Early Referential Context Effects in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 147-182

  Van Berkum, Jos J A ^a   Brown, Colin M ^a   Hagoort, Peter ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Discourse context; referential ambiguity; parsing; syntactic ambiguity resolution; ERP

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000339969     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2641     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell K., Shulman H. G., Boland J. Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language. 38:1998;112-130.
2. Altmann G. T. M. Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models. Language and Cognitive Processes. 3:1988;73-97.
3. Altmann G. T. M., Garnham A., Dennis Y. Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language. 31:1992;685-712.
4. Altmann G. T. M., Garnham A., Henstra J.-A. Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20:1994;209-216.
5. Altmann G. T. M., Steedman M. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition. 30:1988;191-238.
6. Altmann G. T. M., Van Nice K. Y., Garnham A., Henstra J.-A. Late Closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language. 38:1998;459-484.
7. van Berkum, J. J. A, Brown, C. M, &, Hagoort, P. 1998, Rapid discourse context effects in sentence processing: ERP evidence. Paper presented at the 11th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New Brunswick, March 19-21.
8. van Berkum, J. J. A, Brown, C. M, &, Hagoort, P. in press, When does gender constrain parsing? Evidence from ERPs, Journal of Psycholinquistic Research.
9. van Berkum, J. J. A, Hagoort, P, &, Brown, C. M. in press, Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
10. Boland J. E. Resolving syntactic category ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;588-615.
11. uit den Boogaart P. C. Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands. 1975;Oosthoek, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht.
12. Britt M. A. The interaction of referential ambiguity and argument structure in the parsing of prepositional phrases. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;251-283.
13. Britt M. A., Gabrys G., Perfetti C. A. A restricted interactive model of parsing. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 1993;Univ. of Colorado, Boulder. p. 260-265.
14. Britt M. A., Perfetti C. A., Garrod S., Rayner K. Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits. Journal of Memory and Language. 31:1992;293-314.
15. Brown, C. M, &, Hagoort, P. in press, On the electrophysiology of language comprehension: Implications for the human language system. In, M. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Univ. Press.
16. Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Vonk, W.1997. Semantic effects on syntactic analyses: ERP evidence. Poster presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, Boston, March 23-25, 1997.
17. Brysbaert M., Mitchell D. C. Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 49A:1996;664-695.
18. Clark H. H. Using language. 1996;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
19. Clifton C. Jr., Ferreira F. Ambiguity in context. Language and Cognitive Processes. 4:1989;77-103.
20. Crain, S, Ni, W, Schankweiler, D, Conway, L, &, Braze, D. 1996, Meaning, memory and modularity. MIT Occasional papers in Linguistics 9 (Proceedings of the NELS 26 Sentence Processing Workshop).
21. Crain S., Steedman M. On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. Dowty D. R., Karttunen L., Zwicky A. M.N. Natural language parsing. 1985;320-358 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
22. De Vincenzi M., Job R. An investigation of late closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure, and pragmatics in initial and final interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;1303-1321.
23. Dell G. S., McKoon G., Ratcliff R. The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 22:1983;121-132.
24. Duffy S. A., Rayner K. Eye movements and anaphor resolution: Effects of antecedent typicality and distance. Language and Speech. 33:1990;103-119.
25. Ferreira F., Clifton C. Jr. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 25:1986;348-368.
26. Fodor J. A. The modularity of mind. 1983;MIT Press, Cambridge.
27. Frazier L. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. Coltheart M. Attention and performance XII. 1987;559-585 Erlbaum, Hove, London.
28. Frazier L. Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 24:1995;437-468.
29. Frazier L., Clifton C. Jr. Construal. 1996;MIT Press, Cambridge.
30. Frazier L., Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology. 14:1982;178-210.
31. Friederici A. D., Hahne A., Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 22:1996;1219-1248.
32. Garnham A., Oakhill J., Cain K. The interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases: Time course, and effects of overspecificty. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 50A:1997;149-162.
33. Garrod S. C. Resolving pronouns and other anaphoric devices: The case for diversity in discourse processing. Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L., Rayner K. Perspectives on sentence processing. 1994;339-357 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
34. Garrod S., Freudenthal D., Boyle E. The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse. Journal of Memory and Language. 32:1993;1-30.
35. Garrod S. C., O'Brien E. J., Morris R. K., Rayner K. Elaborative inferencing as an active or passive process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 16:1990;250-257.
36. Garrod S. C., Sanford A. J. Resolving sentences in discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. Gernsbacher M. A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;675-698 Academic Press, New York.
37. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition. 68:1998;1-76.
38. Greene S. B., McKoon G., Ratcliff R. Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18:1992;266-283.
39. Hagoort P., Brown C. M. Brain responses to lexical-ambiguity resolution and parsing. Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L., Rayner K. Perspectives on sentence processing. 1994;45-80 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
40. Hagoort, P, &, Brown, C. M. 1997, When syntax and semantics meet. Poster presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, Boston, March 23-25, 1997.
41. Hagoort, P, &, Brown, C. M. 1998, Semantic and syntactic ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading. Manuscript under review.
42. Hagoort P., Brown C. M., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (P600/SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8:1993;439-483.
43. Kempen, G. 1998, A uniform cognitive architecture for human grammatical encoding and decoding. Manuscript, Leiden University.
