area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 21, 2434-2444.
121. Johns, C., Gordon, P. C., Long, D., & Swaab, T. Y. (under review). An ERP investigation of referential accessibility.
122. Joyce, C. A., Paller, K. A., Schwartz, T. J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of modality-specific aspects of word repetition. Psychophysiology, 36, 655-665.
123. Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 712-718.
124. Kaan, E. (2007). Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief introduction. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571-591.
125. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 159-201.
126. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003a). Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: A comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 621-635.
127. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003b). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98-110.
128. Kaan, E., Wijnen, F., & Swaab, T. Y. (2004). Gapping: electrophysioglogical evidence for immediate processing of "missing" verbs in sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 74, 1-25.
129. Kaan, E., Wayland, R., Bao, M., & Barkley, C.M. (2007). Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1148, 113-122.
130. Kacinik, N. A., Aragon, J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2008). An ERP study of cerebral asymmetries for processing literal and figurative meanings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement.
131. Kacinik, N. A., & Chiarello, C. (2007). Understanding metaphors: Is the right hemisphere uniquely involved? Brain and Language, 100, 188-207.
132. Kacinik, N. A., Polse, L. R., Baynes, K., & Swaab, T. Y. (in preparation). Figurative meanings are not more difficult to integrate into sentence contexts than literal meanings: Evidence from ERPs.
133. Karayanidis, F., Andrews, S., Ward, P. B., & McConaghy, N. (1991). Effects of inter-item lag on word repetition: an event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 28(3), 307-318.
134. Katz, J.J.... (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper and Row.
135. Kemmerer, D., Weber-Fox, C., Price, K., Zdanczyk, C., & Way, H. (2007). Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order. Brain and Language, 100, 238-256.
136. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Prefrontal cortex guides context-appropriate responding during language production. Neuron, 43(2), 283-291.
137. Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from eventrelated potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205-225.
138. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
139. Kluender, R. & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 196-214.
140. Knight, R. T., & Scabini, D. (1998). Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 15, 3-13.
141. Knight, R. T., Scabini, D., & Clayworth, C. C. (1988). The effects of lesions of superior temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobe on temporal and vertex components of the human AEP. Electroencephalography and Clinicial Neurophysiology, 70(6), 499-509.
142. Knight, R. T., Scabini, D., Woods, D. L., & Clayworth, C. C. (1989). Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3. Brain Research, 502(1), 109-116.
143. Kolk, H., & Chwilla, D. (2007). Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language, 100, 257-261.
144. Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85, 1-36.
145. Koriat, A. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association. Memory and Cognition, 9(6), 587-598.
146. Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dualcoding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 804-823.
147. Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49.
148. Kuperberg, G. R., & Caplan, D. (2003). Language dysfunction in schizophrenia. In R. B. Schiffer, S. M. Rao, & B. S. Fogel (Eds.), Neuropsychiatry (2nd ed., pp. 444-466). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.
149. Kuperberg, G. R., Caplan, D., Sitnikova, T., Eddy, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 489-530.
150. Kuperberg, G. R., Holcomb, P. J., Sitnikova, T., Greve, D., Dale, A., & Caplan, D. (2003a). Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), 272-293.
151. Kuperberg, G. R., Kreher, D. A., & Ditman, T. (2010). What can event-related potentials tell us about language, and perhaps even thought, in schizophrenia? International Journal of Psychophysiology, "Language and Psychophysiology" Special Issue. 75(2), 66-76.
152. Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003b). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117-129.
153. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
154. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory & Cognition, 11(5), 539-550.
155. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials reflect word expectancy and semantic association during reading. Nature, 307, 161-163.
156. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1989). An electrophysiological probe of incidental semantic association. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 38-49.
157. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K.D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463-470.
158. Kutas, M., Neville, H. J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1987). A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. Electroen-cephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Supplement. 39, 325-330.
159. Kutas, M., van Petten, C. K., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994-2005). In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 1-67). New York: Elsevier Press.
160. Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 921-933.
161. Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., Swaab, T. Y., & Gordon, P. C. (2006). Reading words in discourse: The modulation of lexical priming effects by message-level context. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 5, 107-127.
162. Ledoux, K., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 18, 135-143.
163. Lelekov, T., Franck, N., Dominey, P. F., & Georgieff, N. (2000). Dissociable ERP profiles for processing rules vs. instances in a cognitive sequencing task. Neuroreport, 11, 2145-2149.
164. Levelt, W.J.M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223-232.
165. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
166. Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., & Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616-618.
167. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
168. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
169. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
170. McCallum, W. C., Farmer, S. F., & Pocock, P. V. (1984). The effects of physical and semantic incongruities of auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials, 59, 477-488.
