How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing

NeuroImage

Volumn 20, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages

  Hagoort, Peter ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; WRITING;

EID: 0242333819     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (60)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell K., Shulman H., Boland J. Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies evidence from event-related potentials . J. Memory Lang. 38:1998;112-130.
2. Altmann G.T.M., Steedman M. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition. 30:1988;191-238.
3. Boland J.E., Cutler A. Interaction with autonomy multiple output models and the inadequacy of the great divide . Cognition. 58:1996;309-320.
4. Bresnan J.W. Lexical-functional syntax. 2001;Blackwell, Oxford.
5. Brown C., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400 evidence from masked priming . J. Cognit. Neurosci. 5:1993;34-44.
6. Caplan D., Hildebrandt N., Makris N. Location of lesions in stroke patients with deficits in syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Brain. 119:1996;933-949.
7. Coulson S., King J.W., Kutas M. Expect the unexpected event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations . Lang. Cognit. Processes. 13:1998;21-58.
8. Duncan J., Miller E.K. Cognitive focus through adaptive neural coding in the primate prefrontal cortex. Stuss D.T., Knight R.T. Principles of frontal lobe function. 2002;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
9. Fodor J.D. The modularity of mind. 1983;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Frazier L. Sentence processing A tutorial review . Coltheart M. Attention and performance. Vol. XII:1987;559-585 Erlbaum, London.
11. Friederici A.D. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data . Brain Lang. 50:1995;259-281.
12. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cognit. Sci. 6:2002;78-84.
13. Friederici A.D., Hahne A., Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing early and late event-related brain potential effects . J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit. 22:1996;1219-1248.
14. Friederici A.D., Pfeifer E., Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations . Cognit. Brain Res. 1:1993;183-192.
15. Hagoort P. The interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations . J. Cognit. Neurosci. 15:2003;883.
16. Hagoort P., Brown C. Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L., Rayner K. Perspectives on sentence processing. 1994;45-81 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
17. Hagoort P., Brown C.M., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Lang. Cognit. Processes. 8:1993;439-483.
18. Hagoort P., Brown C., Osterhout L. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. Brown C.M., Hagoort P. Neurocognition of language. 1999;273-317 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
19. Hagoort P., Wassenaar M., Brown C.M. Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Cognit. Brain Res. 16:2003;38-50.
20. Hagoort P., Wassenaar M., Brown C.M. Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2003;4340-4345.
21. Hahne A., Jescheniak J.D. What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension. Cognit. Brain Res. 11:2001;199-212.
22. Harbusch K., Kempen G. A quantitative model of word order and movement in English, Dutch and German complement constructions. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-2002). 2002;328-334 Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
23. Indefrey, P. 2003. Hirnaktivierungen bei syntaktischer Sprachverarbeitung: eine Meta-Analyse. Submitted for publication.
24. Indefrey P., Cutler A. Prelexical and lexical processing in listening. Gazzaniga M.S. The new cognitive neurosciences III. 2003;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (in press).
25. Jackendoff R. The representational structures of the language faculty and their interactions. Brown C.M., Hagoort P. The neurocognition of language. 1999;37-79 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
26. Jackendoff R. Foundations of language brain, meaning, grammar, evolution . 2002;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
27. Kaan E., Harris A., Gibson E., Holcomb P. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Lang. Cognit. Processes. 15:2000;159-201.
28. Kaan E., Swaab T.Y. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis an electrophysiological differentiation . J. Cognit. Neurosci. 15:2003;98-110.
29. Kluender R., Kutas M. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Lang. Cognit. Processes. 8:1993;573-633.
30. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences brain potentials reflect semantic anomaly . Science. 207:1980;203-205.
31. Kutas M., Van Petten C.K. Psycholinguistics electrified event-related brain potential investigations . Gernsbacher M.A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;83-143 Academic Press, San Diego.
32. Levelt W.J.M. Producing spoken language a blueprint of the speaker . Brown C.M., Hagoort P. The neurocognition of language. 1999;83-122 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
33. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychol. Rev. 101:1994;676-703.
34. Marslen-Wilson W. Access and integration projecting sound onto meaning . Marslen-Wilson W. Lexical representation and process. 1989;3-24 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition. 8:1980;1-71.
36. McKinnon R., Osterhout L. Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing evidence from event-related brain potentials . Lang. Cognit. Processes. 11:1996;495-523.
37. Mesulam M.-M. The human frontal lobes transcending the default mode through contingent encoding . Stuss D.T., Knight R.T. Principles of frontal lobe function. 2002;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
38. Münte T.F., Heinze H.J. ERP negativities during syntactic processing of written words. Heinze H.J., Münte T.F., Mangun G.R. Cognitive electrophysiology. 1994;Birkhauser, Boston.
39. Münte T.F., Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R. Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 5:1993;335-344.
40. Münte T.F., Matzke M., Johannes S. Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruities in words and pseudo-words. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 9:1997;300-311.
41. Neville H., Nicol J.L., Barss A., Forster K.I., Garrett M.F. Syntactically based sentence processing classes evidence from event-related brain potentials . J. Cognit. Neurosci. 3:1991;151-165.
42. O'Seaghdha P.G.O. Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit. 23:1997;807-828.
43. Osterhout L. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences . Brain Lang. 59:1997;494-522.
44. Osterhout L., Hagoort P. A superficial resemblance doesn't necessarily mean you're part of the family counterarguments to Coulson, King, and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS debate . Lang. Cognit. Processes. 14:1999;1-14.
45. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J. Memory Lang. 31:1992;785-806.
46. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech . Lang. Cognit. Processes. 8:1993;413-438.
47. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related potentials and language comprehension. Rugg M.D., Coles M.G.H. Electrophysiology of mind. 1995;171-215 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
48. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J., Swinney D.A. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences evidence of the application of verb information during parsing . J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit. 20:1994;786-803.
49. Osterhout L., McLaughlin J., Bersick M. Event-related brain potentials and human language. Trends Cognit. Sci. 1:1997;203-209.
50. Osterhout L., Mobley L.A. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. J. Memory Lang. 34:1995;739-773.
51. Rösler F., Friederici A.D., Pütz P., Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 5:1993;345-362.
52. Tanenhaus M.K., Trueswell C. Sentence comprehension. Miller J.L., Eimas P.D. Speech, language, and communication. 1995;217-262 Academic Press, San Diego.
53. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution . J. Memory Lang. 33:1994;285-318.
54. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Kello C. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths . J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit. 19:1993;528-553.
55. Tyler L.K., Marslen-Wilson W.D. The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 16:1977;683-692.
56. Van Berkum J.J., Brown C.M., Hagoort P. Early referential context effects in sentence processing evidence from event-related brain potentials . J. Memory Lang. 41:1999;147-182.
57. Van Berkum J.J., Hagoort P., Brown C.M. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse evidence from the N400 . J. Cognit. Neurosci. 11:1999;657-671.
58. Van den Brink D., Hagoort P. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2003;. Submitted for publication.
59. Vosse T., Kempen G.A.M. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing a computational model based on competitive inhibition and lexicalist grammar . Cognition. 75:2000;105-143.
60. Zurif E.B. The neurological organization of some aspects of sentence comprehension. J. Psycholing. Res. 27:1998;181-190.