44. Kempen G., Vosse T. Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing. Connection Science. 1:1989;273-290.
45. King J. W., Kutas M. Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7:1995;376-395.
46. Kluender R., Kutas M. Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 5:1993;196-214.
47. Kluender, R, &, Münte, T. F. 1998, ERPs to grammatical and ungrammatical subject/object asymmetries in German wh-questions. Paper presented at the 11th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New Brunswick, NJ, March 19-21.
48. Konieczny L., Hemforth B., Voelker N. The impact of context and semantic bias on constituent attachment in reading. Hemforth B., Konieczny L., Scheepers C., Strube G. First analysis, reanalysis, and repair. 1994;Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg.
49. Kutas M. In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8:1993;533-572.
50. Kutas M. Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;383-398.
51. Kutas M., Hillyard S. A. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 207:1980;203-205.
52. Kutas M., King J. W. The potentials for basic sentence processing: Differentiating integrative processes. Inui T., McClelland J. L. Attention and performance XVI. 1996;501-546 MIT Press, Cambridge.
53. Kutas M., Van Petten C. K. Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. Gernsbacher M. A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;83-143 Academic Press, New York.
54. Levelt W. J. M. Speaking. 1989;MIT Press, Cambridge.
55. Lewis, R. L. 1993, An architecturally-based theory of human sentence comprehension, (Tech. Rep. No. CMU-CS-93-226), Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon University.
56. MacDonald M. C., Pearlmutter N. J., Seidenberg M. S. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review. 101:1994;676-703.
57. Masson M. E. J. Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition. 11:1983;262-274.
58. McCarthy G., Wood C. C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 62:1985;203-208.
59. Mitchell D. C. Sentence parsing. Gernsbacher M. A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;375-409 Academic Press, New York.
60. Mitchell D. C., Corley M. M. B., Garnham A. Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18:1992;69-88.
61. Mitchell D. C., Cuetos F., Corley M. M. B., Brysbaert M. Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 24:1995;469-488.
62. Murray W. S., Liversedge S. P. Referential context effects in syntactic processing. Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L., Rayner K. Perspectives on sentence processing. 1994;359-388 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
63. Neville H., Nicol J. L., Barss A., Forster K. I., Garrett M. F. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 3:1991;151-165.
64. Ni W., Crain S., Schankweiler D. Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contribution of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes. 11:1996;283-334.
65. Osterhout L., Hagoort P. A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King, and Kutas (1998) in the P600/P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language and Cognitive Processes. 14:1999;1-14.
66. Osterhout L., Holcomb P. J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language. 31:1992;785-806.
67. Osterhout L., Holcomb P. J. Event-related brain potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8:1993;413-437.
68. Osterhout L., Holcomb P. J. Event-related potentials and language comprehension. Rugg M. D., Coles M. G. H. Electrophysiology of mind. 1995;171-215 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
69. Osterhout L., Holcomb P. J., Swinney D. A. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20:1994;786-803.
70. Osterhout L., McKinnon R., Bersick M., Corey V. On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the Syntactic Positive Shift a member of the P300 family. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 8:1996;507-526.
71. Osterhout L., McLaughlin J., Bersick M. Event-related brain potentials and human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1:1997;203-209.
72. Osterhout L., Mobley L. A. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;739-773.
73. Perfetti C. A., Britt M. A. Where do propositions come from. Weaver C. A., Mannes S., Fletcher C. R. Discourse comprehension. 1995;11-34 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
74. Rayner K., Garrod S., Perfetti C. A. Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition. 45:1992;109-139.
75. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The psychology of reading. 1989;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
76. Rayner K., Sereno S. C. Eye movements in reading. Gernsbacher M. A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;57-81 Academic Press, New York.
77. Rösler F., Heil M., Glowalla U. Monitoring retrieval from long-term memory by slow event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;170-182.
78. Rösler F., Pechmann T., Streb J., Röder B., Hennighausen E. Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language. 38:1998;150-176.
79. Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Sedivy J. C. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition. 55:1995;227-267.
80. Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Tanenhaus M. K. Referential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L., Rayner K. Perspectives on sentence processing. 1994;415-439 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
81. Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Tanenhaus M. K. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 24:1998;1521-1543.
82. Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Trueswell J. C., Tanenhaus M. K. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 47:1993;276-309.
83. St. George M., Mannes S., Hoffman J. E. Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 6:1994;70-83.
84. St. George M., Mannes S., Hoffman J. E. Individual differences in inference generation: An ERP analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 9:1997;776-787.
85. Tabor W., Juliano C., Tanenhaus M. K. Parsing in a dynamical system: An attractor-based account of the interaction of lexical and structural constraints in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 12:1997;211-271.
86. Tanenhaus M. K., Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Eberhard K. M., Sedivy J. C. Using eye movements to study spoken language comprehension: Evidence for visually mediated incremental interpretation. Inui T., McClelland J. L. Attention and performance XVI. 1996;457-478 MIT Press, Cambridge.
87. Tanenhaus, M. K, Spivey-Knowlton, M. J, &, Hanna, J. in press, Modelling thematic and discourse context effects within a multiple constraints framework: Implications for the architecture of the language comprehension system. In, M. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Univ. Press.
88. Tanenhaus M. K., Trueswell C. Sentence comprehension. Miller J. L., Eimas P. D. Speech, language, and communication. 1995;217-262 Academic Press, San Diego.
89. Van Nice, K. Y, Garnham, A, &, Altmann, G. T. M. 1997, Referential context and the parsing of conjoined definite nouns. Poster presented at the 10th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Santa Monica, CA, March 20-22, 1997.