A Parallel Architecture perspective on language processing

Brain Research

Volumn 1146, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 2-22

  Jackendoff, Ray ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Language processing; Lexicon; Semantics; Syntax; Working memory

Indexed keywords

GRAMMAR; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LONG TERM MEMORY; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD; WORKING MEMORY;

COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; LOGIC; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH;

EID: 34047252546     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.111     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Abeille, A., Bishop, K., Cote, S., Schabes, Y., 1990. A lexicalized tree adjoining grammar for English. Technical Report MS-CIS-90-24, Department of Computer & Information Science, Univ. of Pennsylvania.
2. Arbib M.A. From artificial intelligence to neurolinguistics. In: Arbib M.A., Caplan D., and Marshall J.C. (Eds). Neural Models of Language Processes (1982), Academic Press, New York 77-94
3. Baddeley A. Working Memory (1986), Clarendon Press, Oxford
4. Bickerton D. Language and Species (1990), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
5. Bloomfield L. Language (1933), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
6. Bock K. Sentence production: from mind to mouth. In: Miller J.L., and Eimas P.D. (Eds). Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Vol. xi. Speech, Language, and Communication (1995), Academic Press, Orlando, FL 181-216
7. Bock K., and Loebell H. Framing sentences. Cognition 35 (1990) 1-39
8. I. Bornkessel, M. Schlesewsky, The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages, Psychological Review (to appear).
9. Bresnan J. Lexical-Functional Syntax (2001), Blackwell, Oxford
10. Bybee J., and McClelland J.L. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. Linguist. Rev. 22 (2005) 381-410
11. Caramazza A., and Zurif E. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang. 3 (1976) 572-582
12. Cheney D., and Seyfarth R. How Monkeys See the World (1990), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
13. Chierchia G., and McConnell-Ginet S. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures (1957), Mouton, The Hague
15. Chomsky N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (1965), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
16. Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding (1981), Foris, Dordrecht
17. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
18. Chomsky N. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind (2000), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
19. Collins A., and Quillian M. Retrieval time from semantic memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 9 (1969) 240-247
20. Culicover P., and Jackendoff R. Simpler Syntax (2005), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
21. Dennett D.C. Consciousness Explained (1991), Little Brown, New York
22. Elman J. Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14 (1990) 179-211
23. Elman J., Bates E., Johnson M., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D., and Plunkett K. Rethinking Innateness (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
24. Ferreira F. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cogn. Psychol. 47 (2003) 164-203
25. Ferreira F. Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science. Linguist. Rev. 22 (2005) 365-380
26. Fillmore C.J., Kay P., and O'Connor M.C. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language 64 (1988) 501-539
27. Ford M., Bresnan J., and Kaplan R.C. A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In: Bresnan J. (Ed). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 727-796
28. Frazier L. Against lexical generation of syntax. In: Marslen-Wilson W. (Ed). Lexical Representation and Process (1989), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 505-528
29. Frazier L., Carlson K., and Clifton C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 244-249
30. Gee J., and Grosjean F. Performance structures: a psycholinguistics and linguistic appraisal. Cogn. Psychol. 15 (1983) 411-458
31. Goldberg A. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure (1995), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
32. Goldberg A. Constructions at Work (2005), Oxford Univ. Press, New York
33. Goldin-Meadow S. The Resilience of Language (2003), Psychology Press, New York
34. Goldsmith J. Autosegmental Phonology (1979), Garland Press, New York
35. Hagoort P. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 416-423
36. Hauser M.D. Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think (2000), Henry Holt, New York
37. Hirst D. Detaching intonational phrases from syntactic structure. Linguist. Inq. 24 (1993) 781-788
38. Jackendoff R. A deep structure projection rule. Linguist. Inq. 5 (1974) 481-506
39. Jackendoff R. Semantics and Cognition (1983), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
40. Jackendoff R. Consciousness and the Computational Mind (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
41. Jackendoff R. Semantic Structures (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
42. Jackendoff R. Musical parsing and musical affect. Music Percept. 9 (1991) 199-230
43. Jackendoff R. The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In: Bloom P., Peterson M.A., Nadel L., and Garrett M.F. (Eds). Language and Space (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Jackendoff R. The Architecture of the Language Faculty (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
45. Jackendoff R. Foundations of Language (2002), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
