Reading words in discourse: The modulation of lexical priming effects by message-level context

Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 107-127

  Ledoux, Kerry ^a   Camblin, C Christine ^b   Swaab, Tamara Y ^c   Gordon, Peter C ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Discourse; ERPs; Eye movement; Reading; Words

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FACILITATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROMODULATION; READING; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; WORD RECOGNITION; WORKING MEMORY;

COMPREHENSION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33746605694     PISSN: 15345823     EISSN: 15524159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534582306289573     Document Type: Review

References (140)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & Clifton, C. (1998). Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases. Memory & Cognition, 26, 599-610.
2. Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748-765.
3. Anderson, J. E., & Holcomb, P. J. (1995). Auditory and visual semantic priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 32, 177-190.
4. Anderson, J. E., & Holcomb, P. J. (2005). An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy. Brain & Language, 94, 200-216.
5. Auble, P. M., & Franks, J. J. (1983). Sentence comprehension processes. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 395-405.
6. Bainbridge, J. V., Lewandowsky, S., & Kirsner, K. (1993). Context effects in repetition priming are sense effects. Memory & Cognition, 21, 619-626.
7. Barrett, S. E., & Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain & Cognition, 14, 201-212.
8. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
9. Bentin, S., & Peled, B. S. (1990). The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags. Memory & Cognition, 18, 359-366.
10. Besson, M., & Kutas, M. (1993). The many facets of repetition: A cued-recall and event-related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1115-1133.
11. Besson, M., Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1992). An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 132-149.
12. Blank, M. A., & Foss, D. J. (1978). Semantic facilitation and lexical access during sentence processing. Memory & Cognition, 6, 644-652.
13. Britz, J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2005, November). Lexical integration in sentence and discourse contexts in aphasic patients: Evidence from two ERP studies. Poster presented at the 35th annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
14. Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34-44.
15. Buckner, R. L., Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., & Rosen, B. R. (2000). Functional MRI evidence for a role of frontal and inferior temporal cortex in amodal components of priming. Brain, 123, 620-640.
16. Camblin, C. C., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (in press). The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory & Language.
17. Camblin, C. C., Ledoux, K., Boudewyn, M., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (in press). Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming. Brain Research.
18. Carlson, G., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 21: Thematic relations (pp. 263-288). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Carr, T. H., Brown, J. S., & Charalambous, A. (1989). Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 763-778.
20. Carr, T. H., Dagenbach, D., Van Wieren, D., Carlson-Radvansky, L., Alejano, A., & Brown, J. (1994). Acquiring general knowledge from specific episodes of experience. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 697-724). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Carroll, P., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1986). Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis. Memory & Cognition, 14, 509-522.
22. Chwilla, D. J., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1995). The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology, 32, 274-285.
23. Chwilla, D. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2000). Mediated priming in the lexical decision task: Evidence from event-related potentials and reaction time. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 314-341.
24. Clifton, C., Jr., Speer, S., & Abney, S. P. (1991). Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 251-271.
25. Copland, D. A., de Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K., Wilson, S. J., Eastburn, M., & Chenery, H. J. (2003). Brain activity during automatic semantic priming revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 20, 302-310.
26. Coulson, S., Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2005). Right-hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 129-147.
27. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
28. Deacon, D., Hewitt, S., & Tamny, T. (1998). Event-related potential indices of semantic priming following an unrelated intervening item. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 219-225.
29. Deacon, D., Hewitt, S., Yang, C.-M., & Nagata, M. (2000). Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: Evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 137-146.
30. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., et al. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752-758.
31. Domalski, P., Smith, M. E., & Halgren, E. (1991). Cross-modal repetition effects on the N4. Psychological Science, 2, 173-178.
32. Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin, R.D., Jr., Redfern, B. B., & Jaeger, J. J. (2004). Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition, 92, 145-177.
33. Duffy, S. A., Henderson, J. M., & Morris, R. K. (1989). Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 791-801.
34. Fischler, I. (1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 5, 335-339.
35. Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Foss, D. J. (1982). A discourse on semantic priming. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 590-607.
37. Foss, D. J., & Ross, J. R. (1983). Great expectations: Context effects during sentence processing. In G. Flores D'Arcais & R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), The process of language understanding (pp. 169-191). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
38. Foss, D. J., & Speer, S. R. (1991). Global and local context effects in sentence processing. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 115-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 559-585). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
41. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78-84.
42. Gabrieli, J. D. E., Desmond, J. E., Demb, J. B., Wagner, A. D., Stone, M. V., Vaidya, C. J., et al. (1996). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of semantic memory processes in the frontal lobes. Psychological Science, 7, 278-283.
43. Garrod, S., Freudenthal, D., & Boyle, E. A. (1994). The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 39-68.
44. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99-156.
45. Giesbrecht, B., Camblin, C. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2004). Separable effects of semantic priming and imageability on word processing in human cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 521-529.
46. Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311-347.
47. Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1997). Intuitive knowledge of linguistic coreference. Cognition, 62, 325-370.
48. Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22, 389-424.
49. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 353-379.
50. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Ledoux-Foster, K. (2000). Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 766-775.
51. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
52. Grainger, J., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., & Farioli, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1256-1269.
53. Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203-226.
54. Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416-423.
55. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Swaab, T. Y. (1996). Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. Brain, 119, 627-649.
56. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441.
57. Hamberger, M., & Friedman, D. (1992). Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming and stimulus classification in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 47, 395-405.
58. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
59. Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.
60. Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., & Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 62-82.
61. Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 59-73.
62. Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain & Language, 35, 66-85.
63. Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61.
64. Holcomb, P. J., & Anderson, J. E. (1993). Cross-modal semantic priming: A time-course analysis using event-related brain potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 379-411.
65. Holcomb, P. J., Anderson, J., & Grainger, J. (2005). An electrophysiological study of cross-modal repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 42, 493-507.
66. Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 5, 281-312.
67. Jackendoff, R. (2003). Foundations of language: Brain, grammar, evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
68. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
69. Jarvis, E. D. (2004). Learned birdsong and the neurobiology of human language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1016, 749-777.
70. Johnson, B. W., & Hamm, J. P. (2000). High-density mapping in an N400 paradigm: Evidence for bilateral temporal lobe generators. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 532-545.
71. Joyce, C. A., Paller, K. A., Schwartz, T. J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of modality-specific aspects of word repetition. Psychophysiology, 36, 655-665.
72. Karayanidis, F., Andrews, S., Ward, P. B., & McConaghy, N. (1991). Effects of inter-item lag on word repetition: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 28, 307-318.
73. Kennison, S. M., & Gordon, P. C. (1997). Comprehending referential expressions during reading: Evidence from eye tracking. Discourse Processes, 24, 229-252.
74. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
75. Kleiman, G. M. (1980). Sentence frame contexts and lexical decisions: Sentence-acceptability and word-relatedness effects. Memory & Cognition, 8, 336-344.
76. Kotz, S. A., Cappa, S. F., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Modulation of the lexical-semantic network by auditory semantic priming: An event-related functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 17, 1761-1772.
77. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
78. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1989). An electrophysiological probe of incidental semantic association. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 38-49.
79. Ledoux, K., Gordon, P. C., Camblin, C. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (in press). Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration. Memory & Cognition.
80. Levy, B. A., & Burns, K. I. (1990). Reprocessing text: Contributions from conceptually driven processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 465-482.
81. Liversedge, S. P., Pickering, M. J., Clayes, E. L., & Branigan, H. P. (2003). Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 667-675.
82. Lucas, M. (2000). Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 618-630.
83. Marlsen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
84. Masson, M. E. (1995). Episodically enhanced comprehension fluency. In J. Henderson, M. Singer, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 300-337). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. Matsumoto, A., Iidaka, T., Haneda, K., Okada, T., & Sadato, N. (2005). Linking semantic priming effect in functional MRI and event-related potentials. NeuroImage, 24, 624-634.
86. McCarthy, G., Nobre, A. C., Bentin, S., & Spencer, D. D. (1995). Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I. Intracranial distribution and neural generators. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1080-1089.
87. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 668-682.
89. McPherson, W. B., & Holcomb, P. J. (1999). An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology, 36, 53-65.
90. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
91. Morris, R. K. (1994). Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 92-103.