171. McCarthy, G. & Nobre, A.C. (1993). Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 210-219.
172. McCarthy, G., Luby, M., Gore, J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. (1997). Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(3), 1630-1634.
173. McKinnon, R., & Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 495-523.
174. Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory and Cognition, 23, 477-494.
175. Meyer, M., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: Event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Cognitive Brain Research, 9(1), 19-33.
176. Münte, T. F., Heinze, H., & Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(3), 335-344.
177. Münte, T. F., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruities in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 318-329.
178. Münte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, Marta (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395(6697), 71-73.
179. Münte, T. F., Urbach, T. P., Düzel, E., & Kutas, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials in the study of human cognition and neuropsychology. In F. Boller, J. Grafman, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 139-235). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
180. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Iimoniemi, R., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., & Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
181. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 106, 226-254.
182. Neely, J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: a selective review of current findings and theories. In Besner, D. & Humphreys, G. W. (Eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition (pp. 264-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
183. Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003-1019.
184. Neville, H. J., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.
185. Nieuwland, M. S., Otten, M., & van Berkum, J. A. (2007). Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 228-236.
186. Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. A. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098-1111.
187. Nobre, A. C., & McCarthy, G. (1994). Language-related ERPs: Scalp distributions and modulation by word type and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(3), 233-255.
188. Nobre, A. C., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: Effects of word type and semantic priming. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1090-1099.
189. Núñez-Peña, M. I., & Honrubia-Serrano, M. L. (2004). P600 related to rule violation in an arithmetic task. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 130-141.
190. O'Rourke, T. B., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing. Biological Psychology, 60(2-3), 121-150.
191. Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language, 59, 494-522.
192. Osterhout, L., & Hagoort, P. (1999). A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King, and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 1-14.
193. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
194. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 413-437.
195. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 786-803.
196. Osterhout, L., McKinnon, R., Bersick, M., & Corey, V. (1996). On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 507-526.
197. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
198. Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 283-317.
199. Otten, M. & van Berkum, J.J.A. (2007). What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect. Brain Research, 1153, 166-177.
200. Otten, M. & van Berkum, J.J.A. (2008). Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: prediction or priming? Discourse Processes, 45(6), 464-496.
201. Özyürek, A., Willems, R. M., Kita, S., & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 605-616.
202. Patel, A. D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (1998). Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 717-733.
203. Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Munte, T. F., & Clahsen, H. (1997). How the brain processes complex words: An event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 37-52.
204. Phillips, C. (2001). Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception. Cognitive Science, 25, 711-731.
205. Poldrack, R. A., Wagner, A. D., Prull, M. W., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli J. D. E. (1999). Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 10, 15-35.
206. Posner, M.I. & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Solso, R.L. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
207. Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Neurophysiological manifestations of phonological processing: Latency variations of a negative ERP component time-locked to phonological mismatch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 204-209.
208. Proverbio, A. M., Leoni, G., & Zani, A. (2004). Language switching mechanisms in simultaneous interpreters: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 42(12), 1636-1656.
209. Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F.-H., & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An eventrelated potential study. Brain and Language, 55, 293-316.
210. Radeau, M., Besson, M., Fonteneau, E., & Castro, S. L. (1998). Semantic, repetition and rime priming between spoken words: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 48(2), 183-204.
211. Rugg, M. D., Cowan, C. P., Nagy, M. E., & Milner, A. D. (1988). Event related potentials from close head injury patients in an auditory "oddball" task: Evidence of dysfunction in stimulus categorization. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 51, 691-698.
212. Rugg. M. D., Doyle, M. C., & Melan, C. (1993). An event-related potential study of the effects of within- and acrossmodality word repetition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 357-377.
213. Rugg, M. D., & Nagy, M. E. (1989). Event-related potentials and recognition memory for words. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72(5), 395-406.
214. Rugg, M. D., Soardi, M., & Doyle, M. C. (1995). Modulation of event-related potentials by the repetition of drawings of novel objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 17-24.
215. Sakai, K. L., Noguchi, Y., Takeuchi, T., & Watanabe, E., (2002). Selective priming of syntactic processing by eventrelated transcranial magnetic stimulation of Broca's area. Neuron, 35, 1177-1182.
216. Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel, I. (2006). Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: Electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1098(1), 139-152.
217. Schmitt, B. M., Schiltz, K., Zaake, W., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. F. (2001). An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of conceptual and syntactic encoding during tacit picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4), 510-522.
218. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & LaCount, K. L., (1988). Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 344-354.
219. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 232-252.
220. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
221. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 12(4), 315-328.