46. Jackendoff R. Alternative minimalist visions of language. Proceedings of the 41st meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago (2006)
47. Jackendoff R., and Pinker S. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97 (2005) 211-225
48. Klein W., and Perdue C. The basic variety, or: couldn't language be much simpler?. Second Lang. Res. 13 (1997) 301-347
49. Kuperberg G.R. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. Brain Res. 1146 (2007) 2-22
50. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things (1987), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
51. Landau B., and Jackendoff R. 'What' and 'where' in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 16 (1993) 217-238
52. Langacker R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1 (1987), Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA
53. Lappin S. The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (1996), Blackwell, Oxford
54. Lerdahl F., and Jackendoff R. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music (1983), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
55. Lewis R. Falsifying serial and parallel parsing models: empirical conundrums and an overlooked paradigm. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 29 (2000) 241-248
56. Liberman M., and Prince A. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguist. Inq. 8 (1977) 249-336
57. MacDonald M.C., and Christiansen M.H. Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychol. Rev. 109 (2002) 35-54
58. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., and Seidenberg M.S. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychol. Rev. 101 (1994) 676-703
59. Marcus G. Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cogn. Psychol. 37 (1998) 243-282
60. Marcus G. The Algebraic Mind (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
61. Merchant J. The Syntax of Silence (2001), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
62. Miller G.A., and Chomsky N. Finitary models of language users. In: Luce R.D., Bush R.R., and Galanter E. (Eds). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology vol. ii (1963), Wiley, New York 419-492
63. Neisser U. Cognitive Psychology (1967), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
64. In: Partee B. (Ed). Montague Grammar (1976), Academic Press, New York
65. Phillips C., and Lau E. Foundational issues (review article on Jackendoff 2002). J. Linguist. 40 (2004) 1-21
66. Piñango M.M. Canonicity in Broca's sentence comprehension: the case of psychological verbs. In: Grodzinsky Y., Shapiro L., and Swinney D. (Eds). Language and the Brain (2000), Academic Press, San Diego 327-350
67. Piñango M.M., Zurif E., and Jackendoff R. Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28 (1999) 395-414
68. Piñango M.M., Mack J., and Jackendoff R. Semantic combinatorial processes in argument structure: evidence from light verbs. Proc. Berkeley Linguist. Soc. (2006)
69. Pinker S. Learnability and Cognition (1989), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
70. Pinker S. Words and Rules (1999), Basic Books, New York
71. Pinker S., and Jackendoff R. The faculty of language: what's special about it?. Cognition 95 (2005) 201-236
72. Pollard C., and Sag I. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
73. Prince, A., Smolensky, P., 2004. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical report, Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder, 1993. Revised version published by Blackwell, (1993/2004).
74. Pustejovsky J. The Generative Lexicon (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
75. Pylkkänen L., and McElree B. The syntax-semantics interface: on-line composition of sentence meaning. In: Traxler M., and Gernsbacher M.A. (Eds). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 2nd ed. (2006), Elsevier, New York
76. Rosch E., and Mervis C. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cogn. Psychol. 7 (1975) 573-605
77. Sag, I., 1976. Deletion and logical form, MIT dissertation.
78. Schank R. Conceptual Information Processing (1975), American Elsevier, New York
79. Shieber S. An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar (1986), CSLI, Stanford, CA
80. Smith E., and Medin D. Categories and Concepts (1981), Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
81. Smith E., Shoben E., and Rips L. Structure and process in semantic memory: a featural model for semantic decisions. Psychol. Rev. 81 (1974) 214-241
82. Steedman M.J. Grammar, interpretation, and processing from the lexicon. In: Marslen-Wilson W. (Ed). Lexical Representation and Process (1989), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 463-504
83. Swinney D. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 18 (1979) 645-659
84. Tabor W., and Tanenhaus M. Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cogn. Sci. 23 (1999) 491-515
85. Talmy L. Force-dynamics in language and thought. Cogn. Sci. 12 (1988) 49-100
86. Tanenhaus M., Leiman J.M., and Seidenberg M. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 18 (1979) 427-440
87. Tanenhaus M., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., and Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268 (1995) 1632-1634
88. Traxler M.J., Pickering M.J., and Clifton C. Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. J. Mem. Lang. 39 (1998) 558-592
89. Truckenbrodt H. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguist. Inq. 30 (1999) 219-255
90. Tyler L.K. The role of lexical representation in language comprehension. In: Marslen-Wilson W. (Ed). Lexical Representation and Process (1989), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 439-462
91. Verkuyl H. A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction Between Temporal and Atemporal Structure (1993), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge