An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies

Psychophysiology

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 927-935

  Ditman, Tali ^a   Holcomb, Phillip J ^a   Kuperberg, Gina R ^a,b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Language; Methodology; N400; P600; Self paced reading; Sentence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 35348984031     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00593.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Camblin, C. C., Ledoux, K., Boudewyn, M., Gordon, P. C. Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Research, 1146, 172 184.
2. De Vincenzi, M., Job, R., Di Matteo, R., Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Ciccarelli, L., et al 2003). Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. Brain and Language, 85, 280 296.
3. Ferreira, F. Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348 368.
4. Greenhouse, S. Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95 112.
5. Gunter, T. C. Friederici, A. D. (1999). Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing. Psychophysiology, 36, 126 137.
6. Haberlandt, K. (1994). Methods in reading research. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook in psycholinguistics (pp. 1 31). San Diego, CA : Academic Press, Inc.
7. Haberlandt, K. F. Graesser, A. C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General, 114, 357 374.
8. Hagoort, P. (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 883 899.
9. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439 483.
10. Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47 61.
11. Kuperberg, G. R., Caplan, D., Sitnikova, T., Eddy, M. Holcomb, P. (2006). Neural correlates of processing semantic, syntactic, and thematic relationships. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 489 530.
12. Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D. Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 217, 117 129.
13. Kutas, M. Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463 470.
14. Kutas, M. Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203 205.
15. Kutas, M. Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic anomalies. Nature, 307, 161 163.
16. Kutas, M. Van Petten, C. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook in psycholinguistics (pp. 83 143). San Diego, CA : Academic Press, Inc.
17. Ledoux, K., Gordon, P. C., Camblin, C. C. Swaab, T. Y. (in press). Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration. Memory and Cognition.
18. Legge, G. E., Ahn, S. J., Klitz, T. S. Luebker, A. (1997). Psychophysics of reading - XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision. Vision Research, 37, 1999 2010.
19. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Brown, C. Tyler, L. K. (1988). Lexical representations in language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 1 17.
20. McKoon, G. Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 668 682.
21. Nieuwland, M. S. Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1118, 155 167.
22. Osterhout, L. Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785 806.
23. Osterhout, L. Holcomb, P. J. (1995). Event-related potentials and language comprehension. In M. Rugg M. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 171 215). New York : Oxford University Press.
24. Osterhout, L. Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739 773.
25. Osterhout, L. Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 283 317.
26. Rugg, M. Coles, M. (1995). Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Swaab, T. Y., Camblin, C. C. Gordon, P. C. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 715 726.
28. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K. Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285 318.