222. Sitnikova, T., Kuperberg, G., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 40(1), 160-164.
223. Sitnikova, T., Salisbury, D. F., Kuperberg, G. R., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Electrophysiological insights into language processing in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology, 39, 851-860.
224. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
225. St. George, M., Mannes, S., & Hoffmann, J. E. (1994). Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 70-83.
226. Stroud, C. & Phillips, C. (2009). The structural and semantic selectivity of the "thematic" P600 in sentence comprehension. Poster presented at twenty-second annual CUNY conference, Davis, California.
227. Swaab, T. Y. (1998). Event-related potentials in cognitive neuropsychology: Methodological considerations and an example from studies of aphasia. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 157-170.
228. Swaab, T. Y., Baynes, K., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 99-103.
229. Swaab, T. Y., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1997). Spoken sentence comprehension in aphasia: Event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 39-66.
230. Swaab, T. Y., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1998). Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: Electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca's aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 36, 737-761.
231. Swaab, T. Y., Camblin, C. C., & Gordon, P. C. (2004). Reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 715-726.
232. Tanenhaus, M. K. & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 217-262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
233. Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 14792-14797.
234. Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., & Kan, I. P. (1999). Effects of repetition and competition on activity in left prefrontal cortex during word generation. Neuron, 23, 513-522.
235. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D'Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 9, 15855-15860.
236. Tooley, K., Traxler, M., & Swaab, T. Y. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition, 23(5), 609-645.
237. Traxler, M. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2006). Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
238. Uddén, J., Folia, V., Forkstam, C., Ingvar, M., Fernandez, G., Overeem, S., van Elswijk, G., Hagoort, P., & Petersson, K. M. (2008). The inferior frontal cortex in artificial syntax processing: An rTMS study. Brain Research, 1224, 69-78.
239. van Berkum, J. J. A. (2004). Sentence comprehension in a wider discourse: Can we use ERPs to keep track of things? In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 229-270). New York: Psychology Press.
240. van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). The neuropragmatics of "simple" utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantic and pragmatics: From experiment to theory. 276-316. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
241. van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147-182.
242. van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235-248.
243. van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V. & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticpating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443-467.
244. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Holleman, B., Nieuwland, M. S., Otten, M., & Murre, J. (2009). Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science. 20(9), 1092-1099.
245. van Berkum, J. J. A., Koornneef, A. W., Otten, M., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158-171.
246. van Berkum, J. J. A., van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 80-591.
247. van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967-985.
248. van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 364-372.
249. van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2004). The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1068-1084.
250. van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H. J., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 241-255.
251. Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 485-531.
252. Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Weckerly, J., Federmeier, K. D., Folstein, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). Lexical association and higher-level semantic context: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Supplement, 46.
253. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Memory and Cognition, 19, 95-112.
254. Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2006). Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain and Language, 97, 279-293.
255. Van Petten, C., & Senkfor, A. J. (1996). Memory for words and novel visual patterns: Repetition, recognition, and encoding effects in the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 33, 491-506.
256. Van Petten, C., Weckerly, C., McIsaac, H. K., & Kutas, M. (1997). Working memory capacity dissociates lexical and sentential context effects. Psychological Science, 8, 238-242.
257. Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P. & Brown, C.M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science, 280, 572-574.
258. Vissers, C. Th. W. M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Brain Research, 1106(1), 150-163.
259. Vissers, C. Th. W. M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2007). The interplay of heuristics and parsing routines in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and reaction times. Biological Psychology, 75(1), 8-18.
260. Vissers, C. Th. W. M., Kolk, H. H. J., van de Meerendonk, N., & Chwilla, D. J. (2008). Monitoring in language perception: Evidence from ERPs in a picture-sentence matching task. Neuropsychologia, 46(4), 967-982.
261. Wagner, A. D., Koustaal, W., Maril, A., Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1176-1184.
262. Wagner, A. D., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Clark, J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2001). Recovering meaning: Left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. Neuron, 31. 329-338.
263. Wassenaar, M., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P., (2004). ERP effects of subject-verb agreement violations in patients with Broca's aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 553-576.
264. Wassenaar, M., & Hagoort, P. (2007). Thematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: Sentence-picture matching electrified. Neuropsychologia, 45(4), 716-740.
265. Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of objective relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36, 559-570.
266. West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1024-1037.
267. West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(3), 363-375.
268. Wicha, N.Y.Y., Moreno, E.M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272-1288.
269. Willems, R. M., Özyürek, A., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Similar neural correlates for the integration of words and pictures at the sentence level: Evidence from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(7), 1235-1249.
270. Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2005). Meaningful gestures: Electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42, 654-667.