92. Morris, R. K., & Folk, J. R. (1998). Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1313-1322.
93. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
94. Nagy, M. E., & Rugg, M. D. (1989). Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: The effects of inter-item lag. Psychophysiology, 26, 431-436.
95. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles for inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
96. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner, & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97. Neely, J. H., & Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207-248). New York: Academic Press.
98. Nobre, A. C., & McCarthy, G. (1995). Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1090-1099.
99. O'Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizella, M. L. (1995). Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 626-634.
100. O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1989). The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 73-87.
101. Paller, K. A., & Kutas, M. (1992). Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 375-391.
102. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & McIsaac, H. K. (1995). Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychological Science, 6, 107-111.
103. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1989). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331, 585-589.
104. Raney, G. E. (2003). A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 15-28.
105. Raney, G. E., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2000). Repetition effects from paraphrased text: Evidence for an integrated representation model of text representation. Discourse Processes, 29, 61-81.
106. Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 618-660.
107. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
108. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, SI21-SI49.
109. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1290-1301.
110. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
111. Rissman, J., Eliassen, J. C., & Blumstein, S. E. (2003). An event-related fMRI investigation of implicit semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1160-1175.
112. Rossell, S. L., Price, C. J., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 41, 550-564.
113. Rugg, M. D. (1985). The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 22, 642-647.
114. Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18, 367-379.
115. Rugg, M. D., Doyle, M. C., & Holdstock, J. S. (1994). Modulation of event-related brain potentials by word repetition: Effects of local context. Psychophysiology, 31, 447-459.
116. Rugg, M. D., Doyle, M. C., & Melan, C. (1993). An event-related potential study of the effects of within- and across-modality word repetition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 357-377.
117. Rugg, M. D., Furda, J., & Lorist, M. (1988). The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition. Psychophysiology, 25, 55-63.
118. Rugg, M. D., Soardi, M., & Doyle, M. C. (1995). Modulation of event-related potentials by the repetition of drawings of novel objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 17-24.
119. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1-17.
120. Sharkey, A. J., & Sharkey, N. E. (1992). Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 543-572.
121. Sharkey, N. E. (1990). The lexical distance model and word priming. In The proceedings of the 11th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
122. Simpson, G. B., Peterson, R. R., Casteel, M. A., & Burgess, C. (1989). Lexical and sentence context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 88-97.
123. Singer, M., Andrusiak, P., Reisdorf, P., & Black, N. L. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition, 20, 539-548.
124. Singer, M., & Ferreira, F. (1983). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523-534.
125. Swaab, T. Y., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1998). Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: Electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca's aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 36, 737-761.
126. Swaab, T. Y. Camblin, C. C., & Gordon, P. C. (2004). Reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 715-726.
127. Swick, D., & Knight, R. T. (1997). Event-related potentials differentiate the effects of aging on word and nonword repetition in explicit and implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 123-142.
128. Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339-363.
129. Traxler, M. J., Foss, D. J., Seely, R. E., Kaup, B., & Morris, R. K. (2000). Priming in sentence processing: Intralexical spreading activation, schemas, and situation models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 581-594.
130. van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657-671.
131. van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701-718.
132. Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 485-531.
133. Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Weckerly, J., Federmeier, K. D., Folstein, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). Lexical association and higher-level semantic context: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Supplement, p. 46.
134. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 95-112.
135. Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M., & McIsaac, H. (1991). Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 131-150.
136. Van Petten, C., & Senkfor, A. J. (1996). Memory for words and novel visual patterns: Repetition, recognition, and encoding effects in the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 33, 491-506.
137. Van Petten, C., Weckerly, J., McIsaac, H., & Kutas, M. (1997). Working memory capacity dissociates lexical and sentential context effects. Psychological Science, 8, 238-242.
138. Weisbrod, M., Kiefer, M., Winkler, S., Maier, S., Hill, H., Roesch-Ely, D., & Spitzer, M. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 289-298.
139. Wible, C. G., Han, S. D., Spencer, M. H., Kubicki, M., Niznikiewicz, M. H., Jolesz, F. A., et al. (in press). Connectivity among semantic associates: An fMRI study of semantic priming. Brain & Language.
140. Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Hue, C. W. (2003). Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition, 86, 283-315.